Slashdot Mirror


Portable Solar Power For Portable Hardware?

Tjeerd writes "Because the 'green revolution' is accelerating, I felt it was time to get involved. Last week I started with buying a portable solar energy charger for my mobile phone. But soon I was thinking of also recharging my Asus Eee netbook with a portable solar energy recharger. I found things like the Portable Power Pack, Foldable Solar Chargers, and the Solar Gorilla. The Solar Gorilla looks quite interesting and might be able to recharge my netbook and fits nicely in a rucksack. But I would like some real-life feedback. If you have experience with these or other portable solar devices, what has worked for you?"

18 of 262 comments (clear)

  1. Solar and handcranked are the way to go by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Solar has a lot going for it as an alternative power supply for portable items. The problem is that many of those items aren't exposed to sunlight for enough time to actually charge the reserves.

    That's why I use a hand-crank as my primary source of alternative power to my portable items. Especially in the winter time when sunlight is at a minimum, good old elbow grease is always there.

    1. Re:Solar and handcranked are the way to go by rusl · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Are you serious about hand cranks?

      I'm a cyclist and I sure would be. Human power is seriously overlooked. Using your much stronger leg would be easier.

      I have a cheap hand crank flashlight that has a plugin supposedly able to charge a cell phone. Never tried it but I don't see why it wouldn't have sufficient power - a cell phone is extremely frugal and has a great battery. The biggest obstacle would be getting the power at the right level to charge and circumventing proprietary plugs for phones.

      Are there practical crank chargers out there?

      Thus the sun charges the plant, I eat the plant, I crank the laptop. (Or you could insert meat into that supply chain if you wanted it less efficient but more tasty)

      --
      Stupidity is its own reward.
    2. Re:Solar and handcranked are the way to go by dasunt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Another cyclist here.

      My music player tends to die at the end of long tours. This isn't so much of a problem if I'm staying at a place with electricity at night, but next year I'm planning a multiday camping tour and my music player isn't going to last past 8-9 hours. :(

      Been trying to figure out what I want to use to recharge it. I was thinking about a small solar cell on the rack of my bike.

    3. Re:Solar and handcranked are the way to go by DrLang21 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Be a nerd damnit. Mount an electric motor with a small rubber wheel to your rear wheel rim to generate current and then wire it to a 5V regulating circuit.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
  2. Enviromental cost of making the device? by Bwian_of_Nazareth · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I looked at the solargorilla but could not find any information about how much energy I need to generate with this device to reach the green break even - to offset the environmental cost of making this device. Anyone knows this information?

  3. solarcells in the netboot/laptop lid by Ptur · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm still waiting for the first netbook or laptop to feature solar cells in the lid, instead of the stupid logo they put there now.

    Come on, it can't be that hard? And don't tell me I'm the first to think of this?

    1. Re:solarcells in the netboot/laptop lid by rusl · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why does the panel/crank power supply have to be in the same spot as the laptop? Obviously it would be optimal to only have one battery and that should be with the PC. But a wire can transmit a charge - I do believe. Not exactly universal roaming but putting the panel in the window 30ft away wouldn't be totally impractical.

      --
      Stupidity is its own reward.
    2. Re:solarcells in the netboot/laptop lid by apodyopsis · · Score: 2, Interesting

      theres a reason why the OLPC had a hand crank.

      I thought of the same idea ages ago but there was a couple of differences...

      1. no backlight, make a system with a clear mono LCD with a mirror/diffuser that allows you to light up the screen naturally on a bright day or shine any other light sauce into the back on a darker day.
      2. no HDD, no moving parts - we are beginning to see this with the EEE style netbooks
      3. very low power chip - forget the feature creep that is already entering the netbook market. all you need is a web browser and officeware for it to be useful.

      this might have a fighting chance of running for a while after being left on a windowsill to recharge.

      I liked the concept of the OLPC but the moment IBM and MS got on board I thought it was fucked.

  4. "Green Revolution" by lobiusmoop · · Score: 5, Interesting

    While the sentiment is admirable, please don't use 'going green' as an excuse to buy more toys; just buy the toys. Realistically, the power ranges you are talking about are in the 50-100W range for portable solar charging. In comparison, a typical 100 horsepower car is using around 75KW. (1HP=750W), so the power savings possible by simply traveling less dwarf anything possible via solar.

    If you are _really_ concerned about going green, the biggest (and likely simplest) impact you can have is to never have children, especially in the developed world where per-capita energy consumption is highest.

    --
    "I bless every day that I continue to live, for every day is pure profit."
  5. Re:Solar Power carbon-hostile? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Or if you use it only to heat water. And live in a sunny, hot place. Why the hell do you need to heat water when you live in a sunny, hot place?

  6. Wait for Better Solar Panels by EEthan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In my experiences dealing with photovoltaic power supply systems of all sizes, I've become convinced that solar panels are currently not a viable solution for powering mobile devices for a few reasons, mainly cost, unreliability, and inefficiency.

    First of all, look at how much these things cost. the Portable Power Pack retails online for 420 pounds, or about $660. You could buy more than a dozen eeepc batteries for that much and just keep them stocked in your car or rucksack or whatever. LiIon batteries aren't terrible for the environment, and you won't even need sun to use them...

    Speaking of the sun, I live in beautiful southern California, where one can definitely count on the sun 99% of the time. But most parts of the world aren't that sunny, and even if the sun is shining there's bound to be a tree/building/civilization in the way just when you need it most. You're not going to walk or drive around the city looking for a nice open space to sit in for an hour and roast while you check your email, just so you could feel good about spending $600 on a solar panel, no matter how good your intentions are.

    so how do you charge your devices with a solar panel while actually "on the go"? you can try to drape it over that rucksack of yours while you're walking somewhere, but if the panel isn't facing the sun directly you won't get anywhere near the peak power output advertised. Instead, you need to find an open space and lay out your few-square-foot mat-- and then you're tied to the ground.

    And what about that generous peak power they keep advertising? solar panels output their peak power when they are laid out flat, directly facing the sun, on a completely clear, sunny day. I know from personal experience with small panels that small deviations from the sun-facing angle mean big drops in power.

    So alright, let's say that you bought a 30 watt panel and it's noon on a clear, sunny day, so you're getting 30 watts out of it. Please correct me if I am wrong, but I believe that EeePCs use 36 watt power adapters. How do you plan on charging and using your EeePC on less than 36 watts WHILE charging your phone and whatever else you have plugged in? all you could possibly do is increase your battery life considerably-- which might be great, but i'm not sure it justifies the costs and the effort involved.

    Here's my suggestion: Save the money you were going to spend on that portable panel. Use a little to buy extra batteries for your gadgets, and put the rest in a savings account. Save up for a large, multi-kilowatt solar system for your house, which will save a lot more greenhouse gas emissions per dollar you spend than one of these portable things. Use that home solar system to charge your batteries, and you're gold... er, green.

  7. Don't buy kits, buy the bits by shomon2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wouldn't go for the fancy laptop bags with solar panels... Maybe they work well, but if you're a real geek why not build your own? To run a regular 15-24v input laptop for 6 hours a day you'd need:

    2 x 30W Mnocrystalline Solar Panels
    1 x 6amp Charge Controller
    1 x 85 Ah Deep Cycle leisure Battery
    1 x Cigar to Crocodile Clip Adaptor
    1 x Universal Laptop adaptor

    At least that's here in drizzly old england. Comes to around 250 pounds in our drizzly english money.

    Carbon costs and payback aren't everything: computers today aren't green and aren't sustainable but don't just get sad and do nothing :)

    Using solar panels for this means microgeneration and helps promote use of decentralised, off grid energy which I consider a positive social change towards green-ness, and it will help you in particular if you live in a place with frequent blackouts (i.e not the UK!). Think of it as a ticket to a cheap shed-studio setup, or temporary remote setups like at festivals or camping, and once it's all wired up and charging a battery, I can plug it into loads of other kinds of things.

    Ale

    1. Re:Don't buy kits, buy the bits by Alioth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It also weighs about 250 pounds in our drizzly, imperial weights.

      As an experiment, I got an 80W monocrystalline panel to power stuff in the garden. It was going to cost me just as much to lay and connect up mains cables, so I thought it would be a good time to experiment.

      The conclusion is that current technology solar panels aren't all that useful or cost effective. Even on a nice day, you can only count on averaging something like 10% of the panel's rated output (due to the hours of darkness), so over a period of 24 hours I can count on just 192 watt hours off an expensive 80W monocrystalline panel. I can't even run a 10 watt pond pump off it with any reliability, all it's really good for is the LED lighting system since that's only on for part of the day and uses hardly any power.

      To run a puny 10 watt pond pump with any reliability I'd have to have the panel track the sun.

      The other thing is that the panel only makes peak power on a clear sunny day with >20 miles visibility. Even a slight haze layer cuts output by about 30%. A bright day with some cirrus cloud, but shadows still being cast, will get you only about 1/3rd of peak power.

  8. PowerFilm by DynaSoar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The foldable you mention is from PowerFilm. They make many different devices as well as components for building your own. http://www.powerfilmsolar.com/products/portable%20and%20remote/index.html
    I went the build-your-own route using their thin-film cells. I needed a power source for a laptop in the field, so I put one together that I could epoxy to the laptop lid. It's still on duty 4 years later. I also needed a source on board the ultimate portable device -- a rocket weighing less than 2kg total and capable of handling a vertical acceleration of 20 G to Mach 1+, supplying constant high grade power to the recording altimeter that also controlled the parachute ejection system. That system has flown over 20 times. I put their stuff through some hellacious stress testing and the only failures I've had were my fault.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  9. Re:This isn't "green" by Tx · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Rubbish. How many 10year old devices are you using? Even if the real lifespan of the device is actually accurate, the real world lifespan is much shorter. Technology moves on, different devices with different requirements come into vogue etc. For the type of portable devices in TFA, the chances of them being still in use in 10 years is minimal. Moreover, they are in many cases going to be occasional-use (the odd hike or trip) rather than daily use. It's not even worth doing any finger-in-the-air math to refute your claim, it's so obvious. You might possibly have a case for permanent photovoltaic panels on houses/buildings etc.

    --
    Oh no... it's the future.
  10. Re:My Bike Trip and Solar Panel Experiences by leodavinci0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I found a cheaper solution to charging my iPhone by solar. I use two solar arrays, very similar to those found here for $23 each: http://www.batteryjunction.com/12vsopabachs.html They deliver 150 mA max, but I've found they can easily deliver 175 mA each, and not even when angled directly at the sun. I use this with a simple car power inverter that has a USB charger port on it, but you can always make your own 12V to 5V regulator with a 5V regulator from Radio Shack, see here: http://www.radioshack.com/product/index.jsp?productId=2062599 I've used this with my iPhone a couple times and found that it is able to charge my iPhone. There is one trick though, the iPhone is picky about its power supply, and so you need to trick it by making a simple circuit with two resistors. See the post below for instructions (you need to scroll down a bit in the post to get to what I'm talking about, it involves making a voltage divider on the data channels): http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?p=5447947&posted=1#post5447947 Also, it charges the iPhone even while playing music. The first time I tested these was in my car, and I had the panels directed in the windshield. After driving for 3 hours it charged my iPhone from about 60% to 90%; and this was with the panels not angled towards the sun. I haven't taken account of how it charges since, but know it does. Also, if ever the power goes out for several days, you can always pull the battery out of your car when needed (or buy another car battery specifically for this use), and use the power inverter (if it has a USB port) or the 5V regulator to charge your USB electronics. You can then keep the car battery charged with these solar cells, so you don't need to waste gas running the car to charge the battery back up.

  11. Re:Watch out by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Are you sure? My Sony Vaio from 2004 with a Celeron M says it pulls 14 watts while compiling with parallel threads and with the backlight full bright, and gets down to 11 watts at minimum. The battery is only 62 Watt-hours when new, and it lasts a lot longer than an hour.

    If your laptop isn't charging with the smaller power supply, I suspect it is a bit too low voltage, not current.

  12. Re:Come again. Because what? by b4upoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Those products are a rip off. The price for what you are getting is beyond all reason. Check our solar cell products and make your own connectors to suit yourself. You should be spending about 10% of what these jokers are asking.