Slashdot Mirror


FCC Approves Unlicensed Use of White-Space Spectrum

sidesh0w was one of a number of readers to alert us to the FCC's unanimous decision approving unlicensed devices to use the white spaces of the spectrum unused by television broadcasters, provided they take certain precautions not to interfere with licensed users. "Denying a tremendous last-minute lobbying effort by broadcasters, the vote on white space devices went ahead as planned today after a several-hour delay at FCC headquarters. When the vote came, though, it was unanimous. For the Democrats on the Commission, the devices are appealing because they offer a potential new avenue for broadband services, while the Republicans are pleased for the same reasons, but love the fact that this is a deregulatory order that focuses on less regulation and more competition."

6 of 138 comments (clear)

  1. What about the Ghosts? by Mysteerie · · Score: 5, Funny

    You know the ghost that uses the white space to communicate on the tv and recorders? Won't they get pissed now that thier channels are getting clogged? Sigh... don't mind me... stupid stupid corny joke... lala

  2. Re:Great! More interference by plover · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I can't wait to have my cordless phone screw up my TV signal! Wee!

    Your new phone won't interfere with your TV, as your TV does not use this spectrum. Your new phone will only interfere with other devices currently using this band. It's no different than your 2.4GHz phone interfering with your WiFi today.

    The reason this is such a "fun" decision is that a large number of wireless microphones (used by entertainers, churches, actors in theatres, musicians, etc.) have been illegally occupying this spectrum for many years. That's right, they've been squatting spectrum that they should not have been using, and when this announcement came out all these "performers" started whining that they'd have to buy something else.

    I think this is the ideal punishment for those lawbreakers: too freakin' bad, you should have been purchasing and licensing COMPLIANT equipment all along, morons! Now you get to pay for it twice! It makes me happy.

    --
    John
  3. Now hold on a minute! by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 5, Funny

    Republicans AND Democrats are happy about this? We are so screwed.

    --
    Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
  4. Re:Great! More interference by SaDan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you have ever had to deal with RF interference as a primary duty for your job, you'd feel even more hostile than the previous poster.

  5. Re:Great! More interference by plover · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why yes, my life has indeed been negatively impacted. I've been paying the FCC for licenses to use a tiny portion of the spectrum. And I've been supporting more than my fair share because these scofflaws have not been paying at all.

    Without the revenue from the licenses, we would have no regulatory body, and without rules we simply would not have any working RF devices at all. A few giant broadcasters would be pumping megawatts into a handful of megastations, and we'd probably be getting nothing but crappy AM radio leaking interference into every electronic device in existence. Nobody would be responsible for ensuring their signals are of high quality and don't leak. Tiny signals would be drowned out. Cell phones would be impossible, as would any of the GPRS / 3G / EDGE type networking solutions. The fact that the FCC has provided this badly needed regulation says to me that they're an effective body (despite Pacifica and the censorship issues.)

    And the licenses pay for it all. My license and my dollars have paid for my small portion of it. Their money has not. It's time for them to pick up the slack since they're reaping the benefit.

    --
    John
  6. Re:Let the lawsuits begin.... by Starayo · · Score: 5, Funny

    I asked a NAB employee about that, and he said, I quote:

    "The National Australia Bank has no comment on this issue."

    The plot thickens.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20