Slashdot Mirror


D-Link DIR-655 Firmware 1.21 Hijacks Your Internet Connection

chronopunk writes "Normally when you think of firmware updates for a router you would expect security updates and bug fixes. Would you ever expect the company that makes the product to try and sell you a subscription for security software using its firmware as a salesperson? I recently ran into this myself when trying to troubleshoot my router. I noticed when trying to go to Google that my router was hijacking DNS and sent me to a website trying to sell me a software subscription. After upgrading your D-link DIR-655 router to the latest firmware you'll see that D-link does this, and calls the hijacking a 'feature.'"

6 of 428 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Why... by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Probably not. But what are you going to do about it? After enough stink, there will likely be a class action suit. No one that has been wronged will get real resolution (maybe a coupon for a new D-link model router for their trouble!). The amount paid out by D-Link will be less than the profit they get from these things. Business as usual.

    The only solution is to burn the place down or kill a few key people, then let them all know why. But no one is going to throw their life away on a bad router purchase.

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
  2. More reasons never to go consumer again by Chas · · Score: 5, Interesting

    After massive amounts of pain with consumer/prosumer-grade (many of the D-Link) routers in the past two years, I finally dropped real money for a real broadband router earlier this year. So far, I've had months and months of trouble-free service.

    Now I start hearing crap like this. Makes me even MORE thankful I bit the bullet.

    Also "you can turn it off!" apologists? WHY IT IS ON BY DEFAULT? Moreover, tell that to some luddite who barely understands how to boot his computer.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  3. Re:Why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What's annoying with things like this (and others) is that it just gets in the way and obstructs your work.

    I choose things based on their lack of snarkiness. I don't want a Windows PC full of crapware. I'd rather just pay the manufacturer a few extra bucks to cover the loss of crapware kickbacks. I used to run an AV, but occassionally, it would bring up a message telling me I wasn't fully protected because I wasn't running their antispam (despite running Thunderbird). When my renewal came up, I chose another company, and I told them that this was one of the reasons.

  4. Re:Linksys + alternative firmware by TrekkieTechie · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Mod parent up -- I've been running DD-WRT v23 SP2 on a 54GL and have had zero problems. Current uptime is 68 days, and that's only because I had to break down my equipment to move it to another room. Actual uptime would be more like a year, without ever having to look at it or even think about it.

    Isn't it nice when things just work?

  5. Using FLOSS, without the decency to acknowledge it by ChameleonDave · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What annoys be about my D-Link DSL-504T router is that although it runs some sort of customised GNU/Linux (I did "ssh admin@10.1.1.1" and had a look inside), their documentation and website make not the slightest mention of this, let alone make the source code available.

  6. Re:That's the end of D-Link. by MrNaz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's been a long time since I bought from DLink anyway. Their products are expensive, inconsistent, unreliable and plain ugly. I hate how they always use non standard names for things like port forwarding, making it hard to talk people through it over the phone.

    This is a new low for DLink, and is further vindication of my strict no-DLink policy.

    --
    I hate printers.