Slashdot Mirror


Obama Launches Change.gov

mallumax writes "Obama has launched Change.gov. According to the site 'Change.gov provides resources to better understand the transition process and the decisions being made as part of it. It also offers an opportunity to be heard about the challenges our country faces and your ideas for tackling them. The Obama Administration will reflect an essential lesson from the success of the Obama campaign: that people united around a common purpose can achieve great things.' The site is extensive and contains Obama's agenda for economy and education among many others. They first define the problem and then lay out the plan. Everything is in simple English without a trace of Washington-speak. The site also has details about the transition. According to many sources, Obama's transition efforts started months ago. The copyright for the content is held by 'Obama-Biden Transition Project, a 501c(4) organization'."

41 of 1,486 comments (clear)

  1. Re:"Propaganda" by TheSpoom · · Score: 5, Informative

    They did talk about it, actually. There was also a YouTube video, one of the "Blueprint for Change" series.

    Whether or not it's a good thing... I don't know. It seems perhaps a bit much to force students to help out... but then, it could do some serious good as well.

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
  2. wtf .gov domain? by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1, Informative

    Why is it that Obama's charity can get a .gov domain, but the annualcreditreport.com isn't given creditreport.ftc.gov? I wonder how many folks have been bilked by going to a non-official credit report website due to naming and search engines?

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
  3. Re:.gov? by iluvcapra · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is not an uncommon use of a .gov domain. Just look at the Dem and GOP House Caucus sites. The GOP caucus has a nice set of articles on "THE COST OF THE DEMOCRAT CONGRESS" and the Dem site, while not containing any hit pieces, has a lot of advocacy.

    Not saying it's appropriate, just there's a precedent for it and it's not beyond any pale of anything.

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
  4. Re:Excellent... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Except you are wrong with you attempted links, pretty much all wrong. Why don't you try really looking at history for history not for a little while, it makes a lot more sense than when you try to make everything into talking points.

    As to the tax, you also need to think about what the real impact is. The whole 4% on profit over 250K does not translate into anywhere near to 4% increase in total tax.

  5. Dear Sir by coryking · · Score: 5, Informative

    The government is paying a good chunk of your tuition in exchange for 100 hours of community service. Sounds like a fair exchange for me.

    Head Start.

    Do you know what this program is? The government lets you to earn college credit while you are in high school. Many of my classmates were able to graduate with a bachelor degree a year before us chumps who didn't take uncle sam up on the offer.

    Hell, that kind of shit would have been a nightmare for me at that age when I had massive social anxiety and was extremely uncomfortable in such situations.

    How do you know this? Maybe it would have got you over it sooner. In fact, I wager most of the people in head start did it to get away from their high school foes and sit around people who respected smarts.

    that Obama should MAKE you do it

    If you dont want to do it, pay full freight on your college tuition instead! Nobody is pointing a gun at your head saying "cash this government check!!"

    1. Re:Dear Sir by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Head Start? High school? I'm not sure what the heck you're talking about, but Head Start is a program to help little kids (3 or 4 years old) from lower-income or single-parent families. See www.nhsa.org

    2. Re:Dear Sir by Peter+La+Casse · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't see anything in the Constitution which forbids the government from giving out college tuition credits for any reason.

      It's this part: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

      And the community service for college students isn't mandatory.

      In the same way that the drinking age isn't "mandatory"?

    3. Re:Dear Sir by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1, Informative

      You tell me. I don't see anything in the Constitution which forbids the government from giving out college tuition credits for any reason.

      While I don't have a problem with the government giving out college tuition credits in exchange for whatever they want to require for same, I'd like to point out the Tenth Amendment. That's the one, by the way, that says that if a power is not specifically granted to the Federal Government by the Constitution, it's forbidden to them.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  6. Yes We Can - Draft you! by megamerican · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.change.gov/americaserves

    Classic double-think

    "When you choose to serve -- whether it's your nation, your community or simply your neighborhood....

    Obama will call on citizens of all ages to serve America, by developing a plan to require 50 hours of community service in middle school and high school and 100 hours of community service in college every year.

    Obama's chief of staff choice favors compulsory universal service

    Obama and Hillary Call for a Draft Live on MTV

    Text of H.R. 393: Universal National Service Act of 2007

    Obama Calls For National Civilian Stasi

    Constitution, what Constitution?

    Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime where of the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

    --
    If you have something that you dont want anyone to know, maybe you shouldnt be doing it in the first place -Eric Schmidt
  7. Anyone checked the .gov requirements? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Quoting http://www.dotgov.gov/help_qualify.aspx

    Registrations that qualify for a .gov domain

            * U.S. Governmental departments, programs, and agencies on the federal level
            * Federally recognized Indian Tribes (-NSN.gov domain)
            * State governmental entities/programs
            * Cities and townships represented by an elected body of officials
            * Counties and parishes represented by an elected body of officials
            * U.S. territories

    Noteably not present:

    * Incumbent presidents
    * Chapter 501 C organizations (as is referenced in the copyright)

  8. Re:"Propaganda" by Cristofori42 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The youtube video was interesting, and if what he states in there is still accurate then it's not quite "mandatory", but it still feels rather intrusive to me to make government funding for schools contingent on developing service programs (if I understood that correctly).

    The $4000 tax credit for college students that do 100 hours of service didn't seem all that unreasonable to me.

    --
    "Is that dad? Either that or Batman's really let himself go."
  9. Re:"Propaganda" by LanMan04 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Mandatory community service? Great, let's send a bunch of unmotivated kids to do stupid work. Hell, that kind of shit would have been a nightmare for me at that age when I had massive social anxiety and was extremely uncomfortable in such situations.

    Maybe it would have made you a more well-rounded person. /shrug

    --
    With the first link, the chain is forged.
  10. Re:Excellent... by iluvcapra · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Obama tax plan reaffirms the Bush tax cuts on all but the highest brackets past 2010; the salient change is that the $250k bracket simply returns to where it was when Bush took office: see here. In the end, the total tax rate of the country is still below where it was during the Reagan administration. It's astonishing to think we went through the first decade of expansion this century without collecting any money to pay down our debt; through the 50s, the highest brakcet had a marginal tax rate of over 90%, in order to pay down our war debt, and that was a tax code submitted by a Republican congress and signed by Eisenhower. At the time thus amounted to a huge wealth redistribution since the paper on the war debt was in war bonds, which were universally subscribed, not to mention the costs of the GI Bill and Marshall plan, which educated millions and could also be considered a form of debt repayment or infrastructure invetment.

    When Hoover raised taxes in 1932, it caused a complete economic collapse of an already precarious situation.

    It didn't help that he wasn't spending much; if we trim up taxation while spending gobs on infrastructure like in 1933. Of course back then, they didn't have $10 trillion in debt.

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
  11. Put cynicism aside for a moment by AmeerCB · · Score: 3, Informative

    I already see a lot of posts about how this is a waste of time and how the government will never read the submissions and how this is a poor use of the .gov domain.

    Even if all those things ARE true, isn't a webpage that encourages two-way communication between citizens and the highest level of government *LONG* overdue? Regardless of how you feel about Obama or how much you believe this website will help or how much you believe in the "change" message, I would think that slashdot readers - of all people - would agree that it's ABOUT TIME the Executive Branch implemented an idea like this.

    I mean, think about it for a moment - I've been able to communicate with fantasy baseball experts, tech support workers, musicians, and videogame reviewers online for more than a decade. Yes this is the first time a president has thought to do something like this.

    Regardless of how well it works, this IS a step in the right direction.

  12. Re:Progaganda by volxdragon · · Score: 3, Informative

    Having a .gov domain means it's a tax payer funded government web-site.

    Um, no it doesn't. http://www.dotgov.gov/

  13. Re:"Propaganda" by CRCulver · · Score: 5, Informative

    The US may have left England when the colonists were taxed without representation, but I don't think you can compare the differences between the US and the UK then to the differences between the US and the EU now. I moved to Finland a few years ago and found excellent public services, fantastic support of the arts, adequate health care, and much more disposable income (even after the higher taxes here) than I ever saw in the US. Meanwhile, my family back in the US finds themselves struggling under rising costs, facing the prospect of working until they die, and never have any free time to travel because leisure time seems anathema there. My telling them about how good life is in the EU spurred them all the more to vote for Obama. While he's a very lackluster centrist politician from our view here, at least there's the slight chance he might bring things in the US to the standard of living of the countries rated most highly in that regard.

  14. Re:We'll build more nuclear power plants by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://my.barackobama.com/page/group/NuclearPower

    Barack is not so much against the idea as he is the implementation. Unfortunately, he doesn't seem to realize that much of the implementation problems are caused by the regulations around nuclear power. Waste disposal in particular is problematic because the government requires waste disposal rather than reuse and reprocessing. (I'm not going to go into the full details of the issue, but let's just say that it was a pointless attempt to prevent terrorists from getting Nuclear bombs. More security theater.)

  15. Re:"Propaganda" by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1, Informative

    Are you kidding? The law requires kids to take math class. If that's not "involuntary servitude," neither is Obama's proposal.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  16. Re:"Propaganda" by Ambitwistor · · Score: 4, Informative

    Read the actual page the GP was quoting (here). That was a real quote, not made-up text: "Obama will call on citizens of all ages to serve America, by developing a plan to require 50 hours of community service in middle school and high school and 100 hours of community service in college every year."

  17. Re:We'll build more nuclear power plants by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's a link directly from the horse's mouth:

    http://neinuclearnotes.blogspot.com/2008/05/barack-obama-on-nuclear-energy.html

    [W]hat we've got to figure out is can we store the material properly? Can we make sure that they're secure? Can we deal with the expense? Because the problem is, is that a lot of our nuclear industry, it reinvents the wheel. Each nuclear power plant that is proposed has a new design, has--it, it has all kinds of changes, there are all sorts of cost overruns. So it has not been an effective option.

    I'm hoping it's possible to swing his opinion toward strong support for nuclear energy. Because most of the issues he raises have already been solved, but are blocked by outdated and ineffective government regulation.

  18. Re:"Propaganda" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I think you spelled the word "Socialism" wrong in your post. Please correct at your earliest convenience.

  19. Re:"Propaganda" by Straif · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's hard to compare a coutry with the population of a medium size city with a coutry that both dwarfs it in population and physicaly displacement.

    With higher populations come a lot more problems. Not to mention when's the last time you saw a major disaster occur around the world and the leaders of that country cry out for the Finnish to send in their military for aid?

    Simply put the US carries a lot more weight on it's shoulders both domestically and internationally than most of the EU combined. Hey and I'm from Canada where, like most of Europe, we get to skimp on a lot of things (especially military spending) because we know the American's will keep us covered.

    --
    Of course that's just my opinion...... you could be wrong!
  20. Re:"Propaganda" by sesshomaru · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hmm, I wonder how they'll enforce the mandatory part of the mandatory community service. I guess it will be similar to how they enforce anti-truancy laws, I'd have to look into that. Will it be Juvenile Hall? Fines for the parents? I wonder.

    Ah well, however it works it'll be a great chance for cops to use their tazers, since it will be against the general public and not hardened criminal types. Those are always the best people to tazer. They don't really have an effective means to fight back.

    If it's truly mandatory then there's a gun behind it at some point, if it isn't really mandatory they need to say what they mean.

    --
    "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
  21. Re:this country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The "fact" that a high percentage of soldiers never fired their weapons or delayed firing them when first in combat has been shown to have been made up.

    I know it is gospel for a lot of people - including the service academies, but new research has shown that the author of those studies (can't recall the name right now) sexed up most of the statistics he used and outright fabricated a great many of the interviews he cited.

  22. Re:html change by Animats · · Score: 4, Informative

    Looks like he's at least getting some decent web developers behind him.

    Well, let's see:

    • 17 attempts to send a cookie.
    • Single-pixel GIFs.
    • Google Analytics on a .gov site
    • Different CSS for IE6 and IE7.
    • Commented-out dead code (including something called the "America Serves" plan)
    • Commented-out banner rotation (must have copied that from some other site)
    • Commented-out "Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Curabitur suscipit erat vitae massa. Phasellus ut est."
    • 20 errors in HTML validation, including a mismatch between the character encoding in the HTTP header (iso-8859-1) and the META tag (utf-8).
    • Type is XHTML, but there are many unclosed tags.
    • Nothing on the page that couldn't have been done better in HTML 3.1.

    Interesting commented-out content:

    • A New Era in Transitional Transparency
    • Healthcare
    • Voter Protection Center
    • America Serves / Service Plan / Find a Way to Serve
    • The Blog
    • Latest News
    • Upcoming Events
    • Press Room
    • The Inauguration

    This isn't good HTML. It's HTML copied from several other sites and cobbled together by an amateur. Lame.

  23. Re:"Propaganda" by ObiWanKenblowme · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes, participation in the plan requires 50 hours. Where does it say that participation in the plan is mandatory?

    --
    Obvious exits are NORTH, SOUTH, and DENNIS.
  24. Re:"Propaganda" by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 4, Informative

    Where else you gonna make $40 bucks an hour in college?

    Tax credit, remember? There are two kinds of tax credits available in the US system. Refundable, and non-refundable. Most tax credits are the latter type, which means they can be used to reduce your income tax burden to zero, but no further. Only refundable tax credits are worth the full value if your tax burden is less than face value of the credit.

    Assuming the credit is non-refundable (as almost all of them are. The EIC (which is meant to make up for the regressive SS and Medicare taxes) is the only one I can think of off the top of my head that is refundable right now), the benefit will be less than that.

    In other words, since few college students actually owe $4000 per year of income taxes, very few will end up getting the equivalent of $40 per hour.

    Note that as of 2008, you have to clear ~$29,000 per year after the usual deductions before you owe $4000. Realistically, we're talking about $40,000 per year to get the nominal benefit.

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  25. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  26. African Americans are overwhelmingly homophobic by linzeal · · Score: 3, Informative

    African Americans deserved an erudite and experienced leader and they got one in Barak Obama. He got a proportionally higher amount of the AA vote than did John Kerry or Bill Clinton. African Americans have been voting democratic for years well over 70% in most areas, this is nothing new. What saddens me is that the high black voter turn out brought to light some of African American's prejudices against homosexuals where the high black turnout passed 3 anti-civil rights measures regarding gay marriage. It is time now to start examining the anti-Semitic, anti-Asian, anti-Hispanic and anti-homosexual prejudices of African Americans. Rev. Jesse Jackson has always been a bigot about most of these issues, many black church leaders the same and what the black community needs now is someone who can help them with introspection because they are going to have a lot more attention paid to them with Obama as president.

    1. Re:African Americans are overwhelmingly homophobic by Eric+Pierce · · Score: 2, Informative

      > "Caucasians" deserved an erudite and experienced leader and they got one in Barak Obama.

      So many people seem to leave out that Obama is half African American and half Caucasian. He is truly multi-racial and represents the "average" American more than the past 43 presidents. Go Obama!

      EP

  27. Re:why is this stupid? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2, Informative

    Obama will call on citizens of all ages to serve America, by developing a plan to require 50 hours of community service in middle school and high school and 100 hours of community service in college every year. Obama will encourage retiring Americans to serve by improving programs available for individuals over age 55, while at the same time promoting youth programs such as Youth Build and Head Start.

    So if you are not a middle or high school student, the mandatory requirement does not apply to you. As for college students, this is tied to the $4,000 tax credit. If you don't want that money every year, you can choose not to do community service.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  28. Re:"Propaganda" by LordKronos · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's a refundable credit:
    http://www.barackobama.com/issues/education/

    Near the bottom:
    "This universal and fully refundable credit will ensure that the first $4,000 of a college education is completely free for most Americans, and will cover two-thirds the cost of tuition at the average public college or university and make community college tuition completely free for most students. Recipients of the credit will be required to conduct 100 hours of community service."

  29. Re:"Propaganda" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    They never joined NATO because they have their own defense covered

    Look up "Finlandization".
     

    proved their mettle by driving the Russians back twice

    They didn't drive them back even once, unless you count the "kick them while the Germans are holding them down" Continuation War. Even then, they lost Karelia after the war.

    The Finns didn't have to have a large army or join NATO because their foreign policy wasn't built on irritating their neighbors, the exact opposite of what America advises to its allies.

  30. Re:watched the news by dubl-u · · Score: 5, Informative

    Why couldn't they think like that before the election? It is sad, truly sad.

    Some years back, when I started to lose it on top, I shaved off my pony tail, and stayed a chrome-dome for a year or so.

    A couple of months in, I was talking with pals over beers, and told them that the weirdest thing about it was that strangers treated me differently. Nervous looks in the grocery store line. Uncomfortable pauses when chatting with people on the bus. Crossing the street so they didn't have to pass me on the sidewalk. One of those friends, whose parents are African immigrants, and who is one of the most affable people I know, said, "Yeah, now you know how it is to be black."

    I didn't, of course, not really. How could I? But I could see that if you spent your whole life with people treating you as different, lesser, or scary on a daily basis, it would tend to color your outlook. And what I'm sure of is that most white people have absolutely zero understanding of what it's like to not have the instant boost in regard that they get just from being white.

  31. Re:Obama by EllisDees · · Score: 2, Informative

    >i'm not a big fan of the bipartisan system--personally, i'm a Nader supporter--and i'm not too excited about having a former drug Czar as a VP. but how is this not news for nerds?

    Biden was never a drug Czar. He did sponsor the horrible piece of crap legislation known as The RAVE Act, but he's never been the head of the ONDCP.

    --
    -- Give me ambiguity or give me something else!
  32. Re:Obama by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 4, Informative

    Obama is not the first. :)
    The Official Blog of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad - The President of the Islamic Republic of Iran
    http://www.ahmadinejad.ir/

  33. Re:Obama by joeman3429 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ah, so we're all Libertarians

  34. Re:Please stop spreading mistruths. by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Obama did NOT run unopposed. Did you just not look at the words I typed? Have you bothered to do a cursory google search on the issue? He ran against Alan Keyes. What part of that do you not understand?

    Look, it says so right here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Senate_election_in_Illinois,_2004

    There's two candidates. Barack Obama and Alan Keyes. So how did he run unopposed?

    As to your second assertion that video link you posted is an hour long. Can you give the time in the video where they start talking about public service?

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  35. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Obama actually did give a speech that was similar to Cosby's speech.

  36. Re:Obama by joeman3429 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Is a Man Not Entitled to the Sweat of His Own Brow? âoeNo, says the man in Washington, it belongs to the poor.â âoeNo, says the man in the Vatican, it belongs to God.â âoeNo, says the man in Moscow, it belongs to everyone.â

  37. Re:Obama by joeman3429 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sorry, messed up, Is a Man Not Entitled to the Sweat of His Own Brow?

    "No, says the man in Washington, it belongs to the poor."
    "No, says the man in the Vatican, it belongs to God."
    "No, says the man in Moscow, it belongs to everyone."