Slashdot Mirror


ODF Toolkit Announced

Sweetshark writes "IBM and Sun joined at the 2008 OpenOffice.org conference in Beijing to announce the ODF Toolkit Union. The ODF Toolkit project will be independent of the development at OpenOffice.org, and will operate under the liberal Apache license. It goes from small tools that simplify using ODF in the software development process to large ODF Java and .NET libraries that can be used within other projects. 'The future of accessing and distributing software is here today,' said Michael Bemmer, senior director of Collaboration Engineering at Sun. 'It is no longer an acceptable business practice to have silos of office document data stored in proprietary formats. The industry has moved forward and is replacing the silos with business content, such as on-premise business applications, software solutions offered over the Internet and applications supported by mobile devices that are critical in Service Oriented Architectures.' Will this help ODF to make inroads in the business world after the successes on the desktops of users at home?"

11 of 71 comments (clear)

  1. Will this help ODF to make inroads? by verbalcontract · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Will this help ODF to make inroads in the business world after the successes on the desktops of users at home?"

    Short answer: no.

    Long answer: As long as there are PHBs who think "writing = Microsoft Word," good luck getting rid of DOC.

    1. Re:Will this help ODF to make inroads? by trjonescp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Long answer: As long as there are PHBs who think "writing = Microsoft Word," good luck getting rid of DOC.

      That answer is useless. The question, essentially, is, "Will this help people realize that Writing does not necessarily equal Microsoft Word?"

      --
      Only speak when it improves the silence.
    2. Re:Will this help ODF to make inroads? by .orvp · · Score: 4, Funny

      I see a PHB has modpoints, thus proving they are on Slashdot, and therefor not intelligent.

      Waaait a second there.....

      --
      My other sig is just as lame
  2. Re:QOTD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Jars are just zip files, they are completely documented, as the java class structure. Multiple JVM implementations exist. I'm unsure what your point is.

  3. Re:QOTD! by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well yeah except you don't need Sun to open your jar. You can use Winrar to extract the info so it's not like it's a closed format.

  4. Re:Beating Word will be hard by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In an ideal world, beating Word won't be necessary. Word itself isn't the enemy here. The enemy here is the notion that document format X must imply program Y(read .doc and word respectively). I don't care what word processor people feel like using. I do care what format the documents they send me are in.

    In this case, the ODF Toolkit mentioned isn't a word processor at all, it's just a layer that makes it easy(er) for any sort of program to interact with ODF documents. Whether that means server side programs that parse information out of ODF formatted resumes that get uploaded, programs that generate ODF documents for various purposes based on database input, somebody's eccentric hobby word processor that needs to speak a standard format, whatever.

    I'm not a huge fan of word, personally, and I'm very glad indeed that there are Free alternatives; but word isn't a big issue. Undocumented, badly documented, or deliberately obfuscated formats, that force us to all use a particular program just to communicate are the issue.

  5. Re:Beating Word will be hard by DragonWriter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In this case, the ODF Toolkit mentioned isn't a word processor at all, it's just a layer that makes it easy(er) for any sort of program to interact with ODF documents.

    Exactly. Where this really seems likely to help is in integrating ODF as a message format within the SOA/Messaging/Web Services world.

  6. A good strategy by krisher · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sun and IBM are opening a community that will help propel adoption of the ODF standard by making the format more useful. By providing free libraries to access the data inside the documents, they encourage applications that consider the importance of the content, and minimize lock-in for a single presentation tool.

  7. So does this mean... by Al+Al+Cool+J · · Score: 3, Interesting

    that one day I will finally be able to use command line tools to work with odf documents -- like convert them to pdf or postscript, cause that would be awesome (it would also come about six years after I really really needed that kind of functionality, but oh well)

  8. Re:Wasn't ODF invented by shampoo? by mhall119 · · Score: 4, Funny

    This person is being extremely rude, please do something about it or I will be forced to document it excessively.

    --
    http://www.mhall119.com
  9. Re:Beating Word will be hard by cheater512 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Erm I've *never* had a problem with OOo reading doc formats (or even ppt and xls).
    Apparently there are the occasional glitch when saving complex documents in Microsoft's format, but I havent seen any.