Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Denies Paying Nigerians $400K To Ditch Linux

Da Massive writes "Microsoft has denied paying a Nigerian contractor $400,000 in a bid to retard Linux's movement into the government sector. Media reports alleged that Microsoft had proposed paying that sum to a government contractor under a joint marketing agreement last year, in order to persuade the contractor to replace Linux OS with Windows on thousands of school laptops. Although a joint marketing agreement was drafted to document the best practices for using technology in education, it was never executed, said a Microsoft regional manager for Africa. It became clear, he added, that one customer wanted a Linux OS."

11 of 148 comments (clear)

  1. Of course they didn't pay the "partner" ... by siddesu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As they do in other countries (see Eastern Europe for an example), Microsoft will just pay the government officials that award the contract.

    It is a lot easier, safer (there are lawyer intermediaries, so it is impossible to catch the perpetrators) and works well, as the government has a "legitimate" reason to increase the budget, and the larger the budget, the merrier it gets.

  2. Retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Microsoft...denied paying a Nigerian contractor $400,000 in a bid to retard Linux's movement into the government sector.

    What could be more retarded than a government sector using windows? (grammar nazis, let it slide...)

  3. Re:Corruption is normal in Nigeria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's right. Even trying to build a house requires the bribery of several people!

    Even if it did happen, this is not Microsoft specific.

  4. Re:Is vista really that bad? by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's probably XP, as school laptops are involved. They're not likely to be vista capable.

  5. Re:REQUEST FOR URGENT BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP by akentanaka · · Score: 1, Insightful

    you guys have so much time on your hands. Very nice exchange!

  6. The REAL reason microsoft decided not to pay... by voss · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Microsoft could have paid $400,000 and the Nigerians could have gone ahead and used linux anyway. Bribes only work when you trust people to stay bought.

  7. Re:hmmm... interesting bribe? by cgenman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Actually, read between the lines:

    Although a joint marketing agreement was drafted to document the best practices for using technology in education, it was never executed, said Thomas Hansen, regional manager for Microsoft West, East and Central Africa. "As such, the joint marketing agreement became irrelevant; no such marketing agreement was ever agreed to, and no money was ever spent," he said.

    You'll notice he doesn't deny attempting to pay 400k dollars to ditch Linux, he simply states that the plan to do so fell through.

  8. Re:hmmm... interesting bribe? by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The plan was done by Microsoft's vampire core. When it was exposed to the light of day (and media stories), the deal evaporated. The deal was actually exposed some number of months ago Microsoft doesn't like such deals being exposed. Deals like this being illegal doesn't help the situation.

    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  9. Re:Corruption is normal in Nigeria by turing_m · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Exactly how much a company like Microsoft should play by Nigeria's rules is a difficult question...

    Those are "Nigeria's rules"? That's a bit like asking how much someone like Gary Kasparov should play by the rules of FIDE.

    --
    If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
  10. Re:Customers deciding! What will MS think of next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You are naive as members of ISO commitee

  11. Re:ah november by HermMunster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No, it's just you. Truthfully.

    You can't win a war without staying on the offensive. The best you can attain with that strategy is a stalemate. A loss is more likely.

    At digg.com it appears that either Microsoft has paid people to come and digg down negative comments and/or digg up positive ones. Even if you comment stating your belief or feeling (and your points are valid) you'll get dugg way down. This just started happening about the time that Microsoft announced Windows 7. I guess they understand the digg effect and how sites such as slashdot and digg play a big part in perceptions about technology.

    I'm not the only one that recognized that. Others have commented as well. I do believe that it will be the start of the decline of digg as people will loose trust in it if that behavior continues.

    Now maybe they didn't pay anyone and it is just a few people that have set up multiple accounts to alter the vote. Who knows, but something is going wrong.

    Maybe you are just reading too much digg.com regarding Microsoft products and you noticed the effect too, attributing it to the wrong thing.

    But, no, really, slashdot has not been coming down harder on Microsoft that they deserve. In reality, they haven't even begun to touch the breadth of the insanity Microsoft has caused to the software industry.

    --
    You can lead a man with reason but you can't make him think.