Slashdot Mirror


Yahoo CEO Jerry Yang To Step Down

JagsLive was one of several readers to point out Jerry Yang's departure as Yahoo CEO. He's not leaving the company; he will return to his former role as Chief Yahoo, whatever that entails. Yang has been under fire in recent months from investors for his handling of Microsoft's recent acquisition attempt."Yahoo, under fierce financial pressure, has begun a search to replace company co-founder Jerry Yang as chief executive, the company said Monday. 'Jerry and the board have had an ongoing dialogue about succession timing, and we all agree that now is the right time to make the transition to a new CEO who can take the company to the next level,' Chairman Roy Bostock said in a statement."

5 of 199 comments (clear)

  1. Isn't it kind of sad by Armakuni · · Score: 5, Insightful

    when a company's main goal is to be acquired as soon as possible?

    --
    That's not Picasso, that's Kandinsky!
    1. Re:Isn't it kind of sad by bberens · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Seriously, the company you work for does not exist to enrich your life. It exists to enrich the life of the owner(s). You are paid a stipend to perform labor because the owner(s) believe that your work will further enrich them.

      --
      Check out my lame java blog at www.javachopshop.com
  2. Re:Dividends? by AuMatar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No- because investors today think the stock price means everything. Played that way, the entire thing is a giant pyramid scheme waiting to collape... oh too late.

    --
    I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
  3. Re:Dividends? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Basically dividends, and stock buy-backs which are effectively the same thing, are an easy way out when a company has more money than it knows how to make useful investments with.

    Or basically dividends allow your investors the option to take part of your profits and either put them back into the stock or use them for income or other purposes.

    One symptom the lack of dividends leads to is companies feeling compelled to branch out in order to make use of the money they have on hand; they usually aren't as good at their new tacked-on field, and the formerly well-focused company that the investors bought into no longer exists.

  4. Jerry is too nice to be CEO by pcause · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know Jerry and he is smart and insightful, but way too nice to be a CEO in an industry where he has to compete against SOBs like Ballmer and Schmidt. Jerry is polite and considerate. He is thoughtful and modest. The other guys are rude, arrogant, aggressive, nasty folk.

    Jerry did a lot of useful changes, but what he didn't get that it is all about perception of being a leader and being on the path upward. A lot of the issue for the market is PR versus reality. And, let face it, search and search advertising are the things the market views as keys to future success and Yahoo has fallen further behind in this area. The decision to outsource search to Google by Yahoo may prove to be one of the top 5 greatest business mistakes of all time and Jerry has to share blame for that as well.

    Jerry didn't move boldly enough, but his Board should have known that his base style wouldn't allow it. He should have reorg'ed immediately and publicly, giving folks ownership and accountability. You get the job but you get fired if you don't hit the goals. He let key services stagnate. Yahoo mail took too long to fix their UI to match Google and Yahoo still charges for POP access. Yahoo was the calendar leader, but Google launches a slightly better calendar and is viewed as the leader, even without a customer base. Yahoo Groups is a leader but is old and stale compared to something like Ning. There are lots of examples of how to upgrade their services out there for Yahoo and they seem to ignore them and let others steal mind share and leadership from them.

    I fear that it is too late. Yahoo is the AOL of Web 2.0. It is only a matter of time.