Slashdot Mirror


Why the Widening Gender Gap In Computer Science?

ruheling writes "From yesterday's New York Times: ' What Has Driven Women Out of Computer Science?' In many US universities, over the past decade, there has been deliberate effort to integrate and encourage women and girls to get more involved in the 'hard' sciences, engineering, and math. However, instead of the proportion of women to men increasing, in Computer Science the opposite is actually true. Specifically, in 2001-2, only 28 percent of all undergraduate degrees in computer science went to women. Now many computer science departments report that women now make up less than 10 percent of the newest undergraduates. What's going on here, folks?"

47 of 1,563 comments (clear)

  1. Obvious.... by The+Dancing+Panda · · Score: 5, Funny

    You guys are being creepy. Girls don't like creepy dudes leering at them all the time.

    1. Re:Obvious.... by jjohn · · Score: 5, Funny

      No doubt that the CS field is "socially challenged" at times. However, there are plenty of women in the military. These women face an almost institutionalized form of sexual harassment. This has not dimensioned the enrollment of females into the armed services.

      I second your call for male nerds to dial down the stalker instinct. You aren't the first to complain of it.

      While we're Blue Skying, I'd also like to call for wider adoption of deodorant in the CS field.

    2. Re:Obvious.... by butterflysrage · · Score: 5, Insightful

      well... yes. Sexual harassment is a huge issue for female students/workers. One girl to a dozen guys, you're going to get hit on, a LOT. Even after I got married, I still got chatted up left and right (don't guys check for rings anymore?) and I really don't like it. It feels like the only reason half my co-workers talk to me is because I'm the only one with tits in the place... not because I'm smart, not because I can code with the best of them, not because I'm funny, or cheerful or anything else.

      The "OMFG BOOBS! Let's go talk to them" effect creates a really hostile environment, which causes many of us to change majors/jobs... which makes women even more rare, which makes the next set of boobs even more rare... vicious cycle.

      --
      the preceding post was not spell checked... suck it.
    3. Re:Obvious.... by Nursie · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "don't guys check for rings anymore?"

      Why bother? With divorce and infidelity so popular these days, who cares about a piece of metal on your finger?

      BTW, I'm not the harassing type. My workplace seems mercifully free of that and reasonably well balanced (for a software house). Just my observation on modern society.

    4. Re:Obvious.... by bwalling · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think nationalism is something that has a stronger appeal to people than geekdom. "American" has turned into a somewhat creepy religion.

    5. Re:Obvious.... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 5, Funny

      tits || gtfo

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    6. Re:Obvious.... by theaveng · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The OP echoed my own thoughts (geeks scaring off the girls), but the "real" reason is because women are cool and computer science is not. ;-) They simply aren't attracted to that type of work. And there's nothing wrong with that.

      You ever wander past the Health & Human Development part of your college?

      It's like an engineering class in reverse - 40 women; 2 guys. (I knew I picked the wrong major.) Men and women are not that same. Men migrate towards "things" and women migrate towards "humans", each dominating their respective engineering & health majors. They don't think the same and they have different interests. Why can't people just accept that?

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    7. Re:Obvious.... by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 5, Funny

      But there is a girl in the classroom! I'm going to show her some cool macros...

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    8. Re:Obvious.... by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If it was last night when I had mod points, I'd give you +1 insightful. When did "American" become a lifestyle rather than a place of birth?

    9. Re:Obvious.... by muridae · · Score: 5, Insightful

      well... yes. Sexual harassment is a huge issue for female students/workers. One girl to a dozen guys, you're going to get hit on, a LOT. Even after I got married, I still got chatted up left and right (don't guys check for rings anymore?) and I really don't like it. It feels like the only reason half my co-workers talk to me is because I'm the only one with tits in the place... not because I'm smart, not because I can code with the best of them, not because I'm funny, or cheerful or anything else.

      Now, I'm not saying all those guys weren't flirting, but were all of them? I've sat and chatted with just about everyone in any of my smaller classes. I know that I'm going to work with them at some point during the year, so why not get to know them. The sooner I can pick out who is going to flake out, and who's code is superior, the better I can plan for the final projects.

    10. Re:Obvious.... by HungryHobo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And trying to force it is only going to hurt people.
      It's getting to the point that if girls are particularly capable of doing math/science they get pushed to even if they don't want to in the name of equality.

      For gods sake let people choose for themselves even if they don't make the choices you think they should!

    11. Re:Obvious.... by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 5, Insightful

      When did "American" become a lifestyle rather than a place of birth?
      When people decided that culture was a sacrosanct, frozen set of behavior rather than an adaptation to environmental forces. Of course the overwhelming nostalgia hasn't helped that problem either.

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
    12. Re:Obvious.... by theaveng · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What I don't understand is why these anti-sexist persons are sooooo concerned about lack of women in science. Why do I not hear anybody crying out, "There are only 2 men for every 40 women in the Health & Human Development Major!" I guess we men don't matter. How sexist. ;-)

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    13. Re:Obvious.... by tyler.willard · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sexual harassment is a huge issue for female students/workers. One girl to a dozen guys, you're going to get hit on, a LOT.

      Getting chatted up and being sexually harassed are not even remotely the same thing.

    14. Re:Obvious.... by Jonas+the+Bold · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You don't get paid based on how much you or anyone else thinks you deserve. You get paid based on what salary you can command, which is regulated by supply and demand.

      It's not an outrage at all that one kind of job doesn't get the same salary as another. If you want more money do something more valuable, which will be something there is a lower supply and/or a higher demand for.

      --
      Everything seemed to be going so nice
      'till the end of all beings punched right through the ice
    15. Re:Obvious.... by Dishevel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So an American should at the same time both understand that hanging on to his culture is wrong and allow immigrants to bring their culture with them. Am I getting that right?

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    16. Re:Obvious.... by LordKazan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No - what earned liberals the label the "Blame America First Crowd" was them making an honest attempt at understanding why we were attacked on Sept 11, 2001 without excluding all possibility that it might have been in response to actions we had taken in the past.

      Your pointless sarcasm aside GP as a point that a certain portion of the population has lost all perspective and worships the country like a god instead of being good citizens and stewards of the country and realizing that it can and does have laws that we should strive to correct to make it an even better country. They've lost the ability to realize that something can be both good and flawed.

      There are two forms of love - that of a child to a parent, and that of two adults. With a child to a parent they cannot see the flaws and when the flaws in their parent are pointed out they become irrational and lash out. In adult love they see each others flaws and accept them and work to help the other solve their flaws.

      That certain part of the population I talked about before loves America like a child loves a parent. Their lashing out is the source of the label "The Blame America First Crowd" because the other group, the mature one that recognizes and tries to correct flaws, was making an honest attempt at understanding what happened to try to prevent it from happening again.

      I would also advise you take a look at your reaction and evaluate it in the light of this assessment.

      --
      If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
    17. Re:Obvious.... by ryanvm · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So nearly all species in the animal kingdom have inherent behavioral differences between males and females - except humans? You really believe that?

      You know, just because men and women are different doesn't mean they can't have the same rights. You don't have to be so petrified at the thought of differences between the sexes.

    18. Re:Obvious.... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You don't get paid based on how much you or anyone else thinks you deserve. You get paid based on what salary you can command, which is regulated by supply and demand.

      I don't think that they were saying that it's an outrage that HR workers don't make as much money as other professions. The outrage comes from the overall male vs female income, which female-dominated relatively-low-income professions like HR skews, and thus gives an inaccurate picture.

      However even if I misinterpret the sentence starting with the word "outrage", one thing I'm sure I comprehend, and that they're correct on: The reason nobody gives a rat's ass about gender equality in those jobs is because nobody is envious of those job's salaries. Nobody cares about the gender gap in day laborers even though it's huge. If CS was a low-paying job, nobody would care about the gender gap in CS.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    19. Re:Obvious.... by PylonHead · · Score: 5, Funny

      What could people be so afraid of, except her being a powerful Republican ticket in the future?

      Yes. We're quaking in our boots. You should definitely choose this fine woman to be your 2012 nominee. That would teach us.

      --
      # (/.);;
      - : float -> float -> float =
    20. Re:Obvious.... by Draek · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So an American should at the same time both understand that hanging on to his culture is wrong and allow immigrants to bring their culture with them. Am I getting that right?

      Yes. Same way you should both understand that believing the Earth is flat is stupid and allow flat-earthers to voice their opinion anywhere they please.

      --
      No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
    21. Re:Obvious.... by somethingwicked · · Score: 5, Funny

      My idea of American 'culture' is fast food, celebrities, gas guzzling cars, and guns. Have I missed anything?

      I am always taken back by how people in other countries think about us.

      It is horrifying to me that you left out porn...

      --

      ---"What did I say that sounded like 'Tell me about your day?'"---

    22. Re:Obvious.... by TheGeneration · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes you have actually missed something actually.

      America, just like England or any country across the Atlantic, has subsets of culture.

      The "fast food, celebrity [tabloid obsession], gas guzzling cars, and guns, [and god]" you speak of is the working class America. Especially southern and mid-western working class America. I believe in England this type of person would be called a scally or a chav.

      The primarily middle class area in the west where I live is heavily populated by an entirely other subset of Americans that are educated, peace loving, atheist/agnostic, socialist minded, and environmentally conscious.

      While we may not be wasting our congress persons time with debates on fox hunting, we are wasting their time with debates on flag burning.

      The UK and America aren't all that different.

      Scotland by the way is one of the most beautiful places I've ever been. I look forward to returning someday. The food in Scotland has a lot in common with the American south (where the fattest Americans are) lard is not a seasoning, no matter how much the American South and Scotland may wish it so.

      --


      The Generation
      I'd say something witty here, but I'm not that bright.
    23. Re:Obvious.... by Sparks23 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think it would be wonderful to teach the biblical theory: flat earth sitting on a firmament; with the sun planets and stars under a dome of water, .... and slowly work through why these ideas were rejected.

      I had a teacher who actually did precisely that over the course of a school year in junior high; used the changes in scientific understanding to illustrate the importance of challenging things and continually questioning accepted belief. Basically, the entire gist of his class was the importance of looking at the world around you and asking 'why' rather than blindly accepting what others tell you.

      He got in some trouble for not sticking blindly to a textbook, unsurprisingly. But I like to think all of his students learned a lot more from him than we did from many of our other science teachers. Instead of learning rote scientific theory, we learned to question and investigate for ourselves.

      --
      --Rachel
  2. Women don't want to do CS? by Tridus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For some reason its hard to accept that a lot of women simply aren't interested in studying CS, engineering, or hard science.

    Its a similar problem to something like Nursing, in the other direction. At my graduation, the CS group sat right behind the nursing group. There's lots of comments at how the CS group was 80% male. There were no comments at how the nursing group was 97% female.

    At some point, the reality has to set in that women on average simply aren't interested, and all the incentives in the world won't change that.

    --
    -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
    1. Re:Women don't want to do CS? by jjohn · · Score: 5, Informative

      Unfortunately, the article mentions that in the 80s, female enrollment in CS was closer to parity with males. Something has changed since then and I doubt it's biological.

    2. Re:Women don't want to do CS? by spicate · · Score: 5, Insightful

      For some reason its hard to accept that a lot of women simply aren't interested in studying CS, engineering, or hard science.

      Now for fifty comments about how "men and women are different" without any recognition that historically, "male" and "female" professions can and do change.

      Medicine, for example, used to be almost entirely dominated by men. Now many medical schools have 50 percent or more women in their entering classes.

      The real issue, I believe, is that most people need to feel comfortable in their chosen career, and for many women the culture of computer science doesn't seem to have a place for them.

    3. Re:Women don't want to do CS? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      A few years ago, I was approached by someone canvassing for support as a candidate for the post of Women's Officer in my student union (there is no Men's Officer). She said 'Women make up 52% of the population, don't you think we should protect this minority?' Needless to say, she didn't get my vote.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    4. Re:Women don't want to do CS? by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Key paragraph from TFA:

      What's particularly puzzling is that the explanations for under-representation of women that were assembled back in 1991 applied to all technical fields. Yet women have achieved broad parity with men in almost every other technical pursuit. When all science and engineering fields are considered, the percentage of bachelor's degree recipients who are women has improved to 51 percent in 2004-5 from 39 percent in 1984-85, according to National Science Foundation surveys.

      "Women aren't interested in X" has historically been applied to X = medicine, business, politics ... and it's always been wrong. There's something specific about CS here, and I don't think it's the field.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    5. Re:Women don't want to do CS? by Yahma · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Women and men are different, feminism seems to think "Equal"="same". This is simply incorrect, the sexes are different and so are attracted to differing professions.

      Well said! While there is nothing preventing a woman from pursing a CS degree, why do so many people fail to see the obvious.. Women are generally not interested in CS and/or engineering. I have several female friends (non slashdot reading females) who have absolutely no interest in CS. When I talk to them about computers they look at me like I'm a freak. They are more interested in jobs that are more "social". This could be why men prefer action/horror movies, and women prefer drama/romance movies such as "Sex & the City".

      Rather than forcing women into CS, I say let them choose what they want to do. Women tend to be more in touch with their emotions than men are, and hence tend to prefer jobs that allow emotional freedom and creativity. Many men would be find in a non-emotionally stimulating environment.

    6. Re:Women don't want to do CS? by Cormacus · · Score: 5, Funny

      You should talk to a few RN's before you make the assertion that a nursing graduate has a more healthy lifestyle than a CS graduate. One of the nurses at the flu clinic recently had just come off of three straight "twelves." I was glad that it was the other lady who was giving me my shot . . .

      --
      Mon chien, il n'a pas du nez. Comment scent-il? TrÃs mauvais!
    7. Re:Women don't want to do CS? by Lord+Ender · · Score: 5, Funny

      To deal with the cold, hard logic of computers all day, you need to be comfortable with such an unemotional, machine-like environment. As an IT worker, I can tell you firsthand that many women aren't comfortable in situations like that. Far too many ex-girlfriends of mine have told me I'm "too much like a robot." To which I reply, "a sex robot?" And they say no. :-(

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    8. Re:Women don't want to do CS? by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We raise girls to be nurturers and boys to be tinkerers. Small children are all given little dolls, which act as security blankets. But when little girls get their next toy, it's another doll. A little boy will get a toy truck, or car. The girl gets the Barbie dream house. The boy gets the lego set. We define gender roles for children from the time they are small, then are amazed when they don't break out of those roles.

      If/when you have children, you will understand just how false this is. I can't tell you how many times I am personally shocked, and my friends who are also parents are also personally shocked, at just how innately different boys and girls are. And it's not just my own kids, but it's all kids.

      Another thing I found shocking is just how unreceptive children are to parents' attempts to define roles for them. They really are there own people, and that goes from about age 0.5 onwards. Go ahead. Try to give your male child a doll. Last time I gave my son a doll, he was about 1 year old. He threw it around for a while, then smashed it repeatedly with a hammer. Try giving your little girl a toy gun. She'll put it to bed and tuck it in and give it a kiss good night.

      In our house, my wife and I do not encourage traditional gender roles. But man, oh man, do they sure happen on their own.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    9. Re:Women don't want to do CS? by DerekLyons · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Trivially falsifiable - if "women prefer good pay and healthy lifestyles" were true, then nursing classes wouldn't be overwhelmingly female as nursing fails both criteria by a wide margin.

    10. Re:Women don't want to do CS? by maxume · · Score: 5, Funny

      Insightful? Parenting advice that includes giving a 1 year old a hammer?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    11. Re:Women don't want to do CS? by HungryHobo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ah the oft toted argument.
      Problem is that even with infants only a few weeks old, if you test their attention span for different stimula then you'll find that little girls tend to be more interested in faces and will pay attention to them longer and little boys will tend to be more interested in things and pay attention to them longer.

      Children are not empty vessels, sure you can beat them into the shape with enough force applied but not everything is due to outside influence.

  3. Widening gap in first posts by line-bundle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why do they pick and choose industries to focus on. No-one raises a stink about shortage of female garbage collectors.

    And I haven't heard a big push to increase males in areas dominated my women, e.g. elementary education.

    1. Re:Widening gap in first posts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      daemonisation of men

      I got fired from my last job, so I'm staying home with the kids. I suppose that means I got Terminated, and I Stay Resident instead.

  4. This Is the Part ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... where everyone jumps on me, the young white male programmer in a low level position. For everything I've done, for all the women I've sexually harassed out of computer science, for all the minorities I've laughed and jeered at through entire classes, for all the old men I've found in my field and killed A-Clockwork-Orange style, for all the alienating I've done by creating an "aura" or "mood" set against women.

    Has anyone ever once argued that maybe--just maybe--I really really like computers?

    What's the ratio in nursing? 20 females:1 male? So here's your solution: take all the entry level students from these two professions and even them out regardless of what the individual wants to do. See how happy you make everybody.

    Or better yet, unfairly weight the minority sex in each of those classes, that's fair because I definitely was given a detailed account of the outside world while I was in my mother's womb and then filled out a scantron card for what I wanted to be--a white male in the United States with no heritage whatsoever.

  5. Brain size by sxltrex · · Score: 5, Funny

    With props to Will Ferrell, the funniest man alive:

    A woman's brain is one-third the size of ours. It's science.

    1. Re:Brain size by troll8901 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Women's brains may be 10% smaller (Brain Size: 1130 vs 1260 cc), but I believe they're more advanced, uses less energy, and generates less heat.

      They appear to be:

      1. Multi-core, capable of thinking of several things simultaneously.
      2. Real-time OS, hardly freezes (even when staring at handsome men).
      3. Proprietary OS, difficult to reverse-engineer or predict.
      4. Secure, always having secrets that will never be revealed.
      5. Highly efficient I/O, capable of 30000 words per day.
      6. Threat-ready, capable of out-talking (and sometimes out-thinking) any opponent.

      Why women avoid pursuing a CS career is a mystery to me.

  6. Women aren't a "minority", either.... by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Last I checked, they comprised about 51% of the population....

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  7. The brainy girls are going to med school by HangingChad · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The smart girls are going to med school or veterinary medicine. They see the creepy geek guys leering at them like they've never seen a live female before and figure if they're going to need to deal with some horse's butt, they might as well go to vet school.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  8. Why is gender 'equality' so important? by fructose · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously, why does every career or activity have to have an exact 50-50 mix of males and females? Last time I checked, the hormonal balance in men and women were quite a bit different and each sex has a general preference to what interests them. The examples of teachers, nurses, and garbage collectors are excellent examples. The two sexes are different. Why do so many people have a hard time accepting that?

  9. differing interests by jollyreaper · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As the great philosopher Barbie once said, "Math is hard!"

    No, but seriously, before my karma is ruined, it's all a matter of differing interests. When I got into computers, they were still a seriously nerdcore hobby. It was rare to even encounter another girl at school who had a computer at home, even less likely for her to know how to use it. My sister looked at my computering, laughed, and went back to her interests.

    Kind of without me realizing it, computers became a bigger and bigger thing in the lives of non-geeks. The internet is what really did it. When my sister finally asked me to help her find a computer, this was a watershed moment. And the social aspects made possible by the internet was what really sucked her in. I enjoyed the bulletin boards in my pre-internet days but IRC and ICQ were the killer apps that really sucked her in, that and the web in general. And more and more of her friends ended up having computers, and the social elements online weren't about computers but were simply facilitated by computers. == This, I think, is key. She has become as big of a computer geek as me now but she's using it as a tool, not as an end unto itself. She uses Photoshop and Illustrator for her art, uses different programs as a designer at her job, does her personal writing on there, keeps up with friends, etc. But it's not just geeking out on computers for the sake of geeking out. She's not installing all sorts of upgrades for games, she sticks with consoles for that sort of thing.

    Since Slashdot is all about car analogies, I'd say most women are using computers the way they use a car, as a tool that they find very useful but they don't care about what's going on under the hood. Getting into CS is like becoming a gearhead. Most car users, male or female, aren't really gearheads. And from the stats I'm hearing from people I know in academia, Americans as a whole, male and female, aren't really into the hard sciences. There's just no money there.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  10. My Thoughts by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When we were in CS classes, we did not consider our male classmates to be scary, and some of them even seemed fairly cool. We'd flirt, and even exchange jokes with them that only a CS major could find to be funny. But we were all about making money. There may be men who are into computers just because it's fun, but women go to college to further their careers, and ever since outsourcing, CS doesn't seem to be the way to do that. If a CS degree becomes likely to result in a high-paying job, the women will come.

  11. Women use Google, guys can, but don't by stonewolf · · Score: 5, Informative

    My wife and I have been married for 31 years. We met in college. She was a civil engineering major, I was a computer science major. She later changed her major to mechanical engineering when she learned that ME's are more widely employable than CEs. When we met she was a freshman and I was a senior.

    I went on to get a masters degree, she took the classes for a master degree but spent the time she would have spent on a thesis getting ready for, and passing, the P.E. exam. She has had her stamp for a long time.

    We are both now in out fifties. She gets calls several times a year offering her jobs. Some in the private sector, some in the public sector. People value her decades of experience. People look up to MEs with decades of experience and a professional certification.

    I was laid off for the last time on my 49th birthday and have not been able to find a technical job since. It is hard to find a company that will believe that I actually have the experience I have. I can't tell you how many times I have had an interview where I have been challenged on my experience and even though I can prove every bit of it people just don't believe it. And, don't get me started on certification for computer people, compared to getting a PE certification in the computer world isn't even a bad joke. It is mostly just a con.

    I went back to school and "retrained" as a teacher and I am now certified to teach CS in public schools and I work part time teaching people how to use a mouse. I haven't been able to find a full time teaching job because their aren't many of those and the competition for them is fierce. You see, I live in Austin, Texas and for about 10 years this is where IBM transfered entire divisions before they laid them off. There are literally thousands of people my age with my qualifications wandering around down here (we used to have a morning walking club just for laid of 50+ software developers) and they all did the work of getting certified to teach in the Texas public schools. I got the job I had when the lady who had it before me got a full time teaching job. My application had been on file for more than a year. I moved from a job that was even more part time to one that is almost half time. A major step up!

    When my wife graduated from high school she took the ACT. She compared her ACT scores to the average ACT scores of different majors and the average starting salary in those majors. Engineering had the highest starting salary and most closely matched here ACT scores. I went into computer science after taking a class in it and falling in love with it.

    I have come to learn that I am pretty typical of a guy who goes into computer science. Most of us do it because we really really like it. Some do it for the money but those guys don't stay in it for long. I have also come to learn that my wife is pretty typical of women who go into technical subjects. They do it because it is a good way to make a living and you can do some really interesting stuff too.

    Now, lets see some of the differences between being a "software engineer" and a real engineer. My wife has been laid off once, I have been laid off twice. Until I turned 49 (I'm now 56) I made 20% to 40% more than she did. She now makes 250% more than I do. I have done thousands of hours of involuntary unpaid overtime. She has always either been paid for, or received comp time for, all the overtime she has ever done. And, while it is common for programmers to be told to get something done by Tuesday or else, that has never happened to her. Working conditions that are normal for programmers are practically unheard of for engineers.

    Women tend to be more practical than men when it comes to picking a career. Being more practical they will google for information about salaries, work hours, working conditions and so on, *before* picking a major. If you want to have a job for the rest of your life, and work 40 hours per week most of the time, and be respected at work and in the community, you do not study computer science. At least