Slashdot Mirror


NASA Tests Deep-Space Network Modeled On the Internet

hcg50a writes "NASA has successfully tested the first deep space communications network modeled on the Internet. Working as part of a NASA-wide team, engineers from NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, CA, used software called Disruption-Tolerant Networking, or DTN, to transmit dozens of space images to and from a NASA science spacecraft located about 20 million miles from Earth. The store-and-forward protocol was designed by NASA in consultation with Vint Cerf. Here's a discussion from last July before the test began."

21 of 109 comments (clear)

  1. Imagine... by pitchpipe · · Score: 3, Funny

    lolcats in space!

    --
    Look where all this talking got us, baby.
    1. Re:Imagine... by jd · · Score: 4, Funny

      Elebenty of tehm! Running Beowulfs!

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    2. Re:Imagine... by RockWolf · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wonder what images they actually sent...the press release doesn't mention anything about them.

      Porn, obviously.

      --
      February 9th, 2009 8:55pm: Slashdot becomes self-aware.
  2. their first message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    5th post

  3. DRM by frisket · · Score: 2, Funny

    Would sub-space internet radio broadcasts be subject to a DRM?

    1. Re:DRM by sexconker · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've just copyrighted the term subcasting.

    2. Re:DRM by Directrix1 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, but while you guys were talking about that, I trademarked Subcasting (TM).

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
  4. Designed to survive galactic warfare... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...and route around event horizons.

  5. Yay! by owlnation · · Score: 2, Funny

    Space Porn!!!

  6. Previous method... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The previous technique of interplanetary messenger pigeons was obviously lobbied against by PETA as a disgusting abuse of animals.

  7. Finally by sleeponthemic · · Score: 1, Funny

    I can market my CHEEP VAIGRA and ATHENTIC ROLLEX WATCH to the Vogons.

    Revenge will be mine!

    --
    I record my sleeptalking
  8. Searching Doom 3 servers... by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 5, Funny

    CLANWARS_PUBLIC#1 LAVAPIT-BIG UDP 56
    LOL-GIBBERISHED OH!NOSHIT_ctf UDP 68
    PLAYTIME.DOT.UK DM_HOLYGROUNDS UDP 254
    FRAGFEST_REDPLANET DM_HELLHOLE UDP 2,139,442

    Ping of 2 MILLION? WTF ?!?

  9. Re:very exciting by Star+Particle · · Score: 3, Funny

    I agree, this is very exciting news in terms of internet devel- *error: connection dropped*

  10. Re:bollocks by Spikeles · · Score: 4, Funny

    then what will we call a communication protocol that works well between stars

    Interstellar?

    --
    I don't need to test my programs.. I have an error correcting modem.
  11. Re:Remember FIDONet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    We already have a working _global_ _worldwide_ _free_ network based on store-and-forward protocols.

    It's called FIDONet. It's almost dead now, but it was very alive during early 90-s before the advent of cheap Internet.

    Kids...

    We shall, respectfully, remove ourselves from your lawn.

  12. Re:Remember FIDONet by Jimbookis · · Score: 2, Funny

    We already have a working _global_ _worldwide_ _free_ network based on store-and-forward protocols.

    It's called FIDONet. It's almost dead now, but it was very alive during early 90-s before the advent of cheap Internet.

    Kids...

    The best thing is if NASA used FIDONet think of the money they'd save by only sending messages to Deep Space at 3am when the tolls are cheapest!

  13. Re:Remember FIDONet by Cyberax · · Score: 2, Funny

    Same problem :)

    I'm seriously thinking about FireFox extension which will stop opening new Wikipedia links after 20-30 minutes of reading Wikipedia pages.

  14. Re:very exciting by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 3, Funny

    Don't worry, everybody.
    The rest of the post will come within the hour. Or maybe next week.

  15. Re:bollocks by plover · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think Microsoft may have been considering the scope of this problem for a long time. They stopped the hubristic practice of naming "guaranteed unique" identifiers as UUIDs (Universally Unique IDentifiers) and started referring to them as GUIDs (Globally Unique IDentifiers.)

    Why would they change horses in the middle of the race, with all the expense of changing documentation, supporting two naming systems, and all of the resultant confusion, unless there was a reason to not refer to them as "Universal"?

    OK, maybe it's because they were trying to "embrace, extend, and extinguish" the RFC defining UUIDs. But I'd prefer to give them the benefit of the doubt, and say that they were "forward thinking", looking at the problems of networking in space.

    BWA HA HA HA! Sorry, I couldn't keep a straight face for that last bit.

    --
    John
  16. Re:Remember FIDONet by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you ever get those kids off your lawn, I may be willing to pay big dollars for the right to put a giant baseball mitt there.

  17. Re:Store anf forward.. could it be... by markana · · Score: 2, Funny

    African, European, or Alien swallows?

    (assuming that the airspeed velocity is irrelevant here...)