Slashdot Mirror


Fewer Than 1% Arrested From TSA's "Behavior Detection"

An anonymous reader writes "Fewer than 1% of airline passengers singled out at airports using the much vaunted 'suspicious behavior detection' techniques are arrested, Transportation Security Administration figures show. The TSA program, launched in early 2006, looks for terrorists using a controversial surveillance method based on behavior detection and has led to more than 160,000 people in airports receiving scrutiny, such as a pat-down search or a brief interview. It has resulted in only 1,266 arrests, often on charges of carrying drugs or fake IDs, the TSA said. The TSA has not publicly said whether it has caught a terrorist through the program." In related news, the odds of sanity coming to the TSA plummeted today when Schneier said he's not interested in the top job there.

11 of 412 comments (clear)

  1. In other news: by cosmocain · · Score: 5, Funny

    Not all flying things are ducks.

    1. Re:In other news: by n3tcat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Flying toasters... the next step in mobil improvised explosive device technology.

  2. Better than it was by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    It may not be very effective, but it's way more politically correct than their old arrest strategy, "if he's brown, take him down"

  3. Re:Only 1.2k Arrests! by I+cant+believe+its+n · · Score: 2, Funny

    The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to the lazy.

    Is this what your father used to do?

    --
    She made the willows dance
  4. Re:Only 1.2k Arrests! by Comboman · · Score: 5, Funny
    I don't see how a person carrying pot can bring down a plane

    By sharing it with the pilot.

    --
    Support Right To Repair Legislation.
  5. Re:In that case, by HungryHobo · · Score: 3, Funny

    For the actual quote:
    "Blessed is the one who grabs your little children and smashes them against a rock."
    Psalm 137:9

  6. Re:seems to me by compro01 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Honestly, all this 'using a Buick to swat a fly nonsense has to end sometime.

    Why end it? It's likely helping keep GM afloat.

    --
    upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  7. Re:Only 1.2k Arrests! by FishAdmin · · Score: 1, Funny

    Are you serious? You want to lump illegal drugs into the same category as a pocket knife whose blade is 1/2" too long? Give me a break; no-one is advocating arresting folks for the "pisant (sic) little laws", like oral sex being illegal on Tuesdays in Omaha. As for fake IDs, there's a major difference between your average citizen with a fake ID so they can drink, and a terrorist with a fake ID to cover the fact that they're known to have been involved in urban warfare. It's time everyone realizes that the Police et al are here to protect you; yes there ARE crooked cops, but there's crooked sysadmins, lawyers, CEOs, and pizza delivery boys, too. Grow up, and lose the adolescent "the Man is out to get me!" thought processes, what say?

    --
    Last night I played a blank tape at full volume. The mime next door went nuts.
  8. Re:Only 1.2k Arrests! by DrLang21 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Could you obfuscate that with some more negatives please

    My apologies. Please allow me to clarify.

    It's not even a non-tractioned slope. It's not an outright truth. Just because something is not non-legal does not mean that we don't want to not keep it in full view.

    --
    I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
  9. Re:Only 1.2k Arrests! by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 3, Funny

    Nah, he'd just fly really slow with the windows down.

    Oh, I see your point.

    --
    "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
  10. Re:I don't know if that's good or bad... by 2short · · Score: 2, Funny


    In this post I will in no way say that you are an idiot. Regardless of what opinions I may or may not have regarding your possible lack of any functioning brain cells, I am definitely not implying here that you are a moronic baboon. You should not take offense at the idea that I think you are clearly a stupid twit who gets in pedanitic arguments on slashdot because nobody will talk to him otherwise due to his disgusting personal habits best left undescribed. I'm definitely not saying that. Under no circumstances should you conclude that I would have any purpose in writing these sentences, or be trying to imply anything, because obviously the only thing I could be implying is your utter mental and moral deficiency; and I'm not saying that. So don't put words in my mouth by pretending anything at all has been said by this post, because that would only be believed by a moron, which I'm not saying you are.