Slashdot Mirror


Chinese Hacking of American Military Networks On the Rise

Anti-Globalism writes with this excerpt from the Guardian: "China is stealing sensitive information from American computer networks and stepping up its online espionage, according to a US congressional panel. Beijing's investment in rocket technology is also accelerating the militarization of outer space and lifting it into the 'commanding heights' of modern warfare, the advisory group claims. ... A summary of the study, released in advance, alleges that networks and databases used by the US government and American defense contractors are regularly targeted by Chinese hackers. 'China is stealing vast amounts of sensitive information from US computer networks,' says Larry Wortzel, chairman of the commission set up by Congress in 2000 to investigate US-China issues." The full study addresses these issues and others relating to the US-China relationship (PDF).

40 of 205 comments (clear)

  1. Obligitory... by religious+freak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But how much is the USA ramping up their attacks on China?

    --
    If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
    1. Re:Obligitory... by narcberry · · Score: 3, Funny

      No no, we need to stop the creation of nuclear weapons by dismantling our nuclear facilities and reducing our workforce of experts. By spearheading this initiative, we can expect other nations to follow suite.

      Or they will surpass our technology and stockpiles while we hold hearings on the effects of global climate change. But I am confident they will not do so.

      --
      Modding me -1 troll doesn't make me wrong.
  2. WTF? by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Perhaps I'm just too simple minded, but WHY ON EARTH is ANY of that information even accessible from the interwebz?

    1. Re:WTF? by aliquis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My first though to, why is it even accessible if they think it's such a problem? Guess at least the military should know such basic things. (Though I do understand it makes their sharing easier.)

  3. Where's The F***? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No you're not simple minded. Why indeed is it anywhere near the internet ESPECIALLY with a report telling us WE KNOW THERE"S A PROBLEM!.

  4. Why would they bother? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    America is sending all of it's wealth to China anyway and is happily enslaving future generations to chinese investors.

    "Supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting." Sun Tsu. 2500 years ago so.
     

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Why would they bother? by Nerdfest · · Score: 3, Funny

      You can have the oil, but only if you take Celine Dion and Ben Mulroney as well.

  5. It's not one way by Caedes.Leighton · · Score: 5, Insightful

    US hacks China, China hacks US, where is the news in that? It's like watching two kids fight and both of them saying "He started it!" when in fact, they're both annoying little bastards.

    1. Re:It's not one way by moderatorrater · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The news is that they're fighting and that the fighting's escalating. The two kids on the playground are more like Godzilla and Mothra - if they fight, there's going to be lots of explosions and buildings falling over. Plus, there's going to be some terrible dub work and the Japanese are going to somehow be involved. Also, we're going to find out about new powers that Godzilla has that he didn't have in the last movie. And then Steven Spielberg will do a remake that'll flop.

      That got out of hand fast. Anyway, just because "they're both annoying little bastards" doesn't mean you shouldn't keep an eye on them. Especially if you live in Tokyo.

  6. Get real. by Colin+Smith · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is propaganda. It's simply preparing the public for adding China to the Axis of Evil, erecting trade barriers etc.

     

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Get real. by moderatorrater · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd agree with you if this were a few decades ago, but right now we're too dependent on China's production and cheap labor.

    2. Re:Get real. by zappepcs · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bang on correct! When do people, especially government types admit that they have a problem and are hemorrhaging data to foreign states? Only when there is an advantage to doing so. In this case, I think you are right, it's part of a ramp up on public information to demonize the Chinese. Specifically who among the Chinese is yet to be determined, but the probably have a short list of targets.

    3. Re:Get real. by MrNaz · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, according to this list, the top spammers are from the US but perform their nefarious deeds using Chinese servers.

      In other words, your claim that "The Chinese are EVIL!" because they portscan you is BS.

      I also think that by saying this "this is a good reason for me to have an unfriendly attitude toward China" you qualify for the Dumbest Statement All Week award. Most civilized people have, by now, realized that the "us versus them" attitude between nations is stupid, as no nation's people can be judged according to the deeds of its government or a minority such as it's hacking community. What sort of judgment would the world make regarding the US based on the actions and behavior of your last president?

      Well done on being the among the last blind bigots to grow up.

      --
      I hate printers.
    4. Re:Get real. by zappepcs · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think the US was just testing the waters at that point. We signed the commerce deals, opened borders... that sort of shunted the communist thing to ground. Now we have to deal with the 21st century cold war problems. What we are seeing is that effort. Dealing with enemies that cannot be outed without revealing your own discrepancies. Cat and mouse in the age of social networking and video phones is much different than the post WWII cold war.

      Everyone has forgotten the mysterious underwater cable cuts. Not before or since has such happened, and it's now just ignored. If you ask me that is bizarre. I'm not saying one way or the other what actually happened, but look at the news, and how news treated such problems before then. It's ... odd.

      As for who has a better grasp now? I would think that those who know Obama's social circles know best. I'm fairly disgusted with American politicians and what they have accomplished in the last 30 years. I want my America back and I'm not easily swayed from thinking that those in power are corrupt beyond redemption. It is not easy to get in those positions of power, and getting the backing to get there is not a job for the pious. Sure, it takes a bit of that to make the decisions that are necessary, but the warnings Eisenhower gave us should be printed on coffee cups everywhere so we don't forget. http://leisureguy.wordpress.com/2008/07/31/chalmers-johnson-on-the-military-industrial-complex/

      Today, 22 Nov 2008, is the anniversary of JFK's assassination. What better time to stop and think about how many plans within plans our governments weave. It is by no small measure that they benefit from such deceptions. I am fully willing to see and hear evidence from full and impartial investigations into all matters of dodgy repute where government is concerned... and until I see such investigations, I will continue to believe that governments are run by, and staffed by corrupt individuals. If you think your mailman is one of the people I'm speaking about and that they are not corrupt, ok... I'm talking about people that make decisions, sign things into law, or send soldiers to fight etc.

    5. Re:Get real. by RocketRabbit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're living in fantasy land if you believe the Chinese aren't spying on us to the best of their ability. Yes, this includes network sweeps and all kinds of other shit that you can see, right in your own logfiles! You can read about it in the paper if you wish.

      I don't think the poster was saying "All people of Chinese heritage including people who are genetically Chinese but were adopted by American parents are evil!" He was saying "The People's Republic of China is spying on us."

      Get a grip, man. Save yourself the effort and relax. The Chinese, Israeli, Canadian, French, and Mexican states are all spying on us all the time. We spy on them too. States are like pigs at a trough, always jockeying for position among each other. Sometimes they bite each other. I hear there are a few people who manage to make obscene amounts of money all the while.

      Were the Rockefellers or Morgans or Chases or Vanderbilts or the Fords ever eating meatloaf because they had to stretch their meat ration?

  7. Time to do what we did to the USSR by istartedi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One of the largest non-nuclear explosions ever came as a result of US technology that was stolen by the Russians. Except, the CIA knew it was happening and instead of stopping it they decided to plant faulty chip designs. Once the USSR knew the tech was unreliable, they were stuck with one helluva an auditing problem, beyond their capability.

    How much do you want to bet that somewhere on a "vulnerable" network, there are some designs that are just... a little... bit... off.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  8. Well, you just saw the first propaganda salvos by Colin+Smith · · Score: 4, Informative

    They'll escalate it from there.

    From TFA:

    "says Larry Wortzel, chairman of the commission"

    Larry Wortzel was:
    http://www.heritage.org/about/staff/larrywortzel.cfm

    who are:
    http://www.heritage.org/about/

    "Our Mission
    Founded in 1973, The Heritage Foundation is a research and educational institute - a think tank - whose mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense."

    Yah got to have a bogeyman.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Well, you just saw the first propaganda salvos by MrNaz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In the democratic theater that is modern western politics, the two governments that the population choose between (Republican/Democrat in the USA, Liberal/Labour in Australia, Conservative/Labour in the UK) need to be effectively identical in order that the real decisions get made not by the people, but by the neo-nobility.

      There's no difference between modern western politics and autocratic regimes such as monarchy or even dictatorships. It's just that the ruling class hides behind the veil democratic system, and like the Wizard of Oz, pulls the string without the vastly dumbed down population being any the wiser.

      They are kept in this subjugated state with a combination of bread and circuses to keep them politically passive as well as carefully constructed media content that portrays a monoculture as though it's freedom.

      This is actually an on-topic point, that meandered for a bit. The point I'm trying to make is that only a fool would believe that the US does not have a cyber-warfare (ugh, idiotic term) program, and all this reporting on online attacks by the Chinese is an example of the media reporting bias.

      --
      I hate printers.
    2. Re:Well, you just saw the first propaganda salvos by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The point I'm trying to make is that only a fool would believe that the US does not have a cyber-warfare (ugh, idiotic term) program, and all this reporting on online attacks by the Chinese is an example of the media reporting bias.

      The burden of proof is upon you to show that the US has a cyber-warfare apparatus which is attacking foreign governments in the same way that the Chinese are attacking the US government.

      The are only 2 reasons you shouldn't be able to provide credible support for your claims:
      1. The US government doesn't actually conduct Chinese style hacking raids.
      2. Foreign governments hacked by the USA do not publicly talk about it.

      I'll accept any news stories from credible foreign or domestic media.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:Well, you just saw the first propaganda salvos by religious+freak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      hides behind the veil democratic system

      Well, that's your problem right there... we are not a democracy, we are a republic. And a republic functions exactly as you describe. The older I get, the more appreciation I have for this too. Some of the dumbass ideas I've seen and heard over the years that most everyone would support (if they actually voted) would ruin this country. There's a reason the founding fathers set us up this way.

      If you and your ideas are truly worthy, you can get your message out and past the gatekeepers who keep dumb shits out (not trolling you personally, by any means - just saying).

      Irrespective of your opinion of him, Obama is evidence of this fact - he was not supported by the elites in EITHER party until he passed the tests and demonstrated his ideas could withstand critical scrutiny. The average citizen cannot provide this skilled scrutiny - the average citizen's job is to keep the elites accountable.

      --
      If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
    4. Re:Well, you just saw the first propaganda salvos by Gunnhild · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Regardless of how friendly or unfriendly relations would be between the US and China, the US is the country with the more creative, inventive talent and that is where the technology and patents are that the Chinese want to steal. It is all in line with their lack of innovative talent, and tradition of plagiarism. They would steal ideas from their best allies or enemies equally. Just do a search for "Chinese plagiarism". They have been spying on the US like this for decades.

      --
      http://www.corrupt.org
    5. Re:Well, you just saw the first propaganda salvos by TheLink · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "The people very loudly clamored against that, to no avail"

      Bush still got reelected.

      So either the voters didn't object to it that much, or the elections got significantly Diebolded...

      You will have a problem as long as voters keep voting for candidates mainly because those candidates get a lot of money from greedy companies. Go figure.

      Democracy is window dressing if the voters abdicate. Which is what many do.

      --
  9. Boo! by ISoldat53 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Every age needs bogey man.

  10. Here's the Link by istartedi · · Score: 2, Informative

    It was part of the Farewell Dossier

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  11. Old School Security by Plekto · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Perhaps this seems a bit extreme, but exactly WHY are these military computers even connected to the Internet? If it's really secret information, shouldn't they have their own network or just not put these things online?

    1. Re:Old School Security by Ant+P. · · Score: 2, Funny

      That is old-school security - the admins probably still think it's called ARPAnet.

  12. Re:Communist China! Your days are numbered! by bleh-of-the-huns · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This sends the message to the rest of the world that the US may not pay its debt to them if they do something the US does not like.... That would be a bad precedent, as we would soon find ourselves very isolated when it comes to finance and commerce...

    --
    I came, I conquered, I coredumped
  13. Beijing's investment accelerating militarisation? by krou · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Beijing's investment in rocket technology is also accelerating the militarisation of outer space

    Funny, I thought it was the US stance of space dominance that was accelerating militarisation of space.

    --
    'If Christ had tweeted the sermon on the mount, it might have lasted until nightfall.' - John Perry Barlow
  14. Very off-topic pdf, except part of ch. 2 by billsf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The pdf may be of interest to those studying relationships with China, but very little mention of any "cyber war" except part of chapter two that stresses its 'non-classified' information. The biggest hole in US computer security is Windows and how people use it. It is very common for 'users' of Windows not to set passwords, which just makes it even easier easier to penetrate the whole network. Hopefully, no Windows machine can even access classified information in the first place.

    Unix isn't perfect either and again, its the human aspect that is the biggest risk. Anyone caught using an account with access to 'sensitive' or 'classified' without an adequate password should be warned, explained what a good password is and fired if they can't comply. It would seem that there is high compliance and regular audits anywhere 'classified' information can be accessed. Chapter 2 of the pdf only mentions 'unclassified' material, never mind all 'classified' material is created from 'unclassified' resources. Truly classified data should never be accessible from The Internet in any way, in the first place. Any information placed on, or close to The Internet should be considered 'public' on a worldwide basis.

    Generally speaking, China uses the simplest, known techniques, to penetrate servers. Any admin can tell you how many dictionary attacks come from China. It is impossible to determine which ones are just 'script kiddies' or students and which are serious organized efforts. There is a very small rate of success from this method. Today it seems that these (Unix) machines are simply used to spread the simple scripts on a wider scale. Simply moving off port 22 (even to port 23) will stop 99% of the problem. Statistical programs that temporarily deny access to a certain IP address can be very effective as most scans never return, even if the access is denied for as little as five minutes. To combat the hardcore attempts where the attack returns, simply increase the 'access denied' time and ultimately blacklist the IP address and the whole net if necessary. (It is very rare it ever goes that far.)

    In conclusion: Don't put classified information in the reach of The Internet. Never use any Microsoft product to view 'classified' or 'sensitive' information unless it can be assured there will never be any Internet connections of any sort. It is highly unlikely any government secrets leak out unless that was the intention, such as a "trial balloon". At this time, this is a non-problem that can be stopped. If absolutely nothing is done, it could escalate in much the way spam did. The official report appears to draw the same conclusion, however that is buried in a pile of irrelevant and off-topic material.

    BillSF

                           

  15. No, it is not propaganda. by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have seen this. I used to work in a start-up and saw 2 seperate incidents. In one case, I was hiring for coders. Found a gal who was interesting. She had married a GI and moved to Northern Colorado Springs. Since we could do the work over the line, not an issue. I interviewed her and she was not interested. That is, until I mentioned taht we were doing work for DOD and NSA. Then her attitude changed dramatically. She very much wanted the job. Ok, not a big deal.

    But a year later, we were looking for funding. Found a Tawain born guy from Loveland who use to own the chinese restaurant there. He wanted to invest. But he insisted on getting control of the hardware (which was the important part) if we defaulted. When would company be considered defaulted? When he said so. Told him no way. So, then he wanted to buy hardware and said that he would sell it in mainland china and we could all be worth 30 million or more. The hardware was only 1M. But he explained that mainland was willing to pay 30 for it and might go higher. I was actually shocked since I considered him Tawainese and would not do that. My opinion changed when at a slashdot posting, a tawain native said that the chinese who came there STILL consider themselves chinese, not tawainese. The original guy may not have been a spy. But, he was all too happy to sell tech to them. More interestingly, he indicated that he had been in touch WITH mainland china.

    No, this is absolutely not propaganda. This is VERY real. Chinese ppl are happy to see their country coming up. And I understand that. But chinese gov is STILL in a cold war with us. They are very much spying on the west and buying tech. whenever possible. And yes, it is the west, not just America. That includes countries like Japan, Australia, Canada, France, UK, Israel, etc and even Russia. In fact, I consider your statement far more propaganda, because you have NO IDEA of what you are talking about.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:No, it is not propaganda. by LingNoi · · Score: 2, Funny

      My opinion changed when at a slashdot posting, a tawain native said that the chinese who came there STILL consider themselves chinese, not tawainese.

      Are you kidding me? Your evidence is based on a slashdot post?! The biggest hive of Asperger syndrome whining twitter morons on the internet? That's your proof?!

  16. And even that is faked by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Informative

    The reason is that China controls the currency and pretty much fixes it against the dollar. When the euro rises against the dollar, then yuan rises a bit as well. BUT, China is the one with the monster holding of our dollars and increasing at exponential rate. The yuen should be rising against the dollar if it was traded freely. But it is not. BTW, same issue with India.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:And even that is faked by wisty · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Don't be to hard on them. China holding dollars gave the west cheap finance, which triggered an asset bubble, and encouraged overcapacity building in China (overcapacity and debt are the two main causes of depressions, depending on which economists you ask). Then they didn't pass on the wealth to their grunt workers, so Chinese demand won't be able to cushion the fall. Oh wait, that was pretty hard on them.

  17. zeros by cpankonien · · Score: 4, Informative

    the DoD network will continue to be vulnerable as long as they insist on using windows. lest you think i'm a peacenik or something, i was a boom operator in the USAF for 20 years. i retired in 1997, and joined the local LUG. Alot of the members were NCO sysadmins from the base, who related that "all the officers coming out of the zoo (USAF Academy) only knew windows, and policy did not allow for anything else". So, being good NCOs, they snuck linux in the back door and had it running all over the place, as proxy servers, firewalls, etc. their officers didn't know about it, but as long as nobody complained and it made them look good, they were happy. then when they found out, and had it removed. problems increased dramatically soon thereafter. fuckin' zeros...they don't listen! MSgt, USAF (Ret.)

  18. I wonder if it is personal? by victim · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The DoD takes everything personally, and for good reason, but I have a steady stream of chinese hackers attempting to break into the router in my tool shed that reports battery voltage and temperature at a cabin that is inaccessible for 6 months of the year.

    I really should put a webcam in there so they can see what they have achieved if they ever do manage to get in.

    (22.1F, batteries 25.3V, 600 watt hours of energy stored today.)

  19. poisoned Honey pots by dotmax · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And you guys claim to read Schneiier?? Consider this: if the Chinese are spying on our tech, we can stick it to them rather badly by lettng them find pointless dead end projects upon which to waste their treasure. everything is an opportunity... .max

  20. Democracies: imperfect but not like dictatorships by thaig · · Score: 2, Insightful

    IMHO Western countries are *not* comparable to dictatorships at all - not in the slightest. I am from Zimbabwe - that's all I claim as qualification.

    Whether or not they are heavily influenced by powerful individuals, there are a lot more powerful and rich people in democracies so there are many interests to be satisfied and compromises to be made to keep parties in power. i.e. nobody can have it all their own way.

    In dictatorships, anyone who appears even as if they *could* provide some challenge is mown down. This way the dictator *can* have everything the way they like it and in my country's case that turns out to be a very bad thing for everyone else.

    --
    This is all just my personal opinion.
  21. Huh? by TheLink · · Score: 2

    "Chinese ppl are happy to see their country coming up"

    And that Taiwanese guy was also "all too happy" to sell something that costs 1 million to the Chinese Government for 30 million.

    30 million dollars. Not 2 million, not 1.5 million.

    Oh yeah, it was because of patriotism or "The Love of China" that he gave them 50% off the original price of 60 million. That must be it eh?

    Given what I know of Chinese people, it's far more likely that the Taiwanese guy was just seeing it as a great business opportunity - a chance to make lots of money.

    You were the one with the "love for your country (or other thing)" which got in the way.

    The Chinese government was willing to pay for US secrets. And chinese people (and other free market loving people ;) ) are very happy to sell it to the Chinese government, for the right price.

    "I was actually shocked since I considered him Tawainese and would not do that"

    Why wouldn't he do that? He's Taiwanese not American. Selling US tech to China _might_ only negatively affect Taiwan in the future, and even if it did, he and his family would have millions in the bank - so they could move to Australia or Singapore or wherever.

    You appear to be joining the dots the wrong way.

    --
    1. Re:Huh? by TheLink · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not surprised he had millions in the bank. It's good business if you can keep selling 1 million dollar stuff for 30 million.

      So what's your point? That he'd stop trying to make lots more money because he already had millions in the bank?

      That's hilarious if you knew how a typical chinese businessman thinks.

      Most Chinese care about Family and Money (for some - Money first then Family ;) ), Country at most is a distant 3rd place. Yes they will get that patriotic spirit from time to time, but that's about it.

      Just go visit a chinese temple and see what they ask for. Count how many ask for good fortune and $$$, or healing/blessings for their family members, and count how many ask for "China to be blessed".

      Take a close look at the Chinese New Year festivities and see what it's all about. The names of the food. The reasons for doing stuff.

      Think those chinese in China putting melamine in everything and everywhere were doing it because they loved China? Or hated America? They were doing it to make themselves richer.

      I bet if the French government also offered the Taiwanese guy 20 million for the designs, he'd make copies and sell them to both the French and Chinese governments. Unless he was getting enough extra money for an exclusive deal and goodwill.

      --
  22. Counterfeit IC's in Cisco Routers by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It is not too hard to hack a network if you got
    counterfeit hardware inside the network giving
    you a backdoor in.

    http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/05/12/FBI-worried-as-DoD-sold-counterfeit-Cisco-gear_1.html

    So once they got in, they learned what they needed
    to know to stay in, and put other methods in place
    to stay in.

    They are going to have to rebuild their network one segment
    at a time from the ground up.

    They need several things with one of them being segment
    monitoring IDS system that can detect the outbound traffic.

    Something that can track all outbound traffic against
    a white-list of acceptable IPs, think a reverse peer guardian
    that tracks what IP's are reached and snds alarms if they
    are not on the list.

    In any event they will have a monumental task of clearing
    all the backdoors in the system, and should consider going
    totally to a secure hardware+software encrypted VPN that
    does not even travel over the public internet.

    There is enough dark fiber out there to do it for the classified
    material they transmit.

    Also if most of your military traffic goes over the old
    global crossing network, don't allow the public sale of
    that network to a foreign nation with an oppposing ideology.

    Namely China !

    http://www.hereinreality.com/likashing.html

    When you do stupid things, bad things happen.

    --
    google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"