Slashdot Mirror


New .tel TLD Now In Use

rockwood reports that the .tel top level domain has been deployed, "in a first attempt at pushing the recently approved .tel... The top-level domain .tel was approved by ICANN as a sponsored TLD launching on Wednesday, December 3, 2008 to trademark owners of national effect and on February 3, 2009 to anyone who wishes to apply. Its main purpose is as a single management and publishing point for 'internet communication' services, providing a global contacts directory service by housing all types of contact information directly in the DNS."

9 of 175 comments (clear)

  1. Huh? by TypoNAM · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is anybody else shrugging their shoulders and asking the same question of: What the hell is the point in wasting DNS space for such a half-assed crap idea?

    --
    This space is not for rent.
    1. Re:Huh? by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Take a look at what's already out there. Mostly over 500 Telnic employees grabbing henry.tel and david.tel. Yawn.

      Its main purpose is as a single management and publishing point for 'internet communication' services ...

      And right from the get-go it's main purpose is overshadowed by some every Telnic employee's desire to be THE Henry on the .tel TLD. That must be awfully helpful to us in our need for 'internet communication' services.

      More garbage for the tubes, I guess.

      What the hell is the point in wasting DNS space

      Are we really concerned about "DNS space?" I guess I'm a bit of an idiot when it comes to why we need to be concerned about 'space' on DNS names ... perhaps you mean IP address space? And if so, people are basically flushing those down the toilet by giving every device one (including their toilet).

      --
      My work here is dung.
    2. Re:Huh? by fm6 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Take a look at what's already out there. Mostly over 500 Telnic employees grabbing henry.tel and david.tel. Yawn.

      These all seem to follow a template. Obviously Telnic told all its people to create domains to help publicize the product. Teensy little mistake: the pages do nothing to obfuscate personal email addresses. Got spam?

  2. Half-assed indeed by DesScorp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can understand something like the .XXX tld, for the purpose of openly idenfitying what a site is (and ease in blocking porn sites in school LAN's and such), but otherwise, creating this raft of tld's is a really silly idea. We've just now gotten to the point where most users don't think everything ends in "dot com". The proposed system of hyper-classification won't be a boon to anyone but domain squatters and con artists. And for the non-technical public, it'll be just plain confusing.

    Even as quickly as it was thrown together, the concepts of the internet were relatively simple, commonsense, and workable, if not always elegant. We should keep it that way with a minimum of monkeying around. No more .aero's, or .biz's, or .tel's.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
  3. Re:I want royalties by pwnies · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Not many opportunities like that with this tld sadly, a quick search in a dictionary file only reveals a few words that end in tel.

    Bartel/M

    Bechtel/M

    betel/MS

    cartel/SM

    chattel/MS

    Christel/M

    Chrystel/M

    Estel/M

    Gretel/M

    hostel/SZGMRD

    hotel/MS

    Intel/M

    Itel/M

    Kristel/M

    lintel/SM

    mantel/SM

    Martel/M

    Mattel/M

    motel/MS

    muscatel/MS

    pastel/MS

    Patel/M

  4. Re:YAY! Just what we needed! by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As if we don't have enough TLD's already

    Can you get your last name.com or .anything? I snagged mcgrew.info when .info frst came ou, but let it lapse. I doubt seriously I could get it back.

    IMO we have no where near enough TLDs.

  5. Re:Uh, what? by Kent+Recal · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Aren't we beyond the point of "must own every tld in existence" by now?

    I lived through that in my old company. They literally wanted all TLDs, not only for the primary name but also for most spelling mistakes. And for country-specific spelling mistakes (french people might make different mistakes than english people).

    Consequently they had 1-2 fulltime employees doing nothing but domain registration and babysitting. Yes, domains do need babysitting when you're literally owning thousands of them from all countries of the world. Ever deciphered a russian expiry notice? Or tried to establish an office in some arabic country only so that you are allowed to buy a domain from them?

    Long story short: Most sane businesses should have realized by now that they really only need the standard set (.com/.net/.org), plus the country TLDs for the countries where they're actually doing business. Everything else is wasted money. If someone squats your name on some obscure foreign TLD then so what? Ignore them or sue them into oblivion (trademark!) if they try to pull off scams in your name.

  6. What a racket by Bertie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1. Come up with new TLD
    2. Watch corporations flock to register theirname.tel because they can't afford for squatters to get there first
    3. ??
    4. Profit!

    Repeat every time you feel the need for a new revenue stream.

    Nice work if you can get it.

  7. How is this different from .name? by Ilyakub · · Score: 3, Interesting

    .name has been active since 2001, for the very same purpose. It's not very popular.