Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Technical Specs Released For Aussie Net Filtering

Posted by timothy on from the for-a-limited-time-only dept.

smallkathryn writes "Technical specifications have just been released for the Australian net filtering trial. The trial, which aims to prove that ISP-level filtering is a viable way to stop 'unwanted content' from reaching users, will go live on 24 December. The trial will involve ISPs choosing a commercially available hardware filter from an internet content filter (ICF) vendor, adding it to their networks, then loading the blacklist of unwanted sites. Still no indication of how peer-to-peer information will be addressed."

7 of 231 comments (clear)

  1. Encryption by vvaduva · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is the time to invest in and bring to market an encryption product to the masses in Australia. What would stop a US company from selling cheap VPN tunnels to end users down under?

    1. Re:Encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What would stop a US company from selling cheap VPN tunnels to end users down under?

      Not a damn thing. Which is one of the primary reasons why this whole thing is such a stupid pointless waste of time and money.

  2. Unwanted? by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 5, Insightful

    then loading the blacklist of unwanted sites.

    Obviously someone wants these sites, else there would be no need to blacklist them.

    1. Re:Unwanted? by QuantumG · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually. The government's assumption is that reasonable Australians don't want to see hard core porn and other "offensive" material. You disagree? Oh, you're just being unreasonable.

      This is what decades of tolerating film and media classification has done to us.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
  3. technical ramifications of network filtering by liraz · · Score: 5, Informative

    Putting aside the question of whether filtering is desirable in the first place ("think of the children!"), or issues regarding the potential for future abuse (e.g., censorship of unpopular speech, and who determines what needs to be filtered in the first place) at the technical level any halfway-reliable filtering technology that peeks into the transport layer is going to add a huge amount of overhead that will increase costs and degrade performance. Good for the equipment companies, but bad for everyone who would prefer their Internet connection as dumb and fast as possible.

    OTOH, OpenDNS provides a free, opt-in filtering service available to anyone who wants it. It's very easy to deploy, why not just use that?

    --
    TurnKey Linux: if it can be easy, it should be easy
  4. Re:Dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    They're already adding otherwise legal sites to the blacklist. From the second link:

    One of the more recent concerns over the blacklist is its extension from 1,300 sites to 11,300 sites containing "objectionable material", the content of which has not been made clear. The only details that have been divulged about them is that pro-euthanasia and pro-anorexia sites will be included on the blacklist.

  5. Re:Voluntary by batdragon · · Score: 5, Informative

    Only the *testing* is voluntary.

    When (if, hopefully) the real thing goes live, "Filtering will be mandatory in all homes and schools across the country".

    See: http://nocleanfeed.com