Slashdot Mirror


21 Million German Bank Accounts For Sale

anerva writes "Black market criminals are offering to sell details on 21 million German bank accounts for €12M ($15.3M), according to an investigative report (German; Google translation) published Saturday. In November reporters for WirtschaftsWoche (Economic Week) had a face-to-face meeting with criminals in a Hamburg hotel, according to the magazine. Posing as buyers working for a gambling business, the journalists were able to strike a price of €0.55 per record, or €12M for all the data. They were given a CD containing the 1.2 million accounts when they asked for assurances that the information they would be buying was legitimate." 21 million is three in four existing German bank accounts.

79 of 302 comments (clear)

  1. How to pay... by LingNoi · · Score: 5, Funny

    Couldn't you just buy one to begin with and then use that German bank account to buy the rest?

    1. Re:How to pay... by Ihmhi · · Score: 5, Funny

      And then we can beat the crap out of the office printer and dance to rap music!

  2. Hmmm... by RobertM1968 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You'd think they'd have gotten the police involved instead of trying to scoop a story...

    Nah, guess not.

    1. Re:Hmmm... by LingNoi · · Score: 4, Funny

      The police are too busy raiding game developer buildings with shotguns and listening in on Skype calls.

    2. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's not their job or function in society.

    3. Re:Hmmm... by jdrugo · · Score: 4, Informative

      You'd think they'd have gotten the police involved instead of trying to scoop a story...

      From the article:

      Wie so viele Kontonummern illegal in Umlauf gelangen konnten, muss in den nächsten Wochen die Staatsanwaltschaft Düsseldorf klären. Die WirtschaftsWoche übergab den Ermittlern am vergangenen Donnerstag die CD mit den 1,2 Millionen Datensätzen und Kontonummern.

      which roughly means:

      How that many account number reached circulation illegally is to be clarified over the next weeks by the prosecuting authorities of Düsseldorf. Reporters of the WirtschaftsWoche handed the CD with the 1.2 million data sets and account numbers to the investigators last Thursday.

      So, they firstly contacted the responsible branch of jurisdiction and after that published the article.

    4. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, they're referring to this raid on Crytek with the riot police:

      http://www.quartertothree.com/game-talk/showthread.php?t=31767

    5. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      ...um, they did? I didn't RTFA since I'm German anyway and have heard more about this case than I care to know already, but they DID go to the police. Getting a good scoop for your magazine or paper and going to the police aren't mutually exclusive, you know.

    6. Re:Hmmm... by swillden · · Score: 4, Informative

      Uhm... no? No such thing as Good Samaritan laws here.

      Good Samaritan laws have nothing to do with reporting crime, they're laws that shield those who try to help injured people from civil liability for anything that goes wrong. They're a response to the problem of people refusing to help because they're afraid they'll get sued.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  3. On your marks (no pun intended) by pin0chet · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In theory, if the banking system were known to be compromised in such a huge way, and there were no way of knowing if your own bank account was compromised or not, shouldn't there be a massive bank run? Because everyone wants to withdraw their money right away to minimize the chance that this ridiculous security leak negatively affects them, right? Such a massive erosion of confidence can completely destroy a banking system.

    1. Re:On your marks (no pun intended) by OrangeTide · · Score: 4, Informative

      bank account and routing numbers never was considered secure. the only thing protecting your bank account (weakly) from fraud is a paper trail.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    2. Re:On your marks (no pun intended) by John+Hasler · · Score: 5, Funny

      > In theory, if the banking system were known to be compromised in such a huge way, and
      > there were no way of knowing if your own bank account was compromised or not, shouldn't
      > there be a massive bank run?

      This is Germany. There will be no bank run until it is properly planned, organized, and regulated.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    3. Re:On your marks (no pun intended) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      None of that is truly secret information in the first place. Every business prints its address, bank account number and bank routing number on each of its invoices. When you buy something on eBay, the seller will usually give you his name, address and bank account number and bank routing number: It's the information you need to send him the money.

      There is a way of transferring money which is called "Lastschrift" or "Bankeinzug". Basically the recipient tells his bank that the sender has agreed to let the recipient debit a due amount directly from the senders bank account. The bank makes the transaction solely based on that promise. The bank does not require any form of proof that the sender has actually agreed to that transaction. In practice the recipient doesn't even have to get the name right. The transaction will go through even if the named sender doesn't match the bank account number. This seems like a major security problem, doesn't it?

      It isn't a big problem because the sender can always reverse the charge. If the charge is reversed in a reasonable time frame (1-2 months), no questions will be asked. Reversing the charge is always free for the "sender", the sender's bank is paid by the recipient's bank for the reversal, which in turn will charge the recipient of the Lastschrift a (hefty) fee. Because of that, the recipient's bank treats amounts gained by "Lastschrift" like credit. You can't just debit someone else's bank account and make off with the money. That's exactly like getting a credit line over the same amount and making off with that.

      Let's assume that you count on the carelessness of the people who don't regularly check their bank account transactions. Because the bank will not give you the money right away, unless you have a history of using the Lastschrift-system without problem with them, all it takes to stop the money from reaching you is a few people who do check their account transactions and report the fraudulent transactions to the police, which will then put a hold on the money and investigate you.

    4. Re:On your marks (no pun intended) by hweimer · · Score: 2, Informative

      In theory, if the banking system were known to be compromised in such a huge way, and there were no way of knowing if your own bank account was compromised or not, shouldn't there be a massive bank run?

      In practice, this isn't much of a problem. Actually, there are two ways to earn money with this. You can commit old-school pen and paper wire transfer fraud, i.e., you fill out forms directing the bank to transfer funds from one account to another. However, there are two problems with that. First, you need to have a valid signature on the form and banks are required to check that (whether they actually do it is the banks' problem). Second, this scales not too well and if you dump 21M forms the bank will surely notice.

      The second approach is to setup a fraudulent business and take part in the direct debit program. However, not everyone can participate in this and banks do some background checks. And even if there is a fradulent transfer from your account you can get your money back by a single call to your bank.

      So in a nutshell, these methods can only be used to defraud negligent banks, not the customer. Oh, and all this typically doesn't work with saving accounts that hold the real money. That's why there is no reason to withdraw your money.

      --
      OS Reviews: Free and Open Source Software
  4. Gotta love the germans by sleeponthemic · · Score: 5, Funny

    Even their criminality is impressively efficient :-)

    --
    I record my sleeptalking
  5. Re:So what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yah, ho hum. I mean, I bought my first 21 million German bank accounts YEARS AGO. Nothing to see here folks.

  6. Tomorrow's News by Bentov · · Score: 5, Funny

    This morning the entire banking system in Germany collapsed due to 3 in 4 Germans transferring money out of the country to banks in neighboring countries....

  7. ohshiza? by Stormie · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think the taggers in this story need to learn how to spell "Scheiße"

  8. 1.2 million out of 21 million by txoof · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It is possible that not all of the 21 million work, or are valid. If I were in the criminal's position, I would offer a CD where about 70% were valid. And then when the payment was made, provide a data set that had only a few working accounts and a bunch of garbage.

    In any case, it's pretty scary to think that there might that much personal data out there.

    --
    This one's tricky. You have to use imaginary numbers, like eleventeen... --Hobbes
  9. Re:So what by henni16 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who wants a mass list anyway, you can't target spam at people just because they're German and they have a bank account, and stealing that many identities begs the question, "why?"

    Yeah, who could have use for the equivalent of 21 million valid direct debit cards.

  10. May I introduce you to rule 36? by zappepcs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Rule 36 states:

    There will always be even more fucked up shit than what you just saw

    Now, I've been saying this all along, but nay sayers think the sky will never fall, and that the government is not out to get them. I've got bad news for you: It will, and they are, and if those two problems are not enough there will always be people willing to steal your stuff. period. no exceptions.

    The fact that they have not stolen yours yet is merely an oversight on "their" part. It will happen at some point. Security is myth. Do not trust those that want to protect you. The government will never shield you, only pretend to do so. This is a harbinger of dangers to come, and reason to demand with some vigor that your financial institution be held accountable by law for the protection of your information. Yes, I mean that. If they want to do business with my money, I want guarantees. You should too.

    1. Re:May I introduce you to rule 36? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      OK, so you're saying that government isn't going to protect us, so the answer is to demand that financial institutions be held accountable to laws passed by a government that you said won't protect us?

    2. Re:May I introduce you to rule 36? by Cl1mh4224rd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The government will never shield you, only pretend to do so. This is a harbinger of dangers to come, and reason to demand with some vigor that your financial institution be held accountable by law for the protection of your information.

      Bolding mine, to highlight a serious disconnect in the parent's preaching.

      You're suggesting that people demand that banks be held accountable to laws enforced by the very government you said won't protect them?

      --
      People will pass up steak once a week, for crap every day.
  11. Who wants to bet... by emptycorp · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...they analyzed the bank accounts and the combined total in them is less than $1 million?

    1. Re:Who wants to bet... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean there's less than 500 Euros in those 21 million accounts?

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  12. Exactly by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But an account number is not the equivalent of a direct debit card. It's not that easy to withdraw money from an account when all you have is the account number.

    Every time you write a check, you're giving the recipient your bank address, bank account number ... AND a specimen of your signature. OMG! Quick - millions of people compromised their bank accounts today!

    1. Re:Exactly by trjonescp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In 2008, checks are the sort of thing that would be used regularly only in an ass-backward country like the United States.

      --
      Only speak when it improves the silence.
    2. Re:Exactly by Jesus_666 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I know nobody who uses checks anymore. That's what wire transfers are for. In theory you can order checks from your bank but, well... I haven't seen a real checkbook in at least a decade.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    3. Re:Exactly by enrevanche · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A wire transfer typically costs $25 outgoing and $12 incoming and you need to know the receiver's bank account # & routing number. I seriously doubt that it is used that much by most people.

      You probably mean direct deposit/automated withdrawal. Sometimes, these can be a real pain to cancel once authorized. For a "reputable" vendor, I suppose it is OK, but using a VISA/MC debit card is a lot easier to fix.

    4. Re:Exactly by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, he means exactly that. Wire transfers cost nothing in Europe (at least not in my country) and international wire transfers only require you to use an IBAN account number (which are already standard in some countries) and the SWIFT/BIC code. All this information is typically provided on every bill you get.

      National transfers, you only need the account number that you with to wire money to. In most countries, the "bank code" is part of the account number. It most certainly is encoded in the IBAN. (Can you tell, that I implemented the IBAN code for a major bank?) IBAN is a wonderful system: a bit reading material

    5. Re:Exactly by dropadrop · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Wire transfer does not cost anything in Europe. I have a close friend from the US living here, and can't stop wondering at how the way your banks work are so 1980...

    6. Re:Exactly by svunt · · Score: 4, Funny

      I manage a team of payment processing staff who do work for superannuation companies, local councils, payroll companies, etc, and we process around 17,000 cheques every evening, which is roughly three metric fucktons. We're one of nine offices in the country, one of many such companies, and I'm in Australia, which has a population of about eighty people, I think. There are lots of cheques, they're just not part of most slashdotters' lives.

    7. Re:Exactly by RMH101 · · Score: 5, Informative
      Conjecture: you have information on 21M bank accounts. Presumably this includes account number, sort code and possibly other more sensitive information such as date of birth.
      You then arrange the stealing/pickpocketing of cards. More likely, you request freshly stolen cards from a specialist. Some of those cards are going to marry up with the information you already hold, and may be enough to leverage funds.
      Don't believe criminals are this organised? An example from personal experience. Turns out a machine at my other half's work was compromomised with a keystroke/screenshot recorder infection. First we haerd of it was when all our accounts were cleared out - someone had been organised enough to patiently continue recording "please enter X and Y character of your password" long enough to piece together the full password. They'd then used this on a saturday before a bank holiday to transfer all of our funds into another account at the same bank - this clears instantly and has less restrictions. They had then coordinated with someone in the UK who could provide them with a stolen debit card issued by the same bank, transferred our money into that account, and got a stooge to go into the bank just before it shut on saturday and take all that money out in cash - within hours of initial transfer.

      End result? We were cleaned out, some innocent who had their card nicked had their bank account abused, and the criminals got our money in cash, untraceably. 6-8 weeks later, we were refunded but it was a long and unpleasant experience that taught me several things:
      1) Don't assume your bank has a coherent identity theft/fraud department. Expect to get bounced around outsourced call centers that don't communicate with each other or the police. Don't expect them to be interested in IP logs or anything else you think might help them catch the hackers, either
      2) "Organised crime" isn't just a phrase. They're quite advanced now, even outsourcing the donkeywork on the ground to other organisations
      3) Two-factor authentication is a Good Thing with online banking
      4) Don't do online banking on someone elses' computer

    8. Re:Exactly by kagebe · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, most wire transfers in Germany don't cost anything, especially low volume ones. Some banks charge a very small fee (may depend on whether you do it online/offline). It's an often used payment for online shops/mail orders or to pay bills - maybe even more often than automated withdrawal.

    9. Re:Exactly by Chatterton · · Score: 3, Informative

      It take 1 or 3 days because they make interests on your money during this time.

    10. Re:Exactly by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 3, Informative

      Like, from Switzerland to Germany.

      Ah! The example that confirms the rule ;-) Intra-EU, it's free... The other poster is right about the reason why it takes three days, by the way....

    11. Re:Exactly by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 3, Informative

      A wire transfer typically costs $25 outgoing and $12 incoming

      Even Fortis isn't that expensive... Try more something more like â3. And you have the appropriate plan ("Global Club"), you get a number of free wire transfers per quarter.

      and you need to know the receiver's bank account # & routing number.

      Which surprise most people do. Bank routing numbers (BIC) are published by the banks themselves, and account numbers of people wanting to receive such transfers (shops, charities, admistrations ...) are public too. And if it's family or friends, they can give you their account number easily. Oh, and usually the account number is only enough if you want to put money on an account. If you want to remove money from an account, you'll need something more, such as a password, a signature plus id, etc.

      I seriously doubt that it is used that much by most people.

      Well, here in Europe, it is used very commonly, for all kinds of things.

    12. Re:Exactly by the_other_chewey · · Score: 2, Informative

      A wire transfer typically costs $25 outgoing and $12 incoming and you need to know the receiver's bank account # & routing number. I seriously doubt that it is used that much by most people.

      In Germany, in the majority of cases wire transfers are free. This is even so for most of the transfers within the EU.
      You will have a hard time to find anyone in Germany who even knows how to fill out a check, let alone have one available.
      Most retailers probably won't even know what to do with it any more.

    13. Re:Exactly by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 2, Informative

      Trust me, nobody even uses them here.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    14. Re:Exactly by Bugsville · · Score: 3, Insightful

      just the old lady in front of me at the grocery store.

    15. Re:Exactly by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Checks have to be hand processed. Mailed in checks haveto have a Person paid to open it and key it in and then hand carried to a bank.

      Yet when I pay electronically on the internet where NO costs in labor are had, I am CHARGED a convience fee for doing so.

      Only because of Fradulent tactics by businesses and banks are paper checks still in heavy use. If these companies were not blatently trying to rip me off, I'd pay via online all the time. Instead I send them a paper check that costs them more money to process.

      Paying my Gas bill is more expensive online with a bank card payment than me sending them a check or even the bill WITH my bankcard info on it for them to process. I refuse to pay $10.00US convience fee to make their life easier and cheaper.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    16. Re:Exactly by b0bby · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Checks are such a pain that our bank gave us a check scanner (optical recognition for the amounts, magnetic for account / routing numbers) so we do the processing ourselves. We scan them in through a web connection, then file them away for a month or so before shredding. The bank never touches them, and we never have to go into the branch anymore.

    17. Re:Exactly by Cytotoxic · · Score: 3, Informative

      Three day transfers are not called wires in the US. They are called ACH transfers. They are free - treated the same as checks, using the same clearing house that checks route through. Wires are instantaneous bank-to-bank transfers - you send the money at 9:47 am and it arrives at 9:47 am, usually costing a ridiculous amount of money, $5-$75 depending on your banking relationships.

    18. Re:Exactly by dave562 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I used to think that too until I was educated on the subject. Most of the checks are all processed mechanically these days. They have machines that cut the envelopes open and sort the checks and statements. The checks are then scanned and processed electronically. My reason for sending checks in is that I wanted to keep as many people employed as possible. Now granted, opening envelopes and keying in numbers may not be the best job in the world. However at least it was a job. It kind of burst my bubble when I figured out that machines do 99.9% of the check processing these days.

  13. How to use??? by It+doesn't+come+easy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    21 million is a lot of accounts. No one person or group has time to abuse all 21 million accounts in a timely fashion. More likely, one would need to rely on the lackadaisical attitude most people have when it comes to security coupled with a low volume approach to the number of transactions to an external account in order to profit from purchasing all 21 million accounts.

    The purchaser would also have to consider just how many accounts would be accessible and for how long. It might not be practical to expect to make significantly more than 12 million euros even with 21 million accounts, since most accounts would probably have low balances or have their passwords, etc., changed rather quickly if the account had a high balance.

    So to use this many accounts, one would need to set up a number of new accounts in other banks (a few at a time and more than one so that the number of transactions to a given account would not be too high), then siphon a little bit of money off a few stolen accounts to some of the new accounts, withdraw the money, then close the new accounts almost immediately. The amount withdrawn would need to be random and small enough to escape detection for at least a few days. Anything faster would surely raise suspicion and cause automatic transaction blocking (at least, if the banks have some kind of working fraud prevention), especially since the announcement of the stolen data up for sale. I can also imagine adding a fraud check for a slurry of never-seen-before transactions to new accounts. Wire transfers would be quickest, yet they would also stand out more (since a bunch of new wire transfers from accounts which had never made a wire transfer before would be unusual -- the likely case for most accounts).

    The 12 million price tag seems like a number arrived at by the thieves after taking into account the difficulties to be faced in exploiting the 21 million accounts while they are still exploitable. It seems likely that any purchaser would in turn sell them again in smaller blocks (a lot safer that way, relatively speaking).

    Wonder if we'll ever find out what eventually happens?

    --
    The NSA: The only part of the US government that actually listens.
  14. mmm... that means that ... by Jerry · · Score: 4, Funny

    the Linux desktop market share in Germany is only 25%.

    --

    Running with Linux for over 20 years!

  15. Re:So what by joocemann · · Score: 4, Funny

    lmao.

    buying bank accounts in bulk is soo..... 2007...

  16. Re:So what by henni16 · · Score: 4, Informative

    You have to keep in mind the differences between countries.
    In Germany, the most popular way to order stuff online is to give your bank account number to the merchant who will then charge your account.
    It works just like a credit card number and stores rarely check if the number (account) really belongs to the person that's making the order.

    The only time I have encountered such a check was with Paypal:
    they do two small test transactions (just Cents) and you have to ..I actually don't remember right now..either enter the correct amounts into a form on Paypal's site or to send the cents back to prove that you really have access to that account.

  17. Re:21 million accounts on the wall by actionbastard · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's 20 (twenty) million and nine hundred ninety nine thousand and ninety nine accounts, douchebag.

    --
    Sig this!
  18. Re:Tomorrow's News by John+Hasler · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...Such as Iceland?

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  19. Re:So what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nice combo-post there. You start with a subtle misunderstanding of the topic, move to a non-sequitur, then finish with a classic "begs the question" dismount.

  20. I did it last week by ZiggyM · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I live in Lima Peru. Last week a teller at my bank made me wait 10 minutes while she waited for the safe to open to give me some cash. In the meantime I went to a computer terminal without a keyboard, and access to only a webpage with the bank rates (windows, no start menu, no access to desktop etc). The machine was supposedly locked so that you couldnt navigate away or do anything except scroll the page and click a few links. Well, they forgot do disable right-click. 7 steps later I was able to access their internal network, and had access to a lot of internal information on individual machines. I went to the branch manager and showed him. He was surprised and embarassed, and took note of the steps I took. It was amazing how easy was to do it. The 7 steps were clever, but not impossible.

    1. Re:I did it last week by karmatic · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you lived in the US, you would be sitting in a jail cell right now facing felony charges FYI. Never help anyone with their computer in the US. It's not worth it.

      Eh, that's not always true.

      I was stuck in a Wells Fargo branch for a bit 3-4 years ago, and their kiosks would only go to wellsfargo.com. Being the enterprising person that I am, I immediately typed the HTML for a hyperlink into the search box, it worked just fine.

      When I got home, I whipped up a quick Proof of Concept that abused JavaScript to do some nasty things (Cross Site Scripting attack). I contacted Wells Fargo, gave them the details (as well as how to fix it) - it was fixed in a couple days, and they called and said "thanks".

      I was careful to keep it proof of concept - tested only against my own account. I also phrased it carefully - "An unscrupulous attacker could...", rather than "I could...". Furthermore, I pointed out that as a Wells Fargo customer, it is in my best interest that the environment be as secure as possible - it's my money too. When you look like a threat, they treat you like one. When you look like a concerned customer protecting your (and their) interests, there is little incentive to silence or harass you.

  21. Re:So what by trampel · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can reverse the charge within a 6-8 week timeframe with no questions asked, which then puts the burden on the merchant to prove that the charge was legit.

  22. Hmm... by sootman · · Score: 5, Funny

    21 million is three in four existing German bank accounts.

    I have for sale EVERY VISA NUMBER EVER ISSUED! From 4000 0000 0000 0000 to 4999 9999 9999 9999! (Note: some numbers may not be valid.)

    I will sell them for US $1,000,000 MILLIONS US DOLLARS. Contact me via this website.

    Act now and I'll throw in every Master Card ever issued. (5000 0000 0000 0000 to 5999 9999 9999 9999) (Same disclaimer as above.) And no identity thief would be complete without a REAL SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER to go with it, eh? Guess what? That's right--I'VE GOT THEM ALL TOO! (001-01-0001 to 999-99-9999)

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  23. Re:21 million is 3/4 of accounts? by quarrel · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I had the same reaction re the number of accounts. It is small.

    However, Germany isn't all that small.

    So some back of the envelope calcs:

    They claim 21/.75 = 28M bank accounts in Germany

    It's got roughly 80M people. Assume something like 2.2 people per househould (dunno what it is in Germany), and you get 36M. You gotta figure each household has at least one. I don't know how things really work in Germany, but I assume they're like the rest of the developed world and you essentially can't function without a bank account.

    Then there are businesses. Even very small businesses will run several accounts.

    I think the 28M bank accounts is just bullshit. It's gotta be heaps higher.

    Surely 100M wouldn't be that big a figure even?

    --Q

  24. Re:This is scary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Need an automatic screenshot taker? Try here. [16software.com]

    Is your PrntScrn key broken?

  25. Re:So what by EvilIdler · · Score: 4, Informative

    Wow, that's so behind. In Norway, there's no way to charge an account without full ID. This means either approving a direct debit by showing up at the bank with your picture ID, or logging on through the (relatively) secure website.

    Just allowing anyone to put a charge on a bank account number like that opens up for all sorts of abuse. Tiny transactions can go unnoticed for a long time.

    Of course, debit cards in stores aren't really any safer. Nobody has ever checked the signature on one while I've used them. A signature is required when the system for some reason can't contact the bank and verify the PIN. I've used other people's cards just fine (with permission, of course, but the banks might find me signing my name a bit funky ;).

    Anything but cash is broken, obviously :(

  26. Re:So what by scubamage · · Score: 4, Funny

    Plus, in Norway there were Vikings. And Vikings rank only slightly behind Pirates and Ninjas on the Cool-O-Meter (tm, patent pending).

  27. 6 weeks reversal by krischik · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As trampel pointed out: you have a 6 weeks reveal time frame. What trampel missed is: A real fraudster will have moved the money onwards by then. Which puts the loss to the bank.

    Of course: As with riding without a ticket in the end we the honest customers will pay through higher bank/ticket changes.

    1. Re:6 weeks reversal by xaxa · · Score: 2, Informative

      If they can't, because it's some other bank or because the business would be able to fight it, they ponder what's more hassle: Duking it out with you or with them.

      Now guess who's less likely to be able to mount a lengthy legal battle, you or the other bank.

      I'm British, but Germany is similar.

      We have consumer protection laws that prevent that kind of thing. And also a legal system that isn't quite so in favour of big businesses.

  28. It's not just numbers, ya know! by cpghost · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have for sale EVERY VISA NUMBER EVER ISSUED! From 4000 0000 0000 0000 to 4999 9999 9999 9999! (Note: some numbers may not be valid.)

    Well, do you also have the personal data belonging to those VISA numbers? Like, say, owner, expiration date, etc? Because that's what this 21M bank account list is all about: it contains not just account numbers, but also all associated identifying data (names, addresses, dates of birth, in some cases even a balance).

    Armed with that, criminals can easily charge those accounts and EVERYONE in Germany MUST now check their accounts at least every 6 weeks and issue reverse-charges if they discovered fraudulent activity. And that's not always obvious, because criminals can charge small amounts and label them rather innocuously, so they could go undetected (or rather: unnoticed) for longer than mere 6 weeks.

    --
    cpghost at Cordula's Web.
    1. Re:It's not just numbers, ya know! by the_other_chewey · · Score: 3, Informative

      Armed with that, criminals can easily charge those accounts and EVERYONE in Germany MUST now check their accounts at least every 6 weeks and issue reverse-charges if they discovered fraudulent activity.

      No. Charges without an "Einzugsermächtigung" (a permission by the account holder to the charging entity to do such charges)
      can be reversed indefinitely. Some banks like to hide this fact from their customers, but every single case that went
      to court was won by the customer, and most of the time it is enough to insist on that fact.

  29. Re:21 million is 3/4 of accounts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The article says 3 in 4 households, not accounts. Take the exaggeration factor of a newspaper into account and it works out.

  30. Re:So what by pisto_grih · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you talk to the Russians...

    So you could say, "In Soviet Russia, 21 million German bank accounts buy You!"

  31. Re:Steve Jackson Games raid? by KDR_11k · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think he was talking about CryTek, that emo company that starts to whine and threatens to cut itself every time someone talks about violent videogames.

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  32. Re:So what by ben0207 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I live in Germany. It really is like that here. Some shops (Beate Uhse is one I can name off the top of my head) even give you 14 days to transfer the money.

    I just bought a new MacBook from Apple.de using Bank Transfer. Took a day or two longer, but I'm typing it on it now :)

    --
    cmd-q.co.uk - some sort of stupid fucking internet bullshit
  33. Re:So what by MPolo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yep. That is essentially the system. It is your responsibility to check each month that the charges that were made were in fact authorized. As I understand, they are very good about chargebacks (suprisingly), though I have never had to actually do this. I have used this method of payment primarily with Amazon and with airlines, but it's very often an option. Germans don't particularly like credit cards (partly because German banks don't really "get" them -- most "credit" cards actually automatically suck the full amount of the bill out of your account on the due date... which means you're not worried about exhorbitant interest rates, but you're only barely buying on credit. It's actually more of a delayed debit card.)

  34. Re:Online purchases usually require TAN codes by bickerdyke · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Thats only used for money transfers initiated by the costumer. And as there is proof that it was indeed the account owner transfering the funds (he used his secret TAN&PIN) those transfers are really hard to reverse.

    It's the other way round with those Lastschriften (direct debit) easy to initiate by anyone, easy to reverse by the account holder.

    --
    bickerdyke
  35. Re:So what by skolima · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Strange, in Poland Paypal withdraws money from your credit card to verify that you are indeed the holder...

  36. Re:So what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    No, it's very common in Germany since credit cards are actually pretty uncommon (people can pay with debit cards in stores and you can get cash in forgein countires with German debit cards at Maestro-enabled ATMs).
    And debit cards don't have a particular key-card number so these don't work for such transactions.

    Furthermore, the payment from the account is actually pretty risk-free. You have several weeks to issue a "charge-back" with no conditions or costs attachted. The transaction fees for these charge-backs usually go with the store which issued the transaction in first place. So as long as you check your account regularily you are pretty much safe.

  37. Re:21 million is 3/4 of accounts? by Xelios · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Because as TFA says it's "3 out of 4 households" that might be affected, not 3 out of 4 accounts.

    --
    Murphey's fighting Occam, and we're in the stands.
  38. Re:So what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Pfft. We recently moved to Norway. The envelope of letter that my gf can now fetch the card from the bank was not closed. Additionally, she did no have to show her ID/passport when fetching the card.
    I suppose Germans are way more sensitive and bureaucratic ;)

  39. Re:So what by the_other_chewey · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Wow, that's so behind. In Norway, there's no way to charge an account without full ID.

    Yes there is. I've been quite scared to learn that it is possible to charge my account using my Maestro card
    without its PIN code in Norway. I've been asked "Do you have a PIN code for that card?" regularly when
    paying with it all over Norway - apparently, it is quite common for norwegians to have cards without them. In
    such a case, the store clerk is supposed to check the ID. Guess how good or how reliably this works, especially
    with foreign IDs...

  40. Re:So what by the_other_chewey · · Score: 3, Informative

    ??? WTF? A bank allows ANYONE to debit from your account WITHOUT any authorisation?

    No. At least not in theory. The person/corporation/entity charging yout account has to get your permission
    to do that first (called "Einzugsermächtigung"). Then, everyone wanting to do such charging has to get it approved
    with their bank, which is not completely automatic - non-commercial entities need a very good reason to be
    allowed to do that.

    However, the existence of such an "Einzugsermächtigung" is not checked by the banks, so if you claim to have one, the default is
    to believe you. But this also means that if such a charge happens without one, it can be reversed indefinitely. Banks like to
    tell teir custemers that there is a six week limit on this, but this is only valid for charge reversals on charges that were done by
    someone actually having the account holder's permission.

    The whole system works surprisingly well.

  41. Re:So what by jabithew · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Hi, me and my friends want to buy this aircraft carrier. Can we split the check evenly over 21 million debit cards?"

    --
    All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
  42. Re:So what by Random+Walk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't think it's that Germans don't "get" them.. it's more that they were invented to circumvent the 17th century backwardness of the US banking system. There wasn't ever any need for them in Germany, and the high charges (for the merchants) are not suited to make them popular if better solutions exist.

    Note that you can overdraw your account anyway, so there is no need for the "credit" functionality either.. and since the account is balanced by the next payment from your employer, you are on average less due than with a separate "credit" account of your card.

  43. Re:So what by yoma666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's true in 2008 you can actually buy banks themselves in bulk. Gotta love the credit crunch.

  44. Re:Groan - you didn't recognise the joke by Thaelon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Biometrics are foolish.

    Today, if someone gets your credit card information, they can make charges in your name. To resolve this, you inform your credit card company that someone is fraudulently using you card. Typically they'll just nix the charges and issue you a new card with a new number.

    Throw in biometrics:
    Someone gets your biometric information, they can make charges in your name. To resolve this, you inform your biometric-enhanced credit card company company that someone is fraudulently using you biometric information. They just nix the charges and issue you new...fingerprints?

    So biometrics do go a long way toward fraud prevention. However, if it actually does occur, you're utterly and permanently fucked.

    --

    Question everything