Slashdot Mirror


USPS Server Meltdown

m2pc writes "The US Postal Service is experiencing major server issues for its shipping API web services. After spending about an hour debugging my own eCommerce software for a client, I found the problem was with the USPS shipping servers being unavailable. Further research showed that message boards for OS Commerce and other e-Commerce packages are filling with posts from angry users who are experiencing crashing Web store applications and frustrated customers. Developers are scrambling to find interim solutions, from hard-coding fixed price shipping, to 'rolling their own' shipping calculation APIs based on the USPS Fixed Rate Zone Tables, to disabling the USPS option altogether. One user reported yesterday that a call to USPS yielded the response 'we expect it to be down all day.' As of 9:20 AM PST the service is still unavailable."

58 of 238 comments (clear)

  1. Bailout? by erik76 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sounds like the USPS is just angling to get some of that federal bailout money! Oh wait...

    1. Re:Bailout? by imamac · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, I work for the USPS. And I always wondered what the big red button that says "DO NOT PUSH" actually did. Oops.

  2. That's what you get.... by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And that's what you get for writing e-commerce packages that rely on 3rd party sites for basic functionality...

    Don't say I didn't tell you so...

    1. Re:That's what you get.... by qoncept · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While in principle I agree with that, what are they supposed to do? They are quoting you a price for a service they don't provide themselves.

      --
      Whale
    2. Re:That's what you get.... by tekiegreg · · Score: 3, Informative

      Really, you'd think someone in the apparently non-existent risk management departments would ask "what if the USPS Servers went down?" Hopefully the answer wasn't simply "we're screwed."

      In any third party connection for an application I've built, I typically consider the implications of such web service/outside API going down, even if I label it "non vital, don't worry about it" to "have a backup plan". Oh well, no sympathies here

      --
      ...in bed
    3. Re:That's what you get.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And that's what you get for writing e-commerce packages that rely on 3rd party sites for basic functionality...

      Like a credit card processor? How many web stores have more than one?

    4. Re:That's what you get.... by smallshot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If it's important enough they should have a backup. I know it's not always within budget, but their website doesn't have to crash because the USPS service is unavailable, it could simply fall back to an acceptable solution, such as a fixed price, an estimation table, or an error message that says the USPS shipping estimator is down and shipping will be calculated at the time of shipment, or they can try again later. Yeah, they'll lose some business, but they can lose less business with a decent backup.

    5. Re:That's what you get.... by KevMar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      try {

      }
      catch (exception ex){

      }

      --
      Im a gamer, not a grammer major. This post is full of spelling and grammer mistakes.
    6. Re:That's what you get.... by lysergic.acid · · Score: 5, Funny

      that's why i design all my e-commerce sites to accept cash only. (always makes sure the bills are facing up before you feed them into the floppy drive!)

    7. Re:That's what you get.... by southlander · · Score: 3, Informative

      Part of the issue is the USPS servers are not failing consistently. Sometimes they allow a connection and respond so slowly to requests that the ecommerce app. times out. Sometimes they allow no connections and return nothing. Sometimes they are simply returning shipping rates of 0.00. So any live "backup" would have to allow for all that, at least.

    8. Re:That's what you get.... by JoelKatz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "While in principle I agree with that, what are they supposed to do? They are quoting you a price for a service they don't provide themselves."

      Fail gracefully. For example, state that they are unable to price that shipping option at that time. Offer you to accept the option without knowing the price, select another type of shipping, or get an email when they know.

      Designing software to gracefully handle external failures is a vital real-world programming skill.

    9. Re:That's what you get.... by EvilIdler · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wouldn't it be easier to have a background task update the USPS prices, and just use the last working snapshot?

  3. Proof that computers corrupt all!!!! by banbeans · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Neither snow nor rain nor heat nor gloom of night stays these couriers from the swift completion of their appointed rounds"

    But the computers will!!!

  4. What can Brown do for you? by HeavyD14 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Provide a web service, apparently.

    1. Re:What can Brown do for you? by HeavyD14 · · Score: 4, Informative

      No kidding. UPS *is* up and running, while USPS *is not*. Therfore, Brown can provide a web service.

  5. Crashing Web store applications? by truthsearch · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Only a really terrible developer would hit a web services API and not code for it to fail. No one should expect a third party service to be up 100%. The apps should fail gracefully. Anyone finding their e-commerce software handling this situation poorly should find another package.

    If a store offers only the USPS delivery method and the web service is down, the user could be directed to call the sales number to place their order. If the store offers other deliver methods the store front could instruct the user that USPS isn't currently available and they must choose another method.

    1. Re:Crashing Web store applications? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 5, Informative

      osCommerce is well know to be a bowl of spaghetti code and in general a P.O.S. Zen Cart forked a long time ago and did a complete code re-write. osCommerce continues to keep their heads up their asses, and only a fool doesn't look for alternatives at the earliest opertunity.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    2. Re:Crashing Web store applications? by seanadams.com · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Only a really terrible developer would hit a web services API and not code for it to fail. No one should expect a third party service to be up 100%. The apps should fail gracefully. Anyone finding their e-commerce software handling this situation poorly should find another package.

      I have developed a fulfillment system using UPS so I have some experience with this. This was a few years ago, but at the time, UPS's system was designed on the assumption that a shopping cart system would contact UPS during the order placement process (or checkout). USPS appears to be very similar. This is incredibly moronic, because it means that if their server doesn't respond or any reason, you simply lose the sale. Problems AFTER the order has been accepted are far less serious - that just means fulfillment is interrupted - you don't lose orders. It would be even better if you could print the labels without having to reach their server, but they don't provide this (UPS's own software, however, can.)

      The only reasonable way to do it (obviously?) is to have your own shopping cart software calculate the shipping rate. At the time I did this in 2001, UPS did not offer reasonable data to let you do this. Their rating system is extremely complicated, and the spreadsheets they gave me had clearly been maintained by hand and needed a lot of massage to get them into a reasonably parseable format. Not only that but it was very difficult to get these tables in the first place, requiring multiple escalations through tech reps and ultimately a "god damn it just give him the tables" from our sales rep.

      I imagine things might have improved a little since then and I know there are shopping carts that can now do the rate calculations internally. But if any shipping company forces its customers to contact a server to calculate shipping costs, then they are just as retarded as the merchants who use them (for a web checkout).

    3. Re:Crashing Web store applications? by JoelisHere · · Score: 2, Interesting

      it's against the agreement/policy/licenses/contract that developer's have to sign before being given access to the web service.

    4. Re:Crashing Web store applications? by truthsearch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Most e-commerce sites, including the ones I've built, have a multi-step process to place an order. If the step for shipping (or tax, etc.) failed, then the system would re-load the page with any appropriate messages and option changes. So, for example, if the third-party payment processing service didn't respond before a timeout the user would be asked to call customer service to complete their order. The sales rep could see the order in its incomplete state and finish it over the phone.

    5. Re:Crashing Web store applications? by Cyrcyr · · Score: 3, Informative

      There is almost no end to how true parent is. I was tasked by a friend to find a solid, open source webshop for him (a startup clothing business), and while (admittedly lazy) browsing around, I found that osCommerce was well used so I assumed this was a good idea, and recommended it to him. Not a day later he called me up again to help him out with adding a few plugins (very simple things as well, and also quite popular). I assumed this was because he didn't know php very well, so I said sure, but when I started going through the plugins, how to implement them, I realized how horribly they clash with eachother, and how extremely unmodular the whole software is. The original code is a mess, and any attempt to make it modular has made it an even bigger pile of spaghetti than it originally was. A good example of this is how the plugins are documented; "Add between "IF" on line x and ". I'm amazed it's popular at all. Now, I realize there are alot of good open source applications out there, and I've had the pleasure to being a part of a few really well written pieces as well, but am I the only one who thinks that alot of popular open source projects are stinking piles of crap? Another good example of this is phpBB, suffering from the exact same issues as osCommerce; very poor modularity and messy code. I'm a strong supporter of open source, but one has to realize that just because a project is open source, and has alot of users and contributors, this does in no way ensure that it is well written.

    6. Re:Crashing Web store applications? by seanadams.com · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most e-commerce sites, including the ones I've built, have a multi-step process to place an order. If the step for shipping (or tax, etc.) failed, then the system would re-load the page with any appropriate messages and option changes. So, for example, if the third-party payment processing service didn't respond before a timeout the user would be asked to call customer service to complete their order. The sales rep could see the order in its incomplete state and finish it over the phone.

      I would not consider that an acceptable failure mode. I think you overestimate the patience of the online shopper - you would lose a lot of sales making them jump through hoops like that. Not to mention, who are all these sales guys that you'll have on staff ready to take calls- are you going to pay them to sit there even while the web site is working?

    7. Re:Crashing Web store applications? by Rorschach1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      osC is insidious. You install it because it's open source and a zillion other sites are using it, so it can't be THAT bad, right? Then you have to install a few contributions to add the basic functions you need - and with each contribution, adding the next gets harder and harder.

      But you get up and running. Then you discover all of the little annoying usability quirks - US state names don't use proper abbreviations, customers in Ireland can't place an order without a post code even if you set the minimum length to zero, the payment option selection looks like it has a default selected when it doesn't, users don't know that 'authorize.net' is actually the credit card payment option, and so on.

      So you spend hours fixing those. Meanwhile, you've got the database populated with all of your products, and you're using it to track sales figures. Maybe you add some back-end order processing stuff for your own convenience.

      Eventually this mass of haphazardly patched spaghetti code becomes an absolute nightmare to do ANYTHING with, but by this point you've spent so many hours working on it that it's easier to just keep slogging away at it than to just abandon the whole thing, install something new, and try to move your catalog and your sales records over to the new system.

      And THAT is why there are so many osCommerce sites.

  6. Couldn't have come at a worse time by RemoWilliams84 · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is sure to piss off a lot of people being between that Thanksgiving and Christmas period. Lets hope nobody that ordered me something is having problems.

    --
    "I don't have to think. I only have to do it. The results are always perfect, but that's old news." - Meat Puppets
    1. Re:Couldn't have come at a worse time by maxume · · Score: 4, Funny

      The crap I get, I hope that people buying me things are having problems.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  7. Through snow and sleet and driving rain... by NinthAgendaDotCom · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...but not through server crashes, apparently. :-)

    --
    -- http://ninthagenda.com/
  8. Why SAS fill eventually fail by djnewman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is a great example of why SAS (Software as a Service) in its current form will eventually fail. The very nature of the Internet is to be disconnected and stateless. If there is no guaranteed delivery at the 5 - 9's level (99.999%), then how can business expect to depend on the service? Mind you, I don't have a better model, but we had better come up with one if we intend to continue using the Internet for commerce!

    1. Re:Why SAS fill eventually fail by zappepcs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is a better way. Code your own backup solution, revert to it when the SaS you are counting on fails. In this case, that would be a static shipping 'estimate' process that substitutes data when the USPS service fails. Writing code what depends on a third party is dangerous. If your business depends on that software you are fooling yourself if you think it won't fail. It will. This is where coding disaster recovery functions into your system is important.

      Many of the posts here are about how stupid this situation is, but people are like that. There is a better solution: don't rely on SaS to hold your business together on a daily basis.

    2. Re:Why SAS fill eventually fail by zappepcs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In this case, you might want to only guarantee prices quoted from USPS and use your data as 'estimates' in the event that your own data is wrong and costs change at shipping time.

      In yet other cases, the backup plan might simply be to use data from last week or yesterday if that is sufficient, but is data that is held in house on your servers.

      Depending on the situation and requirements, any number of solutions are possible. By using a 'back up' solution that is not as good or perhaps as accurate, when the system fails to the back up, you have something that is workable if not 100% perfect or accurate.

      You may indeed have a backup solution that is 100% accurate etc. and that is good. It's purpose is still a backup if that is how you configure the systems. You could also choose not to use the SaS and rely totally on your in house solution, but that is not what was being talked about here.

  9. What would USPS do? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Funny

    It would probably snailmail patches to all the vendors connecting to their site ;-)

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:What would USPS do? by rfunches · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You laugh, but older contract offices still get their software updates, including price changes, via mail.

      On 3.5" floppy.

      The terminals still use green-text monitors.

  10. Lots of free shipping today. by khasim · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Try it. Go to a USofA-based commercial site and check the shipping charges for your purchase.

    Most of the sites are offering free shipping. I'm guessing that these two items are related.

  11. UPS is flaky too by el_gordo101 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Our website has been suffering from time outs and dropped connections to the UPS rate calculator web service as well since yesterday. Seems to be intermittent, refreshing the page seems to help and it will eventually connect. Luckily none of our customers see the problem as our sales tools are all internal. Happy Holidays!

    --
    TODO: Insert witty sig
  12. Same here by Rorschach1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I came in yesterday morning to find the USPS module non-functional. Worse, the only working option was DHL overnight - and in case you've missed the news, DHL is now about an order of magnitude worse than the post office for domestic delivery. Even for places they say they can do next-day delivery to, actual delivery can take more than a week.

    Why? Because they hand it off to the post office rather than deliver it themselves. Why it takes the post office a week to deliver it when I can get it there in two days by sending it by priority mail myself is a mystery. In any case, DHL's out of the (US) domestic game entirely next month.

    My site was up last time I checked, but if the USPS option goes down again, I think it's time for a 'free economy shipping' promotion. No messy rate tables to deal with!

  13. Re:Healthcare? by djnewman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Um... The post office is private, but protected. Even the best hardware and software fails on occasion. That was my point earlier - we need a better service model if we expect SAS to work. If the small Government crowd had their way the post office would still be the Pony Express. Let's see you get a letter acorss the country in a week for less than 50 cents. UPS and FedX can't - they get $5 for the smallest item. So much for off loading services to business!

  14. Express Delivery by Statecraftsman · · Score: 5, Funny

    An unexpected error occurred. An exception occured in module:

    USPS

    at address: 0x1234 Main St., Hometown USA, zc=0x10001

  15. I know why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    posting anonymously to cover my ass... We upgraded to MySQL 5.1 last week. We had some major table corruption and no backups. Sadly, no one will be fired or even reprimanded for any of this major cluster fuck.

  16. Re:Very poor design by sunking2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is why my company ships 2 of everything that is ordered. One via USPS and the other by UPS, just in case one gets lost. Always need redundancy.

  17. Re:Healthcare? by Capybara · · Score: 5, Informative

    UPS and FedEx can't, because it's illegal.

  18. Re:Sounds like fun. by MadMorf · · Score: 4, Interesting

    USPS has IT people? Oiy veih I can imagine that job.

    A few years ago, I used to be one of them...

    Oy Vey, indeed...

  19. hosted vs downloaded/licensed e-commerce by jrozzi · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The company I work for provides a hosted e-commerce shopping cart solution, SEO-Cart, which supports the USPS Web Tools. Of course the first call coming in for the day was from a client using USPS and having incorrect shipping prices being calculated for their store.

    I went ahead and called USPS and the lady who answered was quite rude and explained to me that they had a Worldwide outage which affected other applications than just their Webtools API, and also that they hire a 3rd party company to handle their Webtools API software. She couldn't provide any other information at all and I told her a company of that size should have some sort of fail over plan in place to prevent them from being down as long as they have been. I was really disappointed in the fact she didn't even ask me for my name, phone number, or company by time the conversation was over, but she was probably being bombarded with phone calls all day.

    After figuring out that USPS was completely down, I looked through our fail over code and found the following equations seem to come close to the USPS pricing:

    National shipping: [cart-weight]*1.6+3.00
    International shipping: [cart-weight]*1.6+15.00

    These also include pricing for insurance.

    After tweaking the fail over pricing code to this, it seemed that everyone using USPS were happy with the results. We also had to decrease the connection timeout set for the request to the USPS Webtools API which was also slowing things down.

    The Webtools API seems to be both up and down today, with some orders having shipping prices directly from USPS and others having the fallback pricing. Either way, hopefully their IT department learns from this and also provide us information as to what exactly went wrong.

    On that note, this is a prime example that I use when speaking to prospects about the advantages of using a hosted shopping cart solution rather than a licensed/free download solution. Besides the obvious IT benefits that you get with a good hosted shopping cart solution, hosted shopping cart software is typically a centralized application that can provide quick updates to problems like these. Of course this is assuming that the prospect is serious about their online store and doesn't want to handle technical support themselves.

  20. Re:That's what you get... for not using FedEx by quanticle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    To be fair, what sort of "backup" calculation would you have done here, short of reverse-engineering the USPS algorithm for calculating shipping rates?

    I'm not usually a rabid free-market libertarian, but this here can be seen as a result of the fact that the USPS isn't really beholden to its customers. Can you imagine FedEx or UPS being afflicted by such an issue? And, if they were, would they blow off inquiries with a glib, "We expect the servers to be down for the rest of the day?" Of course not, because, for FedEx, UPS, DHL, et. al. such an outage directly affects the health of the organization. If people can't calculate shipping rates, they can't ship, and if they don't ship, the company doesn't make money. The close linkage between revenue and working services tends to put more impetus behind keeping things working and making sure that they get fixed quickly if they do happen to go down.

    --
    We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
  21. Re:Healthcare? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The government can't even manage to keep a simple web service online, and people still believe that it would be wise to let them control health care.

    Get real. On several occasions, I've had to manually intervene to fix idiotic billing f*ckups between my PRIVATE insurer and a PRIVATE hospital, who had entered into mutual contracts to be in the same "network". For some reason, they couldn't get their own computers to talk to each other and I had to fix their bugs by going deciphering cryptic paper printouts myself and wasting hours calling customer service. This kind of stupid private healthcare IT problem happens routinely to millions of people every year. Therefore, using your reasoning I conclude that due to a clear history of incompetence, it is unwise to let private parties handle health care, and such practice should be banned.

  22. Re:That's what you get... for not using FedEx by TemporalBeing · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Because it's no longer reliable enough. The S&H charges change based on too many values for the few factors (carrier, size, weight, destination, type of delivery, timing of delivery, etc.), and things change. So it's not a necessarily easy calculation to perform.

    --
    Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
  23. USPS by gnosi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Neither snow nor rain nor heat nor gloom of night stays these couriers from the swift completion of their appointed rounds"

    But the computers will!!!

    You do realize that this has never been the motto or creed of the USPS.

    It is taken from the courier service of the Persian Empire. See Wikipedia.

    --
    This is not the sig you are looking for... Move along...

    1. Re:USPS by powerlord · · Score: 5, Informative

      See Wikipedia.

      Sure, but it would have been easier if you had provided a link at least.

      The motto will also continue to be mistaken for the motto of the USPS so long as the USPS does nothing to correct that.

      The motto is prominently carved over the U.S. General Post Office in NYC

      The building prominently bears the inscription: Neither snow nor rain nor heat nor gloom of night stays these couriers from the swift completion of their appointed rounds, which is frequently mistaken as an official motto of the United States Postal Service. It was actually supplied by William Mitchell Kendall of the firm of McKim, Mead & White, the architects who designed the Farley Building and the original Pennsylvania Station in the same Beaux-Arts style. The sentence is taken from Herodotus' Histories (Book 8, Ch. 98) and describes the faithful service of the Persian system of mounted postal messengers under Xerxes I of Persia. The USPS does not actually have an official motto or creed, but nonetheless the inscription on the building is often recognized as such. The inscription was carved by Ira Schnapp, who later designed the Action Comics logo and many other iconic logos for DC Comics.

      and the USPS even used it in their own television spot (albeit in an altered form):

      The commercial, which ran after the September 11, 2001, attacks and the anthrax mailings, featured no voiceover, only the following text interspersed on title cards:
      We are mothers and fathers. And sons and daughters. Who every day go about our lives with duty, honor and pride. And neither snow, nor rain, nor heat, nor gloom of night, nor the winds of change, nor a nation challenged, will stay us from the swift completion of our appointed rounds. Ever.[2]

      Note that the [2] link in the above quoted Wikipedia article takes you to this page on the USPS site quoting the exact text of the tvspot.

      Yes, they have no Motto, but considering how much they use the meme, they might as well have one.

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
  24. USPS rate API SUCKS by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Apart from the trouble reported in this /. article which I found occuring on one of the existing sites I wrote yesterday (simply because there were no USPS prices being returned, no error, but took about 30 seconds to work out what happened), USPS simply sucks ass.

    Here's why:

    Some time ago, they had an API to get rates, it was called RateV2.
    Then they "updated", and now have RateV3.
    RateV3 is the only specification published.
    To get access to the Rate API servers, you must first test your implementation against thier testing servers successfully, when they see that they let you on the production server....

    Thier testing servers only work with a limited version of RateV2.

    So, in order to use the USPS API, you must:

        Write to the now unpublished RateV2.
        Test that RateV2 on the test servers.
        Ask USPS to allow you to use Production (and get the keys etc) because you have successfully tested.
        Write completely new code against RateV3.
        Test that RateV3 on the production servers.

    And if you try and show the USPS staff the logical problem in this process, they will reply "I can not put you on production servers, until you have done three successful tests on the test servers".

    --
    NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
    1. Re:USPS rate API SUCKS by SnarfQuest · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you want to get USPS's attention, FexEx them a package. For some reason, it really pisses them off.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  25. Re:That's what you get... for not using FedEx by Yez70 · · Score: 3, Informative

    It doesn't take a brain surgeon to look at a postal rate schedule - the postal service does provide them for all shipping services with clearly marked zones to figure out how much to pay for postage.

  26. Re:Sounds like fun. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 3, Funny

    Did you get the security guy who came in and told you not to surf porn on company time, then ramble about how the USPS computer network was more important than the DOD? I got that, and they tried to do good cop/bad cop on us - it was comical.

    --
    "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  27. Re:Very poor design by WilyCoder · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does your company offer mail order brides?

  28. Re:That's what you get... for not using FedEx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can you imagine FedEx or UPS being afflicted by such an issue?

    Having worked in IT for one of them this year... yes, without question, yes.

  29. Re:That's what you get... for not using FedEx by pauljlucas · · Score: 3, Informative

    ... [F]or FedEx, UPS, DHL, et. al. such an outage directly affects the health of the organization. If people can't calculate shipping rates, they can't ship, and if they don't ship, the company doesn't make money.

    The same has been true with the USPS since 1970. Their entire budget is financed by people buying stamps and other services. They don't get a dime of taxpayer money.

    --
    If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
  30. Re:That's what you get... for not using FedEx by rfunches · · Score: 3, Informative

    The zones are clearly marked but determining which zone you are shipping to is not. They are based on distance from the originating ZIP Code so the application must use Postal Explorer to generate the zone chart ahead of time. (For now, it happens to be working.) And in the case of non-flat-rate Priority Mail, there's a huge price difference between zone 4 (zone and weight only) and zone 5 (zone and weight *OR* zone and size).

  31. Re:Sounds like fun. by maxume · · Score: 2, Informative

    You do realize that most of the routing of letters is done by computers, using OCR, right?

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  32. That's what you get... for not using Utilities. by Ostracus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Americans are pathetic sometimes -- they expect their government services to do as well as private industry, yet they don't give them the ability to charge what private industry charges. Amtrak is a similar situation, Amtrak is expected to be cash flow positive, yet they are not allowed to own their own tracks, those are owned by the freight companies, whereas their main competitors run on highways that are paid for completely by the taxpayer and gas taxes, or operate out of airports also funded by taxpayers."

    Welcome to municipal broadband. Oh wait!

    --
    Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
  33. Re:That's what you get... for not using FedEx by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Informative

    The same has been true with the USPS since 1970. Their entire budget is financed by people buying stamps and other services. They don't get a dime of taxpayer money.

    How did you ever get modded +5 informative with that load of bull?

    The total funding for the Postal Service in the administration's 2005 budget is just over $61.7 million.

    Appropriation, fiscal year 2004 $65,135,000
    Appropriations, 1999 $100,195,000
    etc, etc

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  34. USPS Server Meltdown by USPSRateCalc · · Score: 2, Informative
    Hey folks,

    The shipping api is down, however the rate calculator is available. We provide the rate calculation engine to the folks that provide the shipping api. The shipping api offers numerous services and we are just one of them.

    If you require domestic rates calculations, as received by ShippingAPI.dll, you can access our rate engine directly.

    Accessing the rate calculator api is very similiar to how you access this functionality from the shipping api.

    Getting started:

    A simple demo site that will allow you to learn/test a subset the API:
    http://postcalc.usps.gov/domSDK/SDKXMLtest.asp

    XML over HTTP Application access:
    http://postcalc.usps.gov/SdkXml.aspx

    Documentation is available but I do not have a publically available site to post this on. If a site is available, just let me know and I will post the SDK documentation there.

    Let me know if I can help.

    Adrian Griffith
    ManTech Information Systems & Technology
    Project Manager, USPS Postal Explorer and Rate Calculators

    adrian.griffith@mantech.com