Slashdot Mirror


Should Apple Open Source the iPhone?

An anonymous reader writes "Given the OpeniBoot project is just a breath away from getting Android onto the iPhone, maybe Apple should consider opening up the platform. This post has five reasons, but I think there are far more. Without open source, Apple will find itself in the same position as today's Microsoft in seven years."

14 of 379 comments (clear)

  1. Oh no! Success by Gizzmonic · · Score: 5, Funny

    Without open source, Apple will find itself in the same position as today's Microsoft in seven years.

    The largest software producer on the planet? Perish the thought! That would be TERRIBLE!

    Anyway, I don't like the iPhone either but let's face it, some people are zebras and others would just as soon kill you as open a pack of gum.

    --
    (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
  2. Microsoft in 7 years? by Alcimedes · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Without open source, Apple will find itself in the same position as today's Microsoft in seven years."

    You say that as if it were a bad thing. I'm guessing that despite the recent drop to 89% marketshare MS is feeling just fine.

    I'm not saying OSS would be a bad move for Apple or the iPhone, but to say that if they aren't careful they might end up completely dominating the market and rolling around in mountains of cash isn't going to get your point across to most people.

    1. Re:Microsoft in 7 years? by Llywelyn · · Score: 5, Informative

      Number abuse! 2 minute minor!

      Seriously. Talking about their stock price right now is an extremely dishonest way to look at it, and saying they are "ratcheting downward" seems to be totally ignoring the size of the rate.

      They've lost... 1.9 points from their marketshare in the last 10 months (oh, the horrors!) and are down *only* 44% from their 52-week high. SPY is down 41% from their 52-week high. FCX (to pick a random stock) is down 82% from their 52 week high. Citigroup is down 77% and Apple is down 48%.

      Given the rest of the market, MSFT is doing just fine right now.

      --
      Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
  3. Why the Bleep should they? by nweaver · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A huge part of the reason why people buy the iPhone is the unified user experience. Yes, I'd like a platform that I don't have to pay $100 to develop on...

    But my mother doesn't care. she wants a smartphone that "Just Works": its easy to use, with lots of apps.

    Apple has provided a great unified user experience on the iPhone, and thats the secret. Its a smartphone my MOTHER can use.

    Opening up the platform wouldn't help.
       

    --
    Test your net with Netalyzr
    1. Re:Why the Bleep should they? by nweaver · · Score: 5, Insightful

      From a developer standpoint, the iPhone is actually damn good.

      The dev kit is $0, and a signing key/registration is $100. So the barrier to entry is very VERY low.

      And the app store is a godsend. A distribution system where the distributor gets a flat 30% and thats it? And already has a micropayment infrastructure? Thats unheard-of nice.

      If you can make a $10 app that sells to just 10,000 people, thats $70K gross revenue to you as a small developer.

      --
      Test your net with Netalyzr
  4. A stupid question by east+coast · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First, they simply won't. The question is little more than theoretical and we all know how that goes.

    And secondly, they'll end up like Microsoft? Do you mean they'll end up with 85%+ of the market share? How is that a loss?

    I know OSS is real popular around here but let's face facts, MS and Apple have a combined 98% of the marketshare in their primary markets and tons of side markets that are doing well. Give us a real reason they want to be in alignment with the other 2% of the market.

    I know, most folks here have a real love for the open source way but when it comes down to making a dollar off it the ratio of wins to loses is pretty sad. Given all the advantages of open source it's hard to understand why it never really got a bigger foothold and now it seems to be little more than that... a foothold that those involved are trying to keep in fear from falling off the mountain altogether.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  5. They did... by tjstork · · Score: 5, Interesting

    one would think apple would have learned from their past mistake of a less closed platform overtaking them and nearly sending the company down the drain

    Apple went down the drain more from the clones. Look, Apple's whole thing is about the entire consumer experience from store to computer hardware to boot. It always has been and hopefully always will be. To say that Apple should just be like Microsoft, is kinda crazy. Apple doesn't have the money to compete with Microsoft or Dell and so the real brand differentiator is that they have an entirely different business model.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:They did... by Score+Whore · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not to be contentious, but you might want to review your statements before posting.

      Dell market cap on 12/10/2008: $23.41 billion.
      Apple cash in the bank at quarter ending Sep 08: $24.49 billion.

      Apple could write a check for Dell and have a billion dollars left over. If they aren't competing with Dell, it's not because of a lack of money.

  6. Nah. by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, I think they should keep it as is, or maybe even lock it up even tighter.

    Umm, what were you expecting Slashdotters to say?

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  7. mod parent up... business model is key by eleuthero · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Different business models entirely--Apple learned their lesson in the late nineties by finally stopping its efforts to be like the big boys. By focusing on a niche market and slowly expanding it is perhaps akin to Southwestern Airlines vs. American

  8. Re:those who dont learn from history by megamerican · · Score: 5, Funny

    And those who do learn from history go mad while watching the same shit happen over and over again.

    --
    If you have something that you dont want anyone to know, maybe you shouldnt be doing it in the first place -Eric Schmidt
  9. Re:Oh no! Success by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have to admit I had a similar response. There are so utterly few open source projects that succeed in any large financial way, apple are a company that wants to make money, and the iPhone is one of the biggest gadget successes in the last 5 years - their iPod is one of the others.

    This post seems to say Apple should dump surefire success and go for something risky and likely to flush all their efforts into the toilet. Goodluckwiththat indeed.

  10. Re:Well as an Apple stockholder by tsa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I prefer Apple's performance over Linux. I have been using Linux for more than 10 years, and I still think it's not nearly ready for the desktop. Many commercial systems or programs still outperform their open source compatitors by far. Give me a phone that works, not one that I have to tinker with for a long time to get something simple working.

    --

    -- Cheers!

  11. Re:Well as an Apple stockholder by cgenman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Where does MS go from here? Oh, I don't know... Consoles, handheld music players, cell phones, car control systems, Internet search...

    Oh wait, they're falling in all of those (consoles excepted) because they waited for someone else to forge the path, then were unable to buy the leader out as easily as they have been able to in desktop software.

    Microsoft isn't suffering from success, they're suffering from a profound lack of vision.