Slashdot Mirror


The Year of 2008 In Cybercrime

BobB-nw writes "Underground botnet markets and high-profile spam cases headlined the year in tech crime. One of the most disturbing cybercrime trends in 2008, many security analysts say, has been the emergence of a full-blown underground economy where credit card information, identity theft information, and spam and phishing software are all available for relatively low prices. 2008 also saw major developments in the cases against three major spammers in the United States."

47 comments

  1. Almost a dupe, but yet. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Worse. ANOTHER stupid, mindless Networkworld slide show.

    Can someone please rustle up a good old Scientology bashing article, please?

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    1. Re:Almost a dupe, but yet. by LMacG · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A cynical person might begin to wonder if there's some kind of deal between NW and /. in order to drive traffic to NW so they get the ad-impressions. Now where would be find anybody so cynical on this website?

      --
      Slightly disreputable, albeit gregarious
    2. Re:Almost a dupe, but yet. by owlnation · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Networkworld = dumbfotainment.

      Editors, please banish anything from this site to Idle -- slashdot's garbage can in other words. Better still, just banish it.

    3. Re:Almost a dupe, but yet. by Lost+Race · · Score: 1

      Hmm, NW, as in NetworkWorld, as in submitter "BobB-nw"....

      The SD editors have made it clear on numerous occasions that they have absolutely no editorial judgment whatsoever, they just post anything that comes across their desk and looks at all shiny or sparkly. They don't even seem to follow the links in most submissions before posting. It's highly unlikely that either "BobB-" or "-nw" paid them anything other than attention.

    4. Re:Almost a dupe, but yet. by Architect_sasyr · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a good plan, but slashdot is probably the worst place to do advertising like that, especially as so many of us will* be using AdBlock/NoScript or Squid filtering, thus negating the ads.

      * Should be - I recall a stat a little while back that had something like 40% of /. traffic as IE still. The numbers may be wrong.

      --
      Me failed English...
      FreeBSD over Linux. If my comments seem odd, this may explain...
  2. "cyber"? by syrinx · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's 2008, not 1998; aren't we done with "cyber" yet?

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    1. Re:"cyber"? by Yvan256 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Indeed, it should be an iCrime to talk about cybercrime.

    2. Re:"cyber"? by mrdoogee · · Score: 4, Funny

      Crime 2.0 ?

    3. Re:"cyber"? by owlnation · · Score: 0, Redundant

      It's 2008, not 1998; aren't we done with "cyber" yet?

      iCrime?

    4. Re:"cyber"? by HungryHobo · · Score: 2, Funny

      How about "nano" that seems to be a popular word, or "solution".
      "Hyper" is a bit out of fashion.

      "Nanocrime" just rolls of the tongue.

      Course we could just call it "crime" or "fraud" to fit what it really is no matter the medium but that doesn't sound so cool.

    5. Re:"cyber"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the people over at nanowrimo.org would take offense. Nano-crime sounds almost like a slur against Oprah's book club or something. :-p

    6. Re:"cyber"? by xaositects · · Score: 1

      It's 2008, not 1998; aren't we done with "cyber" yet?

      No, kids in rivets and pink/black vinyl pants carrying cutesy, plastic Japanese backpacks need labels too...

    7. Re:"cyber"? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      "In the year two thousaaaaand. In the year two thousaaaaaaaaand!"

      The cyber-term "cyber" will become an ubiquitous cyber-prefix to all cyber-nouns. And half of all cyber-verbs.

    8. Re:"cyber"? by plover · · Score: 1

      The cyber-term "cyber" will become an ubiquitous cyber-prefix to all cyber-nouns. And half of all cyber-verbs.

      It'll just get creepier. Just as we are now all cyber-complacent, the digerati will start shortening it to cy-. Cyverbs will creep into the cylanguage. We already have cyborgs, why not cyarms and cylegs? They'll "log on" to the cyweb with their cyphones.

      Ish. Someone get me a cygun before this goes any further. Or a cylon. That'll stop 'em.

      --
      John
  3. Emergence? by MosesJones · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hasn't there always been an underground crime racket in things like check fraud, ID fraud, ID forging, financial fraud, theft etc. It isn't that this is an emerging market, more than it is where the old market has moved into. In the same way as Wallmart moved from the real to the virtual so are the criminals.

    Sure its slightly different in that you don't get mugged and it can be better automated and scaled, but fake or duplicate passports have been around for years as has the ID theft problem. Hell in a world where Illinois can elect 4 out of 8 corrupt governors its hardly surprising that there is a problem with fraud and extortion.

    This isn't news about a market that is new, its news about how existing crime organisations are going into new markets, just like the Mafia et al shifting from alcohol and protection into drugs. There has always been a problem with organised crime and there has always been an underground market for illegal information and products (after all these are just different illegal shipments).

    This reads a bit like the .com stories of 1999 which said that there was a new magic economy that would replace the old one, then it turned out that mainly it was the boring old economy that worked in the new world. I'd imagine that the same is pretty true for the cybercrime world, same bosses, different henchmen who have more brains than muscles.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:Emergence? by LilGuy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There surely has. I found my way into such a vast place back when I was 13 and discovering IRC. People hawked credit card info like there was no tomorrow, and others sold bots you could add to a net to perform DDoS attacks, all very cheap.

      Nothing has changed in the 12 years since except perhaps now clueless reporters are discovering the dark side of the Internet.

      --

      You're nothing; like me.
  4. Rather obvious transition by geekmux · · Score: 4, Insightful

    20 years ago, we didn't have the term "brick and mortar" to differentiate between a vendor and an e-vendor. Is it REALLY that much of a shock that the Black Market, which has been around for hundreds of years, now has an online shopping cart?

    1. Re:Rather obvious transition by zappepcs · · Score: 1

      Sorry mate, but in merry olde England, brick and mortar was a valid saying 20 years ago, but it had not yet been applied to online vendors/retailers. I do like the thought of the black market having an online shopping cart though. Sort of like a bacon sandwich vending machine!

  5. New developement? by N1AK · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One of the most disturbing cybercrime trends in 2008, many security analysts say, has been the emergence of a full-blown underground economy where credit card information, identity theft information, and spam and phishing software are all available for relatively low prices.

    I'm not a 1337 hacker, I'm not a computer expert, and I'm certainly not savvy to the cutting edge of crime but I'm sure this isn't remotely new. Is anyone else reading this and thinking that this was the case at least as far back as 2006?

    1. Re:New developement? by LilGuy · · Score: 1

      It goes back WAY further than 2006. It goes back at at least the latter part of the 90s. I actually traded a few cards myself back when I was an underage idiot some 10 - 12 years ago. It was much easier to get away with back then it would seem as it was before the invention of that CV2 number, and most websites would let you order crap without checking the holder's info... but essentially its the same today as it was back then.

      --

      You're nothing; like me.
    2. Re:New developement? by olehenning · · Score: 1

      The approach might be the same, but the widespread use of credit cards and personal information online surely means that in the past few years, it is a much larger problem than it was 10 years ago. But I'd say that as for 2008, this is nothing new.

  6. Doh by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 2

    And not a word about Gary Mckinnon and the US's ongoing struggle to try and extradite him

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

  7. Re:Yeah, cybercrime is nice, but... by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes, it does.

    No operating system is perfectly secure. Even Linux, with its non-root mentality, has exploits for it. I've got 74 updates waiting for download right now, many of which are security updates. (Let's just say 1/4 for the sake of argument.)

    Windows was wiiiide open for years, which is why there are so many exploits for it. We've all read the "Surviving the First Day of Windows XP" guide; we know how open that OS was. That's not to say it's the only shaky OS. It's just the most famous and the most available.

    The folks who break into our computers spend and make fortunes on security. I've spent about $100 in the last 10 years securing my computer. The only things that keeps me from getting cracked are my obscurity and my neural network. In other words, I don't have anything valuable or desirable, and I'm not dumb enough to open random attachments.

    Any online system is crackable, given enough time and resources. These cybercriminals have more of both than we do.

    Thinking for even one second that you're fully secure because you're using Linux makes you part of the problem.

    --

    ---
    ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  8. What about tax zappers? by deviated_prevert · · Score: 1

    A biggest black eye for IT is the ease with which criminals can use zappers to dupe accounting packages.

    --
    This message was not sent from an iPhone because Peter Sellers really was a deviated prevert without a dime for the call
    1. Re:What about tax zappers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how many cookies does one site need?

    2. Re:What about tax zappers? by deviated_prevert · · Score: 1

      how many cookies does one site need?

      The Vancouver Sun needs as many cookies as it can set. Considering the subscription base consists mostly of Wasps in a sushi based economy!

      --
      This message was not sent from an iPhone because Peter Sellers really was a deviated prevert without a dime for the call
  9. Re:Yeah, cybercrime is nice, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    No, I think I'm fully secure because I:

    * Run a hardware firewall between my cablemodem and my Linux box, AND an iptables firewall on my Linux box,

    * Drop packets that aren't part of an established or related session (instead of rejecting them), so to most scans I'm a black hole,

    * Always clear all my data when exiting Firefox, including cookies and everything else, and periodically clobber my .firefox directory with a clean version I keep handy,

    * have no open ports or services that someone could latch onto (i.e. my network-facing Linux box is strictly a workstation),

    * And (important!) I always -- ALWAYS -- turn off my computer AND disconnect my cablemodem whenever I'm not actively using them. In fact, my cablemodem is rather nice; it has a button on top that disconnects it, so I don't even have to pull the cable. To hack ME, you've got to know my random DHCP IP address, AND you've got to know whether I'm even online, which only happens for a couple of hours a day.

    Before you get all proud of yourself for being wiser than the rest of us Linux guys, realize that using Linux or *BSD actually DOES make you more secure, because the tools available to you to secure your box are top-notch, and with a little effort, you CAN be completely secure.

    Get over yourself. Do you think you're adding anything to the conversation?

     

  10. Re:Yeah, cybercrime is nice, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only things that keeps me from getting cracked are my obscurity

    security through obscurity will never work!

  11. what OS .. by rs232 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What OS does the vast majority of this 'identity theft', spam and phishing run on ?

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
    1. Re:what OS .. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      What OS does the vast majority of this 'identity theft', spam and phishing run on ?

      OSX, but the users don't realise it...

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  12. the solution .. by rs232 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The solution is to stop relying on Credit Card numbers for online verification. Using something like a smartcard, for each transaction, use a card-reader to generate a unique one time session-code. The transaction from the card-reader to the server is encrypted by this one-time session code. No CVC2 number, no PIN or card number need be entered or sent over the connection. To verify card present, the card generates a one-time four digit passcode that is syncronized with the server and this is typed in by the user, only then is the transaction completed. At worst all a key logger would record, is a defunct four digit code and session key.

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
    1. Re:the solution .. by mlts · · Score: 1

      Even better would be a two-fold solution:

      1: Make SMS messages not cost so much, or have it where they are free for the receiver.
      2: For an online verification, the user gets via SMS the name and ID of the business, how much is being asked for as payment, other pertinent info (so the customer can tell if the SMS is genuine or a fake), and finally a 4-6 digit PIN that the customer types in as validation for the transaction. For someone to spoof the transaction, they would have to generate a bogus one with the amount and such, have possession of the user's cellphone and card, or forcing the user to do the transaction for them.

      What would be even nicer would be a SMS-like protocol with certificate management built in. It would factor in SSL certs where purchase requests from venders are signed by their keys, and the keys are certified by a known CA. This would help people know that a purchase request for "X" is actually from the shop they were buying at, as opposed to a cheat.

  13. the Pentagon, Spaceships and Dope .. by rs232 · · Score: 1

    Which is easier, trying to stem the phishing epidemic or putting away a UFO nut ..

    "The Americans have a secret spaceship?" I ask ..

    ".. What were the ship names?"

    "I can't remember," says Gary.

    "I was smoking a lot of dope at the time. Not good for the intellect."

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
  14. cv2 numbers no defense .. by rs232 · · Score: 1

    "It goes back WAY further than 2006 .. It was much easier to get away with back then it would seem as it was before the invention of that CV2 number"

    CV2 numbers are already hacked through the use of 'bugging' devices that record card wipes and key presses, usually with the collusion of the staff.

    "but essentially its the same today as it was back then

    Correct, a total failure of the so-called security experts to devise a secure online commercial transaction system ..

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
  15. Re:Yeah, cybercrime is nice, but... by rs232 · · Score: 1

    "Windows was wiiiide open for years, which is why there are so many exploits for it"

    How do you explain the current phishing infestation ?

    'We've all read the "Surviving the First Day of Windows XP" guide; we know how open that OS was'

    It's news to me that it was considered so open. I can't find a link to the original but this says that to secure XP you enabled the XP firewall. Not much of an improvement then.

    "Thinking for even one second that you're fully secure because you're using Linux makes you part of the problem"

    It's not my Linux getting hacked that's a worry, but the server getting hacked and my identity stolen.

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
  16. Re:Yeah, cybercrime is nice, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While taking precautions carefully helps, nothing is completely secure. Just like careful use of a condom reduces your chances of disease and fatherhood, they are not a guarantee. What your discussing is basically the same, your putting condoms on your computer and trying to be careful with what other computers you connect too, but even that is not absolute prevention. Still if your going to do it, then it is safer with the precautions.

  17. Re:Yeah, cybercrime is nice, but... by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 2, Informative

    XP didn't always have that security center.

    Before the firewall was put on by default in SP2, a fresh install of XP had - at best - 5 minutes between the time you connected it to the Internet and the time someone else had full control of your machine. It was unbelievable.

    Phishing is nothing new. It's the same ancient techniques used by snake oil salesmen and corrupt businesses since we started using money as a trade medium.

    You're right about hacked servers. It's a problem that won't go away until they make banks financially responsible for the security breaches.

    --

    ---
    ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  18. Re:Yeah, cybercrime is nice, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ECHELON? Isn't that where the government searches for words like bomb, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy?

    Also, awesome game on the C64. Wireframe 3d like Elite! but still awesome.

  19. Re:Yeah, cybercrime is nice, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Basically you're just saying that you're as secure as the next guy using Windows XP with sufficient knowledge.

    Nothing new there, move along.

    The problem is that the majority of people having a computer connected to the Internet lack the skills to secure it no matter what OS they are running.

    And before they have learned how to secure it they have already made holes in the default security in order to make, for example, a torrent client work.

  20. Howzabout: ELECTROCRIME ? by A+New+Normalcy · · Score: 1

    ...lb

    --
    ...Lorenzo / I'm into kinky crustaceans. I just discovered internet praWn.
  21. Re:Yeah, cybercrime is nice, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That still isn't fully secure. Not all attack vectors are covered in the 'connections incoming from the cloud' category.

    Before you get all proud of yourself for being wiser than the rest of us Linux guys, realize that using Linux or *BSD actually DOES make you more secure, because the tools available to you to secure your box are top-notch, and with a little effort, you CAN be completely secure.

    Get over yourself. Do you think you're adding anything to the conversation?

    this is you.

  22. Re:Yeah, cybercrime is nice, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, but Windows XP has many mysterious services turned on all the time. A home user cannot be expected to understand what any of those services are, or why ports are open, or indeed what ports ARE.

    Linux, on the other hand, tends not to behave that way. By default, the only thing Ubuntu has open is the printer port. Use Firestarter to set up a firewall and even that won't be available to the outside world.

    Safer by DEFAULT.

    If you want to be even safer, use OpenBSD. Those guys are just plain paranoid. I believe it's the only operating system available in which ALL the code has been audited -- and continues to be, on a regular basis.

    If you think I'm doing the fanboy boogie, I'd like you to try a short experiment. Your assignment, should you choose to accept it, is to cleanly install three operating systems one at a time on a wiped, empty laptop. For each, you will connect the laptop directly to the internet (no hardware firewall -- don't cheat!), and retrieve a full set of O/S updates WITHOUT YOUR MACHINE BEING COMPROMISED. Try the O/Ses in this order: OpenBSD, Ubuntu Linux, and Windows XP.

    I'm taking a shot in the dark here, but I'm guessing you won't see anything remarkable for BSD or Linux, but you'll be lucky if your XP install is even usable by the time you're done.

    Let's find out! If I'm wrong, PROVE IT. Show me how tough Windows is. Tip: The average lifespan of an unprotected network-connected Windows XP box is fourteen minutes.