Slashdot Mirror


If Programming Languages Were Religions

bshell writes "With Christmas around the corner I know we are all thinking about religion, or at least maybe wondering why this one religion dominates the rest for these few weeks. A fellow named Rodrigo Braz Monteiro (amz) posted this list comparing each programming language to a religion. Guaranteed to make you chuckle and generate a good long thread here on slashdot. Great way to pass the time as work winds down this week and we relate to our own programming faiths during this very special time of year. Merry PHPmas." Fortunately Pastafarianism is referenced.

34 of 844 comments (clear)

  1. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Except for the part about only accusing Islam of murderous tendencies?
    It's sad that only biases which disagree with our own internal ones are noticed.

  2. I'm Atheist I suppose. by MouseR · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Objective-C isn't in the list. And that makes me happy.

    1. Re:I'm Atheist I suppose. by QuantumG · · Score: 5, Funny

      objc is a heretic cult and will be quashed.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
  3. LOLCode by Andr+T. · · Score: 5, Funny

    LOLCODE would be Pastafarianism - An esoteric, Internet-born belief that nobody really takes seriously, despite all the efforts to develop and spread it.

    WHAT??? What do you mean no one takes Pastafarianism seriously?? Die, infidel!

    --

    Any life is made up of a single moment, the moment in which a man finds out, once and for all, who he is.

    1. Re:LOLCode by berend+botje · · Score: 5, Funny

      Obviously you ment: "Dine! Infidel!" :-)

    2. Re:LOLCode by jollyreaper · · Score: 5, Funny

      WHAT??? What do you mean no one takes Pastafarianism seriously?? Die, infidel!

      If you disbelief in the deities you're an atheist, if you disbelieve in Pastafarianism does that make you antepasta? And if so, what would be a good wine to match with you?

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  4. Dual religion is accepted? by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am a fundamentalist crhistian (java) AND a satanist (visual basic)? LOL!

    I am the incarnated paradox :)

    --
    Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
  5. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Like how you ignored the part about Fundamentalist Christians burning people at the stake.

  6. I wish programming was a religion by jollyreaper · · Score: 5, Funny

    Then we could excommunicate people for breaking coding conventions and burn them at the stake for buffer overflows. Of course, this would also mean we'd need altars to Gates and Torvalds in the server room, would have to burn the right incenses and make appropriate obeisances to ward off crashes. Of course, when the crashes happen anyway, we could then have the debate over whether the religion was false or if we simply weren't observing it strictly enough and decide to throw a virgin off the roof and see if things improve. (cue jokes about the likeliest department to find virgins in.) You know, it would be kind of cool to have a giant computing pyramid atop which is the altar we tear out the beating hearts of living sacrifices.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    1. Re:I wish programming was a religion by paulsnx2 · · Score: 5, Funny

      The 10 commandments of coding conventions

      1) Thou shalt not place the Left Curly Brace on a line of its own; this shows disrespect to thy Fathers and thy Mothers who only had 80 columns and 24 lines in days of old
      2) Thou shalt not use the GoTo, for such disrespects the Prophet of Programming Dijkstra,
      3) Thou shalt comment thy code, and provide great detail about the workings of thy mind when thou does first write thy method. And thou shalt revisit and revise thy comments only in the earliest hours of the morning prior to thy code review.
      4) Honor thy Sun and thy Java that your days may be long upon the Virtual Machine where thy code livith.
      5) Thou shalt Compile before checking in.
      6) Thou shalt Run thy code at least once before shipping.
      7) Thou shalt Test at least one Browser against thy Server's code, and thy backup Server's code, and thy Neighbor's Server's code.
      8) Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's operating system unless thy neighbor runs Linux; If ye cast your eye upon thy neighbor's Windows Server, and covet it in thy heart, thy staff shall take thee into thy parking lot and stone thee with mice until the demon of stupidity leaveth thee
      9) Thou shalt not make libraries of other gods such as C# or Perl. These are an abomination before thy God.
      10) Once thou hast compiled thy code, generated thy Java Doc, Reviewed thy code with the elders of thy people, Deployed thy code upon thy server, and tested thy code upon the Browser of thy God (Firefox 3.0), and thy customer doth stumble upon thy bug, thou shalt blame thy customer with thy mouth, and curse his existence, for thou hath commented, placed thy braces properly, indented with four spaces (and not eight as do the godless), hath capped thy constants, hath lowercased thy methods, and hath passed all thy JUnit tests..... It is the truth of God that if yee hath done all these things, thy customer must be at fault.

    2. Re:I wish programming was a religion by orclevegam · · Score: 5, Funny

      I guess I must have my own cult cause if you follow command 1 I will personally burn you at the stake.

      Thou wilst follow thy K&R style guide or be beaten to death with dangling pointers. Always remember to cuddle your else clauses, they get lonely easily.

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
  7. Re:If Programming Languages Were Religions? by rhfixer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Are you sure you can assert that?

    --
    Hi.
  8. Re:Are religion by PinkyDead · · Score: 5, Insightful

    More to the point, religions are programming languages.

    --
    Genesis 1:32 And God typed :wq!
  9. Re:Theologians will disagree by aaron+alderman · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't believe in programming.

  10. Re:wow by aaron+alderman · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. Insult the religious.
    2. Insult programmers.
    3. ????
    4. Prophet!

  11. Re:wow by theaveng · · Score: 5, Funny

    If two anonymous posters speak to one another, does anybody hear them? ;-)

    --
    FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
  12. Re:wow by jkiller · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is all wrong. COBOL is like Judaism... it controls most of the world's money.

  13. Re:wow by tbannist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's a difficult question to answer, but it's one that the moderates are going to have to figure out. Any group that can't police their own extremists will, sooner or later, find themselves dragged into a war with everyone else. That's the nature of fanatical extremism, they want a war. And if they try hard enough, eventually they're going to get one.

    As for Baby P, I assume the people responsible are headed to trial for their crimes? Thus Britain is policing it's own even though the example you chose isn't even roughly the same situation.

    --
    Fanatically anti-fanatical
  14. Re:wow by HungryHobo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ya but he mentioned nothing of the chance of rape at the hands of fundamentalist christians.
    Since catholic priests love the rape, or so the media coverage would tell us.
    How much video footage of muslims sitting at home reading the paper are you shown? there's a billion of them out there but all you ever see is are the rabble rousers and nutcases.
    Imagine if all they ever saw of america on their TV shows was Westboro Baptist Church protests,KKK protests and rednecks talking about how they'd love to shoot all dem damn muslums and George Bush. They might decide that Americans were all violent fundamentalist nutcases. And they'd be exactly as right as you are.

  15. Slight Tangent by JoeMerchant · · Score: 5, Funny

    Taoism: Shit happens.
    Confucianism: Confucius say, "Shit happens."
    Buddhism: If shit happens, it isn't really shit.
    Zen Buddhism: Shit is, and is not.
    Zen Buddhism #2: What is the sound of shit happening?
    Hinduism: This shit has happened before.
    Islam: If shit happens, it is the will of Allah.
    Islam #2: If shit happens, kill the person responsible.
    Islam #3: If shit happens, blame Israel.
    Catholicism: If shit happens, you deserve it.
    Protestantism: Let shit happen to someone else.
    Presbyterian: This shit was bound to happen.
    Episcopalian: It's not so bad if shit happens, as long as you serve the right wine with it.
    Methodist: It's not so bad if shit happens, as long as you serve grape juice with it.
    Congregationalist: Shit that happens to one person is just as good as shit that happens to another.
    Unitarian: Shit that happens to one person is just as bad as shit that happens to another.
    Lutheran: If shit happens, don't talk about it.
    Fundamentalism: If shit happens, you will go to hell, unless you are born again. (Amen!)
    Fundamentalism #2: If shit happens to a televangelist, it's okay.
    Fundamentalism #3: Shit must be born again.
    Judaism: Why does this shit always happen to us?
    Calvinism: Shit happens because you don't work.
    Seventh Day Adventism: No shit shall happen on Saturday.
    Creationism: God made all shit.
    Secular Humanism: Shit evolves.
    Christian Science: When shit happens, don't call a doctor - pray!
    Christian Science #2: Shit happening is all in your mind.
    Unitarianism: Come let us reason together about this shit.
    Quakers: Let us not fight over this shit.
    Utopianism: This shit does not stink.
    Capitalism: That's MY shit.
    Communism: It's everybody's shit.
    Feminism: Men are shit.
    Chauvinism: We may be shit, but you can't live without us...
    Commercialism: Let's package this shit.
    Impressionism: From a distance, shit looks like a garden.
    Idolism: Let's bronze this shit.
    Existentialism: Shit doesn't happen; shit IS.
    Existentialism #2: What is shit, anyway?
    Stoicism: This shit is good for me.
    Hedonism: There is nothing like a good shit happening!
    Mormonism: God sent us this shit.
    Mormonism #2: This shit is going to happen again.
    Wiccan: An it harm none, let shit happen.
    Scientology: If shit happens, see "Dianetics", p.157.
    Jehovah's Witnesses: Knock Knock Shit happens.
    Jehovah's Witnesses #2: May we have a moment of your time to show you some of our shit?
    Jehovah's Witnesses #3: Shit has been prophesied and is imminent; only the righteous shall survive its happening.
    Moonies: Only really happy shit happens.
    Hare Krishna: Shit happens, rama rama.
    Rastafarianism: Let's smoke this shit!
    Zoroastrianism: Shit happens half on the time.
    Church of SubGenius: BoB shits.
    Practical: Deal with shit one day at a time.
    Agnostic: Shit might have happened; then again, maybe not.
    Agnostic #2: Did someone shit?
    Agnostic #3: What is this shit?
    Satanism: SNEPPAH TIHS.
    Atheism: What shit?
    Atheism #2: I can't believe this shit!
    Nihilism: No shit.

  16. Re:wow by sjames · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Like it or not, Muslims are more likely to kill in response to perceived offenses against their religion, and his post makes light of that fact.

    It's not really intrinsic to Islam. It just happens that the surrounding culture of the area most strongly associated with Islam is more likely to kill over any sort of slight. Muslims who grew up in other surrounding cultures are MUCH more moderate as a whole. My personal experience is that Muslims who grew up in western culture are much LESS likely to attempt to impose their religious beliefs on others than fundamentalist Christians are.

    AS for 'policing their own', what in the world is an American Muslim family supposed to do about the Taliban? Bombard them with greeting cards from the 'lighten up collection'?

  17. Re:wow by jason.sweet · · Score: 5, Funny

    I personally found offensive that he compared C++ to Islam. C++ is much more peaceful.

    You think so?

    Try publishing some cartoons of Bjarne Stroustrup, then we'll see how peaceful it is!

  18. Converting into Judaism by Jason+Levine · · Score: 5, Informative

    The article's author says about Judaism:

    The catch is, you can't convert into it - you're either into it from the start, or you will think that it's insanity.

    This isn't true, however. You can convert into Judaism, we just purposefully make it difficult to do so. The custom is that you need to turn the person away 3 times. Only after they come back after the third turn-away can they begin the process to convert. This helps ensure that people don't take conversion to Judaism lightly. The conversion itself is mainly classes to get up to speed on the religious laws and then a dunk in a mikvah (a kind of ritual pool). Males have an extra obstacle - circumcision. And don't think that hospital-administered one will get you out of it. In the case of an already circumcised male convert, a drop of blood is still taken (as a sort of token religious circumcision). The end result is that converts are actually more likely to be religious than natural-born Jews and aren't likely to convert away from Judaism on a whim.

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  19. Re:wow by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The moderates usually have no authority over the extremists, so how should they police them?

    Leave the group.

    If the organization or group you are in is being lead in a direction you are opposed to and you have no say in that course, then you should leave. To stay is to explicitly condone the actions of the leadership. The best contemporary example of this in the context of religious groups is in fact the "Mormon" Church of Latter Day Saints, which has seen many followers leave because of the way in which it conducted itself during the Proposition 8 vote.

    Here was a church leadership which injected its organization voluminously and inappropriately into a contemporary political issue. They turned an institution of private religious belief into public political party. Their church is now feeling the backlash from this, and attempting to take off their political cap as quickly as they put it on is simply not possible.

    By staying in their church, Mormons explicitly endorse their churches actions and stances. Ostensibly on the issue of gay marriage, but more importantly on the long term decision that the LDS church can and will inject itself and its considerable demographic and monetary clout directly and voluminously into any political debate that takes its fancy. Many european states, learning from experience, outrightly ban such behavior, but in the US, obviously things are different.

    You can stay and support the actions of your church leaders, or you can leave. There are other sects, and other interpretations. The same goes for Muslims, particularly those in western countries, who frequent mosques with radical imams. Protestants break off and form new churches all the time. Even catholics can pick other pulpits if they take exception to their current priest. Staying to avoid social difficulty, or pretending that your presence is not being used to support your church leader's views and actions, are not valid excuses. Staying to "change from within" is only valid if you are actively doing so, otherwise it too is an excuse.

    People can and should leave a church if that church's actions or beliefs go against their own principles. To stay is to abandon those principles.

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
  20. Re:What do you mean if? by TehZorroness · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No. There certainly are endless ways of writing truly atrocious code.

  21. Re:wow by The+Wooden+Badger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Absofreakinlutely. The only reason religion gets brought up in regards to Northern Ireland is that one side happens to be Catholic and the other side happens to be Protestant. There isn't any thing religious about the conflict at all apart from that. If they were all one or the other the Irish would still be pissed (angry) about British occupation, rule, whatever you want to call it. It would be really nice to call it what it is and stop calling it a religious conflict.

    --
    Heroscape, it's like legos combined with anachronistic wargames.
  22. Re:I beg to differ by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I believe Stalin (as well as Pol Pot, and those responsible for Rwanda's genocide) adequately demonstrated that atrocities need no basis in religion. You can just as easily come up with a flawed ideology that is not based on a belief in the supernatural and use that for genocide.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  23. Re:What do you mean if? by DiegoBravo · · Score: 5, Funny

    But few ways so actively promoted by the language.

  24. Re:wow by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Out of your examples, the only one related to modern Christianity was about the abortion doctor murderers, and they are loudly and publicly condemned by all but a few nutcases. Honestly, you'd be hard pressed to collect a worse set of evidence for your hypothesis.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  25. Re:I beg to differ by Rycross · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well but then you're not talking about religion but something else. What you're referring to is that its fairly easy to get humans to rally around any sort of idea or belief, and then paint their group as being under attack, which will provoke a defense response. Its a fundamental human nature that gave us a competitive advantage when we were still just small groups strewn about the globe.

    I think people give religion too much credit. Religion is not some special-case organization, but rather a simple result of the mental quirks that evolved in humans to help us survive. You can see a lot of the behavior from people who adhere strongly to political parties, racial-supremacy groups, nations (nationalism), and even sports teams. Even the religion-is-bad crowd says a lot of shit that is stunningly similar to a lot of stuff that the religious crowd puts out.

    The reality is that its a problem with humanity, not a problem with religious people. Religion just tends to be an easy and comfortable target to project their fears and anger on. Kind-of like the atheist version of Satan and heathens, so to speak. Of course, recognizing that its a human condition brings up all sorts of uncomfortable truths.

  26. Re:wow by Tack · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The parent's post might be worded rather harshly and somewhat unfairly, but the general point is valid.

    During the Danish cartoon incident, I was quite surprised that the primary reaction of moderate Islam wasn't condemning the violence of their fellow Muslims, but rather insisting that the cartoonist should not have insulted their prophet.

  27. Re:wow by squidfood · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hey, that's LISP. Oh, wait. I mean that's Zen!

    For those who doubt that LISP is Zen, I ask the following: What is the sound of one ) closing?

  28. Re:What do you mean if? by mcgrew · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In the beginning there was the word, and the word was assembly. It is the basis of every other language. No other is so pure, so simple, and yet at the same time so complex.

    You try writing a playable battle tanks game for a 4Mz Sinclair with 4k of memory in any other language. I say it can't be done.

    What kind of punk kid would write a religious creed about programming without even mentioning the language that all other languages are written in (or at least the languages they were written in were written in).

    Get off my lawn. Damned kids. And take your burning cross with you.

  29. Stop me if you've heard this by mcgrew · · Score: 5, Funny

    A lawyer, a priest, and a Rabbi are on the Titanic when it hits an iceberg.

    "Save the children!" yells the rabbi.

    "FUCK the children!" snarls the lawyer.

    "No time for that!" excaims the priest.

    //alternate version for those who don't like lawyers//

    A rabbi and a priest are walking down the sidewalk when they see a poor waif in tattered, wet clothing shivering homeless in a doorway. "Poor thing," says the Rabbi, "What should we do with him?"

    "Take him home and fuck him" the priest says.

    "Out of what?" asks the rabbi.

    //one more//

    Two Muslims are walking down the st%$&*&^5J[no carrier]