City In Georgia Planning Virtual World For Civic Interaction
GamePolitics reports that Decatur, Georgia is looking into the development of a virtual environment to "encourage community networking, improve civic engagement, and promote economic development in the city." They've put out a request for ideas (PDF) on how to adapt a blending of MMOs and social networking to suit a city's civic needs. "The virtual environment should mimic, though not necessarily mirror, the layout and visual aspects of the City within the defined geographic area." They also want it to be avatar-based, friendly to businesses, and have a "fun and intuitive interface."
I've got it! Make it like America's Army Ops meets GTA. It's a first person shooter MMORPG that takes place in a virtual version of the town. Then you can find your n00b mailman and show him what you think of him forgetting to put the flag down on your mailbox. Did you just get overcharged at Walmart? Go home, log in, pick up a rocket launcher, and blow that place the hell up! It'd be a great stress reliever and creative way to let others in the town know you have complaints about them. I bet if people could speed through town at 120MPH in a hijacked corvette in the game, when it gets to reality it'd be all out of their system and they'd even drive under the speed limit. It's genius i tell you!
Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
"GamePolitics reports that Decatur, Georgia is looking into the development of a virtual environment to "encourage community networking, improve civic engagement, and promote economic development in the city."
The Sims meets Sim City.
Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
This all assumes that the citizens in the community are anxiously and zealously awaiting the chance to partake in this experiment. From my perspective, most of the people who actually concern themselves with community matters are the ones who will view this project as a mere gimmick to be avoided. I understand the idea is to encourage more community involvement by appealing to the more tech-savvy generation, but I truly do not believe this will be the stunning success that the article seems to imply they want it to be.
Coupons can be obtained from a plethora of other sources (newspaper anyone?). Visitor's information would be best served on a standard web page. And streaming video? Nobody watches C-SPAN, and that's nation-wide. How many viewers are they expecting from a town of 20,000?
How about like, you know, networking with people in real life? There's too much virtual interaction as it is. I say as I type a comment on a website.
-- http://ninthagenda.com/
Well, there will be someone to try something like this.
*quote from above link:*
"Meanwhile, the entire neighbourhood is whimpering and standing in puddles of their own urine.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! I don't really have to say anything else here, do I?"
And it has clowns!
Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
Dan Lockton's fantastic Architectures of Control blog pointed out this week that the city of Sutton is already engaged in a similar, and yet more tangible project
Isn't setting up a virtual version of your city for "civic interaction" tantamount to admitting that the real one is so far from that objective that setting up a virtual one is easier than fixing the real one? I'm all for electronic communication methods, they are loads of fun and sometimes useful; but why would I want my real city to be busy building a fake city when it should be working on the real one?
Now, in the future, I can imagine certain uses of a non-sucky virtual city, see "plot" section here.
Second Georgia?
Ew.
My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
There have got to be some roads that need to be paved, or the library could always use more books.
At most, a small town needs a well organized and moderated forum. maybe throw in some social networking juju, but avatars?
There are some successful virtual worlds out there, which, despite their success, I have no interest in visiting. Their effort will be crappy, buggy, pointless, and empty.
The only use I could imagine using this for would be to walk down, virtually, to the mayors house and scream obscenities at it. Add to that a swarm of flying penises and maybe they've won me over.
Snowcrash ... and if independent states or countries would have a virtual environment it could be pretty cool. I really can't think of existing tech that could make that level of (referencing the book) immersion possible but still it is an interesting thought.
I hope Russia doesn't take them over in VR too! :P
Those of us who think they know everything annoy those of us who do.
Project Wonderland is a 100% Java and open source toolkit for creating collaborative 3D virtual worlds. Within those worlds, users can communicate with high-fidelity, immersive audio, share live desktop applications and documents and conduct real business. Wonderland is completely extensible; developers and graphic artists can extend its functionality to create entire new worlds and new features in existing worlds.
tomorrow who's gonna fuss
Editors, please, be more specific when mentioning Georgia, and clarify if you're referring to the country or the state.
To me and most people around me, the title "City In Georgia Planning Virtual World For Civic Interaction" suggests that the article is about an impoverished city in the Caucasus trying to use technology to better preserve its ancient heritage during new architectural developments.
Watered down Second Life. Without the 'fun'.
DNA is a Turing machine. You, however, being dynamic and emergent, are not.
Search for local pictures, and, from those, you'd have a nice build of the local scene pretty quickly. You might end up with something like the virtual city in "The City and the Stars" by Arthur C. Clarke. That had the ability for the user to move back and forth in time; that feature could be implemented here too.
DNA is a Turing machine. You, however, being dynamic and emergent, are not.