Slashdot Mirror


New York City Street Lights To Go LED

eldavojohn writes "Wired has a short piece on NYC's new street light project. I don't think we need to belabor the many benefits that LEDs hold over traditional light bulbs, but the finishing touches are being addressed, and they will hopefully be put into place sometime next year. This design won a competition back in 2004, and OVI has been whittling down the prototypes. At $1.175 million, this sounds like a pretty cheap deal considering the DOE forked over $21 million to 13 R&D projects along the same lines."

39 of 303 comments (clear)

  1. flicker crashes by goombah99 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The thing that is awful about led lamps is that most of them are run straight off the AC voltage and have massive 100% brightness flickers. If you are moving it's like a strobe. You don't see it in car lights since they are run off DC. but most, perhaps not all, AC socket lamps I've seen have really bad flicker.

    I also how they have secondary lenses since LED's can be very directional the way they are typically resin cast.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:flicker crashes by digitalunity · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Assuming the line voltage is run through a full wave bridge rectifier, there would be a 120 Hz flicker, imperceptible to most people. Toss a large capacitor across that DC output and you've got dramatically less ripple.

      Your directionality comment is apropos. It's also worth noting that some people don't like the light spectrum output on white LED's. Personally, I prefer the pink tint from high pressure sodium lamps.

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    2. Re:flicker crashes by goombah99 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Assuming the line voltage is run through a full wave bridge rectifier, there would be a 120 Hz flicker, imperceptible to most people. Toss a large capacitor across that DC output and you've got dramatically less ripple.

      true but then you also have 100 times the surge current when you turn them on, or a slow turn on.

      What you say is of course obvious to any EE, and yet i've never actually seen a single 120v LED lamp made that way. One wonders why.

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    3. Re:flicker crashes by amRadioHed · · Score: 4, Informative

      There are plenty of LED traffic lights around me and I've never noticed any flicker. I imagine it isn't a problem.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    4. Re:flicker crashes by digitalunity · · Score: 3, Insightful

      These aren't headlights, they're street lamps. Do you really care if it takes them 3 minutes to warm up?

      And even assuming they have ballasts featuring accelerated warm-up, the starting current will still be as much as double the normal operating current requirements. Really though, the starting current is negligible in the grand scheme of efficiency comparisons.

      I'm not an expert on line voltage LED units designed to replace incandescents, but I would imagine including a bridge rectifier and capacitor would increase the cost and pose significant design constraints due to the components size.

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    5. Re:flicker crashes by corsec67 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I dunno. Lots of people claim they can see the 'flicker' on a CRT with a 70 hz vertical refresh rate. If I turn my head wayyyyyy to the left or right, putting the monitor in my peripheral vision, I might be able to see the flicker on a 60 hz, but never at 70 hz or higher.

      Just because you don't have some trait doesn't mean that other people don't. In this case, that trait is how fast your eyes can see. Congratulations, you have slower eyes.

      I am one of those people. It isn't just "flicker", I can see the image-black-image-black pattern of the CRT at 60Hz without doing any tricks like waving my hand in front of the monitor or using the side of my vision.

      I can't stand to be in the same room as a CRT monitor running at 60Hz, it is almost physically painful to see. When I had a CRT I had to run it at 85Hz to be able to use it for any period of time, but still had to make the text white on black, turn the brightness down, and such.

      If it doesn't bother you, then imagine replacing every CRT with a strobe light running fast, as bright as the monitor. That would be annoying and distracting, right?

      Imagine that tail lights of cars and buses were red strobe lights. Around here, that is actually a reality, with most of the new buses and some new cars having tail lights running at 60Hz. It is extremely obvious to me, where I can instantly point out which cars in a long line have blinking LED tail lights.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    6. Re:flicker crashes by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3, Informative

      You don't have to have a bridge rectifier. Just run two strings of LEDs with opposing polarity, in parallel, and you have the light of one string containing the same number of LEDs, but at 120 Hz. What the bridge rectifier gains you is a fuller duty cycle, rather than one something less than 50%, and just more light from each LED. Whether you want that or not depends on heat.

    7. Re:flicker crashes by Low+Ranked+Craig · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, they have been testing these lights in my home town of Scottsdale, and they have three different types installed along one stretch of road way. They are super bright, and there is no flicker whatsoever.

      The fact that they are directional is an advantage in this case since they are meant to throw light in a cone shape. The ones I've seen have no secondary lens. If there is any covering at all it is completely transparent glass.

      Personally I like them because the light is white, not the orange of sodium vapor. Reminds me of when I was a kid before the move from mercury vapor to sodium vapor...

      --
      I still cannot find the droids I am looking for...
    8. Re:flicker crashes by a1englishman · · Score: 3, Informative

      The biggest problem with LED traffic lights is that the greens are REALLY bright. You'll be shocked, especially at night how bright the damned things are. In SoCal, we have LED traffic lights everywhere.

    9. Re:flicker crashes by kc8apf · · Score: 3, Informative

      Cars and buses with LED tail lights are not running them at 60Hz. Nor are they being pulsed at any rate. The electrical system in a car is 12V DC. The LED assembly is either designed with enough LEDs in series such that the forward voltage drop over the set is 12V (roughly 10 LEDs) or they are in parallel with a buck-style switching power supply in front of it.

      Now, before you go on about how the switching power supply causes flicker, you should research how they work. You will find that for cost and size reasons, it is better to run a buck topology as fast as possible. 250kHz, 500kHz, and 1MHz are common frequencies. Of course, the output from the switching portion is put through a LC filter such that the voltage ripple is reduced to a small percentage of the target output voltage. Besides, LED brightness is controlled by current. Even a 5% voltage ripple on a 2V output would trigger a few lumens of brightness difference.

      So, if you are seeing flicker in car and bus tail lights, then you can see a 250kHz "flicker" with an average brightness delta of a few lumens. If you can, I'm sure there are plenty of researchers who would love to talk to you as you are the only person on the planet who can.

      Of course, since cost is the driving factor in these types of devices, they probably aren't using the switcher at all and thus there is _no_ flicker due to electrical reasons. You are probably being more affected by the directionality of the LEDs and the lenses used being vibrated by the engine at idle speeds. You get the same effect watching a motorcycle headlamp on a rough road. The light isn't flickering, it is just vibrating enough that the beam is falling in and out of your eye.

      --
      kc8apf
    10. Re:flicker crashes by Gorshkov · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Seriously, if you start your thought process with "I only pulled a B in something, but couldn't you fix ..." when the people working on it have bachelor's degrees (or master's or PhD's) in the subject area, it probably would not solve the problem

      I don't know what I hate more on slashdot .... seeing somebody spout off when it's obvious to anybody with even passing familiarity in the field in question that they're full of it, or seeing somebody get shat upon when they ask a perfectly valid question in an attempt to try to learn something new

    11. Re:flicker crashes by Tokerat · · Score: 3, Interesting
      1. Find a car with LED tail lights.
      2. Look at them as the brake is applied and they illuminate.
      3. "Shake" your eyes left and right rapidly

      You will observe, instead of a smooth trail of light (referred to on film as a "motion blur") like you normally would see, you can see individual "sets" of lights; very broken partial light trails. This effect is exaggerated enough to be realized in this case by the constant movement of your eyes.

      Every set of LED tail lights I've ever seen could produce this effect. How can this be? Apparently, I'm not alone in my experiences, either. I'm certainly not one of those nut jobs who says WiFi makes them nauseous, hell I can't tell teh difference between 320kbps MP3 and WAV.

      I can, however, hear a high pitched whine from an old CRT with no signal, 60Hz monitor refresh gives me a headache, and LED tail lights leave a strobe pattern instead of a smooth trail.

      I believe this is dangerous as it can make determining the point of origin for such types of lights difficult when split-second instinctive brain functions take over. Instead of a line leading to the current position of the tail light, in that slit second my mind has 3 "still frame" snapshots to piece the scene together with - not quite enough information.

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    12. Re:flicker crashes by paul248 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've seen a definite flicker in some cars' tail lights as well, so you're not crazy.

      I think the cars pulse the lights at ~50% most of the time, then switch to 100% when the brakes are applied.

    13. Re:flicker crashes by gfilion · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In SoCal, we have LED traffic lights everywhere.

      In Québec we have them pretty much everywhere too. Sometimes when the snow is just the right consistency and falls in the right direction, it sticks to the traffic lights lenses, obscuring them. In the past, the heat generated by the incandescent bulbs would melt the snow, but the new LED lights don't produce enough heat. A city worker has to remove the snow with a kind of small broom attached to a long pole.

      Two steps forward, one step back...

    14. Re:flicker crashes by zenyu · · Score: 4, Interesting

      *sigh* You remind me of the EE graduate student who was showing me and my classmates around his lab one day. To prove the point that humans couldn't hear a 16kHz tone very well he quickly turned the power up from 1 to 11, and through pain practically paralyzed the half of the class that still had their hearing intact.

      Many cars have the flickering tail LED lights, and it has nothing to do with DC-DC converters or other sources of ripple in the supply current. It's simply a matter of the duty cycle timer, the tail lights are "dimmed" not by limiting the current but by turning them completely on and off at a low frequency. The ones I've seen are in the 40-80Hz range, just stick an oscilloscope on there if you don't believe me. The flicker stops when the lights go to full illumination (i.e. the break petal is depressed).

      Now go outside and look at some LED tail lights! Even if you have very poor vision you should be able to see the ones flickering at 40-50 Hz.

      PS If you are legally blind, just don't comment on lighting. You are bound to suffer from foot in mouth at times; go take on those annoying audiophiles buying 1000 euro power chords.

  2. Giant LED light bulbs by pwizard2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is something I've been wondering about for awhile. LEDs (especially the white ones) are really bright for being so small, and they don't have that yellow tint that incandescent bulbs do. Compact florescent bulbs are nice, but they aren't perfect for every situation. I'm not an expert on the subject, but I've always wondered why they don't make giant LEDs that can replace ordinary light bulbs. It seems like 220 AC would be more than enough to power them.

    --
    "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    1. Re:Giant LED light bulbs by goombah99 · · Score: 3, Informative

      uh... because they do and you can buy them.

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    2. Re:Giant LED light bulbs by KudyardRipling · · Score: 3, Informative

      The white LEDS are doped to generate three distinct colors of light (R,G,B) whose combination yield a very cold blueshifted white light (>6500 K). If one seeks to use these for video, better check to see if the camera works well with such light.

      --
      Submission as evidence constitutes plaintiff and/or prosecutorial misconduct.
    3. Re:Giant LED light bulbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's not what he means. The replacement 120v led lamps are a collection of a bunch of little white led's. Why can't they make a single led the size of a lightbulb instead of 100 small led's.

      Is it possible to make a single, huge led?

    4. Re:Giant LED light bulbs by goombah99 · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can buy a single 5 watt led that is the same brightness as a 50 watt incandesscant.

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    5. Re:Giant LED light bulbs by dlenmn · · Score: 3, Informative

      LED light bulbs do exist (they're a bunch of small LEDs, not one jumbo one -- I don't know if that's feasible).

      I think you hit on the problem in your post though, power. 220V (or 120V) AC certainly has enough watts, but it's not in a usable form for LEDs. They require direct current (DC) at a much lower voltage. So you need some power conversion electronics to make them work. Then, to make them work efficiently, you need more electronics to regulate the current through them. For a standard electronics project, you just use a resistor, but then you're wasting power (to the tune of P=R*I^2). Off the shelf components that regulate the power more efficiently exist, but it adds expense.

      Fluorescent lights need some electronics to work too, but I don't think they're as complicated (and are thus, cheaper). Cost is a big factor here, because old incandescent light bulbs don't cost much to purchase.

    6. Re:Giant LED light bulbs by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah. I've noticed that. What I don't get is why they choose to set the color temperature that way. Red LEDs are extremely cheap compared with producing light at the other end of the spectrum. Why in the world would they balance them towards the blue (expensive) end of the spectrum when that is both more expensive and visually unpleasant? About the only thing I can imagine about the current LED designs is that they were designed to be used in combination with standard incandescent bulbs. If you blend the two, you should get a fairly nice looking light spectrum, albeit probably a bit heavy in the yellows....

      I'd buy LED lights instantly if they actually used three emitters. Unfortunately, most don't. They use two---one yellow, one blue. Because the yellow LED has a relatively narrow light spectrum compared with an incandescent, you end up with basically no light output down near the bottom of the visual spectrum. The result is light that is downright unpleasant to deal with in every way. The bluish light makes it hard to see color accurately, makes colors not reproduce well in photography or video, and really isn't good for you mood-wise. Basically, the current crop of LED lights have all the problems of CFLs except the mercury (well, and the LEDs should last a lot longer, I believe).

      The question, then, becomes this: "When are we going to see properly designed white LED bulbs?"

      On the other hand, while they suck for homes, the existing LED lights are perfect for street lights. First, there was one experiment that suggests that suicides and crime may decrease when street lights are replaced with bluish lighting. Second, the color temperature of blue LEDs are virtually indistinguishable from the mercury vapor lights (~6000K) that are already used in a lot of places.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    7. Re:Giant LED light bulbs by cathector · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > and they break when they get too hot.

      actually, high-power LEDs such as Philips's Luxeon series are quite robust in the face of surprising amounts of heat. I've run enough current through them so that they melted their soldering several times, and while its true their efficiency declines with heat, they suffered no permanent damage. When you put an amp and half through one of those suckers, they're literally stunningly bright.

    8. Re:Giant LED light bulbs by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why can't they make a single led the size of a lightbulb instead of 100 small led's.

      Is it possible to make a single, huge led?

      I don't know. Maybe it's the same reason that they can't make a tungsten filament the size of a whole light bulb. Instead, they keep selling us a tiny wire the size of a pubic hair surrounded by a huge void filled with argon gas. This has been going on for well over a century, and they never seem to fix it.

    9. Re:Giant LED light bulbs by eggnoglatte · · Score: 3, Informative

      First, the GP is right: most high power white LEDs are actually blue or UV LEDs with a yellow phosphor in the plastic packaging.

      As for phosphors yielding a spiky mess for a spectrum: how exactly do you imagine the spectrum of an RGB LED looks? The individual primaries in such combinations are VERY narrow band, so rather than a continuous spectrum you get three distinct peaks. Phosphors are actually smoother by comparison.

  3. How by no-body · · Score: 4, Funny

    many NewYorkers does it take now to change a light bulb?

    1. Re:How by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Funny

      What's it to you, pal?

  4. Re:one million? by shawb · · Score: 4, Informative

    FTA, the ~$1million is for building and testing six working prototypes. The design will then be added to a catalog the city uses, and they can then install them as they see appropriate.

    --
    I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
  5. Won't anyone think of the astronomers? by pentalive · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Are there any major observatories near NYC? (hmm large mountains close to NYC?)

    Are these new lights narrow or wide spectrum?

    See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light_pollution

     

  6. Re:I hate leds!! by digitalunity · · Score: 3, Informative

    The lighting product manufacturers quote efficiency in lumens-per-watt(lpw). What they don't shove in your face in marketing is that the devil is in the details.

    CFLs, LEDs, incandescents, HPS and metal halides all have drastically different spectrum outputs. Incandescents have a very broad spectrum but their lpw is astonishingly low.

    CFLs have as much as 80 lpw, whereas MH and LEDs are currently at about 100 and HPS can be even higher(around 140 lpw initial, which declines over time). LEDs have the potential to be higher than HPS but across the lifetime of the HPS bulb the LED may end up with a higher average lpw and definitely much longer service life.

    There are CFL's with a broader spectrum but they're less efficient. While not completely monochromatic, there is a big spectrum spike in reds and yellows for HPS bulbs. Most people find this light to be soothing. Metal halides have a broader spectrum than HPS but are less efficient than even fluorescents. There are new white LEDs in research that produce as much as 145 lpw, but these are not commercially produced yet. Philips produces a 115 lpw white LED which is available in large quantities. You're right about the blue light hazard though - phosphor based white LEDs have a large spike around 465nm.

    Interested in reading more about Lighting? Read the book the pot growers read. They have the best lighting money can buy. The Best of the Growing Edge

    --
    You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
  7. Re:Isn't HPS more efficient? by hardburn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Some of the newer LEDs can go above 100 lumens/watt.

    One thing about HPS is that it spreads light everywhere, whereas LEDs are more directed, which you want in a streetlight facing down. Omnidirectionalness can be fixed with good fixture design, but most cities use crummy fixtures.

    --
    Not a typewriter
  8. Bad plan in snowy environment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here in Portland, OR, we have already started to use LED street lights. And now that we're in a snow storm, these lights aren't working. LEDs don't produce heat (that's why they're efficient). By not producing heat, they don't melt the snow away from them. So all the LED streetlights in Portland are covered in snow and cannot be seen.

    The old lights produce enough heat to melt all the snow. Snow in Portland is rare, so it's not that big of a deal. In NY, it's quite the opposite.

    1. Re:Bad plan in snowy environment... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Funny

      So all the LED streetlights in Portland are covered in snow and cannot be seen.

      Since LEDs are more efficient (more lumens per watt) the colder their tmperature, you can at least take comfort in the fact those snow-encrusted street-lamps are very efficiently lighting up the inside of the snow.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  9. Re:Isn't HPS more efficient? by tlhIngan · · Score: 4, Informative

    The initial lpw on HPS is usually about 140 but this goes down as you near the end of the bulbs lifetime. LEDs have fairly consistent output until they die.

    Actually, LEDs get dimmer as they get used. If they don't fail due to the semiconductor turning into molten metal, they get dimmer and dimmer and dimmer. The 100,000 hour lifetime figure on LEDs is usually the time until 50% brightness (considered to be the point where one would notice the light being dimmer).

    There are many reasons for this - degradation of the junction itself, but the semiconductor itself leads to a large index of refraction - a lot of the light in a LED gets reflected back into the semiconductor. And then there's degradation of the epoxy used to seal the LED. All these conspire to make the LEDs much dimmer, and get dimmer over time.

  10. Submitter needs to visit wikipedia. by serviscope_minor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "We don't need to belabour the advantages of LEDs over traditional lightbulbs"?

    Actually, we do, since we've had lightbulbs other than incandecent for over a decade, and incandecents are never used to light streets. LEDs manage about 100 lumens per watt, similar to high pressure sodium lamps. The old orange low-pressure sodium lamps are still king of the hill at 200 lumens per watt.

    So what were those advantages again? Compared to high-pressure sodium lsmps, they're the same efficiency and lifetime, but a lot more expensive. The only advantage to low pressure lamps is colour, but they loose a factor of 2 on efficiency.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  11. metric vs. imperial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    [...] Instead, they keep selling us a tiny wire the size of a pubic hair [...]

    Please adopt the metric system. PLEASE!!!

  12. What's the metric equivalent? by name_already_taken · · Score: 4, Funny

    [...] Instead, they keep selling us a tiny wire the size of a pubic hair [...]

    Please adopt the metric system. PLEASE!!!

    Pray tell, can you enlighten us to what the metric equivalent of a pubic hair is?

    5.3 centicurlies?

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
  13. Re:If you see flicker in taillights by wings · · Score: 4, Informative

    The flicker is not in his head, it's in the taillights. I've seen the flicker, it's caused by a pulse width modulation circuit to make the taillight mode of a combination taillight/stoplight appear dimmer. A quick google search pulls up this article http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2006_Nov_8/ai_n27039046 about an automotive product specifically designed to address this issue and stop the flicker by eliminating the pwm circuit. It works by reducing the DC drive to the LEDs in taillight mode instead of using pulse width modulation to reduce the average current and effective brightness.

  14. Re:They are also safer because of that by Whillowhim · · Score: 3, Informative

    Incorrect when talking about LEDs. "White" LEDs are covered with a phosphor that takes a blue LED's light and shifts it down. The output from the phosphor is broad spectrum, even if the original LED was a narrow band blue. Thus, these LEDs are a good wide spectrum light, instead of an approximation made from mixing red, green and blue LEDs. Of course, the problem you described can exist, but is commonly seen only with fluorescent bulbs.