Slashdot Mirror


Next Generation T9 Keyboard Technology

Iddo Genuth writes "Cliff Kushler, the inventor of the T9 keyboard technology for numeric keypads, has developed a new alphanumeric entry technology for touch-screen laptops and Smartphone devices. This latest technology, named Swype, works with an on-screen QWERTY keyboard similar to ones found on Windows Mobile and the iPhone. The difference from the usual method of typing in the letters is that a finger or stylus is used to slide in the first letter, then without lifting the finger, the user continues writing the entire word. Only once the word is completed can the finger be lifted off. According to the developers, this leads to a much faster way of 'typing,' or as we might call it soon, 'swiping.'"

107 of 150 comments (clear)

  1. An entire generation will be thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Swyper no swyping"!

    1. Re:An entire generation will be thinking by sootman · · Score: 1

      Two generations, actually: those who watch Dora, and those who have kids who watch Dora.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  2. swipe post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    first swipe

  3. Finally by Anthony_Cargile · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Touchscreen keyboards to me have always been hard to use. On both the plasma-screen smartboards at my friend's A/V workplace and the ones I've seen in modern (i.e. well funded) high schools, the windows on screen keyboard and the keyboard prepackaged with the smartboard software is just terrible, partially due to the heat-sensitive surface being activated wherever my finger's heat first hits it, i.e. NOT where I wanted it to be.

    This looks much more promising, and will hopefully be preventing the smartboard users from running back to a physical keyboard just to type something after using the mouse in front of the actual screen.

    1. Re:Finally by nscheffey · · Score: 2

      Almost no touch screens use heat sensitivity. You are thinking of capacitive touchscreens, which can also be triggered by proximity (i.e. before you physically touch it).

    2. Re:Finally by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Touchscreen keyboards to me have always been hard to use.

      I"mm tesdinbv one now and iys no top bnaf.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  4. Dvorak? by XanC · · Score: 5, Interesting

    All these virtual keyboards are hard-coded for QWERTY, which makes even less sense for that kind of device than for a modern keyboard!

    Dvorak should be an option, along with alphabetical order.

    Actually for this thing, there's probably a whole new layout that's optimal. (That's an exercise for the reader to invent.)

    1. Re:Dvorak? by zappepcs · · Score: 4, Insightful

      say what? Dvorak keyboards are great if you want to type in what amounts to two different languages, and it's designed to accommodate speed and efficiency for ten fingers, not one finger and two thumbs.

      If you are going to break away from the standard qwerty keyboard, why not try to do something that makes sense for two thumbs and a finger? Understanding that you would have two circular areas for common keys, and best to have them arranged so that you get best efficiency switching between thumbs on alternating letters.

      T9 is meant for touch tone keypads, this swipe is designed for efficiency on soft keyboards. If you want to maximize efficiency for thumbs, start all over again please.

    2. Re:Dvorak? by Anthony_Cargile · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually for this thing, there's probably a whole new layout that's optimal. (That's an exercise for the reader to invent.)

      Introducing the patented, copywritten hunt-and-peck touchscreen keyboard! Perfect for touchscreens of all types, and optimized for the elderly! And as an added bonus, pay shipping and handling to receive 2 hunt-and-peck keyboards! Only 2 easy payments of $19.95!

      and one very difficult payment of $49.99

      Order now!

    3. Re:Dvorak? by cgenman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Having been in mixed Dvorak, Qwerty, and Abcdefg environments, and having been on a quest for the ultimate keyboard for the past 10 years, I'm pretty confident that Qwerty is *good enough* until something truly different comes along.

      Dvorak *can* run a little faster than Qwerty for typing, but not so much that you'd see an appreciably speed increase for nomal use. And as Dvorak has been around for about 80 years now, I don't think anyone is getting in on the wave of the future by using it. Similarly, you'd be surprised how hard it is to use an alphabetized keyboard after years of Qwerty or Dvorak usage. The brain just doesn't change over that easily.

      Unless an alternative layout increased speeds 100% or so, I'd keep things accessible. Just use Qwerty, and move on.

    4. Re:Dvorak? by i.of.the.storm · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This might be the optimal layout: HexInput. Or at least, it's designed to work in a similar manner to what's described.

      --
      All your base are belong to Wii.
    5. Re:Dvorak? by evanbd · · Score: 1

      You mean FITALY?

    6. Re:Dvorak? by mollymoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dvorak is designed for efficient touch typing. Virtual keyboards are inherently poor for touch typing (you can't feel which "keys" your fingers are hitting), and most are too small to even attempt it. If you could convince me there is a significant proportion of people who known Dvorak but can't even type one- or two-fingered on a QWERTY I might believe that there is a real need, but I suspect that group of users is vanishingly small.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    7. Re:Dvorak? by joebadmo · · Score: 1

      Seems to me like QWERTY is actually a superior layout for this application. The stroke length difference seems like it would be more or less insignificant, and spreading out common letters, I'd imagine, would make it easier for the predictive software to make the right predictions.

    8. Re:Dvorak? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wonder why they didn't call it ZVCHWK?

    9. Re:Dvorak? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Thats rather good. Would work on the Wii, too.

    10. Re:Dvorak? by i.of.the.storm · · Score: 1

      I think for the Wii onscreen QWERTY keyboards aren't that bad, but the thing has USB ports, so if I were ever to do anything that involved a lot of typing (eg. Wii Linux) I would probably just plug in a USB keyboard. No need to find ugly hackish workarounds when there's a simpler solution, IMO. I think the HexInput idea would work pretty well on the DS though, and maybe other handhelds like the PSP, but onscreen QWERTY will always have the advantage that people are used to the layout.

      --
      All your base are belong to Wii.
    11. Re:Dvorak? by ethana2 · · Score: 1

      Dvorak should be available; colemak too.

    12. Re:Dvorak? by Anthony+Rosequist · · Score: 1

      Actually for this thing, there's probably a whole new layout that's optimal. (That's an exercise for the reader to invent.)

      The guys over at ShapeWriter have already beaten you (me?) to it.

      They call it the ATOMIK keyboard layout, and there's a short demo here. The learning curve is probably a little steep, but I would guess that it's less than learning QWERTY, partly because you're allowed to look at the keyboard the entire time. :)

    13. Re:Dvorak? by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Specifically concerning the iPhone, I think it would be better to use a regular telephone keypad instead of a whole QWERTY keyboard. There would be space for bigger keys. I'd have an easier time just pressing each number until I got the letter I wanted, rather than pressing the smaller QWERTY keys only to have the wrong letter typed. Combining T9 with the telephone keypad would make it even better.

    14. Re:Dvorak? by happyhangone · · Score: 1

      Well, when I was a wannabe Palm hacker, I always saw the need for an onscreen keyboard that didn't follow the QWERTY layout. (I always believed that there was a more speedy way to input things than drawing each letter one at a time) This layout is anything but optimized for one-finger-or-pen-point-swiped-input. So in my own search for perfection, I collided with the ATOMIK keyboard and relevant thesis from IBM research (1, 2, 3) Unfortunately, English is just my second language so anything optimized for English couldn't work out with enough success rate to be useful so I embarked on the journey to program out the algorithms on those thesis to develop my own Spanish arrangement of letters, to make my own atomic keyboard layout. After a while, I ended up with a very useful layout that, as the thesis states, ended up with common word endings available as gliphs from the pen. If any person in the world attempts to make a keyboard for swiping a finger or a pen, is a fool if doesn't try to optimize the layout and to throw out the qwerty once and for all. (PS, the program and the layout were lost on a HDD crash but probably I will recreate this thing again, just for the sake of it...)

    15. Re:Dvorak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      copywritten

      ARGH! The inner Grammar Nazi within me screams in a bloodied rage.

      copywriting is completely different from copyrighting .

    16. Re:Dvorak? by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      Instead of dvorak, linotype would probably work quite well. http://www.wired.com/images/article/full/2007/07/0703_dayintech_full.jpg

      --
      Not a sentence!
    17. Re:Dvorak? by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 1

      I like the number-pad thingy, but I don't like having to press the same key 6 times.

      1-2 should give a capital "A" while 3-2 should give a capital "C" and 6-2 should give a lower-case "c"; 7-2 would just give a "2".

      Also, the iPhone's prediction algorithm is f'ed.

      --
      I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
    18. Re:Dvorak? by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      The point of dvorak is not typing speed, but keeping your hands on the home row as much as possible. I typed on Dvorak exclusively the last few years, it's made my wrists feel a lot better. But I don't type faster, perhaps a bit more accurate.

      Also, with the ease of changing it in most OSes, I don't think it's anything but personal choice anymore.

      If you want something that may be better, try the Neo layout though. It's for the german language, but it may be good for english as well:
      http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/NEO-Tastaturbelegung

      http://www.neo-layout.org/

      I would think, in the future, typing becomes less important anyway. Sorry about the neo links, there used to be good mathematical analysis in english, but it seems the entire site it was on is away. However, it seems to have gained a lot of traction in the German speaking world considering it had next to nothing on the web about it just several years back and was invented in the 2000s.

    19. Re:Dvorak? by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      You might want to look into Colemak. It is touted as being better than Dvorak.

    20. Re:Dvorak? by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      I would think that, since this input method is based on moving a finger between letters in a continuous motion, it would probably be a Good Thing if commonly used letters were far apart, or far enough apart to make each character entered a long enough "swipe" to feel natural and ergonomic.

      I am a bit curious about how you were to type a word like "letter," where you need to make 2 "Ts" at once. Maybe after you enter the first T, you do a little loop and end up where you started.

      You can, by the way, get a writing app for your iPhone now that operates on this principle.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    21. Re:Dvorak? by kv9 · · Score: 1

      I typed on Dvorak exclusively the last few years, it's made my wrists feel a lot better. But I don't type faster, perhaps a bit more accurate.

      do you have some numbers? on a QWERTY layout I seem to have about a 2% error rate (assuming a backspace press counts as one error -- probably more like 0.2-0.5%, because I tend to smash the backspace key multiple times when fixing errors). my sample size is ~20M keypresses.

      other interesting numbers would be:

      • space - 10%
      • a - 7.5%
      • enter - 5%
      • keypad 5 - only 1 press out of 20M

      I doubt Dvorak would help with speed or accuracy in my case. and the QWERTY layout has never given me any hand trouble, while I do get occasional mouse cramps in my right hand.

    22. Re:Dvorak? by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      Optimization for two fingers may be similar to the one stylus optimization done for the Palm desktop a while ago. : http://www.fitaly.com/palm/palmfitaly.htm

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    23. Re:Dvorak? by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      Try Fitaly ( http://www.fitaly.com/palm/palmfitaly.htm ). I've used it on the Palm, and it really is quite nice, once you get used to it.

      It also uses a swipe method to determine capitol letters, so no shift key is needed.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    24. Re:Dvorak? by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      Nah, I don't have the numbers you want. Most analysis goes towards words. For instance, I would recognized that Dvorak generally isn't optimal for coding c and c style langages either although I use lisp mostly and in that, Qwerty & Dvorak are identical, as it would be for the space, a, enter, and keypad keys.

      I found the English Neo layout site, it has more numbers scrolling down, but it's generally considering words, as well:
      http://pebbles.schattenlauf.de/layout/index_us.html

    25. Re:Dvorak? by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 1

      The Storm does something like that. In portrait mode, it defaults to SureType (2 letters per "key" in a QWERTY-like layout), and in landscape it goes to full QWERTY.

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    26. Re:Dvorak? by houghi · · Score: 1

      Sure, just ignore many keyboard layouts out there.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    27. Re:Dvorak? by jrasmussen0 · · Score: 1

      I took a look at the HexInput and found it very fascinating.

      It makes more sense to me than using a QWERTY keyboard.

    28. Re:Dvorak? by Jay+L · · Score: 1

      Actually for this thing, there's probably a whole new layout that's optimal.

      Yes, and it's already been invented a few times:

      • ATOMIK from IBM, which became SHARK, which became ShapeWriter, available on the iPhone
      • FITALY from Textware, available on PPC and Palm
    29. Re:Dvorak? by Nicolay77 · · Score: 1

      but onscreen QWERTY will always have the advantage that people are used to the layout.

      Only for hunt-and-peckers.

      I touch-type, and I have to search the keys in the virtual keyboard of my cell. That's because when I type I don't think in the keys but in the whole word and it then appears in the screen.

      For people like me, an alphabetical order is way more natural. I totally know that order.

      --
      We are Turing O-Machines. The Oracle is out there.
    30. Re:Dvorak? by adisakp · · Score: 1

      FWIW, I think 1 finger (one hand holding the device, the other using a finger), 2 thumbs (both hands holding using thumbs), or 1 thumb (same thumb as holding hand - i.e. 1-hand input) is better than 2 thumbs + 1 finger (which I can't figure out how that would be useful).

    31. Re:Dvorak? by Laser_iCE · · Score: 1

      'Cuz it kind of sounds like FATALITY!

    32. Re:Dvorak? by zappepcs · · Score: 1

      The Sidekick allows you to use both hands to hold the device, two thumbs typing, and also has two buttons for fingers much the same way that nintendo game controllers do. It is possible to use more than thumbs with the two hands holding the device posture.

  5. Re:bleh by scoot80 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I find it works well, unless I want to type a message in a different language. Then it really goes bad. But, I've got a Nokia, and it works great. once you make it learn a few words by spelling them yourself (usually suburb names) its great. If you wanna use slang, hit the hash key a few times, and it takes it off T9, so you can free type.

    But when typing a normal SMS, T9 predictive input makes it so much easier for me.

  6. WritingPad by blacklint · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've had an iPhone application for quite a while that uses this. It's called WritingPad, and the about screen has a link to http://shapewriter.com/.

    1. Re:WritingPad by DancesWithBlowTorch · · Score: 1

      Seconded. Shapewriting was invented by Per Ola Kristensson before 2004 (pdf warning), not by Kliff Kushler in 2008. WritingPad has been available on the iPhone for almost a year now. It has even been praised by Time magazine. These guys are jumping on the bandwagon. They only get more press since they are "the people who invented T9".

  7. What Google thinks of Swype by Animats · · Score: 4, Funny

    Google's ad engine selected "WI Portable Restrooms -- We Offer Portable Restrooms in Every Configuration & Price Range" for this page.

    OK, back to the drawing board on product name.

  8. Writingpad, in an App Store near you by mbourgon · · Score: 1

    Already exists. I think it was out the first week the iPhone App Store was open. Works pretty decently.

    --
    "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
  9. Tag fuckthegovernment? by Anthony_Cargile · · Score: 1

    I know I've already posted, but as of this post this article is tagged "fuckthegovernment".

    Really /.? I know some of the FOSS people here are pretty diehard, but come on, wtf? What does the government have to do with T9 keyboards?

  10. This was "swype'd" from Dr Zhai, of IBM, research by mTor · · Score: 5, Informative

    Take a look at this demo of ShapeWriter from IBM. It's the same thing as Swype and was invented 5 years ago. Dr Zhai has formed a company around the tech and you can see it here: ShapeWriter.

  11. Sounds familiar by Pluvius · · Score: 1

    The difference from the usual method of typing in the letters is that a finger or stylus is used to slide in the first letter, then without lifting the finger, the user continues writing the entire word. Only once the word is completed can the finger be lifted off.

    That's kind of like how a Ouija board is operated, isn't it? More proof that Cliff Kushler is Satan, I guess.

    Rob

  12. One Word - Patent! by ztransform · · Score: 1

    Patent patent patent! Someone will either be looking to make lots by licensing some "new idea".. or stifling such innovation by use of a patent. Or maybe I'm no longer excited by any invention that wasn't born out of the RFC process anymore..

    1. Re:One Word - Patent! by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      The internet has ruined it for all of us. I can't even get a stiffy anymore unless it involves a girl shitting into a cup.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  13. Re:bleh by mollymoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    First, I never use that T9 stuff, because it never chooses the right word. Guessing the word that you want to type isn't convenient, it's annoying. Also, it doesn't allow for purposefully misspelled words and text slang.

    At least in good recent implementations it does usually choose the right word, because in addition to having generic word frequency data it learns the most common words you personally use. You can also add your own words to the dictionary, so you can use as many purposefully mispelled words and slang terms as you like. You can always drop out of T9 mode for unusual requirements.

    I usually dislike people who don't use T9; they tend to be the idiots who write things like "l8r" (7 key-presses, assuming you can hold the key down to get the 8 and wait between letters) instead of "later" (5 key-presses with T9, entered as fast as you like). A good T9 implementation lets me compose messages with correct spelling and punctuation more rapidly and reliably and with less effort. Messages with correct grammar, spelling and punctuation can be read more reliably and rapidly by the recipients.

    --
    Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
  14. Re:bleh by muridae · · Score: 1

    Yes it does. Just edit the T9 dictionary to add the words you want.

  15. Re:bleh by muridae · · Score: 1
    I liked T9, until I moved to a phone with a keyboard. How this will compare, I'll find out after a few days.

    Programing the T9 system to make is learn the words I use was half the fun. It was like training a spam filter to accept purposefully misspelled words, only without the end result being that only spam got through and all the valid email was filtered.

  16. Re:bleh by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ugh. I'll never code another stack after reading this :P

  17. Re:Accuracy? by mollymoo · · Score: 1

    I'd like to see the accuracy of this system in a real-life setting. On phones with the T9 technology, I found it was faster for me to hit a key three times than to backspace every time the software made a mistake (which was frequently)...

    Backspace? Mistake? It's never wrong in the sense that it never suggests a word that can't be made of the letters on the keys you pressed. Erm, you do know how to scroll through the list of suggested words on your phone, don't you? You do know that if it doesn't have a word you can add it to the dictionary and the word you enter will appear in the message you are composing, don't you? The only reason you should have to backspace is if you made a mistake, you don't want to add a word to the dictionary or you don't know how T9 works.

    I suspect a lot of people get as far with T9 as entering 2337 expecting "beer", getting "adds" and deciding it doesn't work because it can't read their mind.

    --
    Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
  18. writingpad iphone app by mdaitc · · Score: 2, Informative

    i've been using the writingpad iphone app for months that does just this.
    http://www.shapewriter.com/iphone.html

  19. Re:This was "swype'd" from Dr Zhai, of IBM, resear by mlynx · · Score: 1

    Why, oh why, do I never have the mod points when something like is it posted. This needs to be modded up.

  20. Dasher? by unifyingtheory · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is this anything like Dasher? The demo can be seen here

    1. Re:Dasher? by shtrom · · Score: 1

      Is this anything like Dasher?

      I thought so by reading the post, but the linked articles shows that it's not the case.

      I still think a Dasher-like system may be a viable input system for keyboard-less devices, though. Modulo some fine tuning, of course...

  21. Re:bleh by AmigaMMC · · Score: 1

    T9 doesn't work really well with English, too many variables. It takes me more time to fix words than just using the standard "press numeric key until needed letter is reached" system (no idea what it is called). On the other hand, when I go to Italy I have a phone there and I use T9 and it works really well with the Italian language.

  22. Re:bleh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I usually dislike people who don't use T9;

    Holy crap, you are an idiot!

  23. Re:bleh by Anthony_Cargile · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    This made me laugh so hard I swallowed my gum and almost choked to death! Bravo, AC!

  24. Re:bleh by Anthony_Cargile · · Score: 1

    Sadly, I was the AC who posted the joke fearing karma wreckage if the mods hated the joke, and I was going to put another stack joke in there (e.g. "then I would have to pop her") but decided not to at the last minute. Got the original joke from a comedian on Comedy Central, anyway.

  25. Re:bleh by DimmO · · Score: 1

    on my phone (nokia), "l8r" is 3 button-presses. it's in the default T9 dictionary.

  26. And it has Caps Lock!!! by cmdotter · · Score: 1

    Like, everyone needs caps lock don't we? ffs!

  27. Re:bleh by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1

    Sadly, I was the AC who posted the reply to your AC's joke because not all karma is worth giving away ;) Oh, wait.

    I got the idea from a comedian -- Seth McFarlane -- in that Family Guy episode where Peter considers a vasectomy and a barbershop quartet goes into a meandering number about sexual harassment and how the chick had too huge a rack to be talking about that kind of stuff(skip to 1:07)

    But I guess that's the definition of the word...I-RON-EEEEY!

  28. Re:bleh by fabs64 · · Score: 1

    I know mine sure stumbled over "rdpadily". But more to the point I had to look at each individual word in that sentence and not just the whole sentence as I normally would.

  29. ACRES of irrelevant words by tepples · · Score: 1

    Erm, you do know how to scroll through the list of suggested words on your phone

    But if you try to type BASES (22737) and have to scroll through ACRES of irrelevant words, you're not likely to be someone who CARES about T9, and using that mode isn't likely to be in the CARDS for you. How many keystrokes does it take to scroll through this list?

    1. Re:ACRES of irrelevant words by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      Er, mine gave me about 5 commonly used options for Bases. Your article says that the word "bases" the WORST possible clash, and the maximum words to pick from is 11. Is an 11 word list too much to handle? I did have to scroll the first time, so I suppose that counts as about 8 keypresses, with no waiting. That's verses a keypress, pause long enough for two keypresses, and four keypresses, which is 5 actual keypresses but is about as slow as 8 keypresses. Also, if I have to type Bases again in the near future, it's going to be 6 keypresses because it's at the front of the list now.

      So, are 2 extra keypresses for one word in a sentance worth 3-5 extra keypress PER WORD in each sentance? Ever tried a word like Literary in multi-tap mode? OMGWTFBBQ!! 8 keys in T9, 19 in multi-tap. Forget about a word like Mississippi, that would take forever on a multi-tap entery (that's one of those words you dread to type out on multi-tap, it can take a full minute to type), but T9 it takes -drumroll- 11 keypresses. That just happens to be how many letters there are in Mississippi! Holy cow, it's amazing! And it isn't just for big words, words like "the" take 2 fewer keypresses, and words like "Hi" need no pause.

      Seriously, it's not that hard, but stick with what you know, and I'll still be faster and more efficient than you even with the occasional word I have to enter into the dictionary (once, never to be entered again ;) ).

      Seriously, the cases where multi-tap is faster than predictive text do certainly exist, but they are rare, and can be completely eliminated if you take a few extra seconds to customise your dictionary when you encounter such a word. After 6 months of use (or less) even cell phone users with full-keyboards should have trouble keeping up with a predictive text user.

      Your article mentions iTap vs T9, T9 I prefer but the auto-completing of iTap isn't as bad as they make it out to be, because if you keep typing the auto-complete corrects itself, and it does make it quicker when it gets it right. My favorite system was whatever Kyocera uses. I found that to be very accurate, but it's a little different for everyone. :)

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    2. Re:ACRES of irrelevant words by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      Seriously dude, I's so serious I used seriously to like, start two paragraphs in a row.

      Seriously.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
  30. Re:bleh by ion.simon.c · · Score: 1

    Yeah. Read speed on that sentence was ~50% of normal. You'd better have something REALLY fucking good to say if you're gonna make me work that hard to decipher it. ;)

  31. A simple question by Goobermunch · · Score: 1

    How does it handle double letters?

    For example, would it type my username as Goobermunch or Gobermunch? How would it know the difference? How does Swyping accommodate the William Wallaces of the world? Are they doomed to being Wiliam Walaces?

    The press release leaves the question open. The ability to detect a repeated input seems to be an advantage of keypad type input. Perhaps, if you dwell for a sufficiently long period of time, it will count the character beneath the stylus twice.

    --AC

    1. Re:A simple question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I got to try out Swype last fall at the TC50. It's pretty great technology, as I remember to do a double letter you just needed to loop around the letter.

    2. Re:A simple question by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      For example, would it type my username as Goobermunch or Gobermunch? How would it know the difference? How does Swyping accommodate the William Wallaces of the world? Are they doomed to being Wiliam Walaces?

      I don't know about Swype, but when using Shapewriter, an iPhone notepad application that works (suspiciously) similar as other have pointed out, you just ignore double letters. I just tried "William Wallace" on ShapeWriter by tracing "Wiliam Walace" and it came out just fine. If there is an ambiguity between two valid words ("planner" and "planer"), they'll both be shown in a pick list from which you just select the right one.

      The technology relies on a dictionary, so it won't recognise words such as your username until you add it manually.

      Perhaps, if you dwell for a sufficiently long period of time, it will count the character beneath the stylus twice.

      Someone else mentioned looping around a letter to make it a double, which beats waiting. I seriously detest any input method that makes me wait, like the Multitap input on old pre-T9 cell phones, where you'd have to wait a second before hitting the "3" key again to type a double "e" (else you'd just get an "f")

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  32. Because fucktheuspto by tepples · · Score: 1

    What does the government have to do with T9 keyboards?

    The government granted a monopoly on T9 input to Tegic (now part of Nuance).

  33. neener by bigattichouse · · Score: 1

    I've just created the rotary version - with letters arranged by frequency (E in the center - others further out.) the E-writer or somesuch... or "Summoner" since it looks like you trace pentagrams on the circle. Different enough to get around the patent, I hope :)

    --
    meh
  34. Re:bleh by altek · · Score: 1

    Nor does it predict when I'm typing an expletive. Seriously, that annoys me (I swear a lot because I have no imagination).

    --
    THE MAGIC WORDS ARE SQUEAMISH OSSIFRAGE
  35. StickyKeys by BagOCrap · · Score: 1

    Only once the word is completed can the finger be lifted off.

    Better not be dyslexic around devices of this kind, or it'll stick to your finger indefinitely.

    It sure lends the term "StickyKeys" a new meaning!

    --
    -- Chaos, panic, pandemonium... My job here is done!
  36. Make use of the medium by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

    I was thinking about on-screen keyboards just yesterday. I usually avoid them, preferring real keyboards, but I was thinking, if your only choice is on screen, how would you want it to work?

    My real keyboard is optimized to minimize hand and finger movement, by placing the keys I use most commonly near where my hands are supposed to be. However, it is limited by the medium: the keys have to be in the same place all the time. An on-screen keyboard doesn't have this limitation: you can put the "keys" wherever you want them to be at any time you like. Does anyone have experience with on-screen keyboards that do this (I know there are some)?

    I was thinking that what you could do is have some kind of frequency table, and arrange symbols in order of frequency, taking into account the symbols that have already been typed. Then, symbols that are more likely to be the next symbol you want to enter would receive preferential treatment, in that they would be closer to the current position of the stylus and/or larger. This would speed up and reduce the effort for entering common combinations, at the expense of uncommon ones. It's sort of like Huffmann coding, and I think it might produce good results. On the other hand, I can imagine that symbols shifting around like that would be really, really annoying.

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  37. Re:bleh by Shlimmy · · Score: 1

    Tap method!

  38. Suretype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm surprised nobody has mentioned SureType- the system the BlackBerry Pearl uses. The keyboard is laid out in QWERTY style, but there are two letters per key. This allows for fewer possible words than a T9 per key-press and also allows for faster typing because of the high likelihood of tapping on the same key consecutively or alternating between the same sets of two or three keys. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Blackberrypearl.JPG for a look at the layout.

  39. Re:bleh by Ecuador · · Score: 1

    Of course, there are more problems with T9 than writing "l8r" (as your "a good T9 implementation" quote starts to hint). There are other systems (e.g. WordWise and LetterWise) that don't have many of the problems of T9, but you are usually stuck with what your phone has (or perhaps not if you have a smartphone).
    Back to topic though, I am trying to draw paths with one finger on my PDA, and it certainly takes me a lot more time and effort than tapping (usually with two fingers). And all this without actually being sure that their software will give me the right word... I think I'll pass!

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
  40. Re:bleh by SerpentMage · · Score: 1

    For the life of me I could not figure out "l8r". I kept seeing I ate her, and thought who in the heck would keep saying that...

    Then I saw the first letter was not an I, but an L and it says later...

    Why do I have this problem... Its called dyslexia, and I have pretty bad... Even my wife often looks at me in pure puzzlement.

    Personally I hate T9 since I can never get out a message for the life of me. I completely prefer the keyboard.

    --

    "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
    "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
  41. GNOME has better by Fri13 · · Score: 1

    GNOME has better virtual-keyboard. You just type wanted letter and then you start moving mouse towards other letters. It needs and dictionary to know what words you are wanting to type and it predicts the needed letters bigger ones. So you can hit them more easily. You should find it from usability-menu.

    1. Re:GNOME has better by spydir31 · · Score: 1

      Do you mean Dasher?

  42. Shark-like by ozbon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This looks like the Shark typing method created for IBM a few years back.

    I really liked the Shark idea when it first came out, so it's good to see something similar again. (Plus Shark worked on non-QWERTY 'boards as well, you just changed the settings on its initialisation)

    --
    I say we take off and nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...
    1. Re:Shark-like by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      I don't know about this dragging from letter to letter system. It'd feel too much like I'm risking waking the dead.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  43. I introducw... by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 1

    The swypo.

  44. I wonder if this will cause RSI? by PipingSnail · · Score: 1
    I wonder if this will cause RSI?

    I've lived with RSI since 1993 - you get used to recognising things that do not help ergonomically. This looks like one of those things.

    One of the major problems with RSI is that prolonged activation of muscle groups leads to fatigue. The term for this is static loading.

    This is why click and release mouse behaviour (to activate menus, then click again to choose) is better for your health than the alternative method (click and hold, release to choose) because the alternative forces you to hold the mouse button down until you make your choice.

    This keyboard idea is doing the same thing.

    I suspect healthy people may like this keyboard and those suffering from RSI will dislike it greatly.

    Info on RSI and remedial exercises: http://www.objmedia.demon.co.uk/rsi/rsi_srk.html

    Stephen

  45. Re:bleh by zlogic · · Score: 1

    Considering the price for sending one message in the US, compressing later into l8r lets you send more text for the same price :-)

  46. Re:bleh by cp.tar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If I understood the idea correctly, tracing paths between letters gives you a curve, or at least a broken line with points where individual letters should stand. That means that, with practice, you simply draw a curve describing the word you want to enter.

    Having started learning Chinese a few months ago, I'm beginning to wonder if we're re-inventing the wheel here...

    --
    Ignore this signature. By order.
  47. Re:bleh by heteromonomer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I usually dislike people who don't use T9; they tend to be the idiots who write things like "l8r"

    You sir, are certainly a judgmental idiot. I agree with the GP. I have a poor opinion of T9, because it rarely ever gets the right word. I usually write specific messages that don't fit to the canned word guesses it has. Trying to use it often turns out to be more work than it saves, at least for me. And I don't write in leet or in the SMS lingo.

  48. Good. Now extend this to touch keyboard + monitor by Snart+Barfunz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As one of the many poor typists out there, I don't see why we still have to choose between looking at the keyboard and learning to touch type. A touch keyboard, detecting my finger positions, could coordinate with a translucent virtual kbd on screen that also displayed my finger positions. The virtual kbd would be made to appear and disappear with appropriate gestures. Addional feedback would include haptic, sound, & 'hover' keys. And, as the whole thing is virtual, it would reconfigure on the fly to cope with any language, which simplifies life for the PC manufacturer. The touch keyboard would still need some kind of display but it could be pretty basic. Oh dear - I hope I haven't described this in too much detail. I wouldn't want some poor patent troll to starve...

    --
    --- Yx3 = Delilah ---
  49. The Sony Ericsson P1 method :) by .-+KAREMBU+-. · · Score: 1

    I don't know what that's called either, but it's been more than great. Each key can be pressed to the left or to the right, resulting in a different letter. What it gives me is a small, full keyboard, no need for T9, and no need for tiny tiny keys like a blackberry or a Palm. I love it :)

    --
    "From here you can get an excellent view of my foot." ~ Pai Mei.
    1. Re:The Sony Ericsson P1 method :) by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      It is called "rocker" keyboard. I got a P1i here myself and I believe T9 is involved in the word completion. We are a bit cheating on P1 since the device shows the words on top beginning with the letters we typed. I heard Blackberry was first to use that keyboard variant.

      BTW If you don't know already, the word completion trick is in Settings/Device/Text Input/Predictive Text.

      Of course most P1 users mix keyboard,scroll wheel and even handwriting recognition.

      Really sad thing that UIQ died in hands of Sony and Motorola and we won't likely see things like "t9nav" which does amazing things on Symbian S60.

  50. Dasher by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 1

    That would be already made, and called Dasher. See an earlier post for a Youtube video, or try it out at their site. Works reasonably well, almost like magic. But then, so does ShapeWriter.

  51. the ring design by RingDev · · Score: 1

    I had a similar idea, character's aranged in rings growing from the center.


        ! @ # $ % ^ & *
        ( l f k p r z )
      - b g a o v =
    [ c h e * u w ]
      ; d n i y x '
       
          \ , . ? ! /

    Where A, E, I, O, and U form the center most ring. Inside that ring is a double, shift, space, and backspace buttons. Consinants would have to be arranged meaningfully (I just tossed them up alphabetically and swapped the vowels)

    I'm highly tempted to try writting such a tool in silverlight now...

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  52. Re:bleh by lilo_booter · · Score: 1

    Personally, I've let the whole SMS thing slide until recently - the whole concept of messaging text with 12 buttons is unpleasant and something that I didn't feel like paying to use (and yes, I tried the T9 thing - found it just as bad).

    This changed when I bought a Samsung Pixon and, finally, I'm happy with an SMS interface - touch screen qwerty available by rotating the device by 90 degrees, and each keypress gets a physical feedback via a subtle vibration. It has a predictive T9 type of interface too, but tbh, I find that more obtrusive and confusing than just using the keyboard.

    I hope when this phone dies on me, I'll be able to replace it with a cheaper model with a similar interface and that the current forms of 12 button interfaces are only provided as an option (if at all).

  53. Rube Goldberg Word Completion by LtGordon · · Score: 1

    I have an LG phone and I hate the T9 implementation that it uses. It's more effective for me to punch ~30% more keys than to deal with the mostly inaccurate recommendations. T9 only makes typing more efficient when you can accurately predict what it's going to recommend, and it actually recommends appropriate words.

    Why is it that every time I open a fresh installation of OpenOffice.org Writer I have to find and disable automatic word completion. Maybe it's just me, but on a full-sized keyboard this feature does far more harm than good for users who already type efficiently. For example, if I'm typing a ten-letter word it's much faster and easier for me to just type the ten letters than it is to wait for the software to make a recommendation, hope that it's the right one, acknowledge the word as correct and accept it, and then return to my train of thought.

    1. Re:Rube Goldberg Word Completion by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      I don't know what you're typing, but T9 vs cycling the letters for me is a difference of 200-300% more button mashing, plus waiting for duplicate letters.

      Perhaps if you stuck with real words and not made up ones it would be easier? I do find if I want to type a made-up word, I either have to add it to the T9 dictionary or switch over to abc input mode (the former takes longer, but I only ever have to do it once).

      My only real trouble with the T9 on my LG is it uses the touchscreen only to choose between possible words, and I've got fat thumbs. Same problem with scrolling on the LG, there is generally no arrow option, you've got to slide it.

      In any case, with T9 I can keep up pretty well with my friend who has a full qwerty keyboard on her phone, and she is very proficient with it. It's impossible to keep up with abc entry mode, on ANY phone I've used.

      And, for the record, Kyocera's predictive typing is the best I've ever used, I wish my LG used Kyocera's entry method, cause the LG is otherwise the best phone I've ever used.

      Can't have it all I guess, eh?

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
  54. Re:bleh by mollymoo · · Score: 1

    I find it interesting that you apparently judged me "certainly a judgemental idiot" on the basis of one sentence where I observed a correlation. FYI I don't dislike people for not using T9, though the number of people I've got to know who use txt-speak and haven't found to be in some way rather obnoxious is extremely small.

    --
    Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
  55. Sounds Ok for English..what about other languages? by master_p · · Score: 1

    It sounds ok for every day English use, but what about other languages?

    And what if a word is not found? how is the word then typed?

  56. Isn't this enough different to make the switch to by Iowan41 · · Score: 1

    Dvorak work?

  57. Re:Finally I hope I NEVER have to see T9 again. by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    That fucking shit pops up on my cell when i enter contact notes, and it has preferential placement at position 1 whereas ABC is position 2. The boneheads pushing or "pimplementing" t9 have earned title of the most hated assholes in my book of tech gripes. My blood pressure goes off the scale when i find myself blindly typing in t9 by touch only to look down and find bullshit gibberish that has NO bearing to what i am thinking or typing. Typos i can live with if i hit sent, but finding umpteen unrelated, garbled, jacked up shit on my screen makes me want to choke people at sprint and anywhere else t9 oozes from. I hope there is a way to eviscerate it from my device/s in future deployments. t9 never learns nor even comes CLOSE to what i am typing. If it learned, it would take note of what i replaced its loony suggestion with. Well, actually, it wont' -- since i escape from t9 before my gasket gets too close to popping.

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  58. Re:bleh by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    First, I never use that T9 stuff, because it never chooses the right word.

    Haven't you ever considered, that the latter is caused by the former? Or is your phone just that outdated.

    T9 learns your word preferences, new words, and unused words in every modern phone I hah in the last years.

    My T9 dictionary knew nearly all of my slang words after a month of usage. On my next phone, i even created an SMS with my most used non-included words on the first day.

    For purposefully misspelled words, there's a simple solution: Spell it right, and then replace just the letter(s) you want to change. Of course this only works comfortable when your phone supports quick switching of modes and editing functions, which mine (Nokia smartphone) did.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  59. Re:bleh by WCD_Thor · · Score: 1

    on my phone later would be, lets see 3 keys for the l8r then the usual send key, etc.

  60. Re:bleh by RMH101 · · Score: 1

    ..and thus is the way the world ends: not with a bang, but with a whimper.

  61. Re:bleh by JohnnyBGod · · Score: 1

    What about if I dislike T9 because I have to look at the screen while I'm typing? I mean, I usually write messages while I'm walking around, and it's nice to... you know, watch where I'm going.