Browser Privacy Test
lazyforker writes "A NYTimes blog post reports the results of security researcher Kate McKinley's tests of various browsers' (FireFox, Chrome, IE, Safari) privacy protection mechanisms. Specifically she tested their cookie handling. She also examined their handling of Flash's cookies. In summary: Safari on Mac OS X (in the 'private browsing' mode) is not so private ('quirky'). Safari on XP is not private at all. Flash behaves awfully everywhere."
Those bastards! Quick, somebody report Sourceforge!
Om nom nom nom nom!!!
My undies are blue.
:(
I'm secretly in love with my best friend's wife, but I like gay midget porn.
[preview]
Damn, Firefox privacy test failed
Only half.
What is wrong with you?
Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
11. ...
12. Profit!
I was just wondering who Kate McKinley really is. Most of all, I am skeptical as to whether she is even qualified to be called a "security researcher" at all.
Why? Because Wikipedia returns no hits for "Kate McKinley" and a Google search returns results that are sketchy or even anemic when it comes to browser security at best.
Maybe she's a privacy expert too.
Fifty years of Yippie! 1968-2018
What the average Slashdotter wants to know is: Is she hot ?
You be the judge.
The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
It's spelled spelled.
That is, unless you're British.
No existe.