Slashdot Mirror


The Future of Independent Game Development

The Guardian's Games Blog has an article discussing where indie game development will go in the next few years after its recent resurgence. The story follows the success of one small game studio, and suggests that the games industry will move to further embrace low-cost development. Quoting: "The likes of XBLA, ... PSN and WiiWare represent a reasonable revenue stream for publishers and developers, especially with a recession looming. However, in-house staff may not have the skills required to punch out cool, hugely intuitive budget games, with little or no management. If you look at something like Geometry Wars from Bizarre Creations, the project was started in the free time of experienced coder Stephen Cakebread, and may never have happened had he been shunted on to different, larger projects. Instead, big industry players are reaching out to the indie scene to source talent."

35 comments

  1. Reach out to the indie scene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It doesn't matter if it's not as good, you did it yourself.

    1. Re:Reach out to the indie scene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If that's what you think of Indie games, then I suggest that you check out World of Goo. It's very refreshing.

    2. Re:Reach out to the indie scene by HueyFreeman · · Score: 1
      I can think of a couple of very good, popular indie games that came out last year, and each used a different distribution method: World of Goo was for the PC and the Wii, utilizing no DRM, Audiosurf was also on the PC, selling only on Steam, and Braid came out on XBLA (will probably be coming out on PC in March 09).

      If anything, it shows that all there's all kinds of ways to market your game and if it is enjoyable, people will pay for it.

      Now, looking at this year's possibly popular indie games, I think Crayon Physics Deluxe will be a hit, and I hope Fez (video here), which I haven't heard of since February 08 will post some news, and finally there's Braid again, which is coming on the PC!

      Additionally, if you include game mods as indie development, I'm looking forward to Neotokyo, a total conversion mod for HL2 that has its inspiration in Ghost in the Shell, and Black Mesa Source, another total conversion for HL2 which is the original Half-Life ported onto the Source engine.

  2. Whats with the console obsession? by cliffski · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Firstly, bedroom coding was NEVER dead. Fuck it, I should know, I was doing bedroom coding games back when I used to read articles in Develop magazine about teams under 100 couldn't make games, and I kept doing it when Peter Molyneux was warning everyone it was suicide to start a small dev company, and I'm still doing it now. The fact that mainstream media such as the guardian doesn't read our press releases doesn't mean we don't exist.
    Suddenly, because there are some indie games on console games, people think "indie gaming is back!".

    Bullshit.

    True INDEPENDENT gaming will always be at home only on the PC and the Mac, and maybe the iphone, because these are the platforms with no barrier to entry. If your game is for XBLA or PS3 or Wii, then your game idea and code has to be approved by a committee of suits at one of those companies. That's about as un-independent as it gets.
    True indie gaming is where someone owns the whole company, has invested their own money to fund, sell and promote the game, and earns all the revenue. The minute you have a 'distribution and publishing partner', things begin to compromise.

    That's not to say that you don't get some awesome games from 'indies' on consoles, but to herald it as the home of indie gaming is just wrong.

    --
    DRM-free indie games for the PC and Mac: Positech Games
    1. Re:Whats with the console obsession? by BeardsmoreA · · Score: 1

      To be fair, XBLA community stuff is pretty close to genuinely indie now (I don't know how carefully MS make sure they have control of the 'community' approvals, but on the surface at least, it's pretty open)

    2. Re:Whats with the console obsession? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      You can publish to XBOX without getting microsofts approval.

      http://creators.xna.com/en-US/

      The XNA Creators Club allows you to develop games for PC and XBOX 360.

      You can then publish the games to the 360 and charge points for them.
      (they get reviewed by the community to ensure that they do not contain bad things).

      XNA is a managed wrapper around direct X that provides a nice layer of abstraction.

      (Also I would like to quickly say that the Farseer physics engine is very nice).

      Joopsy.

    3. Re:Whats with the console obsession? by Xest · · Score: 4, Informative

      "If your game is for XBLA or PS3 or Wii, then your game idea and code has to be approved by a committee of suits at one of those companies. That's about as un-independent as it gets."

      Not sure what the setup for the PS3 and Wii is but the XBox's community games are peer reviewed by other developers and not by Microsoft officials. XNA is also extremely easy to use and has some fantastic samples available.

      I'd argue XBox community games is probably one of the easiest ways for indies to get into game development and have their games published to a wide audience. Even if you develop yourself and advertise yourself games you've made for the PC people still have to find your game in the depths of the web, whilst with XBox community games your game is listed right there on the consolate equivalent of a desktop for the user to find. It takes away the pains of marketing and distribution and even the low level parts of PC game development (you don't need to cater for different LOD for different spec hardware for example), it allows indies to concentrate entirely on the important part- game development itself.

    4. Re:Whats with the console obsession? by Reibisch · · Score: 1

      You don't need your idea approved by Microsoft to begin development - just enough cash to buy a dev kit and proof that your company can hack it.

      You *do* need approval to publish, but that's not what you stated.

    5. Re:Whats with the console obsession? by samkass · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not sure why you say "and maybe the iPhone". Anecdotal evidence suggests that the iPhone is the premiere platform for independent game developers right now. At least one small Mac game developer said that their first iPhone release generated more money in the first 3 months than all the Mac games they'd ever produced in the history of the company. And it's easy to develop for and deploy for, and the limited size and scope of the games make the smaller and more focused games sellable. The Apple Store makes a lower price viable.

      Yes, Apple gets to approve or disapprove your game. To my knowledge, Apple has never rejected a game, although I could foresee a "Postal" kind of thing having some trouble down the road. In any case, Apple is doing a lot more good than evil when it comes to the small game developer.

      --
      E pluribus unum
    6. Re:Whats with the console obsession? by LordMyren · · Score: 1

      The current obsession with consoles is monetization. Unless your game is purely multiplayer focused (where you have broad capabilities to prevent piracy) people will pirate your game. Secondly, if you do make it onto one of the commercial venues, you get exposure to a sizable audience. The console market has a higher barrier to entry, but if you can cross that threshold you're rewarded with a large & paying market (which doesnt presume success; you still have to make a compelling game). Having to pass acceptance committees of XBLA or PS3 or Wii does not infringe on this notion of "sovereignty" over ones game you seem to engender to indie developers... at least I presume as much. I rather doubt these acceptance committees put games through a full battery of gameplay critiques; my expectation is they check for game stability, whether the game is entirely crap, a reasonable test of playability, and last for some level of appropriateness. I'd be interested to hear some negative stories of people trying to get games put on these online services, as it seems like most of the big gaming companies are working hard to attract small developers.

    7. Re:Whats with the console obsession? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I'd argue XBox community games is probably one of the easiest ways for indies to get into game development and have their games published to a wide audience.

      It's community games, not independent games.

      Easiest way to get your game published to a wide audience is to write a flash game.

      #2 is probably to bring it out for the PC, using DirectX. Lots of people can run it if you don't abuse their computer.

      #3 is to do the same with SDL :P SDL/OpenGL games can even be ported with minimal pain (supposedly) to the PS3 (if not too demanding) or to the Wii (ditto) and will run on Windows and Linux.

      Tying yourself to Windows is not really a big win IMO.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:Whats with the console obsession? by KDR_11k · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah but you're comparing it with MAC GAMING.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    9. Re:Whats with the console obsession? by samkass · · Score: 1

      I compared it with Mac gaming by saying it was orders of magnitude more lucrative. And the comparison was because it's easier to port games from MacOS X to iPhone since the OS is basically the same and the tools are the same.

      It seems apparent, though, that with an installed base well over 10M units and an easy path to publication, marketing, and revenue collection that any small games house not considering the iPhone are leaving money on the table.

      --
      E pluribus unum
    10. Re:Whats with the console obsession? by cliffski · · Score: 1

      I thought you couldn't actually sell the community games? and even if you can, good old Microsoft will be taking their big fat cut of your game.

      --
      DRM-free indie games for the PC and Mac: Positech Games
    11. Re:Whats with the console obsession? by Xest · · Score: 1

      Yes you can, you can sell them at 200, 400, 800 or 1200 MS points (I think those are the right ranges anyway). Certainly Microsoft does take a cut (up to 30% I think) but seeing as they're handling distribution and marketing for you I don't think that's terrible.

    12. Re:Whats with the console obsession? by Xest · · Score: 1

      "It's community games, not independent games."

      Huh? By community they mean the indie community who are developing for the XBox, it's still indies developing the games, it's certainly not studios.

      "Easiest way to get your game published to a wide audience is to write a flash game."

      That's certainly the easiest way to publish your game to a potential wide audience but the key word there is potential, you still have to find that audience and attract it somehow, that's a lot of work, the web is a big wide open space, it's not exactly easy convincing people to head to your extremely small part of it. XBox live provides the audience for you, Microsoft handles advertising and distribution, you don't have to worry about any of that. With XNA game studio there's no reason you can't distribute a Windows version of the game anyway to increase your audience on the web if you really want to. You only have to write once with XNA for it to work on both XBox 360 and Windows.

    13. Re:Whats with the console obsession? by Tronster · · Score: 1

      I agree with you that bedroom coding has never been dead; with companies like "Introversion" showing that it's also possible to do it full time.

      So all in all, I agree with your last sentence: that consoles aren't the home of the indies, but throw caution as wanting to differentiate "True" indie vs the rest of indie games.

      Within the indepent game community, I'd say there are a variety of definitions as to what consitutes someone as "indie", but the vast majority (at least from what I've heard at the round tables at GDC) do not feel you lose an "indie" status just because you need approval for a distribution channel.

      "World of Goo" is considered an indie game, as the guys who made it bootstrapped themselves: no publisher funding; no ties to a particular publisher. They've released on PC (via Steam) and Wii, but their approval to release on the Wii by Nintendo in no way diminishes the hardships they had to endure to make the game happen.

      Disclaimer: I both work for a "non-indie" game company, and have my own "indie" game company. When I'm not making games for work, I'm making them for fun ;)

  3. mods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    when i think indie game dev i think mods. not like helpful mods that add stuff to a game, or add a neat feature or two, but mods that really change the way a game is played. because most indie game dev's won't write their own engine, and a lot won't even be able to license one, and frankly a lot of them that do license one probably shouldn't.

    i played this one indie game once, possibly because of mention in a slashdot article. a multiplayer FPS where you could add/subtract terrain from the game world. anyways, one time i was in a server by myself and i dug the entire planet down to the core where it won't let you dig anymore, then i made collumns going up as high as you could go, and then i connected them making interconnecting highways like a spider web. it was all very intricate and beautiful. i spent a good hour doing this.

    then the server reset the level because the time limit for that round had been reached. i havn't played the game since.

    1. Re:mods by Xest · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why can't indies license engines and why should those that do probably not?

      There's lots of good AAA quality engines out there with cheap/indie licenses:

      www.terathon.com
      www.powerrender.com
      www.garagegames.com

      There's also lots of games that have been built on them by indies and been quite successful.

    2. Re:mods by sammyF70 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      because most indie game dev's won't write their own engine, and a lot won't even be able to license one, and frankly a lot of them that do license one probably shouldn't.

      There are plenty of free or lowcost engines out there.
      Torque (mentioned in TFA) is low cost and relatively easy to get into (mostly script based if I remember correctly).
      Ogre3D is free, crossplattform, and in combination with openAL and a good (and free) physics library you can hae a kickass game engine in (relatively) no time.
      And that's if you want to write some 3D game. If you want to stick to 2D, your options are even vaster.

      I think the problem is that many people who think "I want to write games myself" should have watched THAT beforehand.

      --
      "DRM is like the Ford Pinto: it's a smooth ride, right up the point at which it explodes and ruins your day."-C.Doctorow
    3. Re:mods by joelmax · · Score: 2, Informative

      Another system (unfortunately windows only) is the Conitec A7 Engine. It comes with its own scripting language, support for other languages (C++, C#, C, etc...), its own level editor (Basic, but supports importing from other formats), its own model editor (Really really basic, but supports importing from other modelling apps like 3DS Max, Maya, Lightwave, blender, etc..), and a whole host of other features. Personally I used the engine in its older revisions (A5 Standard Edition and A6 Commercial Edition) and I know a lot about the engine has changed; and so has the community, so I am not 100% sure what the community is like now, however it did have a rock solid community when I had the time to dabble in game dev. This engine isn't necessarily as flexible as Torque, but I would put (Older versions compared) Torque and the A# about on par, Torques community and structure would have the edge though with their support for publishing, etc...

    4. Re:mods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I own a license for Torque. When you buy it, you get all of the C++ source code. It's not FOSS, i.e. you can't redistribute the source freely, but you can modify it however you want for use in your own games.

      So yes, a lot of Torque games are heavily script-driven, but you could also write the whole thing in C++. You'd have to be a masochist to contemplate such a thing - but Torque will let you make your life as difficult as you want it to be. :-)

  4. History repeats itself by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

    big industry players are reaching out to the indie scene to source talent.

    Like it ever did. This is just a sign of the video game industry maturing.

    --
    The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
  5. Fewer big titles can only be a good thing. by castironpigeon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe computer games will actually show some game design again instead of being graphics/physics engine demos.

    --
    mmmm...forbidden donut
  6. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    His name is "Cakebread"? Are you serious? That is too awesome. I'm naming my child after him.

  7. Indie gaming is alive and strong by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 0

    One word: BRAID. Developped by ONE MAN, hailed by the critic and downloaded by the thousands on xbox live, this title shows that single individuals with talent and vision can be immense success stories.

    1. Re:Indie gaming is alive and strong by Dadamh · · Score: 3, Informative

      Braid is fun times. There are plenty of others. Spelunky and Dwarf Fortress come immediately to mind. The guy that writes Dwarf Fortress supports himself on donations, which is pretty cool.

    2. Re:Indie gaming is alive and strong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the Touhou series. Developed by ONE DRUNK.

  8. Independent development is a good way to go by Mad+Merlin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I put Game! together in my free time, and initially it had exactly zero art. A couple artists came upon it and liked it enough to start contributing art, and thus it actually has quite a lot of art now.

    Web based games allow for very rapid evolution, and also means you can start putting it in front of users way earlier than usual. It doesn't take a lot of code to make something useful either, I'm still the only coder on Game! and that's just in my spare time. In comparison to game studios with several hundred people all working on a game compared to a few people working part time, it's amazing what you can still get done.

  9. But you need MS's approval by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You still have to agree to licensing terms to use XNA to develop games. These terms restrict what you can publish.

  10. XNA by coryking · · Score: 1

    I've been getting into XNA development. Not to shabby. It definitely will open doors and let people who don't traditionally create games (or anything 3d, really) give it a shot. The documentation is pretty good and not as intimidating as the straight DirectX stuff. For starters, they dont assume you know everything about shaders, vertex buffers, etc. You should still grab the DirectX SDK's though, because the current XNA docs don't go as deep into things like HLSL or lighting.

    You still have to know your math. Remember your linear algebra class in college? You better. Graphics programming seems all about the matrix.

    In theory, the whole thing was designed to be portable. Your code should, in theory, compile down to the Zune, Windows and XBox360.

    As for what you can publish in their community thingy? Dunno as I haven't tried. Something tells me you can probably route around it though. The reason for the community, it would seem, is simply providing a simple way to market and sell your game. Kinda like the store for iPhone apps.

    Good times though. If you've never tried programming for DirectX or any kind of 3d stuff, I'd definitely give it a whirl. Coming from a web-developer background, this kind of programming is very different beast. Much lower level, you gotta worry about byte ordering and how to marshal data into video memory. Plus a lot more attention to performance... Make sure you have your old linear algebra book on hand though :-)

  11. Keep it up we need more indie games by Miamicoastguard · · Score: 1

    I developed this free indie game in 2 weeks, http://skunkhunter.oxyhost.com/ The only problem of keeping it alive is promotion. The time taken to promote it takes time away from following projects and unless you feel the need to throw money at it which in turn will have to provide a return it's not an easy task. Perhaps more sites are needed that sanction free indie games and catalog them in mass for people to download in their lunch breaks

  12. Being Independent is Still Hard by MagratheanTech · · Score: 1

    Being a small game dev. company is still hard no matter what people say. Even if you charge less, give away source code to the whole game, dev. tools, no DRM, etc. people still compare your game to things like Crysis and WoW and expect that level of quality no matter who you are. Here is our shameless plug to enter the gaming market: http://magrathean.ca/project/incognito We never thought of this, but marketing the project will actually be harder than developing the game (which took 12 months). It will probably be another year before we can generate enough sales to create another one. One has to be optimistic at all times :)

  13. Re:why slashdot has a console obsession... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...why the description of your bedroom? We don't need to know about your life, especially since you posted AC.