Slashdot Mirror


Researcher Says Social Networks Link Terrorists

An anonymous reader writes "At the International Conference on Cyber Security 2009 in New York, Evan Kohlmann, a senior investigator and private consultant for Global Terror Alert, claimed that a new breed of terrorists are using online forums to recruit people who align themselves with the mission of Al Qaeda, creating global networks of would-be terrorists."

13 of 212 comments (clear)

  1. FUD by Spazztastic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just another article stating FUD. Nothing to see here, move along. Might as well also get rid of online forums, USENET, and telephones.

    --
    Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    1. Re:FUD by noundi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And paper, morse code, whistles, Microsoft Sam...

      --
      I am the lawn!
    2. Re:FUD by phagstrom · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Also ink - people always forget about the ink. Used by terrorists for recruitment and plotting attacks. When will the madness end and ink be banned.

  2. Quick! Stop all forms of communication! by Thanshin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've heard that terrorists also speak to people to recruit new members!

    We should stop right now the use of language.

    1. Re:Quick! Stop all forms of communication! by cephah · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Jeg er dansker, din ubehÃvlede tumpe!

  3. Oh come on... by tygerstripes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How many stories like this do we have to read? When will the internets finally be recognised as a medium rather than an entity?

    As soon as government agencies begin to properly recognise this fact, they will be able to operate within the medium, making use of its strengths and weaknesses, instead of fearing it the whole damned time. Did it never occur that social networking sites offer an excellent means of infiltrating "would-be terrorist" networks? Anonymity works both ways.

    Just my 0.02.

    --
    Meta will eat itself
  4. How convenient by cruachan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So the jist of this article is several semi-permanent chatrooms have been identified where proto-terrorists gather to recruit and discuss strategy, and they want to take these down??!!!

    That's perverse. Why on earth would you want to take out honeypots that your foes are kind enough to set up for you?

  5. Ooh the hilarities we sadly never will know about by TheP4st · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This made me visualize not X number of terrorists planning attacks and recruiting in these chatrooms, but X number of spooks gathering info on another in the belief that the other spooks are the real thing.

    --
    "I have downloaded hundreds and hundreds of records, why would I care if somebody downloads ours?" Robin Pecknold
  6. Anyone notice a trend...? by Shawn888 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is just the government looking for a new way to view the people's email in any way they can. They will keep making new stories and attach the work "terrorist" to it, so that they can get a free pass to peek inside the area. First it was phones (obviously), and now they do warrantless wiretaps (and get away with it). Then it was laptops, now they can confiscate your laptop at the border for about as long as they want to. Now it's social sites... Anyone see a trend here? Now before I finish I will say that the government does need some of these options under certain circumstances, but not a free pass to view whatever they want, whenever they want.

    1. Re:Anyone notice a trend...? by secretcurse · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I will say that the government does need some of these options under certain circumstances, but not a free pass to view whatever they want, whenever they want.

      Which is the entire point of warrants. Can someone explain to my why the government would ever possibly need to act without a warrant? If there's an imminent threat, they can even go ahead with a wiretap and get the warrant later, they just have to let a judge know why they did it. Is the government afraid our judges are terrorists now?

      --
      I'm using all of my mod points to mod ancient memes down. Please join me.
  7. I congratulate the author by fruey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Anyone stupid enough to read this article and decide avoid the Internet because it is a hive of scum & villany is just one less stupid person on the net in the first place. So much the better.

    --
    Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
  8. Please guys, they are winning by mgiuca · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Terror: "One that instills intense fear".

    How is this continual stream of "they could be EVERYWHERE" news not spreading the terror? Seriously ... every once in awhile they fly a plane into a building or blow up a bus, which is horrible!! But having our media and our politicians say, "forall x. x can be used by the terrorists (watch out|let's get rid of it)" is doing way more damage to our lives.

    Preaching to the converted, I know, but that's why we comment on Slashdot after all :)

  9. Money! by ShatteredMind · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Obviously the number one method for recruiting, arming, and gathering terrorists is good old green backs! Money the number one tool for terrorism; guess we need to ban that shit too.