Slashdot Mirror


Google Over IPv6 Coming Soon

fuzzel writes "Today Google announced Google over IPv6 where ISPs can sign up their DNS nameservers so that their users will get access to an almost fully IPv6-enabled Google, including http://www.google.com, images and maps, etc., just like in IPv4. Without this only http://ipv6.google.com is available, but then you go to IPv4 for most services. So, start kicking your ISPs to support IPv6 too, and let them sign up. Check this list of ISPs that already do native IPv6 to your doorstep. The question that now remains is: when will Slashdot follow?"

5 of 264 comments (clear)

  1. Wow! by Atrox666 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wow I can finally have all the advantages of IPv6 like

    Until they run out of IPv4 addresses it really doesn't matter.
    There are a few obscure tunneling applications to this but who cares.

  2. tried google in ipv6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    it's eerily similar to google in ipv4

  3. Re:Wait for it.... by growse · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not about the short-term advantage because there is no short-term advantage. However, it's going to take a long time to do. Therefore, you start to think about doing it 10 years before it all goes tits-up.

    We don't have a problem *now*. IPv4 is working great at the moment. However, we (people) are incredibly bad a doing global solutions to big problems quickly, so we need to start to migrate things early.

    --
    There is nothing interesting going on at my blog
  4. Re:Wait for it.... by squiggleslash · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We do have problems now. Which is why every residential Internet user is having to use NAT to connect more than one device to their always-on Internet connection, and why things like VoIP boxes (that require transparent two-way connectivity) require special ways of setting them up rather than just plugging into an Ethernet port in the wall.

    We think we don't have problems because we're so used to jumping through the hoops, and even coming up with rationalizations for the mess we have ("Oh, but NAT gives me security because if my computer can't be connected to the Internet then it's completely impossible totally for a viroworm to assplode the packet fragmentation flag!")

    We do have problems. If you don't think we do, fire up the configuration page of your router, and take a look at the "DMZ" and "port redirection" pages.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  5. Re:Oh great by troll8901 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm still running a 32-bit operating system

    It's an extension and graphical shell to a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system...

    (Wait, this is a joke sub-thread, right?)