Slashdot Mirror


Rick Boucher To Chair House Internet Committee

Misch writes "Representative Rick Boucher (D-VA) will be taking the chair of the House Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet. Rep. Boucher has been an advocate for consumers rights, is a co-founder of the Congressional Internet Caucus, and has participated in a Slashdot Interview. He was instrumental in defeating key escrow, back in the day."

55 comments

  1. Re:Red? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    When you click on the story it becomes blue.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  2. He needs to look out... by Urger · · Score: 5, Funny

    A piece of advice to him, before calling anyone wearing a black hat before the committee make sure to check the sub basements for bouncy balls.

    1. Re:He needs to look out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nice xckd reference ^_^

      http://xkcd.com/498/

      Posted anon, because I've got good karma already, and don't need to whore.

    2. Re:He needs to look out... by idontgno · · Score: 4, Funny

      Perhaps the most on-topic xkcd soundbite ever:

      "...it's like herding lolcats."

      Not posting anonymously, 'cuz it's not whoring if you do it out of love.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  3. Hopefully by MikeRT · · Score: 4, Funny

    He will not support net neutrality, but rather will support federalizing and then heavily deregulating franchising laws so that cable, telephone and wireless companies don't have to really pay any taxes or face any regulatory burdens when they decide to set up shop in a new market. In addition, hopefully he will support the first half of Lessig's suggestion that the FCC be abolished, but will stop short of creating the "iEPA" (innovation Environmental Protection Agency) replacement. These laws and agencies only serve to enrich the well-connected at the expense of competition.

    1. Re:Hopefully by eln · · Score: 5, Funny

      See, and here I thought the CEOs of the major cable companies would be too busy to post on Slashdot...looks like I was wrong.

    2. Re:Hopefully by Qzukk · · Score: 2, Funny

      heavily deregulating franchising laws

      This would go farther towards real network neutrality than any misguided law. Comcast wants to cut off google and iTunes? That's ok, a half-dozen more companies will show up and advertise the "real internet" to Comcast's customers.

      Bonus points if it leads to the installation of empty conduit, the real infrastructure solution to "wah I don't want everyone and their dog to be ripping up the road every other day!"

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    3. Re:Hopefully by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The entrenched cable and telco companies wouldn't argue in favor of reducing regulatory barriers. On the contrary, they willingly accept such minor restrictions as they can't work around in exchange for effective protection from competition. An invasive regulatory environment best serves the incumbent providers.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    4. Re:Hopefully by GaratNW · · Score: 2, Informative

      And it's clear deregulation has worked so well for us so far! Look at our financial sector!

    5. Re:Hopefully by DustoneGT · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Federalizing...good rarely comes from federalization. The road to hell is paved with good intentions.

    6. Re:Hopefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The financial sector is one of the most heavily regulated sectors in the market. The real problem was that banks were encouraged by the government to take more then a safe level of sub-prime mortgages. They were more then willing to do so because it increased revenues (thus they are partially at fault). If you need further proof all you have to do is to look at the studies from the last real estate collapse, which did not take the financial sector with it.

  4. Let me be the first to say... by verbalcontract · · Score: 4, Funny

    Let me be the first to say that I, for one, welcome our new sane, Slashdot-answering, fair-use-aware internet overlord.

    1. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Let me be the first to say that I, for one, welcome our new sane, Slashdot-answering, fair-use-aware internet overlord.

      I've never heard the Chairman of a Subcommittee referred to as an overlord before ;) At least know I'll know who to blame when my friends send me an internet and it gets tangled up in enormous amounts of material.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    2. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Sane, Slashdot-answering, fair-use-aware internet underlord", then.

    3. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Fast+Thick+Pants · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Sub" because it's a subset. The smaller the committee, the greater the actual power.

  5. This is all fine and good, but its not the right 1 by plasmacutter · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Legislation related to the copyright into the committees of the judiciary and courts, the internet, and intellectual property.

    Occasionally copies of bill go to the commerce and energy committee, but mostly its just a gesture rather than actual authority, as any approved bills usually get passed back to the afore mentioned committees for another pass.

    If he's leaving either of the others, it's actually a reduction in the influence of reformists. Either way i'm at least glad he's still there.

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
  6. Why isnt parent +5 funny yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    N/T

  7. Good for Internet and Environment by stomv · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Boucher is great for this post, and I'm thrilled that he'll be there. I'm also thrilled that he'll be giving up leadership of the Subcommittee on Energy and Environment. Boucher is a coal guy from a coal region of southwestern Virginia. He was weak on energy and environmental standards relative to the Democratic caucus.

    So, this is good for Net Neutrality and other Internet issues.
    It's also good for climate change and other environmental issues.

    P.S. Like Boucher? Click on my sig link and send him some bucks!

    1. Re:Good for Internet and Environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the Internet isn't contributing to environmental issues through electronic waste. Climate change isn't affected by the need for energy to implement and use connected devices.

      Well, I guess we're saving all that to define another crisis frenetic politicians can use in some future campaign.

    2. Re:Good for Internet and Environment by EvilBudMan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I live in his district and still don't have high speed access at home, but I guess he is trying. Yeah if he went against coal here he would loose that battle and the next election.

    3. Re:Good for Internet and Environment by stalky14 · · Score: 1

      Is he the same Richard Boucher that was the State Department spokesman for so many years?

    4. Re:Good for Internet and Environment by Kalak · · Score: 1

      No. He's been in the House for 20+ years.

      --
      I am, and always will be, an idiot. Karma: Coma (mostly effected by .hack)
  8. Re:Freedom in a few easy steps! by Shakrai · · Score: 1

    * 1 digital scale that reads grams

    But what if I wanna sell my meth in US customary units?

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  9. Re:This is all fine and good, but its not the righ by Dachannien · · Score: 1

    Very true. Markey wasn't that great an advocate as the former chair of this subcommittee, but it's not the coup we were all hoping for. Howard Berman did head over to chair Foreign Affairs after Tom Lantos died, but it's apparently not clear yet whether he's ever going to relinquish the Judiciary IP subcommittee chairmanship that the Content Cabal pay him to cling to.

  10. EXCELLENT CHOICE by rlp · · Score: 4, Funny

    He's honest, smart, knowledgeable. Yet despite those handicaps he's served in Congress for many years.

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
    1. Re:EXCELLENT CHOICE by moxley · · Score: 1

      We know that while it is difficult to survive with that sort of integrity on the hill, it isn't impossible...Look at Ron Paul, and there are a few others...It looks like Franken will be one.

    2. Re:EXCELLENT CHOICE by wilder_card · · Score: 1

      And he serves for Virginia. As a resident of that great Commonwealth, I can't figure it out. :) Fortunately the Representative from my district looks to be more the typical reactionary obstructionist we expect.

  11. Re:Freedom in a few easy steps! by Dachannien · · Score: 1

    You forgot to rent a house or apartment for cooking the stuff up, because your own house or apartment will end up being condemned as a hazard to public health if it doesn't burn down before the cops bust you.

  12. Re:Am I the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And let yourself loose on mankind? Please stay in.

  13. Obligatory paraphrasement by seanonymous · · Score: 2, Funny

    "He was instrumental in defeating key escrow, back in the day."

    Another way to say that is that RIck is never going to give you up, never going to let you down.

    1. Re:Obligatory paraphrasement by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 1

      As long as he doesn't run around and desert us, he can give us up all he wants.

  14. Re:Red? by Stormx2 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Why is the banner red? Communists.

    Isn't red also the colour of the GOP? :/

  15. So he was Ringleader by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    ... of the Congressional Internet Circus?

    It's that big tent full of tubes...

  16. Re:This is all fine and good, but its not the righ by Slothy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Legislation related to the copyright into the committees of the judiciary and courts, the internet, and intellectual property.

    I read this sentence a number of times, and I tried really hard to parse it. First, it has no verb at all. I tried concatenating it to the title of your post, and it still has no verb.

    How did this get +4 Interesting? "Occasionally copies of bill go"? Your first sentence does not parse. The second sentence says, "Occassionally bills go to the committee, but approved bills go back to the committee for another pass". Again, this is not a logical statement. You're also talking about commerce and energy committee, where this story is about the Internet committee.

    Third paragraph is talking about him leaving, and him being still there. The article is about him gaining a chairmanship of a commitee.

    So, first sentence makes no sense. Second sentence also makes no sense and is off topic. Third sentence makes no sense.

    In conclusion, please posts on the slashdot.org webpage and onto the internet, the universe, and the grand unification.

  17. Had to happen. by FlyByPC · · Score: 1

    Heh. Apparently even Congress gets Rickrolled. (Yeah, yeah, wrong Rick -- but still. Maybe he can sing?)

    --
    Paleotechnologist and connoisseur of pretty shiny things.
  18. You may know his brother by Foolicious · · Score: 4, Funny

    His brother is Bobby Boucher -- who was a standout linebacker and special teams player at South Central Louisiana State University.

    --
    Please don't use "umm" or "err" or "erm".
  19. Reality defeated key escrow by Sloppy · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'm grateful to the politicians who kept that from going into law, but let's be realistic: key escrow never had a serious chance. If it were the law, everyone who needed/wanted security would just have broken the law. And the only time anyone would have been charged for breaking that law is when they were already being charged with breaking a bunch of other stuff too -- it would be one of those "let's add a bunch of extra counts to this" thing, sort of like a "robbery with a gun" charge.

    Nobody knows if you're obeying a key escrow law or not, until they're already spying on you and find out, "Hey, that's didn't really decrypt the session key."

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  20. Tell me about it. by Balinares · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Over here, they created telco regulations at the turn of the century, at a time the incumbent providers were already very few and very entrenched.

    It was horrible.

    The regulations got used. When the entrenched telcos tried to stifle the growth of up-and-coming providers with underhanded tactics, they got punished -- I kid you not! The mind boggles. Those guys were only trying to keep making money!

    So now we got up to 20Mbps (in the countryside, don't know about cities) with no cap, with such things as custom reverse DNS and IPv6 as free options, installation on Linux officially supported, TV-over-DSL with hundreds of channels, and, oh, free phone to half the planet, too, all for a fixed monthly rate of about $22. The horror! The former entrenched telcos weeped a lot as they lost the marketshare they were rightfully entitled to.

    Some silly liberals are probably going to bring forth some silly theory about the point of regulation being to prevent attempts by private interests to stifle competition, but that's a silly notion, of course. And probably a little subversive.

    --

    -- B.
    This sig does in fact not have the property it claims not to have.
    1. Re:Tell me about it. by Moryath · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Indeed!

      I hope the FIRST thing he does is start working on eliminating all these local-municipality "time warner/cox cable/comcrap/etc paid the city council a bag of money and sent them some whores in exchange for a local monopoly right" practices, and require equal-infrastructure access so that 'net service works the same way that power and phone service now do.

  21. Yea, regulation always fails. by ClioCJS · · Score: 2, Insightful
    It's a good thing our finance industry has stayed so heavily regul.. oh. wait.

    It's a good thing regulations protected the people who got screwed by Enr... oh wait.

    It's a good thing regulations protected the town that the movie Erin Brockovicth was based on.. oh, wait.

    You, sir, got lucky, and think that because things went a certain way for you, they go that way for everyone. They don't. The world is a larger sample set than the town you lived in.

    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    1. Re:Yea, regulation always fails. by Moryath · · Score: 1

      It's a good thing our finance industry has stayed so heavily regul.. oh. wait.

      It's most of the deregulation effects (things like repealing Glass-Steagal and entering into "free trade" with GATT/NAFTA/WTO from the Carter age onwards) that caused our problems there, actually. Just like how Radio has been effectively fucked to smithereens with the removal of mass-market ownership limits; we dropped from having over 5,000 radio station owners, most of who were comfortably making a profit (if not insanely rich), and converted to where 99% of the radio market is owned by 5 companies all of which are claiming to be "on the edge of bankruptcy" and dropping all the local shows and local commentary to push prerecorded crap and "the same rotation of songs every hour" formats instead... and then wonder why people aren't listening anymore.

      It's a good thing regulations protected the people who got screwed by Enr... oh wait.

      Most of Enron's crimes were already on the books; the "responsive" stuff (Sarbanes-Oxley) was really fluff to tell people "look, we responded, see we passed a law" while being utterly fucking redundant. The problem was enforcement, not the regulations and laws themselves.

      It's a good thing regulations protected the town that the movie Erin Brockovicth was based on.. oh, wait.

      You're going by a movie? Again, the problem was that enforcement didn't happen, not that the laws and regulations themselves weren't right.

      You, sir, got lucky, and think that because things went a certain way for you, they go that way for everyone. They don't. The world is a larger sample set than the town you lived in.

      You, sir, need to realize something very basic: if we just enforced the laws we already have on the books properly, we'd solve so many problems it'd be unbelievable. The problem today is that 99% or more of the laws exist on the books without ever seeing enforcement, and politicians convince the sheeple that "passing a law" means solving the problem, even if the law they just passed is already redundant to 4-5 other fucking laws already on the books that aren't being enforced either.

      If we cleaned up the law books, consolidated all the redundant crap, cleaned up/repealed the really stupid or badly worded ones and then simply enforced what we have properly, we'd be a lot better off.

    2. Re:Yea, regulation always fails. by ClioCJS · · Score: 1
      I think I agree with you actually. I think you thought I didn't understand that the bank industry was caused by deregulation. I do. But the existing regulations not being enforced means that deregulation is simply that much stupider, and the point about the regulations that were there not working is still true, regardless of if the reason is that they are stupid, or not being enforced.

      Erin Brockovitch is based on a true story, by the way. To raise awareness that yes, things like this happen, and good luck getting any justice when they do.

      I might have been unclear or argumentative, but what I'm saying is: Deregulation sucks as bad as not enforcing regulations -- it is de facto the same thing. I'll add to that that OVER-regulation really sucks as well! Some (or all!) situations need to be taken case-by-case, but regulations that exist also need to be enforced so as not to muddy up our conversations!

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  22. Re:Red? by tuxgeek · · Score: 1

    Yep
    The Nazis also used Red with black
    So GOP == Communists, Nazis, Red China, the colour of hate (seeing red), aggression, spilled blood of the innocents, the list goes on ...

    --
    "Suppose you were an idiot...and suppose you were a member of Congress...but I repeat myself." Mark Twain
  23. OK mr grammar nazi. by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

    I made some typos and left a couple words out of my sentences while i was distracted, Whoopdy-freakin-doo.

    The third paragraph is SPECULATING about him leaving other committees he was seating last I checked, if you'll notice the "If" at the front of the sentence.

    I'm not proud of the mistakes, but the message is still quite clear.

    I'd be happy to have one of the /. editors or admins correct the typos, but attacking the idea expressed based on typing mistakes is beyond nitpicking.

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    1. Re:OK mr grammar nazi. by Slothy · · Score: 1

      I think you misunderstand me. I REALLY, TRULY can't understand your post. I have no idea what you're trying to say. It SOUNDS like you have something to say, but I can't follow AT ALL.

      Something about copies of bills not being distributed? Something about copyright law and the internet?

      I'm totally up for a better explanation of what you're saying - I suspect you're far more informed on these issues than I am these days.

  24. Thank GODDESS Berman didn't get this appointment.. by MsGeek · · Score: 1

    Boucher hasn't been 100% perfect, but I'm sure the Content Cabal wanted their fair-haired kept boy in there instead. For the record, Berman IS my congresscritter. And I didn't vote for him this time. Just as I didn't vote for him two years ago.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  25. Then I submit to you a corrected copy. by plasmacutter · · Score: 2, Informative

    Then I submit to you a corrected copy.

    Legislation related to copyright generally goes into the committee of the judiciary and from there to the subcommittee on courts, the internet, and intellectual property.

    Occasionally copies of bill go to the commerce and energy committee, but mostly its just a gesture rather than actual authority, as any bills which are approved by said committee usually get passed back to the judiciary anyway (or a copy is sent to the judiciary at the same time), just to show they're the top dogs.

    If he's leaving either of his other committees (IIRC he was seated on the one on courts, the internet, and intellectual property), it's actually a reduction in the influence of reformists. Either way i'm at least glad he was re-elected.

    I hope this clears up any problems.

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    1. Re:Then I submit to you a corrected copy. by Slothy · · Score: 1

      Very much so. That was a very informative post! Thanks!

  26. Re:This is all fine and good, but its not the righ by bnenning · · Score: 1
    --
    How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
  27. Re:This is all fine and good, but its not the righ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The meaning is clear. An entity, referred to here as Legislation, related to the copyright. A comma was then forgotten, obscuring the meaning somewhat, but it's easy enough to go on from there to conclude that Legislation also related into the committees, the internet, and intellectual property.

    That's an awful lot of relating, but it's easy enough to understand.

  28. I still don't trust him. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I still don't trust him. He's a politician, and politicians are only truly concerned about themselves and how to obtain and maintain their power.