Slashdot Mirror


Roland Piquepaille Dies

overheardinpdx writes "I'm sad to report that longtime HPC technology pundit Roland Piquepaille (rpiquepa) died this past Tuesday. Many of you may know of him through his blog, his submissions to Slashdot, and his many years of software visualization work at SGI and Cray Research. I worked with Roland 20 years ago at Cray, where we both wrote tech stories for the company newsletter. With his focus on how new technologies modify our way of life, Roland was really doing Slashdot-type reporting before there was a World Wide Web. Rest in peace, Roland. You will be missed." The notice of Roland's passing was posted on the Cray Research alumni group on Linked-In by Matthias Fouquet-Lapar. There will be a ceremony on Monday Jan. 12, at 10:30 am Paris time, at Père Lachaise.

288 comments

  1. Rest in Peace, rpiquepa by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While I often found his stories and comments to be far reaching, overstated, overly optimistic & sometimes bordered on religious zealotry, I will miss his contributions and wish his family and friends well. I hope they know that Roland was a man committed to the proliferation of technology and advancements has done great things for both our community & society.

    It is also comforting to see a soul survive and prosper in a technological field and end up where they want to live blogging peacefully. I hope my own retirement and passing are similar instead of some of the mindless inane existences I know my ancestors have lived out in nursing homes and/or in front of a TV.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Rest in Peace, rpiquepa by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I can only suspect St. Peter will give YOU a -1 when you show up before the pearly gates

      I don't know about that, but on Roland's approach St. Peter was heard to say "oh no, it's Roland".

      --
      What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
    2. Re:Rest in Peace, rpiquepa by MMC+Monster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Agree. While I didn't always like his choice of articles, he was one of us and I'm sorry to see him leave.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    3. Re:Rest in Peace, rpiquepa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      If you want to get technical, Hitler was one of 'Us' too.

      And I'll miss Roland less.

    4. Re:Rest in Peace, rpiquepa by BlackPignouf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hey rude boy, you might try "Vaya con dios" next time.

      You'll still sound like an asshole, but at least like an educated asshole!

    5. Re:Rest in Peace, rpiquepa by Ardipithecus · · Score: 2

      Vaya con Dios
      (caps)

    6. Re:Rest in Peace, rpiquepa by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hey rude boy, you might try "Vaya con dios" next time.

      You'll still sound like an asshole, but at least like an educated asshole!

      Agreed, but for Roland, one should say, "Allez avec Dieu."

      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    7. Re:Rest in Peace, rpiquepa by forkazoo · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't know about that, but on Roland's approach St. Peter was heard to say "oh no, it's Roland".

      No, actually St. Peter has no idea that Roland is coming. He was using an extension to block everything related to him.

    8. Re:Rest in Peace, rpiquepa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      tagged ohnoitwasroland

    9. Re:Rest in Peace, rpiquepa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      seconded

    10. Re:Rest in Peace, rpiquepa by backslashdot · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Agreed.

      I was one of those folks who said bad stuff about his posts. If he read it I hope he didn't take it personally. He was a good guy and there's true bad things out there to have gotten riled up about instead. I am saddened by this news.

    11. Re:Rest in Peace, rpiquepa by grub · · Score: 1, Funny

      Thanks for the reminder. I can finally delete the "NoRoland" Greasemonkey script in Firefox.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    12. Re:Rest in Peace, rpiquepa by Seumas · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was initially rubbed wrong by the style of his advertising via Slashdot stories, but he did grow to be a significant fixture in this community. Like most people, there are those whose impressions of him and fondness for him slide off from center in both directions. Regardless, this headline evoked a great deal of sadness as it has clearly for so many others.

      I can only join the community in giving my best wishes and condolences to his family, friends and his colleagues. Yet another in a line of wonderful people we have witnessed the death of in our many years here at Slashdot.

      I fear the passing of notables in this field will only accelerate as those who were my age when the tech world began to bloom reach their senior years now. I am not looking forward to more similar headlines down the road.

    13. Re:Rest in Peace, rpiquepa by Mozk · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thanks for the reminder. I can finally delete the "NoRoland" Greasemonkey script in Firefox.

      Not just yet:

      Suzanne said that Roland had a few posts in the pipeline and wanted them published. If she is able to pull them from Roland’s PC we’ll put them on his blog to complete his record.

      --
      No existe.
    14. Re:Rest in Peace, rpiquepa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have no idea why everyone thought the world would collapse when he linked to a blog with ads from a site that amounts to a blog with ads. I found it quaint and charming, but then again I'm not one to RTFA. Which is another point, if no one reads TFA why make such a fuss about the links? I think it's just weak people trying to feel bigger by insulting people, just like the schoolyard any excuse will do.

    15. Re:Rest in Peace, rpiquepa by FuturePastNow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This makes me sad. OK, I know that a lot of people on Slashdot didn't like rpiquepa, and I understand why. But truthfully, I never paid much attention to who submitted what, so I probably read hundreds of his articles. Am I a better person for being a little bit more informed? I think so.

      And so are you. We're all just names on the internet to each other. Some of those names, like mine, are more or less anonymous. And some people, like Roland, use their real names on the internet. Are we mortal or not? Obviously, we are. One (more) of us is dead now.

      What about our words, our ideas? When the checks to the hosting companies stop and their servers shut down, will our words- all that we really are to each other- not disappear? I'm just rambling. Good night, Slashdot. My condolences to Roland's family.

      --
      Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
    16. Re:Rest in Peace, rpiquepa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he did grow to be a significant fixture in this community

      He submitted stories, as far as I know he never contributed to the "community".

  2. Rest in peace by ChienAndalu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have read some interesting stories from Roland here. Most of them were tagged "ohnoitsroland", the meaning of which I still don't fully understand.

    1. Re:Rest in peace by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 2, Informative

      All of his submissions (minus one or two) were simply links to his blog to generate traffic/revenue, rather than passing us directly to the news source.

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    2. Re:Rest in peace by oneiros27 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There was a period when it was common to see 1/3 to 1/2 of the stories on the front page from Roland, and the stories linking to brief summaries on his own blog rather than to the original article. I can only assume it was a comment on that period.

      --
      Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    3. Re:Rest in peace by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I always enjoyed the irony of Slashdotters accusing him of aggregating multiple articles just to whore his blog :D

      It's very fitting that news of his passing is in the Meta catagory because his submissions were like a Slashdot within a Slashdot. I like the fact that he, like NYCL, wasn't above actually kickin' it with us and participating in discussions. He also made the occasional funnie as well. RIP RP!

    4. Re:Rest in peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Mere death won't stop him from posting

    5. Re:Rest in peace by GameMaster · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Originally, most of the posts attributed to him provided links directly to his blog rather than to the original source. Once there, you were greeted by a summary that bordered very closely on, what many people considered, outright plagiarism. This, along with the sheer number of times the slashdot editors posted his submissions, caused a lot of slashdot readers to conclude that he was "stealing" stories to generate hits so he could profit from advertising. There was also question of whether there was some kind of improper favoritism going on between Roland and the Slashdot editors.

      Personally, I doubt there was any overt quid-pro-quo between Roland and Slashdot. I think he was just a conveniently consistent source of new stories for the editors. As far as the supposed stealing of stories went, he responded relatively quickly by not linking to his own blog most of the time and by providing the summaries in more of his own words. This resolved any potential I, personally, might have had.

      However, since then, there has always been a decent amount of eye rolling every time a story was posted with Roland as the source. This is why you see the "ohnoitsroland" meta tag. I think it's probably in jest, though maybe not the most tactful joke.

      I would also like to join the people offering condolences to Roland's friends and family for his loss. Regardless of what some people may have thought of his posting style, it's a tragedy when a loved one is lost and my sympathy is with them.

      --

      Rules of Conduct:
      #1 - The DM is always right.
      #2 - If the DM is wrong, see rule #1
    6. Re:Rest in peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't this story be tagged "ohnoitsroland"?

    7. Re:Rest in peace by Goaway · · Score: 5, Informative

      Years ago, perhaps. That hasn't been true in a long time, however.

    8. Re:Rest in peace by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      For a while it was tagged ohnoitsnotroland.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    9. Re:Rest in peace by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

      In a nod to tradition, there is a link to his blog in the summary. I was a bit disappointed there wasn't anything about his passing noted on the blog. It seems appropriate somehow.

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    10. Re:Rest in peace by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      It's been years since Katz wrote about Junis posting from Afghanistan on his Commodore 64, and his name still makes everybody groan with delight.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    11. Re:Rest in peace by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Don't bother bringing truth or reason to Slashdot. There's a large contingent of users on this site who seem to have the same amount of religious fervor as your average born-again evangelical, just for a different set of causes.

      I'm not sure if I respect loving Jesus or hate Roland less.

    12. Re:Rest in peace by idontgno · · Score: 5, Insightful

      True, I believe. It seems he learned from the criticism. That alone put him in the top 10% of humanity.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    13. Re:Rest in peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      True, but how would he have written it?

    14. Re:Rest in peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I always enjoyed the irony of Slashdotters accusing him of aggregating multiple articles just to whore his blog :D

      He eventually figured it out and started linking directly to articles in his submissions, while including additional information/pictures on his blog.

      The whining really should have died out around that point, but ohnoitsroland had already become an institution in and of itself.

    15. Re:Rest in peace by Surt · · Score: 5, Funny

      When you see death walking up the path to your door, start typing fast.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    16. Re:Rest in peace by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Or write some generic boilerplate about how sad it is you died, and have your computer automatically post it if you don't log in for a few days.

      And hope you never have NTP issues...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    17. Re:Rest in peace by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      It wasn't just the fact that he linked to his blog, it was the fact that he often posted articles that were junk science or just plain wrong. To be fair to him, this should really be blamed on the so-called editors, but I think after a while they stopped bothering to even do cursory checks of Roland's articles.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    18. Re:Rest in peace by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

      Forget top 10% of humanity, I'd say that puts him in the top 10% of any subgroup he could claim rights to -- even if that subgroup was weighted towards the more intelligent end of humanity.

    19. Re:Rest in peace by steelfood · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      This resolved any potential I, personally, might have had.

      Way to blame him for your inability to breed.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    20. Re:Rest in peace by BenBoy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just doing something, whether subject to criticism or praise, puts him in the top 10%.

    21. Re:Rest in peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Originally, most of the posts attributed to him provided links directly to his blog rather than to the original source. Once there, you were greeted by a summary that bordered very closely on, what many people considered, outright plagiarism. This, along with the sheer number of times the slashdot editors posted his submissions, caused a lot of slashdot readers to conclude that he was "stealing" stories to generate hits so he could profit from advertising.

      Perhaps I am biased as I am someone who has worked in internet advertising and also earned some well needed cash from ads on my websites when I was a student. But somehow I fail to see what is wrong there.

      I don't see people complaining "He is a software engineer for SUN but I think that he programs open source just to earn money from it...". Everyone knows that it is natural. But when it comes to doing other useful stuff for the community (such as delivering numerous interesting stories to everyone) people should suddenly stop earning money from it or they are doing something wrong?

      I know many people here blog too and many do it just for their hobbies. Others of us do it as a hobby too but also for personal profit. When I apply for a web development job I can show my blog to my future employer as a reference about my views and skill. It is exactly the same as if I had ads there.

      I happen to know several people who earn their living from full time blogging. Their blogs actually have a lot of useful content that they could not have produced had their days been spent at other full time jobs. Even there are people who, despite obviously enjoying the material, complain about ads.

      Don't you people realize how much of the useful content on the web exists because of someone earned something from putting it there?

      I could see them as annoying if it was full of pop ups and "You are 1 000 000 th visitor..." ads but people here refer to google ads in the same way... I have even seen people replying to themselves and apolozing that the link in their post led to a site with google ads and that they had not noticed it...

      Could someone PLEASE explain to me what is it all about? Thank you.

    22. Re:Rest in peace by Roland+Piquepaille · · Score: 5, Funny

      You got that right!

    23. Re:Rest in peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *sigh* and now I have to reply to myself to add that I was meant to rant mostly about unexplainable hatred of ads here while my quotations included claims of him plagiarizing.

      I forgot to add the "naturally not linking to the original article was bad but collecting interesting pieces of articles together is exactly same that slashdot is doing. And /. has ads."

    24. Re:Rest in peace by Inzite · · Score: 1

      When you see death walking up the path to your door, start typing fast.

      I prefer to give death the finger.

    25. Re:Rest in peace by Eternauta3k · · Score: 1

      So? Why on earth are you reading the article anyways?

      --
      Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
    26. Re:Rest in peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By that point, it was far too late. Slashdotters are too smart

      -and, you lost me

    27. Re:Rest in peace by ejtttje · · Score: 1

      crap I meant to mod this overrated but the mouse slipped. Like other reply said, I don't think this has been true in a long time. I think people ragged on him too much.

    28. Re:Rest in peace by beav007 · · Score: 1

      I wish they'd fix this usability flaw already. If you use FF/Greasemonkey, you can use the script in my .sig to help prevent it.

      It's really just a stopgap though.


      Dear CmdrTaco: I'm no html/js expert, but I fixed the issue in a couple of hours. Feel free to copy my code if you can't figure out how to do it yourself.

      Either way, please fix it.

    29. Re:Rest in peace by JustOK · · Score: 5, Funny

      I checked his grave, and there was just a link to a different grave with someone else's corpse.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    30. Re:Rest in peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Slashdotters act like schoolyard children and become the bullies that victimised them. Once you're branded fattie, you could win the cross country marathon and still be known as fattie.

  3. In memoriam by hansamurai · · Score: 5, Interesting
    1. Re:In memoriam by brian0918 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Let's not forget about the prophetic dierolanddie.

    2. Re:In memoriam by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Funny

      Prophetic, nothin'! I am SOOOO tagging this article 'diekdawsondie'!

      (It's a joke. It's funny. Laugh.)

    3. Re:In memoriam by jalefkowit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      News flash: you're going to die someday too.

    4. Re:In memoriam by CptNerd · · Score: 2, Funny

      Life is the leading cause of death...

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    5. Re:In memoriam by NiteShaed · · Score: 1

      "Life, and I don't suppose I'm the first to make this comparison, is a disease: sexually transmitted, and invariably fatal." -- Death Talks About Life, Neil Gaiman

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    6. Re:In memoriam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is an atheist site. We do not tolerate such religious heresey from out members here.

    7. Re:In memoriam by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

      I preferred pigpile (possibly because, as far as I can tell, I came up with it). But I don't think it caught on. The link comes up with a bunch of articles, but I think that's just my own list (I haven't quite figured out this Slashdot Tag thing).

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    8. Re:In memoriam by multisync · · Score: 1

      Life is the leading cause of death...

      And marriage is the leading cause of divorce.

      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    9. Re:In memoriam by stinerman · · Score: 1

      (I haven't quite figured out this Slashdot Tag thing).

      Right now, it is essentially a way to get a small comment on the front page.

      Those of us who dislike comments are, however, forced to view them.

    10. Re:In memoriam by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      News flash: you're going to die someday too.

      So are you. And no one will care enough to make jokes about you on slashdot.

      Even the people saying nasty things about Roland Pikatroll today are giving him his props.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  4. I will not miss him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Seriously, I'm not trying to be a troll, but I actively avoided Roland-submitted articles for many many years. They were not worth the effort.
    I'm sad for his passing and feel sorry for his family...but I will NOT miss his Slashdot submissions because that is all I know of him.

    1. Re:I will not miss him by eclectro · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually I will. His reporting improved significantly from his early blogging days, so much so that I often did not notice that the story submitted here on Slashdot was from Roland unless the "oh no its Roland" tag appeared. I think this became more of a good natured ribbing rather than slighting him personally. I also subscribed to the nascent "oh yeah it's Roland" tag movement a couple of months back. Now that he is gone, I really do miss him. Rest in peace, friend.

      Here is more details about his death, which appears to be a fast moving gastrointestinal virus.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    2. Re:I will not miss him by cthulu_mt · · Score: 1

      I don't know why people were so fired up about the ads on his website. No one reads the articles!

      --
      Virginia is for lovers. EVE is for griefers.
    3. Re:I will not miss him by MadUndergrad · · Score: 1

      Frankly, I didn't know he was a real person. I just kind of assumed it was a pseudonym for a blog whore.

    4. Re:I will not miss him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a different AC, I'll agree with that.

      Yes, it's sad for his friends and family that he died, and I feel sorry for them.

      As for Slashdot, though, well... what's the big deal? He DID change his habit of linking to his own ad-ladden blog instead of the original articles after a while, after pretty much every comment on every story he submitted expressed displeasure about this habit, and given that he did change this, I certainly don't hold any grudges or anything against him anymore, but... ...but still, he's just this guy, y'know? One of the few story submitters we actually recognise by name, but in the end, anyone who mourns his passing now here, ask yourself - after you close this tab, will you ever even think about this again at all?

      And the answer, of course, is that unless you knew him personally, or unless you just happen to see the story on the Slashdot front page again next time you check it because there haven't been enough new stories to make it drop off of the front page yet, you will not. Roland Piquepaille doesn't matter to you and your life - there is no reason why he would, of course, but it's the truth.

      So please, unless you DID know him personally, stop it with the "oh Roland, we will miss you so much, may the good Lord mod you up forever now". This isn't a Roman funeral, and you're no professional mourners.

  5. What happens to... by Vexler · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...his blog? Or for that matter, his email account?

    1. Re:What happens to... by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Or, more importantly, his Slashdot account? Maybe the editors could sell it on eBay and donate the proceeds to his memorial fund!

    2. Re:What happens to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      Well since having died on Tuesday he's continued posting to Slashdot, so I guess he'll keep using his blog and email too.

    3. Re:What happens to... by jamie · · Score: 5, Informative

      The "Roland Piquepaille" account is a troll.

      The actual Roland's account, as mentioned in the story, was "rpiquepa".

    4. Re:What happens to... by smellsofbikes · · Score: 2, Funny

      >The actual Roland's account, as mentioned in the story, was "rpiquepa".

      You expect /.ers to RTFA?
      You must be new here.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    5. Re:What happens to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      The real rpiquepa was either a sockpuppet or ad revenue kickback contributor anyhow. I'm not entirely convinced there ever was a Roland Piquepaille. I bet the casket is actually full of hot grits.

    6. Re:What happens to... by thewiz · · Score: 1

      Does that mean we should get rid of the troll account or the person that uses it?

      --
      If "disco" means "I learn" in Latin, does "discothèque" mean "I learn technology"?
    7. Re:What happens to... by brian0918 · · Score: 1

      When you submit a story, you get to pick what you want to display for your name.... yeeesh...

    8. Re:What happens to... by Chosen+Reject · · Score: 1

      Are you sure you don't have it the other way around? If you go off the moderating history of the comments, it seems "rpiquepa" had more Troll moderations than "Roland Piquepaille" did.

      --
      Stop Global Warming!
      Just say no to irreversible processes!
    9. Re:What happens to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "Roland Piquepaille" account is a troll.

      The actual Roland's account, as mentioned in the story, was "rpiquepa".

      Please put this in the story summary! Most of the

    10. Re:What happens to... by Mozk · · Score: 1

      No, that's right. The user rpiquepa, the real Roland Piquepaille, would get modded down solely for being Roland Piquepaille, while the user Roland Piquepaille generally gets modded up for posting comments of some value. That or impersonating Roland, which at least in that instance I think has to be funny no matter how you see this.

      --
      No existe.
    11. Re:What happens to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, I didn't even RTFS (Read the fucking summary).

    12. Re:What happens to... by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Ah, but he's the only real /.er here. He's even got the icon to prove it.

      So what the hell are we?

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    13. Re:What happens to... by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      Go read the Robert Heinlein short story "All You Zombies" some time.
      (Generally I think Heinlein was a twit, but he wrote a few *excellent* stories, and most of them ended up in the compilation "The Unpleasant Profession Of Johnathan Hoag And Other Stories" -- although the title story isn't one of those good stories.)

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  6. No Need for Insult by dsginter · · Score: 5, Funny

    Roland was really doing Slashdot-type reporting before there was a World Wide Web.

    Now, Now... there's no need to insult the guy at this point.

    --
    More
    1. Re:No Need for Insult by gad_zuki! · · Score: 5, Funny

      Its pretty sad I came here just to post that exact joke. Ronald's passing has opened my eyes on how unoriginal I am. Thank you sir, that is the greatest gift of all.

    2. Re:No Need for Insult by Myopic · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I mistakenly moderated that post as overrated instead of funny, so I'm replying to it so that my moderation is eliminated.

    3. Re:No Need for Insult by ryanvm · · Score: 5, Funny

      Who the fuck is Ronald?

    4. Re:No Need for Insult by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, there's Ronald McDonald (some surely wish he would die), Ronald Reagan (he died a few years ago), and being /., full of computer nerds, someone should know of Ronald Rivest, and Ronald Fagin. In this case, however, I think it's safe to say that the GP just made a simple mistake, but by all means, this being /. as I said, you should crucify him.

    5. Re:No Need for Insult by Mozk · · Score: 1

      Man, karma be damned, this is the first post I've bursted out laughing at on Slashdot in a while.

      P.S. Your website is of immeasurable value, assuming you are RyanVM of ryanvm.net.

      --
      No existe.
  7. Just a big conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...to get more pageviews in heaven.

  8. Truly a Slashdot icon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard about it on talk radio.

  9. Hmmm by brian0918 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well you know what they say... you never know how much you miss something until it's gone. For me, I find that is definitely the case here - I will truly miss the use of ohnoitsroland, boycottroland, and dierolanddie tags!

  10. Oh No, Not Roland! by pallmall1 · · Score: 1

    He will be missed.

    --
    3 things about computers: they're alive, they're self-aware, and they hate your guts.
  11. Sad news. His postings were a lot better... by EWAdams · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... than all the slashdotcynicalwhining that pervades the board.

    He'll definitely be missed by some of us.

    --
    I piss off bigots.
  12. Oi. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know, over the years I've read Slashdot, I got the impression Roland was one of those stereotypical "needs a life" /. posters from all the people complaining about him. Then this happens and I find out that, well, he had a life, and worked at some interesting companies back in the day.

    Best wishes to all Roland's people, and at the same time I'm glad that complaining about him from the other basement dwellers is going to stop before too long.

    1. Re:Oi. by tgd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just goes to show, live life well until the end because odds are you'll be remembered for the last thing you did, not the first.

    2. Re:Oi. by gclef · · Score: 5, Funny

      Which means that if you do something awesome, you should never try do anything else, ever.

    3. Re:Oi. by jCaT · · Score: 1

      Either that or wait to do all the good stuff until right before you die. That's my plan.

    4. Re:Oi. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, you might die, but copyright will live forever.

    5. Re:Oi. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be safe, just quietly commit suicide right after doing something awesome.

    6. Re:Oi. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dying in an more awesome way than that something you did, perhaps?

    7. Re:Oi. by superdana · · Score: 1

      Seems to have worked for Bettie Page.

    8. Re:Oi. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you'll be remembered for the nothing that you did at the end of your life.

    9. Re:Oi. by turing_m · · Score: 1

      Just goes to show, live life well until the end because odds are you'll be remembered for the last thing you did, not the first.

      Tell that to Ted Kennedy.

      --
      If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
  13. Funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He didn't say anything about this on his blog...

    1. Re:Funny... by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      William Gibson would be more the type to predict his own death.

    2. Re:Funny... by treeves · · Score: 1

      I'm willing to go out on a limb, and predict right here, in front of everyone - well OK a few hundred /. readers - that one day I am, in fact, going to die.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    3. Re:Funny... by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      Move over Miss Cleo, we've got a rising star in the world of fortunetelling :).

  14. slashdot^2 by FonkiE · · Score: 4, Interesting

    i'll miss his blog. biotech, computers, physics ... it was slashdot^2 ... to bad he had to close down comments a few years ago due to abuse.

    he was thinking ahead of his time. i would like to be that anticipating at that age.

  15. But... by Linker3000 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ...did he run Linux?

    --
    AT&ROFLMAO
  16. Well, this proves... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Apparently its not just his blog links that resulted in a DEAD END.
     
    Too soon?

  17. Re:thank. fucking. god. by zappepcs · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I don't know, I had a pretty good greasemonkey script that got rid of his submissions. When I first saw this story, I quickly checked to see if greasemonkey was disabled somehow. My first thought, WTF? How did that get there? Please tell me he has not changed something to get around the filter!

    Sorry that he died, don't wish death on anyone... well, not most people anyway. Won't miss the stories either... I haven't been reading them, so not much affect.

  18. Know your limits by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I too agree that it is sad to see the passing of a Great One. He certainly contributed greatly and built a mighty pedestal. Unfortunately he also chose to dilute his high quality work with quite a lot of trite, enough to earn his own derogatory tag.

    While it is important to speak when you have something useful to say, it is as important to Shut The Fuck Up when you haven't.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Know your limits by Rei · · Score: 4, Funny

      In honor of him, we should flood news sites with releases for this subject that redirect readers to a blog.

      --
      All we want to do is eat your brains.
    2. Re:Know your limits by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      According to the ZDNet link in TFA he still lives in Paris. Makes a change from netcraft.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re:Know your limits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even so, his stories were far better than anything submitted by Twitter The Troll. Twitter The Troll repeated stories such as "Teh M$ sux0rs"

    4. Re:Know your limits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Quite a lot of trite what? Trite is an adjective, not a noun. Did you mean tripe?

    5. Re:Know your limits by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1, Funny

      Even so, his stories were far better than anything submitted by Twitter The Troll. Twitter The Troll repeated stories such as "Teh M$ sux0rs"

      Granted, but simply being better than Twitter is no claim to fame. That's like saying "more nutritious than sand".

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    6. Re:Know your limits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have lost a bright spark in our community, and you compare him to an irritating pest. He might share the passion of Twitter, but in the way he interacted with and respected the community he was his antithesis. Roland learned from his mistakes, listened to his often vile and obnoxious critics and improved the quality of his submissions. He should be on his pedestal like GGP said as exactly the kind of people we want at this site. He was passionate about our passions, and tempered his tone for the sake of the message. He will be sorely missed.

  19. sorry to hear that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've found "frequent Slashdot contributor Bennett Haselton"'s stories to be a lot more annoying than Roland's though. I keep tagging his stories ohnoitsbennett but it doesn't seem to have caught on yet.

    1. Re:sorry to hear that by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      I'll second that motion. I get really sick of seeing his stories that consist almost entirely of "I try to fight spam, and I'm totally awesome, but judges are so out of it! Also, here's a nearly-incoherent rant on what I think could possibly be a solution but will never work in real life."

  20. Wikipedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Articles about him have been deleted over and over again most recently in 2007.

    Is he really just "A french blogger known for frequently posting articles to the technical website Slashdot that primarily linked back to his own technica" or "a fellow who makes a lot of money on ads by getting his crappy stories linked constantly on Slashdot" [link] or is he notable enough outside of the blogger/Slashdot community to make an article?

    I know it's tempting, but please don't go making an article about him before you read Wikipedia's notability requirements for people.

    Sincerely,
    Anonymous Coward Wikipedian

    1. Re:Wikipedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A... so finally we see a Wikinazi here at Slashdot...

      Guys.... KILL HIM! *raises burning pitchfork-torch*

  21. Wait a second by abigor · · Score: 0

    I googled around, and there's no mention of this. The summary also reads like the famous old "Stephen King is dead" troll.

    1. Re:Wait a second by jamie · · Score: 5, Informative

      Kdawson made the phone calls to confirm this before posting it.

    2. Re:Wait a second by gzipped_tar · · Score: 4, Informative

      Oh, no, Roland is no more...

      http://blogs.zdnet.com/emergingtech/?p=1138

      It is with great sadness to tell you that our Emerging Technologies blogger Roland Piquepaille has passed away suddenly. His wife Suzanne just confirmed his passing.

      Roland, 62, was one of our most passionate bloggers and his ability to explain complex science well was something to behold. Roland spent most of his career in software, mainly for high performance computing and visualization companies, working for example for Cray Research and Silicon Graphics. He left the corporate world in 2001 after 33 years and jumped into blogging.

      Roland passed away Monday in Paris. He was hit with a digestive virus that lead to a high fever and health complications beyond that. Suzanne said that the doctors are still trying to quantify how Roland got the virus and the exact details. We spent the last few hours confirming Roland's passing as word began to spread. It has been a rough year for the ZDNet family.

      There will be a ceremony held on Monday. Rest in peace Roland, we'll miss you. Suzanne said that Roland had a few posts in the pipeline and wanted them published. If she is able to pull them from Roland's PC we'll put them on his blog to complete his record.

      --
      Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
    3. Re:Wait a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because we always get accurate reporting from Kdawson...

    4. Re:Wait a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Do you people do that a lot?

      "Hi it's Kdawson here from Slashdot, can you confirm your dad's died?"

      I don't think most people posting to Slashdot, or submitting stories, expect this kind of intrusion.

    5. Re:Wait a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're expecting me to believe that not only did the /. editors start editing, but that it started with kdawson?

    6. Re:Wait a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kdawson confirms it, RolandBSD is dead.

    7. Re:Wait a second by BlueParrot · · Score: 5, Funny

      Kdawson made the phone calls to confirm this before posting it.

      Ok now THAT makes me doubt this is real.

    8. Re:Wait a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until Netcraft hires him, that means nothing.

    9. Re:Wait a second by pbhj · · Score: 4, Funny

      Kdawson made the phone calls to confirm this before posting it.

      What is netcrafts phone number?

    10. Re:Wait a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well know to be an idiot.

      That was epic, man.

    11. Re:Wait a second by ambrosen · · Score: 1

      Why would I need that when I only live two blocks away from them?

    12. Re:Wait a second by Mozk · · Score: 1

      +44(0)1225 587500

      Netcraft confirms it

      --
      No existe.
    13. Re:Wait a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sixty-two is awfully young. What on earth is a "digestive virus"? Does it attack English cookies? (Note: I did google the term, and it sure didn't turn up hits to useful medical or molecular biological resources like journals or university research proejcts etc.)

  22. Roland Piquepaille - Mod Him Way Up, IMHO by mfh · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I liked his whit, and charming methods of describing things to the readers of this website. He truly embodied what can best be described one of the pioneers of the Slashdot effect. Some people trolled him pretty hard, but he was and will always be remembered as interesting, insightful, funny and underrated.

    Roland, may the god(s) of whatever religion you believed in, forever mod you up.

    RIP, bro.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Roland Piquepaille - Mod Him Way Up, IMHO by rhizome · · Score: 1

      True to form, even the announcement of his passing has a link to his blog.

      --
      When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
    2. Re:Roland Piquepaille - Mod Him Way Up, IMHO by brarrr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I know this is off topic but it's worth mentioning... this is the first time in several years where I've seen a post by any of you sub 1000 (non-rob) UID folks that has content and isn't about the ahem size of your UID.

      (not that I mean to rip on you guys or say that you don't make posts that I just don't see, but it is just such an infrequent occurrence in my view to be worth noting) ... and I will wait patiently for some 56 user to make a non-witty, meaningful post to prove me wrong :)

      --
      to email me: take my /. handle and append .net preceded by charter.
    3. Re:Roland Piquepaille - Mod Him Way Up, IMHO by mfh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      mfh--> mother fucking hillbilly? He doesn't want to be your bro and I don't blame him. And, for the records, he was MODDED DOWN.

      Roland was green-lit approximately 500 times for front page news on Slashdot, and he will be remembered for his love of technology. People like you will not be remembered in such a way, because your whole meme is insipid -- it really offers nothing.

      --
      The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    4. Re:Roland Piquepaille - Mod Him Way Up, IMHO by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      The irony is on you, because I think he bought his account.
      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=118075&cid=9980688

      That being said, his posts are relevant, on topic and informative.

      Sorry MFH :(

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    5. Re:Roland Piquepaille - Mod Him Way Up, IMHO by drew · · Score: 1

      Wow, how many people really look at the UID on every post they read just to see how long the guy's been around? Most of the time I barely notice the name of the user, much less the ID. If I recognize people at all, it's usually because of their .signature - the basis for both my current .sig and my habit of changing it every few months.

      But even still, I find the whole thing rather humorous in a way. For a long time, Slashdot didn't even have user IDs or user names. You used to be able type whatever you wanted to have displayed as your name on every post you submitted. And when they first added accounts, people didn't always rush to sign up for one right away. I can think of a few very notable Slashdot regulars from the days before accounts existed that still have ID's in the 5000+ range (Bruce Perens comes to mind), and at least one with a user ID in the 100,000+ range (John Carmack). Actually, if I remember right, the whole reason they even started displaying user IDs publicly was because of the number of impostors pretending to be one of the early high profile users - do a user search for "Perens" and you'll see what I mean. (Oops - I guess he's not quite in the 5,000+ range. My bad...)

      The moral of this story? Besides just being able to talk about how long I've been reading Slashdot (which I swear I normally never do), there's a good chance that any UID under 10,000 has probably been around, on average, about the same amount of time. And even if it's not that low, it doesn't really mean anything. And really the whole thing is kind of silly. (Although I suppose if I was offered the chance to buy a 2-digit UID for $100, I'd probably take it. <sigh>) And is it really so surprising that people who have been visiting this site for a long time might have more to say than just "Get off my lawn you young'uns"?

      Maybe we should go back to the days when they didn't display user ID's publicly. I wonder how many people would really be up in arms if they tried it?

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    6. Re:Roland Piquepaille - Mod Him Way Up, IMHO by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      Are we talking about the same Roland here?

      I have no idea who this guy you think so awesome is but the Roland I know was an adsense troll in corporation with kdawson.

      Just because the guys dead doesn't mean I have to turn around and call the guy "great" and "will be missed". Yeah, it's horrible he died but his articles and constant slashdot trolling, copying and pasting (stealing) articles will not be missed.

  23. Re:I think I speak for all of us when... by 5pp000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You certainly don't speak for me, Anonymous Coward.

    R.I.P. Roland.

    --
    Your god may be dead, but mine aren't!
  24. We'll miss you, you git by 4D6963 · · Score: 2

    Is there a named cognitive bias (or something similar) for suddenly liking and missing someone who was universally considered a git prior to his passing? Because that's what happening to Slashdot right now, including me a bit.

    --
    You just got troll'd!
    1. Re:We'll miss you, you git by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

      Yeah, parent post sums up my feelings.

      Is there a named cognitive bias (or something similar) for suddenly liking and missing someone who was universally considered a git prior to his passing?

      If there is not a name for this, there should be. Maybe call it the Roland Effect, in honor of a man who may well have been less of a git and more important to my world than I had realized before.

    2. Re:We'll miss you, you git by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, there's always the old Latin saw: De mortuis nisi nil bonum "Of the dead [say] nothing but good"

    3. Re:We'll miss you, you git by macraig · · Score: 1

      That saying was engendered more out of fear than respect, though: they were afraid the dead would exact some sort of supernatural revenge if they dared to libel them posthumously. Ghosts and spirits may not be able to sue you in court, but they're not bound by the laws of the living (or physics) any more, either.

      So, Roland, if you're so inclined, you can finally exact some subtle payback from your detractors.

    4. Re:We'll miss you, you git by NiteShaed · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't know about a named condition, but to paraphrase the (alleged) F.D.R. quote, he may have been a git, but he was our git.

      R.I.P. Roland.

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    5. Re:We'll miss you, you git by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      a man who may well have been less of a git and more important to my world than I had realized before.

      Now now, it's just the Roland Effect speaking ;-). By the way, I always thought Piquepaille was a made up name. How do we know it's not some semi-fictious pundit entity like "Robert X. Cringely"?

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    6. Re:We'll miss you, you git by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't see why you were marked a troll. It is patently obvious that a lot of rose-colored glasses have been donned here today. Or maybe a lot of people really were just clueless as to how unethical he really was - with his blatant plagiarism in not quoting or citing the sources he took from, his "make money by blogging" pyramid scheme(he made money with his blog by displaying "make money by blogging" ads) and subtle tricks like including repeated phrases that were slightly shuffled from normal english to fool search engines.
      Some above claimed that he was a good guy since he changed his tactics due to criticism. I don't think the vampire bat evolving to have a local anesthetic in its saliva so as not to be noticed by the cows it wounds when it feeds means the vampire bat is good.

    7. Re:We'll miss you, you git by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Is there a named cognitive bias (or something similar) for suddenly liking and missing someone who was universally considered a git prior to his passing?

      I think there is a proper fancy word for it, but how about "Diana effect"?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    8. Re:We'll miss you, you git by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      I think that the reason for modding me troll is somehow part of the same phenomenon.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    9. Re:We'll miss you, you git by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

      See, whenever people talk about being scared of ghosts I simply say "Well, if there ARE ghosts, and the bastard kills me, then I'm going to beat his ass on the other side when I get there"

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    10. Re:We'll miss you, you git by QRDeNameland · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is there a named cognitive bias (or something similar) for suddenly liking and missing someone who was universally considered a git prior to his passing? Because that's what happening to Slashdot right now, including me a bit.

      Yes.

      De mortuis nil nisi bonum.

      Latin for: Speak nothing but good of the dead.

      --
      Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
    11. Re:We'll miss you, you git by Xiroth · · Score: 1

      A specific instance of 'You don't know what you've got until it's gone'?

    12. Re:We'll miss you, you git by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      More like "you'll miss what you lose even if you didn't like it when you had it"

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    13. Re:We'll miss you, you git by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1

      The Eulogy Song - hey, you aked for it. You were one of us Roland, we'll all miss you, trolls included.

  25. Ironic? by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    Isn't it ironic that the Slashdot submission itself has a bunch of links to other websites in it, Roland style? /RIP and all that, click-harvester

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  26. Re:I think I speak for all of us when... by palegray.net · · Score: 2, Informative

    Somebody mod parent troll. I didn't always agree with Roland's editorial habits, but I enjoyed many of his stories. The man was quite an accomplished individual, as many would realize if they took the time to learn a bit about his life. There's more to the Web than Slashdot.

  27. Jon Katz by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is breathing a sigh of relief that he escaped Slashdot alive.

    --
    Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  28. Re:TROLL ALERT by palegray.net · · Score: 1

    Right, ZDNet just goes and makes shit like this up for kicks. You fail.

  29. ohnoitsroland by Roadmaster · · Score: 1

    Maybe the "ohnoitsroland" tag should be retired in his honor?

  30. Should have been submitted by Ron... by topham · · Score: 1

    In clear violation of standard posting practice I think the Slashdot editors should have posted it as if by him.
    A certain amount of symmetry.

  31. It's so terribly, terribly sad... by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    Oh, woe...woe! The Grim Click-Harvester has claimed yet another life.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  32. In a truly ironic twist of fate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    All the advertising I usually see on a /. story is coming up with a "404 - Not Found".

    RIP, Roland.

  33. Candles in the wind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First Steve Jobs, now this..

  34. I thought that was a nom du plum by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

    who knew that was his real name?

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
    1. Re:I thought that was a nom du plum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the future, to avoid looking like a total jackass, you may wish to look up the spelling of the fancy foreign words you are trying to use or simply use the perfectly acceptable English words for the occasion; in this instance, "pen name."

      - The Pretension Review Board

    2. Re:I thought that was a nom du plum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That was not "un nom de plume" It was his real name, and he graduated from that school :

      PIQUEPAILLE Roland Lyon Génie Civil 1967

      http://congres.ingenieur-insa.fr/fr/compte/inscrits.php

      R.I.P.

  35. R.I.P. by tsalaroth · · Score: 2

    R.I.P, Roland. You will be missed, even if I didn't agree with you on everything.

  36. Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Call me old school, but I'm still waiting for Signal 11 to kick the bucket.

  37. Please mod my comment down by troll8901 · · Score: 1

    Just confirmed his death by reading more on the web. Calling would be very intrusive. Please mod my comment down.

    1. Re:Please mod my comment down by VeNoM0619 · · Score: 1

      Please mod my comment down.

      No way are we modding you down, that's just what you would expect, especially with a name like troll... I say we mod him +5 underrated.

      --
      Disclaimer: I am not god.
      We may not be created equal
      But we can be treated equal.
  38. Um, how? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    Not once in the summary or in any of the comments did it mention what he died from. Cancer? Heart attack? Eaten by a grue? OD huffing kittens?

    How did the man die, anyway?

    1. Re:Um, how? by BertieBaggio · · Score: 1

      How did the man die, anyway?

      Above, and on ZDNet say he died due to a digestive tract virus that lead to a high fever and other complications.

      RIP

      --
      If all you have is a grenade, pretty soon every problem looks like a foxhole -- MightyYar
    2. Re:Um, how? by Rycross · · Score: 3, Informative
    3. Re:Um, how? by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      Bitten by an unexpectedly venomous shrew.

      I kid, I kid. Even though his articles were missing some necessary criticism of the news items, he did a nice job keeping up an interest in scientific progress and making it available to a wider public. Also cool to see he did some nice stuff at the big players in the day.

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    4. Re:Um, how? by grub · · Score: 1
      --
      Trolling is a art,
    5. Re:Um, how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you have been trolled on Wikipedia - the unsourced comment was removed.

    6. Re:Um, how? by grub · · Score: 1

      Damn, I added it just minutes before.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    7. Re:Um, how? by alienmole · · Score: 1

      He was killed by a digestive virus? Oh, those French doctors...

  39. To quote Schlock Mercenary by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

    "Captain, I have studied more than a little bit of human culture. Nowhere have I found brightly colored, conical hats and inflatable noisemakers to be appropriate funeral attire."

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  40. Yeah... bout that UID. by mfh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sorry to disappoint you, but -- inb4 "He Bought it on Ebay."

    I first visited Slashdot when UIDs were in the low 1000's, so I have a lot of time invested in this website. I've read plenty of Rolly's posts and while I didn't agree with all of them, I always enjoyed his perspective.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Yeah... bout that UID. by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 2, Funny

      God - I totally read your title as "Yeah. . . bout that IUD." It's been a long day. . .

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
  41. Re:I think I speak for all of us when... by Fizzl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    On the contrary, he very rarely seemed to understand what he was reporting about, making overly optimistic and far reaching speculations about trivial matters.
    I was surprised just now to learn that he was actually so technically inclined.

  42. No offense by citylivin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But pretty much everyone here hated his linkjacking ass, even threatening to boycott the site. I can remember threads calling him the worst of the worst, and for a time, he was. To steal others content and pass it off as your own is real intellectual property theft. Especially when you make advertising money from it!! To see everyone get all two faced and misty eyed now that he has died is pretty unreal. Its like everyone feels guilty somewhat. He linkjacked all his content, and everybody dies. I really dont see what saying RIP does for anyone except the person that says it. My guess is that people are trying to say "im sorry".

    Whats next, jon katz found dead and we build him a monument?

    Hopefully I dont get bitchslapped for insulting a slashdot "celebrity", but someone has to tell it like it was

    --
    As a potential lottery winner, I totally support tax cuts for the wealthy
    1. Re:No offense by digitalchinky · · Score: 2, Informative

      I read his posts for the content, some I enjoyed, some not so much. I know a few people are saying "I'm Sorry" but I'm sure others would grudgingly agree Roland was a changed man from the early days, all under the bridge and history. Sure he was in it to earn a living, no problems there, but I think it safe to say that in the end he was doing it better.

      RIP: I guess you are just young to colour everything in such simple black and white concepts. In 5, 10, 20, 100 years, his kids, his grandkids, his descendants, whoever, these are well wishes for them as much as they are personal or for other readers on slashdot.

      In my world Roland was just a name on my computer screen - for good or bad (I never judged), but he definitely stood out from the noise, a name I became so familiar with that it was an assumed extension of slashdot - from the day I started reading this site to the day I finish, this happy looking old guy with glasses would always be there. Simple as that. It really is a case of "You miss what you took for granted when it's gone", and sometimes it can be a sobering moment when you stop and ponder that it is no more.

      So get your head out of your basement and understand that people are social creatures, we are compassionate, we interact. We might go through predictable motions like saying "Rest in Peace", but for each of us, we mean it in ways that go far beyond a moment of personal gratification.

      No offence taken, not everybody squats on the same tree branch though.

    2. Re:No offense by gumpish · · Score: 1

      Hopefully I dont get bitchslapped for insulting a slashdot "celebrity", but someone has to tell it like it was

      Right, because no one's more qualified to tell us how it was than a 1.25+ million uid.

  43. Re:No Wiki Entry by msuarezalvarez · · Score: 1

    "there for"? Maybe you should let long words alone for a few years...

  44. I didn't care by Colourspace · · Score: 1

    What he posted as long as it pointed to interesting enough stories and stimulated the response of the /. massive. You could always just ignore him if you didn't like it, no one is ever forced to click on a link. R.I.P.

    1. Re:I didn't care by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      ou could always just ignore him if you didn't like it,

      When 1/2 the stories on slashdot's main page were all Roland's, no you fucking couldn't.

    2. Re:I didn't care by Colourspace · · Score: 1

      I've been a daily regular on here for almost ten years now, and I never noticed an excess of Roland articles (but yes he did submit regularly, I concurr). I can think of plenty of others who I can remember posting far more often. Anyway, if you didn't like it, why not submit more stories yourself to counteract the 'Roland effect'?

  45. Perhaps many of us misunderstood Roland ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There were submissions from Roland that I thought pointless and absurd, but he also submitted some fascinating stuff.

    It occurs to me now that Roland was "in love" ( in a manner of speaking) with science. And this is probably why he behaved as he did. He wanted to share that which he loved with the rest of us.

    Whether the guy is dead or not, it's hard to hold someone's essentially harmless passion against them. If anything, the world would be a better place if there were more curious and passionate people.

    Finally, I remain utterly amazed that he could manage to assimilate and pass on so much information, and if he really did do it all by himself ( I used to suspect he had a few interns or something ) then he must have been quite a guy.

  46. R.I.P Roland by magnus_1986 · · Score: 1

    I take back all the bitter things I said to you, didn't know it would end like this...

    --
    My last sig was ridiculed
    1. Re:R.I.P Roland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You were expecting him to live forever?

    2. Re:R.I.P Roland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I take back all the bitter things I said to you, didn't know it would end like this...

      To minimise future regrets, you may wish to note that people ALWAYS end by dying.

    3. Re:R.I.P Roland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can make that assumption... but can't prove it (until everyone is dead, it's not "definite" (just "really fucking likely"), and since "everyone" includes you, there's not really any opportunity for gloating about being right afterwards).

  47. Truly by argStyopa · · Score: 4, Funny

    He'll be missed.

    But honestly, his death should have been reported via a link to his blog that would THEN link to the page discussing his death.

    Only a fitting tribute.

    --
    -Styopa
  48. Re:Translation: This is what he is trying to say. by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 4, Insightful

    by lowering reader's estimation of how much Slashdot editors can be trusted.

    Story submitters can't do that. It is the editors' jobs to separate the wheat from the chaff. Failure to do so is what reflects badly on the editors.

  49. And I _still_ don't know... by Sebastopol · · Score: 1

    ...how to pronounce his name.

    sad days.

    --
    https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    1. Re:And I _still_ don't know... by grub · · Score: 2, Funny


      ..how to pronounce his name.

      "Oe-Noe-itz-roe-land"

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:And I _still_ don't know... by jpfed · · Score: 1

      My best guess at a phoenetic spelling would be "Roh-lanh peek-a-pie-uh".

    3. Re:And I _still_ don't know... by PeDRoRist · · Score: 1

      That's actually pretty good if you're in the south of France.

      If you're in Paris, "Peek-pie" will do.

      --

      Anything you do can get you slashdotted, including nothing.
    4. Re:And I _still_ don't know... by Tolkien · · Score: 1

      That's actually pretty good if you're in the south of France.

      If you're in Paris, "Peek-pie" will do.

      As a tourist maybe.

      Try "Peek-Pa-ee-ye".

    5. Re:And I _still_ don't know... by Tolkien · · Score: 1

      Errr wow. Okay, ignore my other post. I was reading your "Peek-pie" in French rather than in English so it sounded completely wrong. Yes, with the English accent "Pik-pie" is fairly close.

      heh....

  50. Geeks by troll8901 · · Score: 1

    It occurs to me now that Roland was "in love" ( in a manner of speaking) with science. And this is probably why he behaved as he did.

    My entire teenage life just flashed before my eyes, upon reading your sentences. (Yes, I'm socially inept.)

    You may not realize it, but I think you've just described some of us geeks.

  51. Pére Lachaise by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 1

    Wow! I thought that Pére Lachaise was for important people of the past. Is it easy to be buried there?

    --
    __
    Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
    GW Bu
  52. adieu by Nicolas+MONNET · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just one word.

    1. Re:adieu by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the correction. In Spanish, vaya con Dios and adios are distinct. My French is awful, but I'm trying to learn.

      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
  53. Oh no it's Roland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Fetch the holy water and call an exorcist! This time, he's going to stay dead.

    1. Re:Oh no it's Roland by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Fetch the holy water and call an exorcist! This time, he's going to stay dead.

      no, no, no,

      You need to drive a wooden stake through his heart and if that doesn't work try separating the head from the body.

      Did you try rebooting before calling support?

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  54. Mod parent up by Thyamine · · Score: 1

    Come on mods, what's the deal? He's responding to a question that someone asked about Roland/Roland's submissions. How much more on-topic can it be?

    --
    I will shred my adversaries. Pull their eyes out just enough to turn them towards their mewing, mutilated faces. Illyria
  55. "Oh no its roland" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The tag always bugged me until I started to wonder if he found it funny... I hope he did.

    I wonder how many people have mean spiritedly used it in the past who are today white-washing their internet mob mentality history so they don't have to feel insensetive

    1. Re:"Oh no its roland" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always thought the "ohnoitsroland" tag was hilarious, and I'm not inclined to whitewash anything. Not everyone thinks it's appropriate to use Slashdot to pimp your blog and generate Google AdWords income for yourself.

  56. First link is a little out of date... by Landshark17 · · Score: 1

    "Roland Piquepaille lives in Paris, France"

    Might wanna update that...

    --
    This sig is false.
  57. Slashdot by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I think whoever happens to have moderation points today should work hard on pushing the disrespectful comments in this article to -1.

    I don't have them, and I'm not looking at this story again, because I'm grossed out by some of the folks here.

    1. Re:Slashdot by stinerman · · Score: 1

      Come on, Bruce.

      Its slashdot for God's sake. If you can't laugh at someone's death here where can you?

      FWIW, I didn't care one way or the other for Roland, but I'm still sorry to hear of his passing.

    2. Re:Slashdot by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Come on, Bruce.
      Its slashdot for God's sake. If you can't laugh at someone's death here where can you?

      Oh, anywhere that it's fashionable to have absolutely no taste or sense of the appropriate, and where flaunting your a sense of bankruptcy is in style.

    3. Re:Slashdot by muridae · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Its slashdot for God's sake. If you can't laugh at someone's death here where can you?

      On Fark, Digg, and many other sites.

    4. Re:Slashdot by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2, Informative

      That should be "where flaunting your moral bankruptcy is in style"

    5. Re:Slashdot by Follis · · Score: 3, Informative

      Wait.. So you mean the whole United States?

    6. Re:Slashdot by jamstar7 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Its slashdot for God's sake. If you can't laugh at someone's death here where can you?

      4chan.

      Yeah, definitely 4chan.

      And of course here where it's expected to laugh yer ass off.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    7. Re:Slashdot by lgw · · Score: 5, Funny

      Moral bankruptcy was so 2008 - fiscal bankruptcy is all the rage in 2009!

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    8. Re:Slashdot by Cecil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Its slashdot for God's sake. If you can't laugh at someone's death here where can you?

      You can't, and 4chan.

  58. It must be true... by Cruciform · · Score: 3, Funny

    I checked to see who submitted and it wasn't Roland. I would think that this being Slashdot he would have set up a dead-man-switch to make that submission himself.

    It would be only fitting.

    RIP Roland.

  59. R.I.P. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rest in Peace

  60. It's a public cemetary. by EWAdams · · Score: 1

    Buy yourself a plot and you can rest alongside Jim Morrison, Jacques Louis David, Oscar Wilde, and loads of other interesting folks. They may be pricey, though -- the place is jammed. No rolling lawns or flower beds -- the graves are so close together that worm action is probably mixing up the bones underground.

    --
    I piss off bigots.
  61. Re:TROLL ALERT by kaiidth · · Score: 1
  62. Re:No Wiki Entry by LingNoi · · Score: 1

    "let long words alone"? What kind of fucking grammar is that?!

  63. Re:I think I speak for all of us when... by LingNoi · · Score: 1

    You spoke too soon..

    Suzanne said that Roland had a few posts in the pipeline and wanted them published.

  64. what people dont realise... by ramul · · Score: 1

    Years ago while working on the cray, Roland uploaded a copy of his entire self onto the cray.
    And hes pissed off...

    Its Roland 2.0 - judgment day

  65. Re:Translation: This is what he is trying to say. by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Perhaps that was right, but Roland has earned a place in the slashdot community.

    I had a good time tagging all of Roland's articles as "ohnoitsroland". It made my days more bearable, and everytime I saw his stories tagged already, I chuckled.

    Roland was a traditional part of Slashdot (for good or bad), and even if only in the form of a meme, I will miss him.

  66. Re:Translation: This is what he is trying to say. by lysergic.acid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Roland might have been short on netiquette when he first started submitting stories to /., but once the community started to speak out against his copy-and-paste blog entries and use of other people's content to earn ad revenue, he stopped doing all that. all of his submissions of late have linked directly to the source article.

    if anything, Roland has contributed greatly to the /. community by submitting a ton of excellent stories--even after he stopped earning ad revenue from submissions--and starting many interesting discussions. so he clearly cared more about /. as a thriving community with a rich online culture than just another business to be monetized. and if you're more worried about Slashdot's value as a business than its usefulness to its users (which is primarily from the discussions that follow each submission), then you clearly don't understand /. as well as Roland did.

    your blatant hyperboles and baseless accusations are more dishonest than Roland has ever been. and i doubt you will ever make as great of a contribution to the /. community as he has.

  67. Re:Translation: This is what he is trying to say. by grub · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Funny, you write the basic truth while his corpse is still warm and are modded Troll.
    Wait a few weeks after they plant him and you'd be modded Insightful

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  68. Re:thank. fucking. god. by Eternauta3k · · Score: 1

    I didn't mind his articles. Nor am I outraged by him linking to his blog (mainly because I don't RTFA). However, I am pissed at the idiots who turned the discussion on his submissions into rants against Roland, taking away from the usual interesting debate. Guess this is the end of it.

    --
    Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
  69. Hey St. Peter by msouth · · Score: 1

    mod decedent up!

    --
    Liberty uber alles.
  70. Goodbye by cuby · · Score: 1

    It's always sad when one of us goes, independently of our personal opinion of his posts. Thanks for everything, even the not so good things. bye.

    --
    Math is beautiful... e^(pi*i)+1=0
  71. Re:I think I speak for all of us when... by Cally · · Score: 1

    Seconded. I suspect we'll find we didn't realise what we had. I never read his blog and had no idea who he was IRL; it's interesting to see he had real actual accomplishments and genuine achievements beyond getting some stories posted on Slashdot, something I doubt any of the trolls here will ever be able to say. RIP. And I hope some explains the phenomena of the "no gutter too low" subset of Slashdot trolls so in evidence here, and on other obituary stories, to the family before they see them.

    --
    "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
  72. It's a bit like by Bertie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The old guy in your local bar. You'd be in there regularly, and there he'd be, holding forth at anybody who'd give him the time of day. You'd make for the other side of the bar, grateful that he'd collared some wet-behind-the-ears Johnny-come-lately rather than yourself, because you'd been there enough times before. He'd be chuntering on in the background and you'd pay him little heed.

    And then one day you come into the bar and he isn't there, and you hear he'd passed away, and you realise that you'd miss the old bastard. Because people like that add colour to the world, and what is this life without characters to enrich it, whether you actually like them or not?

    That was Roland for me - I'd come here and I'd see an article submitted by him and there'd be some generally good-natured muttering about his modus operandi. Some people clearly didn't like him, but the truth is I couldn't tell you who any of those people are. But if you asked me to name five people who post on Slashdot, he'd be one of them.

    So by that measure alone, I for one will miss him, and I think Slashdot will be the poorer for his passing.

    Here's to Roland, and to making a difference in any way you can.

    1. Re:It's a bit like by enigma48 · · Score: 1

      I haven't posted to Slashdot in ages... but wow. This is one of the best analogies I've seen on here (despite the lack of cars). It moved me.

      Roland engaged with the world and you're exactly right, he added colour to it. People who tore him down (IMHO rightfully when he lifted large amounts of text, less so when he cleaned up his act) never contributed in that way. The Roland-haters actually bothered me far more than he did and made slashdot less enjoyable to read.

      RIP Roland.

    2. Re:It's a bit like by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with Enigma. A wonderful eulogy. Thank you.

      Seraphim

      --
      Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
  73. "Palm Announces Killer New Phone" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and now this. Coincidence?

  74. A taste of Slashdot by Ostracus · · Score: 2

    "Its slashdot for God's sake. If you can't laugh at someone's death here where can you?"

    I wonder if your mourners would mind if I laugh all the way through your eulogy?

    --
    Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
    1. Re:A taste of Slashdot by stinerman · · Score: 4, Funny

      On slashdot?

      I'd actually be very pleased if my death made it to the front page.

    2. Re:A taste of Slashdot by TheLink · · Score: 3, Funny

      Unless it happened to be a "darwin award" type of death.

      --
    3. Re:A taste of Slashdot by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah... but posted by kdawson?

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    4. Re:A taste of Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd actually be very pleased if my death made it to the front page.

      Post your home address and we'll see what we can do.

  75. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  76. Re:Translation: This is what he is trying to say. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Roland was a well intentioned soul and will be sorely missed. I found most who mocked him did so in a jovial spirit, he sparked vigorous debate even from detractors and he encouraged a focus on fringe topics that keep this site unique and interesting. We all have our quirks, and his were more entertaining than frustrating. He will live on in all our hearts as more than just a meme, but as a kindred spirit, as one of us.

  77. Well, he's not here to read the comments. by Starker_Kull · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I always wondered about the following question:

    Why is it we only show up for peoples' weddings and funerals? Do they have to hook up psuedo-permanently with a gal/guy or be in a casket before we'll take the time out of our busy lives to see them?

    So, for all those who miss him in requiem - treat the living, give them as much charity, forgive their trespasses, and appreciate their good qualities while they are still around to hear it.

    R.I.P. anyway.

    1. Re:Well, he's not here to read the comments. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Why is it we only show up for peoples' weddings and funerals? Do they have to hook up psuedo-permanently with a gal/guy or be in a casket before we'll take the time out of our busy lives to see them?

      It's because they come with invitations.

      Besides, think about it, do you really give one tenth of one shit about most of the people you know? Don't fucking like, of course not. Only a few of those people are true friends who would actually help you out of a bind at cost to themselves. The rest of them could get hit by a bus tomorrow and the only way it would affect your life is if you received an invitation to the service.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Well, he's not here to read the comments. by Starker_Kull · · Score: 1

      Besides, think about it, do you really give one tenth of one shit about most of the people you know? Don't fucking like, of course not. Only a few of those people are true friends who would actually help you out of a bind at cost to themselves. The rest of them could get hit by a bus tomorrow and the only way it would affect your life is if you received an invitation to the service.

      Actually, yes, I do - I've thought about the company I keep quite a lot in life. I came to the conclusion that most people are worth giving a shit about, even if they don't happen to have the same hobbies as you, same tastes as you, same politics as you, etc. I find that most people, given a decent opportunity, will be decent people. I also find, that if you expect someone to screw you over, it will be noticed, no matter how subtle you think you are, and a self-fulfilling prophesy will result.

      Hence, my point above - if we treated the living with as much charity as the dead, perhaps we would appreciate their positive contributions, and they would be encouraged to be more positive, and our lives would be a bit better for it.

      So, perhaps you should think about it - rather than think, 'Only a few of those people are true friends who would actually help you out of a bind at cost to themselves', perhaps you should try thinking, 'Hey, I could help out this aquantence move - he really is in a bind - but there goes my weekend. Oh well, there will be more weekends.' You might make a new friend. You might learn that this person isn't worth being friends with. You might be pleasantly suprised to discover that the person has the same attitude as you do, and make a really close friend. You might just get some excerise, see some interesting furniture, and see what someone else's tastes are. You might meet a cute girl at your friend's new place who's impressed by your easy-going generosity. Or you might sleep a bit better that night, knowing something useful was done.

      Try it out! Good sig, BTW....

  78. Right there with lilo -IMO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I might not be the smartest fucker out here, nor the dimmest bulb, but shed a fucking tear now and then for your true friends!! I know all you idiots that got nuked by lilo didn't like him, but I did. He stuck up for me when it really mattered. In the same light Roland taught many. NOW your fucking stuck with assholes like me who will tell you to fucking visualize your fucking mathematics. SEE what a 20MHz wave looks like, SEE how it bounces, SEE how it is absorbed, and SEE how it travels forever--like ROLAND...

    Don't be a hater.

    1. Re:Right there with lilo -IMO by myspace-cn · · Score: 1

      Pisses me off that I wasn't logged in when I said this originally. But now I correct it.

      Right there with lilo -IMO

      I might not be the smartest fucker out here, nor the dimmest bulb, but shed a fucking tear now and then for your true friends!! I know all you idiots that got nuked by lilo didn't like him, but I did. He stuck up for me when it really mattered. In the same light Roland taught many. NOW your fucking stuck with assholes like me who will tell you to fucking visualize your fucking mathematics. SEE what a 20MHz wave looks like, SEE how it bounces, SEE how it is absorbed, and SEE how it travels forever--like ROLAND...

      Don't be a hater.

  79. R.I.P. and all that by Eudial · · Score: 1

    I didn't know him, I really didn't have any emotional investment in his submissions, but it's generally a bummer when people go and die, so a R.I.P. is in order.

    --
    GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
    1. Re:R.I.P. and all that by PhB95 · · Score: 1

      Any mans death diminishes me, Because I am involved in Mankinde.
      And therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls, It tolls for thee.

      I didn't write it, but it reflects perfectly what news of people passing away inspire me

      --
      One of those Europeans...
  80. Make a wish! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Filter error: You can type more than that for your comment.

  81. Make a wish! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://i42.tinypic.com/wrdn40.png

    (damn those bad HTML habits, posting again)

  82. Re:No Wiki Entry by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

    Errr... perfectly correct English grammar? I believe more common modern usage in most of the English speaking world is to use "leave" instead of "let" (as in "leave it alone" rather than "let it alone") but "let" is still perfectly correct even if a little archaic sounding.

    --
    My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
    Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
  83. Re:Translation: This is what he is trying to say. by abuelos84 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because there is something called "respect"... nobody will force you to speak beauty of a man you didn't like, but it'd be "respectful" not to throw shit in a post dedicated to his death... Peace. Drx

    --
    -- Counting backwards since 1984!
  84. Re:Translation: This is what he is trying to say. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, well, as someone with a userid of over 800,000 you're clearly entitled to appoint yourself Official Slashdot Historian.

    Picklepail was no better than any spammer, just out to leverage the Internet for monetary gain while contributing nothing.

  85. Re:Wait a second, or, who killed roland? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if only he'd been running a better viruschecker.

  86. R.I.P by ma11achy · · Score: 1

    Rest in peace, you were one of us and we will miss you.

    --
    Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines