Slashdot Mirror


SCO Proposes Sale of Assets To Continue Litigation

gzipped_tar sends in this excerpt from the Salt Lake Tribune: "The embattled SCO Group Inc. is proposing to auction off its core products and use proceeds to continue its controversial lawsuits over the alleged violations of its copyrights in Linux open-source software. The Lindon company has filed a new reorganization plan with the federal court in Delaware where it sought bankruptcy protection from creditors after an adverse ruling in the Linux litigation. If approved by a bankruptcy judge, the plan could mean SCO's server software and mobile products lines are owned by other parties while SCO itself remained largely to pursue the lawsuits under the leadership of CEO Darl McBride. 'One goal of this approach is to separate the legal defence of its intellectual property from its core product business,' McBride said in a letter to customers, partners and shareholders. Jeff Hunsaker, president and COO of The SCO Group, said the litigation had been distracting to the company's efforts to market its products. 'We believe there's value in these assets and in order for the business to move forward it's imperative we separate it from our legal claims and we allow our products business to move forward,' he said Friday."

10 of 290 comments (clear)

  1. Wow. Just wow. by DurendalMac · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So Darl is going to basically sell off most of what the company has to continue a lawsuit he has no hope of winning? What the HELL is wrong with this guy? Worst. CEO. EVAR.

    1. Re:Wow. Just wow. by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In a just world, he will die a homeless drug user on the streets.

      Darl does not deserve drugs. How about him dieing a homeless, disease ridden prostitute?
      Then the only change necessary is creditors seizing his home.

    2. Re:Wow. Just wow. by Warll · · Score: 5, Funny

      In a just world, he will die a homeless drug user on the streets.

      Darl does not deserve drugs. How about him dieing a homeless, disease ridden prostitute? Then the only change necessary is creditors seizing his home.

      Darl does not deserve sex. How about him dieing a homeless RIAA lawyer?

  2. No SNCP, no Arab sheik by symbolset · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They want to pay Novell in worthless stock.

    And the directors will get their pay in worthless options going forward.

    It's amazing how long this zombie company can stay on its feet.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  3. Kinda refreshing, actually... by RicardoGCE · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They're finally owning up to what we've known all along: SCO's business is litigation. Server software? Pffft.

    I love the fact that they're willing to sell the very products they're supposedly protecting from unauthorized use of "their" code, just to keep the legal fight going.

  4. Deck Chairs by pcnetworx1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Darl has now gone from rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic, to throwing them overboard...

  5. Re:what core product business ? by nizo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Then why not drop the case and focus more fully on your 'core product business'

    At this point he pretty much is.

  6. Re:Is groklaw aware of this new development? by RichMan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > because no sane board would authorize the liquidation of the bulk of a company's assets so an obsessed executive can go tilting at windmills

    The decision was made by Ralph J. Yarro III back in 2003 to tilt at the windmill. Darl was hired to lead the charge. Back at the beginning Darl said SCO would pursue this to their "utter destruction" if need be. Well it looks like they are.

    History: SCO, then called Caldera, was Novell's proxy in the DRDOS lawsuit against Microsoft. This lead Yarro, then managing the Canopy investment company that effectively had full control of SCO/Caldera to look for new lawsuit opportunities to cash in on. The decided to attack Linux using their "UNIX IP". To bad there is no UNIX IP in Linux.

    The court system that allows civil cases of this nature is really to blame for the whole thing. SCO's lawyers are now heavily "invested" in the case (at one point they were literally going to be investors in SCO, but then changed their minds to cash up front) and are not really working for justice, but for their piece of the litigation reward pie.

  7. McUnix by capnkr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    SCO has a market cap of just over $3 million. IIRC, McDonald's Corp is one of their major customers. That $3mil is pocket change for the $66.95 billion market cap McD's Corp.

    What if McDonald's buys SCO? McD's could hire a couple devs (since that is all SCO needs, apparently..) for maintenance and some support personnel, then service their own stores as well as other existing customers. Maybe they'd wind up saving, if not making, some money in a few years. Perhaps give Darl a store to manage...

    Heh. :)

    Point being, with a market cap of only $3mil, SCO and anything they have/own are basically chump change for a real corporation. So, if the judges (have) let this happen, then, and I hate to even think of it, we'll see this zombie keep stumbling forward...

    --
    "...there are some things that can beat smartness and foresight. Awkwardness and stupidity can." ~ Mark Twain
  8. You've got to understand what Darl is doing by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    SCO's lawyers include Darl's brother, Kevin. Turning SCO's assets into legal fees gets the money out of the company and into the family. At present SCO is dead in the water like a floating wreck. It still has some value on board. This strategy converts some of that into cash which can be trans-shipped into the family as legal fees.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.