Slashdot Mirror


Flying Car Ready To Take Off

ChazeFroy writes "The first flying automobile, equally at home in the sky or on the road, is scheduled to take to the air next month. If it survives its first test flight, the Terrafugia Transition, which can transform itself from a two-seater road car to a plane in 15 seconds, is expected to land in showrooms in about 18 months' time. Terrafugia claims it will be able to fly up to 500 miles on a single tank of unleaded petrol at a cruising speed of 115mph. Even at $200,000 per automobile, they have already received 40 orders."

20 of 315 comments (clear)

  1. we will NOT have flying cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    seriously. most people can barely control a car on the ground. or even keep one properly maintained.

    and you want to put these folks into the air? over your house? yeah... i don't think so.

    thats what you call a 'bad idea'.

    cap:unguided

    1. Re:we will NOT have flying cars by MoonBuggy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's a quick solution to that problem, and it doesn't even require any technical or legislative changes: don't call it a flying car!

      Even their website doesn't use the term 'car'; it's clearly marketed towards pilots not drivers and they call it a "Roadable Aircraft". It's being sold to people who already fly, but want to be able to get from door to door rather than airfield to airfield - an idea which makes sense to me.

    2. Re:we will NOT have flying cars by should_be_linear · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I, for one, (not welcoming anybody) am dreaming of flying car that I can select my destination on some dialer a then let central computer take me there. I wouldn't put my family into flying car that I am supposed to fly. What they have is not flying car, it is airplane you can drive. Flying car should be, first of all *car* - something that Joe Sixpack can use easily in (relatively) safe way.

      --
      839*929
    3. Re:we will NOT have flying cars by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The moller skycar is not even a real prtotype, it's a vaporware fake demo.

      we will NOT have VTOL flying cars. Have you seen what a harrier does to pavement when it takes off or lands vertically? IT even blisters the hell out of super thick concrete. and no fan or turbofan in existence will do a decent VTOL without being 3X the size ofthe aircraft.

      Flying cars will NOT happen. The general public is far too stupid to own one, and you would have to put in safety systems that make the car refuse to move when periodic service is needed. Hell my old Piper Comanche needed it's wings replaced for every 1000 hours of flight, and that was nearly the fricking cost of the aircraft! (which is when I sold it.)

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  2. Re:Obligatory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I usually say this every time this comes up:

    Putting stuff in the air is doable. Making an aircraft that can be piloted by you average citizen is quite another matter.
    Car crashes can be quite bad as it is, but if you add a 1 km fall to every incident, the death toll would surely go up.

    We would have to add steel plates to every roof to defend against distracted soccer moms raining down at terminal velocity.

  3. It's Not a Flying Car by Cephacles · · Score: 3, Insightful
    It's a driveable airplane. One key difference is it is marketed to licensed pilots.

    I wonder how many airports are out there that have a path from the runway to the road that isn't fenced off or have some other barrier to getting this craft on the road.

    1. Re:It's Not a Flying Car by Alarindris · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would think they all would have a fairly easy way of getting out. Doesn't the mail go through regular passenger planes?

  4. Re:Rules? by yabos · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In the air they have to obey the same rules as other planes. On the ground they have to obey the same rules as other cars. Simple as that. Also to fly one of these things you need a private pilot's license so it's not like any yuppie with 200K is going to be able to fly it.

  5. Re:Rules? by hitmark · · Score: 2, Insightful

    wont stop them from trying tho, much like a lack of that pesky drivers license do not stop many from driving cars...

    --
    comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
  6. Re:Rules? by yabos · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe not but people don't seem to be stealing private aircraft very often. Maybe if this one was in your drive way it'd be more tempting to steal but it still looks like in order to fly it you have to unfold the wings by hand. It's not like James Bond where the wings fold out electrically and you fly away from the bad guys chasing you.

  7. Re:Rules? by phoenix321 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, the rules above ground are drafted for professionals with thousands of logged hours. We can either require that for everyone who wants to fly or we can draft simpler rules in height-confined airspace. Maybe we already have, in VFR flight levels, I don't know.

  8. Re:Roads do nasty things to vehicles by Tx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If people drive this like a car (even if they're qualified pilots) they may start to treat it like a car rather than like an aircraft and skip on servicing. The rest you can guess.

    That's called evolution, baby! If you're the kind of person who's going to think "hey, that corrosion on the wing supports can wait 'till next year", and your still going to fly the thing, then you deserve what you get.

    --
    Oh no... it's the future.
  9. Re:Roads do nasty things to vehicles by Viol8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "That's called evolution, baby! If you're the kind of person who's going to think "hey, that corrosion on the wing supports can wait 'till next year", and your still going to fly the thing, then you deserve what you get."

    Yeah , but the people on the ground you land of top of don't.

  10. It won't be most people by MikeRT · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ever heard of this thing called a "pilot license?" Yeah... "most people" neither have them nor an opportunity to get one, and they'll be required to operate one of these things.

  11. Re:Roads do nasty things to vehicles by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    anyone that would drive a $200,000+ vehicle in the snow and salt is an idiot, and certainly not able to pass a pilots license requirement. That's the cool part, the pilot license requirement weeds out the idiots.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  12. Re:If these do become the norm by skiman1979 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Think of the poor airline pilots, who have 100's of lives on board, restricted lanes to travel in, air traffic control to help guide them....now having to watch out for lunatics in personal flying cars swooping across the front of their cockpits. It'd be an interesting new approach for a terrorist attack.

    Isn't that what air brakes are for? :-P

    I would imagine these flying cars would have their own low-altitude restricted space to fly in. If that's the case, they wouldn't be anywhere near commercial jets, except maybe during the jets' take-off and landing.

    Wouldn't these things also be linked to air traffic control?

    --
    Having a smoking section in a public restaurant is like having a peeing section in a public swimming pool.
  13. Re:Rules? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There's really no correlation between financial success and intelligence. Those people in the rat race aren't happy anyway. Studies have shown that the American dream is a big fucking crock.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  14. Re:Obligatory... by Auraiken · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Natural selection is only good when it doesn't have the ability to take out people not associated with the idiots who are going to die.

  15. Re:Rules? by jsight · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You can get a private pilot's license, good for light aircraft and night flying, for about $5,000, with about 100 hours logged.

    Simulator time or not, 100 hrs @ $50/hr avg is going to be hard to come by. I think most folks end up closer to $7500/60 hrs.

  16. Re:Rules? by powerlord · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not to burst your bubble, but quite a lot of more rural places have small airfields with little checking.

    Some friends used to have one in back of their property that was shared by covenant between the 10 or 12 houses that shared the complex.

    Everyone pitched in to maintain the grass airstrip. They had a windsock at the end, no lights or instruments, and it was listed on local aviation charts (along with lots of other like-rated strips).

    Taking off in a plane wouldn't be the problem. Once you hit a high enough altitude, ATC will pick you up, that's when you'll start to have problem (unless you know what you're doing). Landing though is usually the part of flying that is the most difficult, even for a trained amateur, so I don't see "Joy flying" as being a big repeat sport (for the untrained).

    --
    This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.