Slashdot Mirror


How Does a 9/80 Work Schedule Work Out?

cellocgw writes "My company is in the process of implementing a version of '9/80,' a work schedule that squeezes 80 hours' labor time into 9 business days and provides every other Friday off. I was wondering how this has been implemented in other companies, and how it's worked out for other Slashdot readers. Is your system flexible? Do you find time to get personal stuff done during the week? Is Friday good for anything other than catching up on lost sleep? And perhaps most important, do your managers respect the off-Fridays, or do they pull people in on a regular basis to handle 'crises?'"

37 of 1,055 comments (clear)

  1. I worked 9/80 for 4 summers by brian0918 · · Score: 5, Informative

    It was really nice, especially if you set it up so that one week you're paid, and the next you get the Friday off. They were also flexible about it and would let you switch occasionally, although that obviously depends on the company.

    1. Re:I worked 9/80 for 4 summers by DataBroker · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I've worked 9/80's for a couple of years. They're great! It's nice to have a weekday off because you can easily get through a weekend's errands in a day because of the lower crowds, and in my case, no kids to slow me.

      As for management respecting the day -- that's like any off-day. You have to enforce it yourself. I've been asked to work on my 9/80 day, and never had a problem agreeing to it. I just swapped it for a different day. Management loved my flexibility (in when I took a day off).

  2. it sucks by Dolphinzilla · · Score: 5, Informative

    My company does it - and yes frequently we get hosed out of our day off OR have to travel on our day off. It is inconvenient to many of our customers and I spend a lot of time on my off Fridays checking my e-mail for potential issues. It is not much of a day off. We USED to have a 4-9-4 work week, where we worked 4 nine hour days and half days (4 hours) on Fridays this was AWESOME and I loved it - 9/80 is bogus IMHO

  3. Just a second, here... by IorDMUX · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wait-wait-wait-wait... Do you mean to say that you've found a job in the (non-government) tech industry that lets you work only 40 hours a week?

    ... Are they hiring?

    --
    >> Standing on head makes smile of frown, but rest of face also upside down.
  4. Crises by egcagrac0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If your manager pulls you in to cover a crisis, you need to demand flex time (a different day off next week) or overtime.

    Or, send them an invoice from your consulting firm for about six times whatever your daily rate is.

    1. Re:Crises by Spasemunki · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or, send them an invoice from your consulting firm for about six times whatever your daily rate is.

      Yeah, that way you'll have a lot of time to look for a new job.

  5. My experience by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 5, Informative

    A friend of mine worked under 9/80 and loved it. He felt like he could be more productive staying later on the busy days and he took the extra friday off to take small trips with the family.

    I worked for the same company but different location under a flexible hour system where the only requirement was that I met the 40 hrs per week. It made things much more difficult to free up space on the weekends, but allowed me to be more available during the week.

    It's just preference.

    --
    while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
  6. MIB by Thelasko · · Score: 5, Funny

    The twins keep us on Centaurian time, standard 37-hour day. Give it a few months, you'll get used to it. Or you'll have a psychotic episode.

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
  7. I love it. by friedmud · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've worked for two consecutive companies with 9/80. At the first it was optional (but most people did it) at the second (current one) it is pretty much mandatory.

    Let me tell you.... it's awesome.

    Having a 3-day weekend every other week outweighs any perceived negatives. It gives you the ability to leave on a trip on a Thursday night... spend 3 days somewhere and still make it back for work without taking any vacation.

    To answer your questions:

    - I was wondering how this has been implemented in other companies.

    For both of my companies you work 9 hours a day except the friday you work you only work 8 hours. Then you get every other friday off.

    - Is your system flexible?

    At the first company it was... you could choose which friday you wanted to start your 9/80 schedule on... so half of the people were gone every other friday.

    At my current job it's not... everyone has the same friday off. I see the benefits of both. Personally, I really enjoyed fridays at my previous job... when (at least) half the people were gone I could get a lot of work done.

    Both places I worked for have been flexible in your start time in the morning... meaning I can go in early and still get off early to get stuff done... which leads to:

    - Do you find time to get personal stuff done during the week?

    Yes. If I really need to get something done after work then I'll go in early. If I'm there by 7:00 then I can get off around 4:00 to 4:30... leaving plenty of time.

    - Is Friday good for anything other than catching up on lost sleep?

    Yes. You can use it for weekend trips like I mentioned above. Also, it's a great time to catch up around the house (mending fences, etc.). Finally, it's also a great day to get grocery shopping (and similar) done because most people are working...

    I use the day a lot of different ways... and I do often sleep in a bit... but never sleep the day away!

    - And perhaps most important, do your managers respect the off-Fridays, or do they pull people in on a regular basis to handle 'crises?'"

    Has never happened to me. Like I said.. at my current job the friday off is mandatory. They actually turn out the lights and turn down the air-conditioning, etc. They really expect no one to be there.

    But... I know my jobs are normal (I'm a research scientist at laboratories) so YMMV.

    In conclusion... it can only be a good thing... go for it!

    Friedmud

    1. Re:I love it. by JoeLinux · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The only issue that has ever come up is:

      1) When a customer comes in, and we have to come in on our day off

      and

      2) Because of the increased rest on a three-day weekend, people use less vacation time, resulting in the office being virtually deserted in December.

  8. Re:Lost sleep? by Tokerat · · Score: 5, Funny

    If it does, just eat through lunch.

    Nonsense! Why would lunch be for eating?

    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  9. Seriously... by afabbro · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...this is what Ask Slashdot has been reduced to? Asking how a rather small change to a weekly schedule might work out?

    Future Ask Slashdots We Can Look Forward To:

    • "I'm thinking of switching from a soft toothbrush to a medium-soft. How has that worked out for you?"
    • "I'm considering moving my sock drawer from the top right to the top left drawer. Can anyone tell me the pros and cons of each arrangement?
    • "We're moving to a new home and are having a family meeting this Thursday to evaluate hanging toilet paper so that the next sheet is over versus under on the roll. I was wondering how other readers have approached this decision?"
    • "I'd like to set my USB to automount to a fixed drive letter when I plug it into my Windows XP laptop. I'm considering J:, P:, and possibly Q:. What do you all think? Should I look at M: as well?"
    --
    Advice: on VPS providers
    1. Re:Seriously... by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

      * "I'm thinking of switching from a soft toothbrush to a medium-soft. How has that worked out for you?"
      A: You should really try one of those electric toothbrushes.

      * "I'm considering moving my sock drawer from the top right to the top left drawer. Can anyone tell me the pros and cons of each arrangement?
      A: Have you considered moving the sock drawer to a closet in the bathroom? This would allow you to put on your socks while you are still warm instead of having to freeze your toes off on the way back to the dresser.

      * "We're moving to a new home and are having a family meeting this Thursday to evaluate hanging toilet paper so that the next sheet is over versus under on the roll. I was wondering how other readers have approached this decision?"
      A: Under. What kind of barbarians do you live with?

      * "I'd like to set my USB to automount to a fixed drive letter when I plug it into my Windows XP laptop. I'm considering J:, P:, and possibly Q:. What do you all think? Should I look at M: as well?"
      A: Hello, McFly! Use the U: drive.

      Sheesh!

    2. Re:Seriously... by Aladrin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Under!? Over! It's closer and easier to get to! When it's under, it's right against the wall and harder to grab at. Plus, it's easier to roll down than up, so if you can't see the end, you can get it easier.

      Seriously, what's this world coming to?

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
  10. Re:4/10 is easier by bughunter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I did both 4/40 and 9/80, and I tell you, the first extra hour isn't that noticeable, but going from 9 to 10 hours a day sucked. It means either you arrive at 6am so that you can leave at 5. If you can't get there until 9am, have fun working till 8pm...

    I'm back to working 5/40 now, and do indeed miss the 9/80 schedule. One of the best things was the regular 4-day holiday weekends. The accounting calendar was usually arranged so that Fridays off fell before Monday holidays like Memorial Day, etc.

    --
    I can see the fnords!
  11. I'd rather have 4/36 by trolltalk.com · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'd rather have 4x9hour days, a 10% cut in pay, and 3 days off every week. (Hey, most of the last 10% is taxes anyway, right). If everyone did this, we could avoid tons of layoffs nationwide, lower energy costs (4 days commuting instead of 5), and 3-day weekends every week ...

    1. Re:I'd rather have 4/36 by DudeFromMars · · Score: 5, Interesting

      >>(Hey, most of the last 10% is taxes anyway, right)
      Not Right.
      The idea that at a certain point, the govt takes most of your earnings in taxes is an urban legend.
      For anybody working by the hour, there is no "tipping point" where the govt keeps most of each additional dollar - it is just untrue.

      >>If everyone did this (4x9hr days), we could avoid tons of layoffs nationwide.
      A company can avoid layoffs by cutting hours and pay.
      If everybody at every company had their hours and pay cut, their bills remain the same, so the workers' spendable income after covering expenses is either gone or greatly reduced - You have just created a recession.

    2. Re:I'd rather have 4/36 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm a firefighter. I work 24 on, 48 off. As long as there aren't calls during the night, I get paid to sleep. Relevant to your question? No. Friggin' Awesome schedule anyways? Yes.

    3. Re:I'd rather have 4/36 by EvanED · · Score: 5, Informative

      If it can knock you down into a lower tax bracket you can come out ahead.

      You will never decrease your tax liability by making less enough to compensate for making less, all other things being equal, even under a system as complex as the US tax code. If you think it can, tax brackets don't work the way I suspect you think they do.

      For instance, suppose in a hypothetical universe the brackets were set up so that $0-$50000 was taxed 0% and $50000+ was taxed 50%. If you made $60,000, people would say they fall into the upper bracket, but that doesn't mean they are paying $30,000 in taxes (which would imply that getting a $10,001 pay cut would increase take home pay by 20 grand). Rather, they pay 50% of the amount of money they make in excess of $50,000, meaning they will pay $5,000.

      Continuing the analogy, if there was another bracket starting at $100,000 with 75% tax, someone making $200,000 would pay:
      * 0% of the first $50,000
      * 50% of the next $50,000 (or $25,000)
      * 75% of the next $100,000 (or $75,000)
      giving a total tax liability of $100,000, rather than the $150,000 they would have to pay if they were paying 75% on everything.

      Now, there are changes to your employment state that can have big consequences. I am a grad student, and am taking up a teaching position this semester. Before I was a research assistant. RAs are exempt from FICA taxes (this is at least true in my state, and I think is common) but as an instructor I won't be, so even though I will be getting a nice raise, I'll also essentially be taking an instant 7.5% pay cut too. There may be something similar going from part time to full time or something like that which would apply. But in any case, if taking a pay cut actually increases your take home pay, it is definitely not because it puts you into a different tax bracket.

    4. Re:I'd rather have 4/36 by Average · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Japan's 'lost decade' (and continuing) also has a lot to do with lack of population growth. Sadly, interest-based capitalism goes hand-in-hand with growth. Japan has gone into negative population growth territory. Much of the west will follow in our lifetimes. From a green or even moderately sane perspective, the cessation of growth and consumption is a blessed and long-hoped-for event. But, economics as we know it stagnates. People get money, but they don't lend it. They don't because lending entails some risk, but, whatever you might invest in is unlikely to grow in a steady or shrinking economy.

    5. Re:I'd rather have 4/36 by CDMA_Demo · · Score: 5, Funny

      do you work 9/11 days?

    6. Re:I'd rather have 4/36 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You have absolutely no idea how the US tax code works.

      Nobody knows how the US tax code works.

    7. Re:I'd rather have 4/36 by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is simple.

      Person A makes $50k a year. Let's say they pay 15%. They pay $7.5k per year.
      Their apartment costs $800 per month. Their car costs $400 per month. Their food costs $300 per month.
      At the end of every month they have about $500 left over for spending money.

      Person A gets a 50% raise. They now make $75k. Let's say their total tax burder is now 20%. They now pay $15k in taxes a year.
      They buy a house with their new found fortunes with a $1800 a month mortage. They ea tout more and their food costs $500 a month. They get a nicer car and their lease is now $500. Now they have a net debt of $200 a month.
      Suddenly they're broke. Obviously the government is holding them down. Before their raise they had money to spare. After their raise they are out of money. Taxes are to blame.

    8. Re:I'd rather have 4/36 by youknowjack · · Score: 5, Informative

      Research suggests that while 12 hour shifts can make people happy and psychologically healthy, they can introduce long term health effects due to fatigue (accrued sleep debt).

      Also, people make more errors towards the end of long shifts (particularly dangerous in industrial work environments). An 8 or 9 hour shift as suggested can mitigate this risk.

      http://pt.wkhealth.com/pt/re/oeme/abstract.00022707-199804000-00001.htm

  12. Re:Lost sleep? by pintpusher · · Score: 5, Funny

    I prefer to lunch through work myself, ymmv.

    --
    man, I feel like mold.
  13. Re:Lost sleep? by dangitman · · Score: 5, Funny

    just eat through lunch

    This statement is baffling on so many levels.

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  14. 80 hours by suso · · Score: 5, Funny

    I already work 80 hours.

    Oh wait, 9 days. Ok, I see what you mean now. I thought you meant 5.

    1. Re:80 hours by Sfing_ter · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have a system where I only work 6 half days.... 12hrs each day... sigh.

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. Emo Philips
    2. Re:80 hours by cayenne8 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      " Tell me about it.

      80 on a usual week, 100 on a bad week and 60 on a good week.

      80 hours for nine days? Slackers."

      OUCH!! Why would you (or anyone else) do that to themselves? I hope, at least, you are getting paid at least straight time for every one of those OT hours...??

      If not, you are just killing yourself and robbing yourself of valuable hours of your life.

      That's why I will ONLY work hourly....put it in a contract, I will work when needed...but, I will not work an hour for free. My time is valuable, and I will get my bill rate for every hour worked wherever I work. Doing this way...makes them also think twice about asking if they need you or not for OT. This way...I also don't have a problem with working hours around personal time off. Even if W2 hourly, you just usually have to get avg. 8 hours a day for the pay period, so if you need a day off...swing hours around the rest of the days in the billing period.

      The best is when doing corp to corp 1099...where you work as you wish generally. Don't wanna work 40 hours that week? Don't. Want to work 60 the next...ok.

      Seriously...I just have to believe salary is for suckers. They expect you to work over if 'needed'...but, do they happily let you leave early when your work is done? Hmm....I didn't think so.

      And you can do it W2 too....with benefits if you just know to negotiate it up front with them...if that is the route you'd rather go.

      I'll never work for free again...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    3. Re:80 hours by Angstroem · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Frankly, I don't believe you.

      Telecommuters like to count as work every minute they have their PC.

      Executives count in any minute they're awake, cause even running around with a cup of coffee or having a chat on the toilet is "work".

      Regular employees count the sheer presence, regardless of standing outside smoking, drinking coffee with others (that's called meeting), or just browsing slashdot (called recherche).

      If you start logging what you really do in those 60/80/100 hrs you most likely will notice that you get done no more than the average worker, eventually even less.

      The only people I believe being truly working those insane hours are doctorate candidates in their final year and/or before conference deadlines.

    4. Re:80 hours by Angstroem · · Score: 5, Insightful

      at a previous job I occasionally worked 100 hours a week (thats insane though, only allowed by a crisis allowing you to give up sleep).

      The key word here is occasionally. I'm fully aware that there are situations where you just have to kick in the overdrive and get something by insane working hours. BTDT, and more than once. It usually is, however, a sign of bad company management because they either have too much work for too few people or acquired a too big project. Bad planning in both cases. Only emergency situations justify such insane overload.

      If you continue that overdrive you'll sooner or later burn out and/or start doing nonsense. Especially sleep deprivation is not exactly known for improving your work performance. Raised stress levels may lead to a temporary productivity boost, but that boost comes at a price.

      Unless, of course, your job has a recreational effect on you, which is probably anything but the norm. I know a lot of people who really like their jobs (being one of them myself), but doing some hobbyist stuff, even if somewhat work-related, is something completely different than work. And neither is a replacement for sleep.

      The idea you can only work 40 hours a week and the rest is just wasted is crap

      It indeed is. Usually the quote of productive work per day is much lower, about the range of 5h.

      You mentioned that it's the monotony that kills concentration. True. Zombie work kills. On the other hand, you also need a certain time to adjust to a new task and get that going smoothly. Too frequent task changes (being the norm today with telephone, email, and slashdot interrupts...) will make you feel utterly busy, but in the end being highly unproductive.

    5. Re:80 hours by loshwomp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, some of us [work 80-hour weeks] to maintain our quality of life in these wonderful times.

      I hate to break it to you, but if you're working 80- or 100-hour weeks, you don't have any quality of life.

  15. Re:Getting Customers to leave you alone Fridays by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Leave the computer and phone off, if you're going to take the day off, especially if you've notified people in advance. I say if you're taking the day off, take the day off.

  16. Re:feh by chrisxcr1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Moof!

  17. Toilet Paper Survey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From a non-scientific poll we conducted as undergraduates, we found some interesting results:

    All of the science and engineering students we asked said the next sheet should go over. All of them. (About 14 people.)

    The art students' inclination (8 of 12 people) was to put it under, with the other four simply saying "whichever way it ends up - I don't even look."

  18. 100 hours?! Luxury!! by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 5, Informative

    Why, back in our day we would wake at quarter-to-ten, half-an-hour before we went to sleep, then we'd pay $10 to go work in the mines for 28 hours a day, 373 days a year, double-time on holidays. And we considered ourselves lucky!!

    --
    Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    1. Re:100 hours?! Luxury!! by Fluffy+Bunnies · · Score: 5, Funny

      Getting modded informative was way funnier than the joke.