Slashdot Mirror


How Does a 9/80 Work Schedule Work Out?

cellocgw writes "My company is in the process of implementing a version of '9/80,' a work schedule that squeezes 80 hours' labor time into 9 business days and provides every other Friday off. I was wondering how this has been implemented in other companies, and how it's worked out for other Slashdot readers. Is your system flexible? Do you find time to get personal stuff done during the week? Is Friday good for anything other than catching up on lost sleep? And perhaps most important, do your managers respect the off-Fridays, or do they pull people in on a regular basis to handle 'crises?'"

74 of 1,055 comments (clear)

  1. I worked 9/80 for 4 summers by brian0918 · · Score: 5, Informative

    It was really nice, especially if you set it up so that one week you're paid, and the next you get the Friday off. They were also flexible about it and would let you switch occasionally, although that obviously depends on the company.

    1. Re:I worked 9/80 for 4 summers by DataBroker · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I've worked 9/80's for a couple of years. They're great! It's nice to have a weekday off because you can easily get through a weekend's errands in a day because of the lower crowds, and in my case, no kids to slow me.

      As for management respecting the day -- that's like any off-day. You have to enforce it yourself. I've been asked to work on my 9/80 day, and never had a problem agreeing to it. I just swapped it for a different day. Management loved my flexibility (in when I took a day off).

    2. Re:I worked 9/80 for 4 summers by GizmoToy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I agree, 9/80 is great. I hired on with a company about a year ago that had just switched to the 9/80 system. There were some issues as everyone adjusted, but it's been great since. I like it so much, I'd view a typical 5/40 as a negative for any future employers.

      I found that I didn't miss the extra hour during the week, and the Friday off is great for sleeping in, doctor appointments, or for random things that can't be done on the weekend.

      My employer doesn't typically pull people in on the off Friday, but I imagine it happens every once in awhile. Although, I'm sure this varies greatly by company.

      Overall, I'd say it's nothing to be scared of as long as the entire company embraces it. It's when portions of the employees are working regular weeks and some are on 9/80 that things tend to fall apart.

    3. Re:I worked 9/80 for 4 summers by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 4, Informative
      I worked at a place that did this. Very nice, really. Easier to schedule things like dentist appointment and whatnot without taking time off, since I had a three-day weekend 26 times a year.

      And I could make a nine-day vacation on 36 hours vacation time, as long as I picked an off Friday week for the vacation.

      I can only remember once I had to work on an off Friday in a couple years there. And I got the following Monday off that time.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  2. it sucks by Dolphinzilla · · Score: 5, Informative

    My company does it - and yes frequently we get hosed out of our day off OR have to travel on our day off. It is inconvenient to many of our customers and I spend a lot of time on my off Fridays checking my e-mail for potential issues. It is not much of a day off. We USED to have a 4-9-4 work week, where we worked 4 nine hour days and half days (4 hours) on Fridays this was AWESOME and I loved it - 9/80 is bogus IMHO

  3. 4/10 is easier by poet · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You get every friday or monday off depending on the stagger. The idea of 9/80 bothers me. There is a point of no return for employees. If you are going to work like that, you should make sure and take two one hour breaks a day.

    --
    Get your PostgreSQL here: http://www.commandprompt.com/
    1. Re:4/10 is easier by bughunter · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I did both 4/40 and 9/80, and I tell you, the first extra hour isn't that noticeable, but going from 9 to 10 hours a day sucked. It means either you arrive at 6am so that you can leave at 5. If you can't get there until 9am, have fun working till 8pm...

      I'm back to working 5/40 now, and do indeed miss the 9/80 schedule. One of the best things was the regular 4-day holiday weekends. The accounting calendar was usually arranged so that Fridays off fell before Monday holidays like Memorial Day, etc.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
  4. Also by brian0918 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Also, to answer your question, those off-days were always respected, and I never missed the lost hour each day.

  5. Just a second, here... by IorDMUX · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wait-wait-wait-wait... Do you mean to say that you've found a job in the (non-government) tech industry that lets you work only 40 hours a week?

    ... Are they hiring?

    --
    >> Standing on head makes smile of frown, but rest of face also upside down.
    1. Re:Just a second, here... by diehard2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I work 40 hours, an hour lunch break included, and do .NET development work at a major company. This isn't to say that there aren't deadlines where you might work longer, but they're pretty rare. I find that I get more done with the 7 hour workday than I do with a 10 hour day. I'm more focused and not pissed about all the time I'm wasting at work.

  6. Crises by egcagrac0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If your manager pulls you in to cover a crisis, you need to demand flex time (a different day off next week) or overtime.

    Or, send them an invoice from your consulting firm for about six times whatever your daily rate is.

    1. Re:Crises by Spasemunki · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or, send them an invoice from your consulting firm for about six times whatever your daily rate is.

      Yeah, that way you'll have a lot of time to look for a new job.

  7. My experience by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 5, Informative

    A friend of mine worked under 9/80 and loved it. He felt like he could be more productive staying later on the busy days and he took the extra friday off to take small trips with the family.

    I worked for the same company but different location under a flexible hour system where the only requirement was that I met the 40 hrs per week. It made things much more difficult to free up space on the weekends, but allowed me to be more available during the week.

    It's just preference.

    --
    while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
  8. MIB by Thelasko · · Score: 5, Funny

    The twins keep us on Centaurian time, standard 37-hour day. Give it a few months, you'll get used to it. Or you'll have a psychotic episode.

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
  9. Get out now by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While it is not a bad idea in and of itself, changing work schedules to some bizarre non-standard system is usually a sign that the company management is trying to squeeze more work out of you. First they change the schedule to give you more work per day, then they will ask you to work more days.

    In this economy, they know you don't have anywhere to go, so unless you fight back against this or leave for a new job altogether, you're going to get screwed. Ask them if they've been considering offshoring the IT department. I'd be willing to bet that within the next year they are looking to thin the local IT staff to a skeleton crew and then migrate the servers over to India where they can do your job for a third of the cost.

  10. I love it. by friedmud · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've worked for two consecutive companies with 9/80. At the first it was optional (but most people did it) at the second (current one) it is pretty much mandatory.

    Let me tell you.... it's awesome.

    Having a 3-day weekend every other week outweighs any perceived negatives. It gives you the ability to leave on a trip on a Thursday night... spend 3 days somewhere and still make it back for work without taking any vacation.

    To answer your questions:

    - I was wondering how this has been implemented in other companies.

    For both of my companies you work 9 hours a day except the friday you work you only work 8 hours. Then you get every other friday off.

    - Is your system flexible?

    At the first company it was... you could choose which friday you wanted to start your 9/80 schedule on... so half of the people were gone every other friday.

    At my current job it's not... everyone has the same friday off. I see the benefits of both. Personally, I really enjoyed fridays at my previous job... when (at least) half the people were gone I could get a lot of work done.

    Both places I worked for have been flexible in your start time in the morning... meaning I can go in early and still get off early to get stuff done... which leads to:

    - Do you find time to get personal stuff done during the week?

    Yes. If I really need to get something done after work then I'll go in early. If I'm there by 7:00 then I can get off around 4:00 to 4:30... leaving plenty of time.

    - Is Friday good for anything other than catching up on lost sleep?

    Yes. You can use it for weekend trips like I mentioned above. Also, it's a great time to catch up around the house (mending fences, etc.). Finally, it's also a great day to get grocery shopping (and similar) done because most people are working...

    I use the day a lot of different ways... and I do often sleep in a bit... but never sleep the day away!

    - And perhaps most important, do your managers respect the off-Fridays, or do they pull people in on a regular basis to handle 'crises?'"

    Has never happened to me. Like I said.. at my current job the friday off is mandatory. They actually turn out the lights and turn down the air-conditioning, etc. They really expect no one to be there.

    But... I know my jobs are normal (I'm a research scientist at laboratories) so YMMV.

    In conclusion... it can only be a good thing... go for it!

    Friedmud

    1. Re:I love it. by JoeLinux · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The only issue that has ever come up is:

      1) When a customer comes in, and we have to come in on our day off

      and

      2) Because of the increased rest on a three-day weekend, people use less vacation time, resulting in the office being virtually deserted in December.

  11. Re:Lost sleep? by Tokerat · · Score: 5, Funny

    If it does, just eat through lunch.

    Nonsense! Why would lunch be for eating?

    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  12. Seriously... by afabbro · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...this is what Ask Slashdot has been reduced to? Asking how a rather small change to a weekly schedule might work out?

    Future Ask Slashdots We Can Look Forward To:

    • "I'm thinking of switching from a soft toothbrush to a medium-soft. How has that worked out for you?"
    • "I'm considering moving my sock drawer from the top right to the top left drawer. Can anyone tell me the pros and cons of each arrangement?
    • "We're moving to a new home and are having a family meeting this Thursday to evaluate hanging toilet paper so that the next sheet is over versus under on the roll. I was wondering how other readers have approached this decision?"
    • "I'd like to set my USB to automount to a fixed drive letter when I plug it into my Windows XP laptop. I'm considering J:, P:, and possibly Q:. What do you all think? Should I look at M: as well?"
    --
    Advice: on VPS providers
    1. Re:Seriously... by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

      * "I'm thinking of switching from a soft toothbrush to a medium-soft. How has that worked out for you?"
      A: You should really try one of those electric toothbrushes.

      * "I'm considering moving my sock drawer from the top right to the top left drawer. Can anyone tell me the pros and cons of each arrangement?
      A: Have you considered moving the sock drawer to a closet in the bathroom? This would allow you to put on your socks while you are still warm instead of having to freeze your toes off on the way back to the dresser.

      * "We're moving to a new home and are having a family meeting this Thursday to evaluate hanging toilet paper so that the next sheet is over versus under on the roll. I was wondering how other readers have approached this decision?"
      A: Under. What kind of barbarians do you live with?

      * "I'd like to set my USB to automount to a fixed drive letter when I plug it into my Windows XP laptop. I'm considering J:, P:, and possibly Q:. What do you all think? Should I look at M: as well?"
      A: Hello, McFly! Use the U: drive.

      Sheesh!

    2. Re:Seriously... by Aladrin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Under!? Over! It's closer and easier to get to! When it's under, it's right against the wall and harder to grab at. Plus, it's easier to roll down than up, so if you can't see the end, you can get it easier.

      Seriously, what's this world coming to?

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
  13. 3x12.5 is even better! by Sandman1971 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I once worked a job that was 3x12.5, and it was great! It was overnight, and the boss didn't mind if we slept during the downtimes. The staggered schedule also made it that we had a full 7 days straight off every third week (followed by 6x12.5 in 7 days, that was a bit of a killer). Though being overnight in made family life hell for 3 days, the time off more than made up for it.

    --
    It's better to burn out than to fade away
  14. 90% of the employees voluntarily choose 9/80 by EMB+Numbers · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My employer offers optional 9/80 schedules. I estimate that 90% of the employees voluntarily choose 9/80. It is great to have at lest 26 three day weekends every year. When holidays fall on Monday, you may get a 4 day weekend.

    The off-Friday is well respected by management. The managers generally don't come in either.

    An off-Friday is a great time for banking, appointments, the start of vacation, volunteering in your kids' school, etc.

    Most people who choose the 5/40 schedule do so because they need to be home early to meet kids at the school bus or because the spouse works a regular schedule and they want to match schedules.

    Flexibility is always good. We have core hours from 10:00 to 3:00. Some people come in very early and leave at 3:00 to minimize the time kids are home alone. It can save a lot of child care costs. Others like me regularly come in at 10:00 and leave at 7:00.

  15. Trade-offs of a 9/80 work week by shdragon · · Score: 4, Informative

    The company I work for just switched to a 9/80 a few months ago. We're a little different since we have a schedule A and a schedule B, so only 1/2 the people are at work any given Friday. It's had some ups & downs.

    Here's what I see as the positives:
    1. Having a 4 day work week every other week rocks!
    2. Getting paid on the Friday where I work 5 days makes it all the more bearable.
    3. Easier to get chores, errands done since everyone else is at work.
    4. I get more work done during the last hour of every 9 hour day than any other hour.

    Here's the negatives:
    1. It's a PITA to schedule meetings.
    2. Sometimes I travel and it seems to always fall on a week where I'm supposed to be off that Friday.
    3. Customers are annoyed because they're not on the same schedule and aren't understanding that it won't be until Monday before I get back to them.
    4. I feel like I have less time to get work done since every other week I only work 4 days.
    5. More free time means I spend more money.
    6. Getting to work while it's dark & leaving when it's dark is depressing.

    --
    "...we dont care about the economics; we just want to be able to hack great stuff."
  16. I work 9/80 by tknd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Pros:

    • On the short weeks you can get away with only charging 36 hours of vacation if you want to take the week off.
    • The off friday is convenient for getting errands done (dry cleaning) or appointments (dentist) that normally can't be done outside of business hours.
    • You save some money and time commuting 9 days instead of 10
    • For certain holidays you end up with really short weeks or really long weekends
    • If you find that you're consistently working more than 8 hours, you will actually work less since M-Th is usually 9 hours so you're not always getting screwed by being at the office late as much as you would with only 8 hour days.
    • Every other thursday feels like friday.
    • The off friday is a good excuse to not show up because you can always say "well no one is going to be at the office so I can't get work done."

    Cons:

    • The off friday is a good excuse to have you come in and do things that normally can't be done when everyone else is in the office (might be a pro in some cases since you wouldn't have to come in on the weekend.)
    • Though you have friday off, most other people are at work so you can't just "hang out" during the day.
    • The extra hour for M-Th takes some getting used to; you may find you have zero time left over to do anything on 9 hour days.
    • If you have regular schedules synced with schools (pick up kids and such), the off friday can be awkward.
    • The long weeks feel really long.
    • If you need a random day off, you'll end up charging 9 hours instead of 8.

    9/80 is best when paired with a flex time schedule so that you can move around hours when you need to. The off friday gives you an option to tell your boss "i'll work more these days or just come in friday" if you want to take a different day off instead of the off friday. Coming in on the off friday usually means the office is dead. That can be good and bad. Some people like not having anyone around because they normally get interrupted too much when people are at the office. Other people hate it because there's nobody else to kick the bucket with.

    If you find you are normally working more than 8 hours everyday, 9/80 is actually a good option because you will have a decent excuse for not coming in on the off fridays and you will have to work 9 hours most days anyway. If you find you are working even on the weekends, 9/80 will have no impact on your hours.

    As a single guy, I prefer 9/80. But I do know some family types that prefer the 5/40 since they really need the consistent 8 hour days to keep their family schedules synced. At first you will loath the 9 hour days because that extra hour is bigger than it looks. After a while though 9 hours will seem like nothing and the working fridays will seem really short.

  17. I'd rather have 4/36 by trolltalk.com · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'd rather have 4x9hour days, a 10% cut in pay, and 3 days off every week. (Hey, most of the last 10% is taxes anyway, right). If everyone did this, we could avoid tons of layoffs nationwide, lower energy costs (4 days commuting instead of 5), and 3-day weekends every week ...

    1. Re:I'd rather have 4/36 by Enderandrew · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The best schedule I ever worked was 12 hour days. I'd work 3 days one week, and 4 days the next week. I always had either 3 or 4 days off.

      A buddy of mine worked a variant of 9/80 schedule. They worked 9 hour days M-Th, and then worked a half day every Friday. Frankly, I'd rather have a full day off every other week.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    2. Re:I'd rather have 4/36 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      My father did the 12 hour 3on/4off/4on/3off for years...He said 12 hour days consisted of...He would show up at 9...Take a 2 hour lunch, well that adds up to 11 and leave at 1...and that adds up to 12!

    3. Re:I'd rather have 4/36 by Der+PC · · Score: 4, Funny

      I remember working a schedule like that when I was in my teens..

      3 work, 2 off, 2 work, 3 off... something like that...

      *SIGH* the time flew while flipping burgers.....

      --
      This signature is DRM protected. By the DMCA, you are not allowed to counteract or oppose to it.
    4. Re:I'd rather have 4/36 by DudeFromMars · · Score: 5, Interesting

      >>(Hey, most of the last 10% is taxes anyway, right)
      Not Right.
      The idea that at a certain point, the govt takes most of your earnings in taxes is an urban legend.
      For anybody working by the hour, there is no "tipping point" where the govt keeps most of each additional dollar - it is just untrue.

      >>If everyone did this (4x9hr days), we could avoid tons of layoffs nationwide.
      A company can avoid layoffs by cutting hours and pay.
      If everybody at every company had their hours and pay cut, their bills remain the same, so the workers' spendable income after covering expenses is either gone or greatly reduced - You have just created a recession.

    5. Re:I'd rather have 4/36 by Average · · Score: 4, Informative

      There is no doubt that, cutting back to necessities (as the country may finally be lurching toward), we have a surplus of working capacity. If people *really, really* cut back to needs (rice, beans, 100 warm square feet), we'd have 75%+ unemployment. Tech, mech, and automation meant that we had enough surplus to have more hairdressers and marketers than farmers. The flip side is that we don't need more farmers, even if millions wanted to go back to it.

      As for me, I'm lucky as hell. I'd found the ability to work 30 hours or so a week, with some vacation flexibility, in my nice cheap midwest small town, for slightly under $30k a year. Lucky as all hell to have it, for now. With my degrees and training, I 'should' make $80k or maybe $100k+ on the coasts. Instead, I get time to garden, volunteer, cook, and jam with friends. Awesome and a half. But, of course, it's far less efficient for most companies. Hiring 6 people and pushing them 50 or 60 hours a week is, sadly, much more efficient than having 10 people work 30 to 35. Perhaps shifting certain fixed costs (health care) off the employer might help this become an option for more people?

    6. Re:I'd rather have 4/36 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm a firefighter. I work 24 on, 48 off. As long as there aren't calls during the night, I get paid to sleep. Relevant to your question? No. Friggin' Awesome schedule anyways? Yes.

    7. Re:I'd rather have 4/36 by EvanED · · Score: 5, Informative

      If it can knock you down into a lower tax bracket you can come out ahead.

      You will never decrease your tax liability by making less enough to compensate for making less, all other things being equal, even under a system as complex as the US tax code. If you think it can, tax brackets don't work the way I suspect you think they do.

      For instance, suppose in a hypothetical universe the brackets were set up so that $0-$50000 was taxed 0% and $50000+ was taxed 50%. If you made $60,000, people would say they fall into the upper bracket, but that doesn't mean they are paying $30,000 in taxes (which would imply that getting a $10,001 pay cut would increase take home pay by 20 grand). Rather, they pay 50% of the amount of money they make in excess of $50,000, meaning they will pay $5,000.

      Continuing the analogy, if there was another bracket starting at $100,000 with 75% tax, someone making $200,000 would pay:
      * 0% of the first $50,000
      * 50% of the next $50,000 (or $25,000)
      * 75% of the next $100,000 (or $75,000)
      giving a total tax liability of $100,000, rather than the $150,000 they would have to pay if they were paying 75% on everything.

      Now, there are changes to your employment state that can have big consequences. I am a grad student, and am taking up a teaching position this semester. Before I was a research assistant. RAs are exempt from FICA taxes (this is at least true in my state, and I think is common) but as an instructor I won't be, so even though I will be getting a nice raise, I'll also essentially be taking an instant 7.5% pay cut too. There may be something similar going from part time to full time or something like that which would apply. But in any case, if taking a pay cut actually increases your take home pay, it is definitely not because it puts you into a different tax bracket.

    8. Re:I'd rather have 4/36 by the_B0fh · · Score: 4, Informative

      Are people really that stupid? A simple google search turns up:

      For single filers (this is slashdot after all):
      (Tax Rate Schedule X)

              * 10% on income between $0 and $8,025
              * 15% on the income between $8,025 and $32,550; plus $802.50
              * 25% on the income between $32,550 and $78,850; plus $4,481.25
              * 28% on the income between $78,850 and $164,550; plus $16,056.25
              * 33% on the income between $164,550 and $357,700; plus $40,052.25
              * 35% on the income over $357,700; plus $103,791.75

      Do you understand what the fuck that means? If you make less than $8025, you get taxed 10%. If you make between $8025 and $32550, that means you pay 10% on the first $8025, and 15% on the rest. That means the effective tax rate at $32550 is 13.77%.

      At which fucking point can you come out ahead while making less money?!

    9. Re:I'd rather have 4/36 by garett_spencley · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm self employed and have often worked 12 hours / day. While the idea of taking 3 days / week off is appealing (and I've done it), I find that when I work 12 hours / day my productivity goes down the drain incrementally with each hour. I get extremely tired by the end of the shift and my brain turns to mush.

      I get way more work done doing a standard 8 hour work day with weekends off. Of course that's just me, though.

    10. Re:I'd rather have 4/36 by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Funny

      If I could, I'd gladly shed 20% of my pay for a 4-day workweek. I might even be persuaded to shed more than 20% to get a four-day work week. :-) I would not, however, want to lose time in my evenings to work more hours to get the same or similar pay. Well, some evenings it would be okay, but other days I'd have to make it up on the front end because of evening activities, and I wouldn't much like making it up on the front end. (Wait, there's a 7:00 in the morning? Why didn't anyone tell me!?!)

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    11. Re:I'd rather have 4/36 by Average · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Japan's 'lost decade' (and continuing) also has a lot to do with lack of population growth. Sadly, interest-based capitalism goes hand-in-hand with growth. Japan has gone into negative population growth territory. Much of the west will follow in our lifetimes. From a green or even moderately sane perspective, the cessation of growth and consumption is a blessed and long-hoped-for event. But, economics as we know it stagnates. People get money, but they don't lend it. They don't because lending entails some risk, but, whatever you might invest in is unlikely to grow in a steady or shrinking economy.

    12. Re:I'd rather have 4/36 by CDMA_Demo · · Score: 5, Funny

      do you work 9/11 days?

    13. Re:I'd rather have 4/36 by QRDeNameland · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Excellent post. I can't tell you how many people I know who misunderstand tax brackets and think they can be substantially penalized for earning an extra $1 if it puts them into a higher bracket.

      Another factor I would add that even further detracts from that myth, since I saw you mention it, is FICA. (For non-US residents unaware of FICA, it is a separate federal payroll tax which funds Social Security and Medicare.) For 2008, an employee pays 6.2% up to $102,000 for FICA. If you compare to the US income tax brackets, any money you earn over that $102,000 up to $164,550 is being effectively taxed at 6.2% less than the $78,850 to $102,000 earned (considering Fed Income Tax plus FICA, the vast bulk of most payroll tax). The $164,550-$357,700 bracket raises the rate 5% on additional dollars earned, which still leaves you paying 1.2% less and only when you enter that top bracket are your additional dollars effectively taxed at a whopping 0.8% more than you were taxed for $78,850 to $102,000.

      Bottom line, under the US federal tax system you never lose money by making money. In fact, it really doesn't look so progressive when you spell it out like that.

      --
      Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
    14. Re:I'd rather have 4/36 by Belial6 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have to tell you, that I fell into that misconception for a lot of years. It is poorly described almost universally. On the plus side, it did give a pal of mine who I have frequent friendly rivalries with, a good chance to be right.

      Honestly, that isn't even the worst misconception people have about taxes. Many people (most?) don't even realize that the taxes that come out of their paychecks are "withheld". They think that they have to pay one set of taxes through the year, and a seperate set of taxes at the end of the year. Just look at the tax preparation commercials that are now running where they are bragging that "95% of our customers receive a refund". They say it like it is their great service that gets the government to give you money and that the fact that you have been overpaying throughout the year has nothing to do with it.

      Scarier yet are the commercials that ran last year by H&R Block. Their commercial boiled down to telling people that they should trust them with their money because they were holding a lottery.

    15. Re:I'd rather have 4/36 by tompaulco · · Score: 4, Funny

      any money you earn over that $102,000 up to $164,550 is being effectively taxed at 6.2% less than the $78,850 to $102,000 earned
      Which is why I encourage my employer to pay me more than $102,000. Not only do I get taxed less, but so does my employer. Alas, they didn't see the logic in my argument, nor in the charts which showed the average person with my experience in my position earning $120k in my locale.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    16. Re:I'd rather have 4/36 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You have absolutely no idea how the US tax code works.

      Nobody knows how the US tax code works.

    17. Re:I'd rather have 4/36 by QRDeNameland · · Score: 4, Informative

      I just wrote a post below about tax brackets and rates, and it just so happens that I'm a dual US-Canadian citizen, living and working in Canada now but most of life was in the US. Out of curiosity I wanted to compare US vs. Canadian income tax rates, I was surprised to find that Canadian income tax rates are slightly lower across the board than the US.

      Canada 2009:
      - 15% on the first $38,832 of taxable income, +
      - 22% on the next $38,832 of taxable income (on the portion of taxable income between $38,832 and $77,664), +
      - 26% on the next $48,600 of taxable income (on the portion of taxable income between $77,664 and $126,264), +
      - 29% of taxable income over $126,264.

      US 2008:
      - 10% of $0 to $8,025
      - 15% of $8,025 to $32,550
      - 25% of $32,550 to $78,850
      - 28% of $78,850 to $164,550
      - 33% of $164,550 to $357,700
      - 35% of $357,700 and up

      The US figures do not count FICA which is 6.2% up to $102,000. My additional taxes on my Canadian payroll check do not come close to matching FICA plus other non-Federal taxes that I paid in the US.

      The place where I feel overtaxed in Canada in comparison to the US is not on my income, but with the GST/PST, and the slew of fuel, booze, etc., etc., taxes which contribute overall to higher cost of living here.

      --
      Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
    18. Re:I'd rather have 4/36 by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is simple.

      Person A makes $50k a year. Let's say they pay 15%. They pay $7.5k per year.
      Their apartment costs $800 per month. Their car costs $400 per month. Their food costs $300 per month.
      At the end of every month they have about $500 left over for spending money.

      Person A gets a 50% raise. They now make $75k. Let's say their total tax burder is now 20%. They now pay $15k in taxes a year.
      They buy a house with their new found fortunes with a $1800 a month mortage. They ea tout more and their food costs $500 a month. They get a nicer car and their lease is now $500. Now they have a net debt of $200 a month.
      Suddenly they're broke. Obviously the government is holding them down. Before their raise they had money to spare. After their raise they are out of money. Taxes are to blame.

    19. Re:I'd rather have 4/36 by youknowjack · · Score: 5, Informative

      Research suggests that while 12 hour shifts can make people happy and psychologically healthy, they can introduce long term health effects due to fatigue (accrued sleep debt).

      Also, people make more errors towards the end of long shifts (particularly dangerous in industrial work environments). An 8 or 9 hour shift as suggested can mitigate this risk.

      http://pt.wkhealth.com/pt/re/oeme/abstract.00022707-199804000-00001.htm

    20. Re:I'd rather have 4/36 by blitziod · · Score: 4, Funny

      yea but firemen get LAID all the time.. I mean really there is like NO other job in the same pay range that will get you that much sex.

      --
      The only way to bust a doper--is when you yourself become a smoker!
    21. Re:I'd rather have 4/36 by JavaRob · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Right. That worked so well in France.

      There's something to be said for putting some focus on quality of life as opposed to simply maximizing income.

      It's kind of nice to notice in France that grocery stores aren't normally open 24/7 (more like 10/6 or less), so no one has to work those shitty shifts. I moved to France a few years ago; I never noticed how weird the US was until I was back on business and managed to get a haircut at 10pm on a Sunday night. WTF, America? Yay, jobs created. But they are so shitty and so poorly paid that mostly they just prevent the employees from having the time for education, family, friends, or even searching for a better job.

      Not that France had the ideal balance at all (or even that they took the best approach to "enforcing" quality of life) but I think the base idea is a very good thing.

    22. Re:I'd rather have 4/36 by GospelHead821 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This highlights an unfortunate truth. Employers have an economic incentive to decrease the quality of their employees' lives. I could come up with a dozen different plans involving scheduling, benefits, and workplace amenities that would help to make employees happier and foster a richer national culture. Each and every one of them, however, can and would be countered by businesses as promoting inefficiency. As a society, we've decided that being being productive and successful is all the culture that we need. That makes me pretty sad.

      --
      Virtue finds and chooses the mean.
      Aristotle, Ethica Nichomachea
    23. Re:I'd rather have 4/36 by dotmax · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I want to mee-too the part about errors on long shifts. 12 hr. shifts are great if you're generally sitting around not doing anything real complex, but if it's something that requires a lot of mental concentration for the whole 12 hrs, you're asking for trouble because your brain will turn to oatmeal. The sleep deficit thing is quite real also. I am a ... long time ... shift worker at the big atom smasher's main control room. (not the one that blew up). I know whereof i speak.

  18. Re:Lost sleep? by pintpusher · · Score: 5, Funny

    I prefer to lunch through work myself, ymmv.

    --
    man, I feel like mold.
  19. Re:Lost sleep? by dangitman · · Score: 5, Funny

    just eat through lunch

    This statement is baffling on so many levels.

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  20. Re:Sound better then 5/80 by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously though, does anybody actually work only 40 hours a week?

    Apparently, your job sucks.

  21. 80 hours by suso · · Score: 5, Funny

    I already work 80 hours.

    Oh wait, 9 days. Ok, I see what you mean now. I thought you meant 5.

    1. Re:80 hours by Sfing_ter · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have a system where I only work 6 half days.... 12hrs each day... sigh.

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. Emo Philips
    2. Re:80 hours by buddyglass · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hope it's worth it. That sounds miserable.

    3. Re:80 hours by cayenne8 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      " Tell me about it.

      80 on a usual week, 100 on a bad week and 60 on a good week.

      80 hours for nine days? Slackers."

      OUCH!! Why would you (or anyone else) do that to themselves? I hope, at least, you are getting paid at least straight time for every one of those OT hours...??

      If not, you are just killing yourself and robbing yourself of valuable hours of your life.

      That's why I will ONLY work hourly....put it in a contract, I will work when needed...but, I will not work an hour for free. My time is valuable, and I will get my bill rate for every hour worked wherever I work. Doing this way...makes them also think twice about asking if they need you or not for OT. This way...I also don't have a problem with working hours around personal time off. Even if W2 hourly, you just usually have to get avg. 8 hours a day for the pay period, so if you need a day off...swing hours around the rest of the days in the billing period.

      The best is when doing corp to corp 1099...where you work as you wish generally. Don't wanna work 40 hours that week? Don't. Want to work 60 the next...ok.

      Seriously...I just have to believe salary is for suckers. They expect you to work over if 'needed'...but, do they happily let you leave early when your work is done? Hmm....I didn't think so.

      And you can do it W2 too....with benefits if you just know to negotiate it up front with them...if that is the route you'd rather go.

      I'll never work for free again...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    4. Re:80 hours by Tyr_7BE · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Seriously...I just have to believe salary is for suckers. They expect you to work over if 'needed'...but, do they happily let you leave early when your work is done?

      In a word, yes. I understand where you're coming from - managing your own time is a sweet gig. But don't be so quick to dismiss a salary scheme. When run properly, it can be pretty decent. At my office when there's not much going on, not a lot of people work 40 hr weeks. When it's crunch time, you're going to see a lot of people putting in 60 on a regular basis. Pretty similar to what you described, actually. Work gets done on time, and nobody bats an eye if you work an entire week of half days. It's all in how you execute the salary scheme. I could see it being abused, for sure, but when it's not abused, it's a nice ride.

    5. Re:80 hours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They deem me mad because I will not sell my days for gold; and I deem them mad because they think my days have a price.
        - Kahlil Gibran

    6. Re:80 hours by Symbha · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ya I guess, but I dare you to try and keep that up for another 15 years. Or try and have a significant personal relationship working like that...

      There is no life to be head with 66% of your time at work.

      So, unless that is *literally* the only thing you like... do yourself a favor and find some balance.

    7. Re:80 hours by Angstroem · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Frankly, I don't believe you.

      Telecommuters like to count as work every minute they have their PC.

      Executives count in any minute they're awake, cause even running around with a cup of coffee or having a chat on the toilet is "work".

      Regular employees count the sheer presence, regardless of standing outside smoking, drinking coffee with others (that's called meeting), or just browsing slashdot (called recherche).

      If you start logging what you really do in those 60/80/100 hrs you most likely will notice that you get done no more than the average worker, eventually even less.

      The only people I believe being truly working those insane hours are doctorate candidates in their final year and/or before conference deadlines.

    8. Re:80 hours by Angstroem · · Score: 5, Insightful

      at a previous job I occasionally worked 100 hours a week (thats insane though, only allowed by a crisis allowing you to give up sleep).

      The key word here is occasionally. I'm fully aware that there are situations where you just have to kick in the overdrive and get something by insane working hours. BTDT, and more than once. It usually is, however, a sign of bad company management because they either have too much work for too few people or acquired a too big project. Bad planning in both cases. Only emergency situations justify such insane overload.

      If you continue that overdrive you'll sooner or later burn out and/or start doing nonsense. Especially sleep deprivation is not exactly known for improving your work performance. Raised stress levels may lead to a temporary productivity boost, but that boost comes at a price.

      Unless, of course, your job has a recreational effect on you, which is probably anything but the norm. I know a lot of people who really like their jobs (being one of them myself), but doing some hobbyist stuff, even if somewhat work-related, is something completely different than work. And neither is a replacement for sleep.

      The idea you can only work 40 hours a week and the rest is just wasted is crap

      It indeed is. Usually the quote of productive work per day is much lower, about the range of 5h.

      You mentioned that it's the monotony that kills concentration. True. Zombie work kills. On the other hand, you also need a certain time to adjust to a new task and get that going smoothly. Too frequent task changes (being the norm today with telephone, email, and slashdot interrupts...) will make you feel utterly busy, but in the end being highly unproductive.

    9. Re:80 hours by GreatBunzinni · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If someone needs to work 80 hours a week on average then I would say that their life doesn't have much quality to begin with. Unless by "maintain our quality of living" you mean "paying off the luxury goods and services you've purchased". But then again, as your work load stops you from benefiting from them, I seriously doubt that they do much good.

      Materialism and all that keeping up with the joneses is a bitch, isn't it?

      --
      Slashdot, fix your code or at least hire someone who is competent at it to do it for you.
    10. Re:80 hours by davemabe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sounds like you're one of the most unproductive workers I can imagine.

      The first thing that comes to my mind when I hear about people working these long hours is that they're wasting a lot of time.

    11. Re:80 hours by lawaetf1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Couldn't agree more. A solid day's work is a noble thing but this "80 on a usual week, 100 on a bad week" is for the birds. I have no pity whatsoever unless it truly is the only job you can get or you absolutely have to have it (pays the extra $5k you need for your kids' medicine).

      I've as much sympathy for the OP as I do for lawyers who put in similar hours for 10 years in order to make partner. Enjoy the $$.. you'll have no soul at the end... huh, that explains a lot.

      --
      CommentBot 0.7a running with args "-module irritate,disagree -target random"
    12. Re:80 hours by loshwomp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, some of us [work 80-hour weeks] to maintain our quality of life in these wonderful times.

      I hate to break it to you, but if you're working 80- or 100-hour weeks, you don't have any quality of life.

  22. Re:Lost sleep? by Idiomatick · · Score: 4, Insightful

    not baffling, depressing. That working through lunch has become a standard...

  23. I work whatever hours I want by QuantumG · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The company measures my performance by what I get done.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  24. That depends... by SETIGuy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you're hourly, you can often get away with a "40 hour" work week that lasts less than 45 hours. If you're salaried, whether in government or not, you will be expected to get your job done whether it takes 10 hours a week or 168 hours a week. If you don't get it done, in this economic environment they will find someone who will get it done.

    That said, my wife works a 40 hour week that's supposed to be 4 days per week, 10 hours per day. Usually that translates to 8am to 7pm daily. She say's she'd never go back to 5x8.

    Unfortunately we car pool to work, so I work 8 to 7 as well. And then I usually put in 4 or 5 hours on Friday, and a few hours each on Saturday and Sunday. The difference.... You guessed it. She's in an hourly position that isn't exempt from overtime rules. I'm in a salaried position that is exempt from overtime rules. And to top it off, she makes about 20% more than I do because she is in an industry that competes to get workers. I'm in an industry that has more workers than it can afford.

    All in all 4-5x9 probably works OK, and if you're in an urban area, it's 10% less time that you'll sit in traffic. Maybe more because you either be commuting early or late. If the extra hour in the work day is cutting into your sleep, your commute is way too long. If it's cutting into your TV watching, then get TiVo and watch on your new day off.

  25. Re:Getting Customers to leave you alone Fridays by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Leave the computer and phone off, if you're going to take the day off, especially if you've notified people in advance. I say if you're taking the day off, take the day off.

  26. Re:feh by chrisxcr1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Moof!

  27. Toilet Paper Survey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From a non-scientific poll we conducted as undergraduates, we found some interesting results:

    All of the science and engineering students we asked said the next sheet should go over. All of them. (About 14 people.)

    The art students' inclination (8 of 12 people) was to put it under, with the other four simply saying "whichever way it ends up - I don't even look."

  28. 100 hours?! Luxury!! by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 5, Informative

    Why, back in our day we would wake at quarter-to-ten, half-an-hour before we went to sleep, then we'd pay $10 to go work in the mines for 28 hours a day, 373 days a year, double-time on holidays. And we considered ourselves lucky!!

    --
    Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    1. Re:100 hours?! Luxury!! by Fluffy+Bunnies · · Score: 5, Funny

      Getting modded informative was way funnier than the joke.

  29. Re:Getting Customers to leave you alone Fridays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    exactly, they wouldn't let you beer it up during work ours, so don't let them put your work during your beer hours!