Slashdot Mirror


Solving Obama's BlackBerry Dilemma

CurtMonash writes "Much is being made of the deliberations as to whether President Obama will be able to keep using his beloved "BarackBerry." As the NYTimes details, there are two major sets of objections: infosecurity and legal/records retention. Deven Coldeway of CrunchGear does a good job of showing that the technological infosecurity problems can be solved. And as I've noted elsewhere, the 'Omigod, he left his Blackberry behind at dinner' issue is absurd. Presidents are surrounded by attendants, Secret Service and otherwise. Somebody just has to be given the job of keeping track of the president's personal communication device. As for the legal question of whether the president can afford to put things in writing that will likely be exposed by courts and archivists later — the answer to that surely depends on the subject matter or recipient. Email to his Chicago friends — why not? Anything he'd write to them would be necessarily non-secret anyway. Email to the Secretary of Defense? That might be a different matter."

24 of 374 comments (clear)

  1. Who Cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Talk about a waste of bandwidth.

    1. Re:Who Cares? by JFDMit · · Score: 4, Funny

      To be fair, he's the first President in eight years that has opposable thumbs.

    2. Re:Who Cares? by larry+bagina · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually, Bill Clinton used one. Here's a clue: Monica Lewinsky with the blackberry in vibrate mode in the oval office.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    3. Re:Who Cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You take "Offtopic" to a whole new level.

    4. Re:Who Cares? by mazarin5 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Monica Lewinsky with the blackberry in vibrate mode in the oval office.

      Dammit, I was so sure it was Colonel Mustard.

      --
      Fnord.
  2. Re:research in motion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The one major issue with thi... RIM is a foreign company.

    That can be solved. Once Obama pulls all the troops back from Iraq, they can invade Canada. :-)

  3. Re:research in motion by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Funny

    Once Obama pulls all the troops back from Iraq, they can invade Canada. :-)

    Pffft, easier said than done. If you think an Iraqi insurgent with an IED is a tough adversary just wait until you see a Canadian with a hockey stick..... besides, I don't think the Baldwin family can afford a war with Canada ;)

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  4. Re:research in motion by JWSmythe · · Score: 3, Funny

    I suspect there's some reason that I noticed "DOD Root Certificates" installed on mine. :) There must be some arrangement with the gov't for security, at least of some sort. I doubt that the President should be (or would be) sending much over it though. It's not necessarily the idea that it's a smart phone, and he could lose it (as I noticed someone else said), but that the data is transiting insecure networks.

        And hey, one mistyped address, and some state secret may end up going across insecure networks, to an insecure individual. He is President after all, even an innocent note like "Honey, I'll be home at 8:30, then we can watch that movie" is a huge security concern. The White House is a big place, at least big enough where a targeted attack wouldn't necessarily do much of anything. Knowing he'll be sitting on the couch in whatever room the President would watch movies, at a specific time, is a dangerous thing.

        The again, so far just about everyone loves Obama. :) I'm thinking sometime within the first year, he'd be safe to sit in the front yard of the White House on a lawn chair, smoking a cigar and talking sh1t with foreign diplomats.

        Hmmm, what's this text I just received?

    From: 2024561414@blackberry.net
    To: jwsmythe
    Subject: evac

    Evac ASAP. Bird inbound. ETA 10min

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  5. Re:Obamatard portmanteaus by couchslug · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Can we stop all this portmanteau crap? Please? It's like the imaginary label "President-Elect"... "

    OK, you win. No more Obamanteaus.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  6. Re:research in motion by saforrest · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pffft, easier said than done. If you think an Iraqi insurgent with an IED is a tough adversary just wait until you see a Canadian with a hockey stick...

    That, and we maintain a threatening lead in Zamboni technology!

  7. Re:research in motion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The British set fire to the White House, yes. They did in retaliation for the torching of Parliament in Montreal by Americans, a fact that doesn't make it into U.S. history textbooks 200 years later.

    (Incidentally, the White House was deserted quickly immediately prior to the visit by the British Soldiers, and they discovered a state dinner waiting for them. So they ate first and then torched the White House.

  8. Re:research in motion by Kleen13 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'll be waiting.... gimme a couple days notice and I'll start icing the Keg. I'm sure the troops are thirsty.

    --
    That sinking feeling deep in your gut when you KNOW you screwed up bad summed up with: {head desk} {head desk}
  9. Re:research in motion by geobeck · · Score: 4, Funny

    True. Of course we have a 29 to 1 advantage in baseball teams and all of those guys use steroids so they could be pretty tough to beat in a fight ;)

    Yeah, those baseball players make terrifying adversaries--except that they have to stop to catch their breath after chasing you 90 feet. :p

    I guess us Canucks have to watch ourselves though; I'm sure Sarah Palin is keeping an eye on us from her house.

    --
    Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
  10. Re:This is ridiculous. by geobeck · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...travels through RIM(TM)'s central server in Canada

    Canada, eh? That's one of those unstable, oil-rich nations run by a fundamentalist dictator, that supports all kinds of terror, right?

    --
    Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
  11. Re:research in motion by Shakrai · · Score: 3, Funny

    I guess us Canucks have to watch ourselves though; I'm sure Sarah Palin is keeping an eye on us from her house.

    Nah, she's too busy protecting both of our countries from Putin. There's 12 other US States that share a border with Canada. I suspect that their Governors are the ones busy keeping an eye on you Canucks so don't get any ideas ;)

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  12. Re:research in motion by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Seriously? Do you think that if a foreign/hostile agent or power ever got the "First BlackBerry", they'd be so crude as to attempt a couple of passwords, have it lock, and say "aww, shit, there goes our chance"?

  13. Re:research in motion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Get thee to a video store

  14. Re:research in motion by camperdave · · Score: 3, Funny

    The one major issue with thi... RIM is a foreign company.

    Depends on your point of view. From where I sit, it is a domestic company and a foreign president.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  15. Re:Fangirls of the World Unite! by girlintraining · · Score: 2, Funny

    People who don't like fangirl stories (what happened to fanboys?) have no place on Slashdot!

    Oh sorry. I'll disappear into a black hole of male-dominated language now.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
  16. Re:research in motion by HiVizDiver · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, the self-destruct feature is easy, I already have one on my Crackberry. I just open an HTML e-mail. BOOM.

  17. Re:the answer is obvious. by Xaoswolf · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'll go with the race card... I love my caucasianberry myself.

  18. Re:research in motion by willith · · Score: 4, Funny

    Canada comes from the Iroquois word 'Kanata', which means villiage, or settlement. It was in common use anywhere the Iroquois were - which includes the area above the Great Lakes - but also below, and around

    Really? I thought the name "Canada" came from the two folks who first discovered it.

    "Great country, eh?," said the first one. "What should we name it, eh?"

    "I know," said the second one. "We'll put some letters in a hat, eh, and then we'll take turns drawing the letters out, eh, and that's how we'll name the place!"

    "Good idea, eh!" said the first one. He pulled off his toupe, scribbled some letters on some paper scraps, dumped them into the toupe, shook it up, and they began to draw.

    "Oh, I got a 'c', eh!"

    "I got an 'n', eh!"

    ...and so on.

  19. Re:Let's see here... by JWSmythe · · Score: 2, Funny

        Funny, your IP resolves to something at eop.gov.

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  20. Re:research in motion by multipartmixed · · Score: 1, Funny

    > Parliament is very similar to congress in that way ... original usage
    > was a meeting or session - nowadays, it also refers to a place or a body.

    Not quite. Parliament comes from two French words -- "Parler", to speak, and "Mentir" ... to lie.

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?