Slashdot Mirror


A Waste Gasification Plant In a Truck

waderoush writes "There are plenty of waste-to-energy plants around the US, but most of them simply burn the waste, dumping carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Gasification technology, by contrast, converts nearly all of the waste into gases like hydrogen and carbon monoxide that can be used to run generators and furnaces. The problem is that most gasification facilities are factory-sized. Now a startup outside Boston has built a combination shredder-dryer-pelletizer-gasifier that fits into 30-by-8-by-8-foot shipping container. The so-called 'Green Energy Machine' can be backed up to a loading dock by truck, processing 3 tons of solid waste per day and putting out enough synthetic gas to run a 120-kilowatt generator or a 240-kilowatt-equivalent furnace. The makers say the machine can eliminate 540 tons of carbon emissions per year, in large part by reducing the amount of waste that goes to methane-generating landfills."

16 of 148 comments (clear)

  1. Apples by Thanshin · · Score: 4, Funny

    IGasify. Portable usb gasification plant.

    Power your IPod with your own excrements! As only pop stars can do right now.

    1. Re:Apples by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's spelled poop stars now. And I'm damn glad smellovision wasn't invented yet.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Apples by imdx80 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Roads? Where we're going we don't need roads.

  2. Re:Thinking Creativly About Energy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    There is some sort of error. The picture you linked is of a highly trained Software Engineer earning their hard earned off-shored dollars.

  3. Re:carbon monoxide is toxic by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2, Funny

    You could sequester the CO instead by using to gas bunnies, weighting the bunny corpses down with compacted garbage and chucking them into the ocean somewhere where it is really deep.

    Oh you said a green solution. Sorry, try the next cubicle along. Chap with the pony tail will help you.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  4. For reference: by mosb1000 · · Score: 2, Funny

    For reference, 1 kw = 3/4 hp, so this thing could almost power your car. . .

    1. Re:For reference: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      For reference, 1 kw = 3/4 hp, so this thing could almost power your car. . .

      That is some fscking car if it has room for a 30x8x8 foot container in the trunk.

  5. Re:Carbon Monoxide? by MrNaz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Err, it's pretty obvious that they'd build some kind of safety mechanism. If you're going to point out dangers of various power sources and assume there are no safety measures being taken, here's a bit of airy scary information for you:

    * Nuclear fuel, uranium, is radioactive and will cause cancer or direct radiation poisoning.
    * Coal is full of mercury, and eating it will cause people to call you a mad hatter.
    * Oil is bad because you can drown in it.
    * Solar power is bad because the sun can give you sunburn.
    * Wind power is really nasty because all those spinning blades can chop you up into teeny tiny pieces.

    --
    I hate printers.
  6. Re:The solution is a distributed architecture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think women are the problem. I would be happy to have an energy efficient house made of concrete that is built like a bunker and partially subterranean. My wife however insists on having a pretty house with lots of windows facing all the wrong directions.

  7. Re:"removed"? by gbulmash · · Score: 4, Funny

    Only decepticon reformers turn it into CO2. Autobot reformers are much more responsible with the carbon.

  8. The Nazis... by El+Puerco+Loco · · Score: 2, Funny

    did this back in the '40s. you don't want to be like hitler, do you? burn fossil fuels like every other red-blooded american, dammit!

  9. Re:Here's a better idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Looks like someone doesn't know what "superfluous" means.

  10. Re:Here's a better idea... by sumdumass · · Score: 2, Funny

    Eat Beans!
    America needs gas!

  11. Re:The solution is a distributed architecture by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 3, Funny

    Economies of scale isn't just a fancy word
    No, it's three words.

    --
    I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
  12. Re:Thinking Creativly About Energy by metalcoat · · Score: 2, Funny

    What about the Delorean?

  13. Re:Thinking Creativly About Energy by Bob-taro · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sounds like a bunch of B.S.

    --
    Prov 9:8 Do not rebuke mockers or they will hate you; rebuke the wise and they will love you.