Slashdot Mirror


Unboxing a 1984 Atari Peripheral, 25 Years Later

Harry writes "When you come across a 1984 Atari Touch Tablet for sale cheap--in the original, unopened box--it would be a crime against computer history not to buy it, open it, install it, and use it, and to document the whole process with photos and commentary."

7 of 154 comments (clear)

  1. ...no by RMH101 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...it would be a crime not to put it on eBay untouched for some fool to pay through the nose for it.
    Jesus, I mean, come on. This sort of story isn't helping with changing perception of geeks, is it?

  2. 14 pages... by fyleow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    14 pages for 14 535 x 383 resolution pictures. Ugh.

    1. Re:14 pages... by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 4, Insightful

      All but one comment on the site itself about the article were bitching about that. I, like many of the posters there, decided to forgo pages 2-14.

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    2. Re:14 pages... by Bieeanda · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No kidding. It's not a weblog, it's an ad farm.

  3. Annoying format. by martinw89 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I happen to RTFAs, but I can't stand the image-and-a-few-sentences-per-page format. Especially when each page has to load a bunch of pictures and javascript. I can stand it when these slideshows open up a new window with only the slideshow's content, but this is too annoying.

  4. Re:Collector's Item by LateArthurDent · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No, it is completely logical if the utility that you gain by enjoying the use of the item exceeds the utility you would have gotten from the money gained by auctioning it to the highest bidder.

    Not really. You can sell to the highest bidder, buy a cheaper used product, and still get all the enjoyment of using it AS well as getting a profit. Win-win.

    If you're going to argue that there's a greater utility to opening the box and using the new product, then you are admitting that the unopened box is worth more.

  5. Re:Collector's Item by idontgno · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is clearly a clash of value systems. And, although my value are mostly utilitarian, that's not consistently so. My GP comment has a clue to the inconsistency: "older systems". Yup, I collect old personal computers and software. That's not rational from a pragmatic POV. But, OTOH, I actually use them. I wouldn't pay collector NIB NOS prices for, say, an Amiga 1000. (Pretend such a thing could legitimately be found. Besides, I still have mine from 1986.)

    Again, if you or another collector gets a warm fuzzy feeling looking at your sealed 1977 Kenner Luke Skywalker figure, great. Me, I'd wanna play with the thing.

    So, in the realm of serendipitous discoveries of neat old tech toys: If I find a nifty piece of retrotech that I can play with, at a price I consider reasonable solely on the "play" value, I'm buying. And using. If that destroys it from your perspective, so be it. I'm getting what I value out of it. If you want it, for whatever your reasons, you'd better find it first.

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.