Slashdot Mirror


Black Holes From the LHC Could Last For Minutes

KentuckyFC writes "There is absolutely, positively, definitely no chance of the LHC destroying the planet (or this way either) when it eventually switches on some time later this year. And yet a few niggling doubts are persuading some scientists to run through their figures again. One potential method of destruction is that the LHC will create tiny black holes that could swallow everything in their path, including the planet. Various scientists have said this will not happen because the black holes would decay before they could do any damage. But physicists who have re-run the calculations now say that the mini black holes produced by the LHC could last for seconds, possibly minutes. Of course, the real question is whether they decay faster than they can grow. The new calculations suggest that the decay mechanism should win over and that the catastrophic growth of a black hole from the LHC 'does not seem possible' (abstract). But shouldn't we require better assurance than that?"

37 of 672 comments (clear)

  1. Um...freudian slip? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    From the Summary:

    "Black holes...a few niggling doubts..."

    Yes, it is well known that niglings begin life by coming out of black holes, but wouldn't it be wiser to provide birf control to the black holes given the state of the economy? Fortunately Obama recently authorized abortion funding to ass-backward savage lands which are not specified officially but are known to be Africa, proud motherland of the apes, chimpanzees, macaques, baboons

  2. It's Crazy by LinuxWhore · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't help but think of one of my favorite The Soup clips every time I hear about the LHC now.

    --

    I am MuchTall
  3. Folks I don't want to hear say oops by MyLongNickName · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. My Barber
    2. My urologist during my vasectomy.
    3. The LHC scientists during the first collisions.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:Folks I don't want to hear say oops by eclectro · · Score: 2, Funny

      How can an LHC scientist say oops if their vocal cords have entered another dimension of space and time?

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    2. Re:Folks I don't want to hear say oops by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 4, Funny

      How can an LHC scientist say oops if their vocal cords have entered another dimension of space and time?

      At the LHC's first collisions, a black hole forms....

      scientist: Oops... OMFG! Call the President!
      evil voice from inside the black hole: What good is a phone call if you are unable to speak?

    3. Re:Folks I don't want to hear say oops by zappepcs · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes. At some point in the future, I'm fine with the universe unfolding like so:

      Mother: Tottle, do NOT do that!
      Child: But mom, they are just small ones.
      Mother: You remember what happened to the humans, don't you?
      Child: They danced funny?
      Mother: Besides that...... (hand on hip)
      Child: (face frowning slowly) Yes mother, they blew up the southeast quarter of the galaxy experimenting with black holes.
      Mother: that's right Tottle. It's all fun and games till chunks of the galaxy go missing. Your father will NOT be impressed if he can't find our house after he gets off work tonight.
      Child: yes mother
      Mother: now put your physics set away and make your bed.
      Child: yes mother

      Yes, I'd be happy to be a footnote in the history of the universe as an example of what you really shouldn't do with your Acme Physics set that you got for your birthday.

    4. Re:Folks I don't want to hear say oops by postbigbang · · Score: 5, Funny

      I said it before: Lake Hadron. New shoreline real estate for sale, soon.

      Don't mind the Schwarzchild radius, come on in!

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    5. Re:Folks I don't want to hear say oops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      I, for one, will bet my life savings on it NOT destroying the world.

    6. Re:Folks I don't want to hear say oops by MrMunkey · · Score: 4, Funny

      My urologist was actually quite funny. When he was done he said, "Well, I've finished with the second one... but I found a third." I was a bit confused and shocked and then he laughed and said he was just kidding.

    7. Re:Folks I don't want to hear say oops by kenj0418 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Enrico Fermi, who won the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1938 for his work on nuclear fission, offered side odds on the bomb destroying all life on the planet.

      Assuming he's betting on the "No" side, he probably should have got a prize for economics too. If you're right -- you win money. If you lose -- everyone's dead anyway so you don't have to pay! Its a win-win proposition.

      (Ok maybe win-win isn't the right term here)

    8. Re:Folks I don't want to hear say oops by MadUndergrad · · Score: 5, Funny

      Four minutes?! I'll be damned if they make black holes that last longer than I do!

    9. Re:Folks I don't want to hear say oops by darthnoodles · · Score: 3, Funny

      When I had mine done I asked him how many he'd performed. He said several thousand. So I commented that he could probably do it with his eyes closed. He offered to try...I declined.

    10. Re:Folks I don't want to hear say oops by mseidl · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm hoping it'll suck more than my wife.

    11. Re:Folks I don't want to hear say oops by duguk · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm hoping it'll suck more than my wife.

      Yeah... me too.

    12. Re:Folks I don't want to hear say oops by Eunuchswear · · Score: 2, Funny

      Uh, not much of the Manhattan project was "all over the popular press" at the time.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
  4. What could possibly go wrong? by JCSoRocks · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hey guys, we thought the first nuclear bomb might burn up the atmosphere and we survived that! Guys?

    --
    You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
  5. Space Madness by egcagrac0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    And there's no possible way that Stimpy would be stupid enough to press the beautiful, shiny button - the jolly, candy-like button.

    and nothing of value was lost?

  6. Advanced Alien Civilizations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This could be why we do not see Advanced Alien Civilizations - their technological sophistication gets to a point where they eventually play with some sort of basic question of physics and have a planet ending disaster. Yet another reason to colonize Mars, and do this type of research there.

  7. Bruce Campbell at the LHC by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, I would really feel a lot better if the LHC deployed Bruce Campbell, with a shotgun during those Black Hole experiments:

    Evil Witch/Black Hole: "I'll swallow your soul! I'll swallow your soul!"

    Bruce points his shotgun at the Evil Witch/Black Hole:

    Bruce: "Swallow this."

    *Blam*

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  8. Well, duh! by Shivetya · · Score: 4, Funny

    those mini black holes were up in the air, not next to the earth you ninny.

    sheesh, next thing someone will make a video game with this scenario

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  9. seconds and minutes by phrostie · · Score: 5, Funny

    when they say seconds and minutes is that in normal earth time or according to the time inside the micro event horizon?

    1. Re:seconds and minutes by ryanvm · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're not. That poor SOB is going to get banned.

  10. Finally! by nizo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Finally, we may have resolved the Fermi Paradox.

  11. Absolutely, positively, by xav_jones · · Score: 5, Funny

    There will be no black holes, well except for very tiny ones that will wink out of existence in mere nanoseconds. Certainly no more than a couple of microseconds. At most a second. Likely tops of a minute. Absolutely can't be more than seven minutes ...

  12. The Quantum Make a Wish Foundation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Everyone wins a free trip to France.

  13. Screw mini-black holes. by SilentBob0727 · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's the ice-9 strangelets that have me worried.

    --
    Life would be easier if I had the source code.
  14. I say "go for it!" by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Funny

    If they're right the benefit to humanity could be enormous.

    If they're wrong then it's the end of the economic crisis, unemployment, conflict in the Middle East and world hunger.

    So, on balance ... I think they should do it.

    --
    No sig today...
    1. Re:I say "go for it!" by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Funny

      And not just that: having the entire earth annihilated by incredible gravitational forces unleashed by man's own Faustian arrogance would be the most utterly Fucking Metal thing ever. Orders of magnitude more metal than thermonuclear weapons, the current favorite, or satan, the historical contender.

    2. Re:I say "go for it!" by jameskojiro · · Score: 4, Funny

      OK, no more metalocalypse for you!

      --
      Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
  15. I'm just glad... by hAckz0r · · Score: 2, Funny
    ... that the LHC is not in my back yard.

    Actually this is great! Being across the pond, I should have the benefit of at least a femtosecond to be the first to write and publish a paper on the effects of gravity waves before I go. After all, those Europeans are going to be pretty much getting all the glory and making it much harder for us on this side to be recognized for any new discoveries. With this type of discovery, and it being so close to home, they likely won't even see it coming. And for a Scientist there is surely nothing like getting really embedded into your work to make you forget to publish. But face it, sometimes its just better to distance yourself for a more objective look at a situation.

  16. Re:Not so fast there old chap! by Metasquares · · Score: 5, Funny

    The difference between theory and practice is that in theory there is no difference, but in practice, there is.

    In theory.

  17. "Answer first, experiment second" -- the FRAK? by MrLizard · · Score: 5, Funny

    I find it hilarious how people say, "Before we run an experiment, we need to know what will happen!" Hello, McFly! You run experiments to FIND OUT WHAT WILL HAPPEN. That's, uhm, the whole FRAKING DEFINITION OF THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD! You can do the math, you can form theories, you can hypothesize... but you never know FOR SURE until you flip the switch.

    People like the OP were probably standing around in caveman days, saying, "Ugh. No make fire. What if fire is monster, kill everyone? Bad thing. Not make fire unless know not monster."

  18. Re:cosmic rays by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, ok, since you said so, I just did.

    Aw, crap.

  19. Couldn't agree more... by PinkyDead · · Score: 5, Funny

    Small black holes are far less dangerous than made out to be.

    A while back we had a family of small black holes living in our basement, and I found that if you didn't bother them, they wouldn't bother you.

    The wife wanted rid of them, but I said no, they're not doing any harm to anyone - and anyway we never used that part of the basement.

    Eventually they just moved on.

    --
    Genesis 1:32 And God typed :wq!
  20. Re:cosmic rays by bonch · · Score: 2, Funny

    Thank goodness we built the LHC to provide science fiction authors another MacGuffin.

  21. *Extemely* unlikely by bugeaterr · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's like the odds of a black man becoming President of the United States.

  22. Re:cosmic rays by khallow · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was talking about RHIC fireballs.

    When the gold nuclei smash into each other they are broken down into particles called quarks and gluons.

    These form a ball of plasma about 300 times hotter than the surface of the Sun. This fireball, which lasts just 10 million, billion, billionths of a second, can be detected because it absorbs jets of particles produced by the beam collisions.

    But Nastase, of Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island, says there is something unusual about it.

    Ten times as many jets were being absorbed by the fireball as were predicted by calculations.

    I was interpreting that to mean a black hole has a larger collective cross-sectional area than if the mass that made it up weren't a black hole. I guess it doesn't mean what I thought it did.