Slashdot Mirror


Miscalculation Invalidates LHC Safety Assurances

KentuckyFC writes "In a truly frightening study, physicists at the University of Oxford have identified a massive miscalculation that makes the LHC safety assurances more or less invalid (abstract). The focus of their work is not the safety of particle accelerators per se but the chances of any particular scientific argument being wrong. 'If the probability estimate given by an argument is dwarfed by the chance that the argument itself is flawed, then the estimate is suspect,' say the team. That has serious implications for the LHC, which some people worry could generate black holes that will swallow the planet. Nobody at CERN has put a figure on the chances of the LHC destroying the planet. One study simply said: 'there is no risk of any significance whatsoever from such black holes.' The danger is that this thinking could be entirely flawed, but what are the chances of this? The Oxford team say that roughly one in a thousand scientific papers have to be withdrawn because of errors but generously suppose that in particle physics, the rate is one in 10,000."

36 of 684 comments (clear)

  1. What is the probability... by collinstocks · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...that these researchers are wrong about the probability that the other researchers are wrong?

    1. Re:What is the probability... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      ...that these researchers are wrong about the probability that the other researchers are wrong?

      1 in 1000. But only if they are right. If so the probability is zero. If they are wrong then its obviously 1. In any case, 42 seems like a good number for this type of question...

  2. Re:Voodoo Science by madsenj37 · · Score: 5, Funny

    If they are correct, what are the chances they are wrong (or right)?

    --
    Choosing the lesser of two evils is a choice for evil.
  3. ObUserFriendly by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 3, Funny
    --
    Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
  4. Re:Are they good for anything? by setagllib · · Score: 3, Funny

    Great. Now in a matter of years we'll have hippies protesting abuse of Nature's Own Black Holes for generating power. It's not really sustainable energy if all the mass you add to the hole extends its event horizon. (Does it?)

    --
    Sam ty sig.
  5. Re:My first thought from reading this by Xtravar · · Score: 5, Funny

    I STILL don't think the LHC will kill us all but the fact we're debating it says something.

    I don't know what you're trying to imply here.

    People are still debating evolution.

    --
    Buckle your ROFL belt, we're in for some LOLs.
  6. Bring it on! by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Funny

    My retirement fund is pretty much crushed at this point.
    Being consumed by black holes created by a multibillion dollar scientific whiz-ma-gig is sounding like a pretty good exit plan.

  7. Re:Are they good for anything? by aliquis · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just feed them the darkety kind and we'll never miss it.

  8. Well, the good news is by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Funny

    That this would be the end of the world that neo-cons hope and pray for. Now, they will not have to see a black president in for long, nor take responsibility for their actions.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  9. In the words of Dr Brian Cox by BeardedChimp · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Anyone Who Thinks the LHC Will Destroy the World is a Twat"

    He's a particle physicist from my physics department (Manchester), and hence let it be known Oxford physicists are twats!

  10. Heart of Gold by dangitman · · Score: 4, Funny

    'If the probability estimate given by an argument is dwarfed by the chance that the argument itself is flawed, then the estimate is suspect,'

    But if the improbability is large enough, and you hook it up to a nice, hot cup of tea; then we'll travel instantaneously through every point of the Universe, and possibly create a worried-looking whale and a bowl of petunias.

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  11. Re:Voodoo Science by camperdave · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hell, it's technically "possible" (in the sense that anything is possible) that me getting out of bed in the morning will destroy the earth. It doesn't seem likely, though, and no one has successfully convinced me that I'm dangerous, so I'm going to get out of bed in the morning.

    You almost had a good excuse for staying in bed there. "Sorry Boss. I can't come to work today because if I get out of bed I might destroy the planet."

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  12. hubris by mtrachtenberg · · Score: 2, Funny

    What were the experts' odds on Chernobyl?

  13. Re:Voodoo Science by BeardedChimp · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well if we want to find out who's right, we can just keep an eye on their webcam for anything suspicious.

  14. Re:A simple reason by Shadow-isoHunt · · Score: 2, Funny

    But what if we don't die? What if we discover that we've been living in a black hole this whole time and the current universe's edges are simply the expanding event horizon? Living in a black hole within a black hole would be neat! I wanna press the red button :(

    --
    www.isoHunt.com
  15. Re:Are they good for anything? by Chabo · · Score: 2, Funny

    The real problems come in when aliens from outside our space-time continuum try to harvest their young in your warp core, thinking it's a natural gravity well! Time starts doing some whacky stuff!

    --
    Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
  16. Re:Are they good for anything? by BobNET · · Score: 4, Funny

    true - but if you have a stable black hole you risk the chance of losing containment... which could be bad...

    I'm fuzzy on the whole good/bad thing. What do you mean "bad"?

  17. Re:Voodoo Science by Thiez · · Score: 3, Funny

    > You don't say, "Oh well, we don't know for sure that anything bad will happen, so we'll just assume that it won't." That is voodoo science.

    I say that to myself every time I put on my coat. I know I am lying to myself - with our limited understanding of the universe putting on clothes may very well trigger an unforseen event that destroys the solar system - but the snow outside has convinced me to sacrifice a little intellectual integrity in exchange for being able to wear my coat. Don't worry, I'm not taking too many risks: I'm not wearing anything underneath.

  18. Re:Voodoo Science by CaptainPatent · · Score: 3, Funny

    Essentially their argument boils down to because people make mistakes and we can calculate the odds of them making a mistake, if they calculate the odds of something and it's greater than the odds of them having made a mistake then you have to use the odds of them making a mistake as the probability of the event happening.

    Nuh-uh, that argument is solid and well formed.

    Hey, I have another "scientific" theory, 1 out of every 460 scientific papers are about artificial intelligence, That means the LHC is alive and we don't even know it yet.!

    --
    Well, back to rejecting software patent applications.
  19. Re:Voodoo Science by amRadioHed · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah it is voodoo. If I calculate that there is a 1:10^20 chance an asteroid will destroy the earth this month, and someone else figures there is a 1:50 chance I am wrong, that does not make the odds of an asteroid destroying the earth 1:50. As wrong as the person calculating the odds are, the odds are still going to be incredibly small.

    If what you were saying was true we could destroy the earth by having a 10 year old do the calculations since they would almost certainly be wrong.

    --
    We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
  20. Re:Voodoo Science by mh1997 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hey, I have another "scientific" theory, 1 out of every 460 scientific papers are about artificial intelligence, That means the LHC is alive and we don't even know it yet.!

    You are wrong, it is not alive. It just emailed me and said that there was nothing to see here and keep moving along.

  21. Re:Are they good for anything? by artor3 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who would remember if we all died?

    The race of intelligent beings who, millions of years from now, finds a small black hole orbiting a star, with a flag on its moon.

    Honestly, if the human race has to end, that is exactly how I want us to go out.

  22. Re:Meh.... not really a problem by Krater76 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe that's why we haven't met any aliens. The alien societies all get to the point where they develop their versions of the LHC and annihilate themselves due to an underestimation of the consequences.

    --
    "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
  23. Re:Voodoo Science by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Funny

    When it comes right down to it, though, the odds of creating a dangerous black hole is effectively zero, as evidenced by the fact that the various bodies of the solar system aren't black holes.

    So what happened to the other 200 planets?

  24. Re:Voodoo Science by Hal_Porter · · Score: 5, Funny

    No need for that. You can subscribe to this RSS feed

    http://www.hasthelhcdestroyedtheearth.com/rss.xml

    This is funny too

    http://www.hasthelhcdestroyedtheearth.com/robots.txt

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  25. Re:My first thought from reading this by s1lhouette · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am sorry, The THEORY of evolution and the THEORY of creation both imply that I am somehow related to the people who make LOL cats and I just can not accept that. I CAN NOT accept that.

  26. Re:Uncertainty and certainty by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    How many times can we roll the dice before our luck runs out?

    Every single time. After that, there won't be any more dice to roll, or anyone to roll them if they did exist.

    If we had some dice, we could roll them, if we existed.

  27. Re:A simple reason by failedlogic · · Score: 3, Funny

    Are you really sure about this? I've played Katamari Damacy and a small little ball starting at less than 1 cm, bumps into random things thus growing in size. Eventually, the ball is able to roll over and absorb the earth, other planets, stars and other galaxies and (presumably black holes). What's left after I don't know - it was an computer-based physics simulation played on my television screen.

  28. Re:Voodoo Science by maugle · · Score: 4, Funny

    I have calculated that there is almost no chance of money spontaneously raining out of the sky above me. However, I was drunk when I made those calculations, so they are most certainly wrong.

    *waits expectantly*

  29. Re:My first thought from reading this by yancey · · Score: 2, Funny

    It makes me shiver just to think about it.

    --
    Ouch! The truth hurts!
  30. Re:An excerise in stating the bloody obvious by eli+pabst · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's both right and wrong.

    Yes, yes, but what is it if I look inside the box?

  31. Re:Voodoo Science by mcrbids · · Score: 3, Funny

    Welcome to slashdot, where an insightful post such as yours is moderated up as funny...

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
  32. Re:Voodoo Science by daveime · · Score: 2, Funny

    So put your erection in the black hole, and give humanity a 5 hour reprieve then.

  33. Re:An excerise in stating the bloody obvious by qc_dk · · Score: 2, Funny

    Spartaaaaaa?

  34. Re:Uncertainty and certainty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    As long as it's uncertain, move it closer to France.

  35. Re:Voodoo Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Even funnier is the html code for the home page:
    http://www.hasthelhcdestroyedtheearth.com/

    View the page source and enjoy.