Slashdot Mirror


Stanford's Quantum Hologram Sets Storage Record

eldavojohn writes "It's often assumed that representing data reaches a limit when you get to the point that an atom represents one bit in some form or fashion. But Stanford University researchers have used a quantum hologram model to store the characters 'S' and 'U' by encoding the data at a rate of 35 bits per electron."

32 of 210 comments (clear)

  1. versus USB by KingAlanI · · Score: 3, Funny

    And I thought my 8GB USB flash drive was high-density! (20mm x 54mm x 8mm)

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    1. Re:versus USB by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wow, the only thing more dense is Stanford's quantum hologram. A close second, as usual, is the first post, followed by the secretary at work.

  2. STFU... by Narnie · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sweet... now they're just a 'T' and 'F' away from writing something useful.

    --
    greed@All_Evils:~#
    1. Re:STFU... by pnevin · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sweet... now they're just a 'T' and 'F' away from writing something useful.

      That's just cynical. Everyone knows that this is just a step towards the ultimate goal - an 16-atom-tall image of Princess Leia.

    2. Re:STFU... by Bysshe · · Score: 3, Funny

      with C and K you get quantum pr0n...

      and then you can get your protons off.

      --
      Read what I mean, not what I wrote.
  3. That's great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    And by letting S=0 and U=1 we can now represent a bit using 70 bits! Oh wai-

    1. Re:That's great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      And by letting S=0 and U=1 we can now represent a bit using 70 bits! Oh wai-

      You'll be hearing from Microsoft's patent lawyers.

  4. Dwell not by dmomo · · Score: 4, Funny

    At least your device is also capable of holding the "B"

    1. Re:Dwell not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I heard they were working on "C" and "K"...

  5. Re:Sub nano data recovery??? by Clever7Devil · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's why you need redundancy. Do I hear 2 atoms?

    --
    "By the time they had diminished from 50 to 8, the other dwarves began to suspect 'Hungry.'" -Gary Larson
  6. Re:Sub nano data recovery??? by CastrTroy · · Score: 5, Funny

    So, would that leave you with a Redundant Independant Array of Atoms (RIAA)? Perfect for storing my music.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  7. Re:Sub nano data recovery??? by pushing-robot · · Score: 4, Funny

    But that could get expensive fast. How much does each atom cost?

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
  8. Re:Neat by nine-times · · Score: 4, Funny

    One thing most 'futurists' agree on is that the ultimate 'end game' of technology appears to be the conversion of all matter in the solar system into machine parts and computational elements. It's a logical end result of exponential growth. (and, actually, would be only the beginning : such a 'civilization' would eventually grow to convert the entire universe, but this would take much longer due to the snails pace of light)

    What makes you think this hasn't already happened? Maybe we're part of a big computer thats trying to answer some kind of big question or something.

    Actually, never mind. That seems infinitely improbable to me.

  9. Re:Neat by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe we're just somebody's porn collection.

    --
    This space available.
  10. Re:Neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Probably, it explains why i am permanently aroused by every single thing around me, even that comma.

  11. Re:Neat by DigiShaman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well that's good. At least we will be the last thing to be deleted on the vast cosmic hard drive.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  12. How much data? by LingNoi · · Score: 2, Funny

    The article didn't go into any detail about this.

    Anyone know how many libraries of congress this is?

  13. Re:Wowie! by Selfbain · · Score: 4, Funny

    My god! You're so right! We should like totally stop doing research because it's so hard and takes effort.

    --
    Well, it has never been successfully tested.
  14. Re:Sub nano data recovery??? by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 4, Funny

    They should do it with positrons.

    Are you sure?

  15. Re:Sub nano data recovery??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    $.99 per atom.
    Molecules are $9.99

    ipod nano compatible.

  16. Yeah but... by geminidomino · · Score: 2, Funny

    Read the fine print

    "35 bits per electron.*"

    1 kilobit=1000 bits
    1 bit=1000 bquarks

    Goddamn marketers! It's 1024!

  17. Screw bytes per dollar by kkrajewski · · Score: 5, Funny

    I want the most bytes per MOLE next time I shop for a hard disk!

    1. Re:Screw bytes per dollar by tool462 · · Score: 2, Funny

      6.02e23 ought to be enough for anybody.

  18. Re:Carbon-13 storage by Yeti.SSM · · Score: 5, Funny

    Radioactive storage anyone?

    Then all your pr0n collection would decay after some time. Not a viable solution.

    --
    R Tape loading error, 0:1
  19. Re:Neat by kitsunewarlock · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, the comma is un-questionably the sluttiest punctuation mark in the english language; personally I prefer the exoticism of the semi-colon, but people exclaim that I'm some kind of fetishist!

    --
    Ginga no Rekshiya Mata Each page.
  20. Re:Sub nano data recovery??? by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1, Funny

    Willing to swap Melbourne weather for any weather from the USA or Siberia

    I'll get the truck. *so* not used to 43c days.

    --
    Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  21. Re:Neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    (I think therefore I am. Etc...)

    Sorry to burst your bubble: that statement has a false premise, and a circular argument.

    It's most likely that you don't exist.

  22. Re:Sub nano data recovery??? by noidentity · · Score: 2, Funny

    So, would that leave you with a Redundant Independant Array of Atoms (RIAA)? Perfect for storing my music.

    But that could get expensive fast. How much does each atom cost?

    Similar to homeopathy, the RIAA's civil damages seem inversely proportional to the amount, so I'm not sure we can represent the cost of an atom.

  23. Re:Neat by antibryce · · Score: 4, Funny

    when I was 10-11 my dad caught me looking at porn on our C64. The next day my mom made him pack the computer up for several years until we got a new PC.

    Let's hope God doesn't have a mom.

  24. Re:Neat by OolimPhon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Bah! It's universes all the way up!

  25. Re:Sub nano data recovery??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    He's positive

  26. Rumor I Heard by qzak · · Score: 2, Funny

    I hear this is replacing Blu-Ray as the basis for the storage disk for the PS4, which now has an estimated MSRP of $4260285021.99.