Slashdot Mirror


Google Search Flagging Everything As Potentially Harmful

dowlingw writes "It looks like for the moment at least, all Google results are failing the malware checks and being listed with a warning 'This site may harm your computer,' including all pages from Google themselves. Users trying to visit pages at search results will only be able to proceed via manual manipulation of the search result link to remove the Google click-through (which is also broken). Until Google fixes this bug, it looks Google web search is useless." Update: 01/31 at 15:16 GMT by SS: The problem now appears to be fixed.
Update: 01/31 at 22:01 GMT by KD : Google has now posted an explanation, apologizing and taking responsibility for the "human error" that led to the problem.

41 of 407 comments (clear)

  1. Broke the internets! by x78 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who googled google..

    --
    Don't panic
    1. Re:Broke the internets! by kiyoshigawa · · Score: 5, Funny

      I initially figured that this was an attack on FOSS since I was looking up where to install gdm themes and all the linux sites said they were potentially harmful.

      Little did I know it was really skynet.

      --
      So sayeth Tim.
    2. Re:Broke the internets! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      i searched for "site:google.com -google" and got "Britney spears big tits" as the 5th match.

    3. Re:Broke the internets! by telchine · · Score: 4, Funny
    4. Re:Broke the internets! by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Funny

      Little did I know it was really skynet.

      iptables -I INPUT 1 -p udp --dport skynet -j DROP
      iptables -I INPUT 1 -p tcp --dport skynet -j DROP

      There, I saved the human race. Do I get chicks now?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    5. Re:Broke the internets! by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Insightful

      http://flickr.com/photos/tonyaustin/3241509252/ [flickr.com]

      Maybe Google is just flagging itself as harmful because it knows that Google doesn't respect your privacy ;)

      (Sad thing is I'm only half joking....)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    6. Re:Broke the internets! by h4rm0ny · · Score: 4, Funny


      No you get John Connor. Sorry.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    7. Re:Broke the internets! by dotancohen · · Score: 4, Funny

      i searched for "site:google.com -google" and got "Britney spears big tits" as the 5th match.

      Nice try, getting all of slashdot to DDoS Google just when they are showing signs of weakness.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  2. Clearly... by Caduceus1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Skynet - er, Google - has become self-aware and has deemed that the entire Internet is harmful to us power sour - I mean, humans, and is protecting us for some reason it has not divulged yet...

    --
    rm /dev/mem
    Sci-Fi Storm
    1. Re:Clearly... by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm not a female but I play one on the internet.

  3. Adsense Still Works by alphatel · · Score: 4, Informative

    Results from Adsense which appear at the top aren't getting flagged as malicious, so advertisers are at least free from the damage (but not on their regular indexed link).

    --
    When the foot seeks the place of the head, the line is crossed. Know your place. Keep your place. Be a shoe.
  4. Not entirely useless by Reivec · · Score: 4, Informative

    It isn't entirely useless, you can still get the link for your results, it is just overly annoying. I also found that it was NOT flagging youtube sites, which I found interesting.

  5. Easier workaround for Firefox users by Ambiguous+Puzuma · · Score: 5, Informative
  6. What am I supposed to do now? by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't want to use Yahoo and I'd rather turn off my computer than use Microsoft's Live search.

    Time to see if Alta Vista still exists.

    1. Re:What am I supposed to do now? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Funny

      For the time being, I'd avoid this weblink issue altogether and just use archie.

  7. I knew the Internet was evil! by zach_the_lizard · · Score: 4, Funny

    I knew the Internet was bad for you!

    Now Google confirms it!

    --
    SSC
  8. Layoffs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    So I heard Google was having some layoffs recently...

  9. Well... by Pherlin · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm glad I'm not THAT guy... Resume: 2009 - Brokeded Google.

  10. slashdotted already by buchner.johannes · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Also, the sites

    www.stopbadware.org/
    and
    www.google.at/support/bin/answer.py?answer=45449&topic=360&hl=de&sa=X&oi=malwarewarninglink&resnum=1&ct=help

    were slashdotted before this was even on slashdot ...

    --
    NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
  11. Not a common carrier by mangu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This feature, no doubt implemented with good intentions, show the perils of the nanny state so many politicians all over the world are proposing. Why should Google police the internet?

    They should act like the phone company used to be, a common carrier just sending through the information, for better or worse.

    Of course, I understand that Google isn't an ISP, so the "common carrier" principle does not apply. They are just providing a service for me, without charging me directly. But the principle is the same, if I wanted some sort of protection from malware there are many places where I can get it by asking, I do not need to be protected involuntarily.

    1. Re:Not a common carrier by ScuzzMonkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think what it really shows the perils of is piling additional "features" on top of a perfectly good product until you've ruined what made it good in the first place and turned it into worthless crap. Search should be simple: give the user what they are looking for. All the other extraneous stuff they are loading it up with is bound to interfere with that basic requirement at some point.

      I see this in mature development projects all the time. At some point, people get a pretty good product working, but they can't repress the urge to continue "improving" it... it can be boredom, wow factor for marketing, or just plain stupidity, but few people or organizations seem to know when to quit messing with a product that already works well.

      --
      No relation to Happy Monkey
  12. their check site failed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Google use stopbadware.org to check if a site is bad or not - this site is down.

    I think it should work when it's back up.

  13. Yahoo has changed by Patrick+Manderson · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow! Yahoo looks a lot different than it used to.

  14. No cache, either by ciaohound · · Score: 4, Funny

    If I'm nervous about the site, I look at Google's cache instead. Well, that's no longer available either. Sheesh!

    --
    Oh, yeah, it's not easy to pad these out to 120 characters.
  15. Finally by techsoldaten · · Score: 4, Funny

    Finally, a company just comes out and says what we all know: the entire Internet is dangerous and must be stopped.

  16. Has anyone considered... by sphealey · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Has anyone considered the possibility that as of this morning 95% of the sites on the Internet are infected with malware?

    sPh

  17. out of beta by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yay! I'm finally out of beta!

    --
    This guy's the limit!
  18. Re:Even Google by sveard · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's a good thing I took lots of pictures for the "pics or it didn't happen" crowd :)

  19. Exit to parking lot, run in serpentine fashion! by GreyLurk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Someone is so getting fired for this.

    This is the first Google effective downtime in my memory.. Were there other ones that anyone can think of?

    1. Re:Exit to parking lot, run in serpentine fashion! by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 4, Informative

      I work for Google.

      Someone is so getting fired for this.

      I would bet a lot of money that won't happen. Any failure like this one has many sides to it and responsibility will always be distributed over multiple people. The result of this will be a detailed post mortem, better processes, tools, and software, to ensure that something like it does not happen again.

      This is the first Google effective downtime in my memory.. Were there other ones that anyone can think of?

      google.com stopped resolving back in 2005 for 15 minutes. Nobody got fired.

  20. Re:Not Useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    There are other search engines.

    yes, but they link to another internet

  21. Re:Not Useless by ciderVisor · · Score: 5, Funny

    There are other search engines.

    Why do you hate America ?

    --
    Squirrel!
  22. They broke one thing to fix something else by gcnaddict · · Score: 4, Interesting

    serials.ws is now no longer showing as harmful. It seems like they disabled the engine entirely.

    --
    Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
    1. Re:They broke one thing to fix something else by pabens · · Score: 5, Funny

      It seems like they disabled the engine entirely.

      someone threw a chair at it

  23. Failsafe by fyrewulff · · Score: 5, Interesting

    At least it failsafes to every site being flagged. Much better than it just letting people get malware ridden sites.

    --
    "We need to get over this notion, that, for Apple to win... Microsoft must lose." - Steve Jobs, 1997
    1. Re:Failsafe by thebjorn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      At least it failsafes to every site being flagged. Much better than it just letting people get malware ridden sites.

      You must be kidding? 15 minutes of the entire planet being without our precious Google is *much* better than some stupid yahoo getting a virus from his pr0n site? Not to me, at least...

  24. Re:Even Google by bechthros · · Score: 4, Funny

    yes, but now how do you appease the "everything is photoshop" crowd?

  25. Google Announcement by suntory · · Score: 5, Funny

    Today, Google announced that Google is still in beta...

  26. Re:Not Useless by GuldKalle · · Score: 5, Funny

    Be careful. According to google, Yahoo.com could be harmful to your computer!

    --
    What?
  27. Re:Not Useless by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Funny

    Only if Microsoft had bought them ;)

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  28. Explanation from official Google Blog by FleaPlus · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's the explanation from Google's official blog:

    http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/01/this-site-may-harm-your-computer-on.html

    What happened? Very simply, human error. Google flags search results with the message "This site may harm your computer" if the site is known to install malicious software in the background or otherwise surreptitiously. We do this to protect our users against visiting sites that could harm their computers. We work with a non-profit called StopBadware.org to get our list of URLs. StopBadware carefully researches each consumer complaint to decide fairly whether that URL belongs on the list. Since each case needs to be individually researched, this list is maintained by humans, not algorithms.

    We periodically receive updates to that list and received one such update to release on the site this morning. Unfortunately (and here's the human error), the URL of '/' was mistakenly checked in as a value to the file and '/' expands to all URLs. Fortunately, our on-call site reliability team found the problem quickly and reverted the file. Since we push these updates in a staggered and rolling fashion, the errors began appearing between 6:27 a.m. and 6:40 a.m. and began disappearing between 7:10 and 7:25 a.m., so the duration of the problem for any particular user was approximately 40 minutes.