Slashdot Mirror


Apple's Terms No Longer Allow ITMS Purchases Outside of US

JasonDT writes "I just accepted the new terms of service for iTunes and found that I will no longer be allowed to access US iTunes outside of the United States. This may seem like no big deal but, I am a US citizen living abroad and I regularly purchase and view TV and movies from AppleTV. Not to mention US citizens just traveling abroad. Does anyone know if this has been enforced or have themselves been affected by this?"

42 of 319 comments (clear)

  1. Quick someone register itunesproxy.com by Foofoobar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Register itunesproxy.com before apple does!!!

    --
    This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    1. Re:Quick someone register itunesproxy.com by Yvan256 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Even better, someone register itunes.apple.com, quick!

  2. Re:US and Canada? by geekoid · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes, Canada is still outside the US...for now~

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  3. HA HA HA HA by jhfry · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I bet that the poster of this article is exploring his options, after all, he's not allow to purchase his media legally, so perhaps he would be better served by a free alternative?

    I am sure Apple did it only to make someone else happy (labels, investors, foreign governments, us government, etc...) however, it's ridiculous to suggest that this will do anything but increase piracy.

    --
    Sometimes the best solution is to stop wasting time looking for an easy solution.
    1. Re:HA HA HA HA by repvik · · Score: 4, Informative

      You know Spotify has done the same? A fair bit of music is unavailable in several countries due to licensing issues.
      This isn't Apple, Spotify or any stores fault. It's the music business.
      Yay for making it easy for consumers to buy music.

    2. Re:HA HA HA HA by linhares · · Score: 4, Funny

      YES I AM BRAZILIAN INFERIOR HUMAN BEING and I had one account with a US address and an itunes card. Shit, I fucking said yes to the EULA or SLA when prompted. GOD DAMN YOU, APPLE! Now I can get no new apps for my iPhone. Oh well, just one more thing: GOD DAMN YOU APPLE! I'm just switching to Android as soon as it's available here in Banana Republics.

    3. Re:HA HA HA HA by FerociousFerret · · Score: 5, Informative

      Bought that song on your computer at work? Want to listen to it on your computer at home? Well guess what, charlie, unless you find some obscure bullshit setting in some hidden window in some far off corner of some far off menu in iTunes, $1 more shall go to the Steve.

      What??!?!? Do you not know how to transfer a file from one computer to another??? Find the file in your music library, email it to yourself or put it on a thumb drive or whatever, and load it on your home computer. When prompted, input your iTMS account info to get the DRM key to play the file (that is assuming you used a different iTMS account on your work computer than your home computer). Seriously, this "obscure bullshit setting in some hidden window" is just stupid talk.

    4. Re:HA HA HA HA by Yaztromo · · Score: 3, Informative

      The DRM serves their profit-driven interests. Bought that song on your computer at work? Want to listen to it on your computer at home? Well guess what, charlie, unless you find some obscure bullshit setting in some hidden window in some far off corner of some far off menu in iTunes, $1 more shall go to the Steve.

      What complete and total ass-hattery.

      1. Copying protected iTunes Music from Work to Home only ever required a one-time registration of your home computer, by selecting "Store -> Authorize Computer" from the iTunes menus. iTunes has always allowed you to authorize up to five systems in this way. Once authorized, you can copy the music files between these systems at will. Hardly "obscure" -- it isn't even "buried" in a sub-menu.
      2. Perhaps you missed the announcement -- Apple announced the removal of DRM from all its music files by April 2009, with a significant quantity of their library already DRM free on the day of the announcement, nearly a month ago.

      So if DRM serves their profit-driven interests, what does the removal of DRM from every song they sell in the iTunes Store serve in your twisted version of reality?

      Now please wipe the foam from your mouth. Yes, Apple exists to make a profit. It seems to me that they do so by making products that people want to own for themselves, and by being an advocate for their customers in their dealings with other companies.

      BTW, Microsoft's subscription model (which is way heavier on DRM than iTunes ever was) is virtually ignored because most people consider it vastly inferior. Who wants to pay a fee each and every month to listen to music, only to lose all their music should they stop paying? How many times do you feel the need to pay for that copy of Baba O'Riley anyway?

      Yaz.

  4. You are subject to laws of where you live by ducomputergeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    not where you were born. When I was an American living and working in Germany, I was subject to the laws of Germany. I couldn't download a browser with more than 40-bit encryption at the time due to export regulations. Yes I was an American citizen, but I wasn't in the united states.
    Now, if you are working on behalf of the US government at a diplomatic consulate/mission or in the military, then you may have a gripe, and I believe Apple should do something to work with you. Especially if your billing is to an APO address.

    Just because I'm american and we are allowed the freedom of speech inside the US doesn't mean I can have a copy of Mein Kampf in Germany.

    --
    "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    1. Re:You are subject to laws of where you live by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just because I'm american and we are allowed the freedom of speech inside the US doesn't mean I can have a copy of Mein Kampf in Germany.

      LOL, I think this might be the most sensible post to invoke Godwin's Law ever!

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:You are subject to laws of where you live by JustinOpinion · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't think the submitter is complaining that what iTunes is doing is illegal (or that he should be subject to US law while abroad). I think he is complaining that what iTunes is doing is stupid.

      He wants to be a customer. He wants to give them money. But they (iTunes, or whichever content providers require this rule) want to restrict things regionally. These regional restrictions are inconvenient, arbitrary, and illogical in an age of ubiquitous global network connectivity, and easy trans-national travel. Someone abroad can circumvent the restrictions easily with a proxy. Conversely a US citizen on a trip abroad is denied access (whereas it would have been fine if they had downloaded it while in the US and carried it on their computer on the plane). Thus it doesn't seem that the rule accomplishes its nominal goal. Actually for the most part the nominal goal isn't even clear. In short, the restrictions are silly.

      Of course it is within iTune's ability (technical and legal) to impose such restrictions. But it just seems illogical, since anywhere that the content is not available through a legitimate source (or available but only after a substantial delay) will simply increase the amount of circumvention (proxy, file sharing, etc.). So why don't these companies want the money being offered to them?

    3. Re:You are subject to laws of where you live by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It also is quite wrong. It is legal to own "Mein Kampf" in Germany. It is not legal to sell, give or even show it to somebody else. It is also illegal to purchase it as far as I know.
      Possession however is fine.

    4. Re:You are subject to laws of where you live by statusbar · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe they could hold a book burning party

      --jeffk++

      --
      ipv6 is my vpn
    5. Re:You are subject to laws of where you live by filthpickle · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, it breaks down like this: it's illegal to buy it, it's legal to own it but, if you're the proprietor of a kampf bar, it's legal to sell it. It's legal to carry it, which doesn't really matter 'cause â" get a load of this â" if the cops stop you, it's illegal for them to search you.

    6. Re:You are subject to laws of where you live by muuh-gnu · · Score: 4, Informative

      It is neither of those. The copyright to mein kampf and other Nazi works fell to the state of bavaria, which by copyright simply doesnt allow any copying of mein kampf and hasnt since the second world war. If you happen to have one of the old copies from the WW2, or you bought it a state that doesnt reckognize avarias copyright on it, youre perfectly fine to do anything you want with it. Of course, there are several anti-nazi-agitation laws and selling the book on ebay may invoke some of those laws, but theres nothing specific to this one book and applies to all nazi memorabilia.

    7. Re:You are subject to laws of where you live by vux984 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He wants to be a customer. He wants to give them money. But they (iTunes, or whichever content providers require this rule) want to restrict things regionally.

      In some cases yes, in many cases its not that they WANT to restrict things, its that they HAVE to.

      If Warner owns song X in the US, and Sony owns it Brazil, then no matter how much Warner wants to sell you the song in Brazil they CAN'T. And if Sony owns it but doesn't want to sell it, or wants to sell it but charge more than Warner, that's life. Warner can't do squat about it except say, hey, come to the US and buy a copy while you are actually here.

      In the case I describe Warner isn't trying to restrict things regionally, but don't own the rights to distribute the song in Brazil, and someone else does, so they just can't.

  5. Don't feel special by chrism238 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Similarly, Australians traveling overseas cannot access (their money in) the Australian iTunes store. Don't feel special.

    1. Re:Don't feel special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      As someone who has visited Australia several times over the past few years, I'm wondering why the Aussies would want to travel overseas.

      Bored with the moderate weather in NSW? Move to QLD.
      Bored with the stoner culture around southern coastal QLD? Move to SA.
      Want better wines? Move to WA.
      Want to get away from civilization? Move to the NT.
      Want to get away from the oppressive heat? Move to Victoria.

      Feeling REALLY interested and want to travel to strange and exotic lands?
      Well, there's always Tazmania.

  6. Re:US and Canada? by Yvan256 · · Score: 4, Informative

    No idea, but it's something you don't have to worry about if you get your media from other sources that don't keep on putting up artificial barriers...

  7. Re:US and Canada? by ducomputergeek · · Score: 3, Funny

    Meh, let them keep it. It half full of French anyway....

    --
    "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
  8. Compartmentalizing the Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Welcome to the dismantling of the internet. If you have the slightest knowledge of how media cartels work, not just American ones but World wide, then you know it was just a matter of time before market segmentation reared its ugly head onto the web. Google is not exempt either, they've been IP filtering their early days.

  9. Deployed by donaggie03 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As a deployed American soldier (Afghanistan) who has downloaded many songs from Itunes over the last year, I just have to say this change is ridiculous! That is all.

    --
    Three days from now?? Thats tomorrow!! ~Peter Griffin
  10. Geography - not nationality by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 4, Informative

    This has nothing to do with being an USA citizen and all about where you are geographically located. If you have a credit card registered to a USA address, then you can buy quite happily from the US store (Apple isn't going to know the real story), but not if you have a non-USA address. This policy has been in place since day 1 of the iTunes store, and is in place because of the distribution rights set in place by the record companies, so in reality this is a non-story.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    1. Re:Geography - not nationality by davecb · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Odd, I have a Canadian credit card and itunes still takes my money (;-))

      --dave

      --
      davecb@spamcop.net
  11. it hasn't been enforced by stress_weenie · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This policy is not new. It has been around for at least a year. But I live outside the US (and I am a US citizen... not that it matters in this case) and I still regularly purchase and download and watch TV shows and movies on iTunes. In fact, it is the only software that lets me do this. Amazon and other alternatives disable their service outside the US.

    1. Re:it hasn't been enforced by Ertman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Amazon even disables their service within the US if you don't use a US credit card. (I can walk into any record store in the US while on vacation and buy a CD or DVD using my credit card, but I can't buy songs or videos from Amazon because I don't have a US billing address. How silly.)

  12. Amazon MP3 by Rinisari · · Score: 3, Informative

    Try out Amazon MP3.

    It's cheap, DRM-less, and easy. Plus, it runs on Linux just fine (32-bit has packages, force it on 64-bit, use getlibs, and it works fine).

    YEARwithoutDRM

    1. Re:Amazon MP3 by Lars+T. · · Score: 5, Informative

      Try out Amazon MP3.

      It's cheap, DRM-less, and easy. Plus

      ... it can't be used outside the USA either. Great alternative there.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  13. Completely out of control by paulthomas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The last time I was presented with the "agreement" for the iTunes store, I pulled up a terminal and ran wc on it. It was 4,931 words long, not including referenced agreements. You can go buy a CD at a store with out signing a contract, much less one nearly 5,000 words long.

    It contained all manor of claims of how Apple could unilaterally change the terms for purchased music and required that you "agree to agree" to future terms.

    Having taken some contract law courses ( but IANAHPAADL - I am not a highly paid Apple attack dog lawyer), much of it seemed unconscionable. Specifically, consideration from Apple (ability to play already purchased songs, access the store, etc.) seems weak-to-non-existent in light of the fact that it can be arbitrarily revoked according to the terms.

    Also, I am generally an Apple fan, but this is one area where I think they are really out of control.

  14. Re:US and Canada? by MightyYar · · Score: 3, Funny

    The TOS specifically mentions the annexation of Canada.

    It's official people.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  15. Re:US and Canada? by Daniel+Weis · · Score: 5, Funny

    By French, I'll assume you mean freedom.

  16. Re:use torrents by MightyYar · · Score: 5, Funny

    He could use that service that we never speak about.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  17. iTunes Plus by argent · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's cheap, DRM-less, and easy. And it doesn't install a helper application into your browser, just waiting for someone to figure out how to slide an exploit into a ".amz" file.

    For Safari under Leopard, to remove that erroneous tagging of ".amz" as "safe" (there's no such thing as a "safe" file), remove the entry from ~/Library/Preferences/com.apple.DownloadAssessment.plist .

  18. Re:US and Canada? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Funny

    The TOS specifically mentions the annexation of Canada.

    Apple annexed Canada? Just wow. I didn't know that had that much cash on hand.

    Well, congrats Steve.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  19. Re:US and Canada? by denarii · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, no, it's Russia that wants to annex Alaska.

    Fortunately, we have Palin standing on the coast up there keeping a close eye on them.

  20. Re:US and Canada? by Comatose51 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Shit, when did you guys managed to secede?

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
  21. Re:use torrents by hedwards · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Zune store?

  22. Mac users: easy to work around.. by grogglefroth · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you have another mac in the USA, enable remote ssh logins into it. (Or really, any server that accepts ssh, but since you fell for the Steve Jobs Reality Distortion Field, I'll assume you're on a mac, and you know others with macs in the USA).

    In terminal,
      ssh -D 1080 example.com

    In network preferences,
        Configure your network settings to use a socks proxy on 127.0.0.1:1080

    Now, Safari and iTunes both will be browsing *via* example.com, working around any geolocation features Apple and other companies may be using. This setting is principally only honored by Apple apps; it won't affect Firefox for example (though you can configure Firefox to use a socks proxy).

    --
    Good, Fast, Cheap - Pick any two. - RFC 1925
  23. Re:US and Canada? by Zwicky · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pessimist!

    I prefer to think it half empty of French.

    --
    "Three eyes are better than one" -- Lieutenant Columbo
  24. Re:US and Canada? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's official then ... Canadians are now officially stylish but pointless.

  25. "This isn't right. This isn't even wrong." by weston · · Score: 4, Insightful

    he apple apologists need to seriously STFU with this "it isn't apple's fault!" nonsense. They're partners. Apple is not some holy child that hath cometh down from the mountain to bestow upon the unwashed masses all that is holy and good.

    I'd tell you to a heaping spoonful of STFU yourself, but I think you've done Apple enthusiasts everywhere a service by serving as a quintessential example of knee-jerk Apple Critic. You certainly don't know what you're talking about with regards to how the DRM works, you seem to be ignorant of Apple's actions and stated intentions with regard to said DRM, you seem to have reflexively confused licensing issues with DRM issues, and you seem generally confused about the value and state of other players in the marketplace.

    Exhibit A:

    "Bought that song on your computer at work? Want to listen to it on your computer at home? Well guess what, charlie, unless you find some obscure bullshit setting in some hidden window in some far off corner of some far off menu in iTunes, $1 more shall go to the Steve."

    Anyone who's ever used iTunes on more than a single computer knows there's a simple solution to this problem. It doesn't involve an obscure menu, in fact, iTunes will *prompt* you for the necessary information as soon as you try to play the song.

    Exhibit B:

    A moments of thought would reveal that the geographic restrictions on purchases have little to do with DRM and everything to do with licensing, since DRM (on music anyway) isn't tied to a region, and isn't the technology used in restricting the purchase at any rate.

    Exhibit C:

    "Why do you think people don't use amazon?"

    They do, actually. Their MP3 store launched a year and a half ago and sell about 10% of what iTunes does. Some estimates place them as the #2 digital retailer:

    http://mashable.com/2008/03/26/amazon-mp3-takes-2/

    Furthermore, that figure almost certainly represents sales mostly taken from iTunes. Almost every iPod/iTunes user I know has switched.

    Exhibit D:

    "Or why microsoft's VASTLY superior subscription model is ignored?"

    I can see value in a subscription model, I've participated in Rhapsody and Satellite Radio before. But at the end of the day, many people -- apparently more people -- happily choose ownership of their selection of media rather than ongoing rent to access to a broader selection, so it's not particularly clear that it's a vastly superior model.

    Overall, it appears that the purpose of your post is really to express some ill-defined anger at Apple as a company or to project a straw-man image of people who buy and enjoy their products.

    It certainly isn't to express well-considered criticism of some of the company's practices.

  26. It's been this way for a while. by kklein · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Actually, I got the message that iTMS was not to be used from outside of the US months ago (I live in Japan). They said they might check. Thus far, they haven't. I wouldn't worry about it.

    Also, Amazon MP3 won't sell to me anymore, although they do for my friends. I had to buy a book for work from the US site and registered my Japanese credit card (my work can only reimburse expenditures made in yen), and then, like magic, Amazon MP3 stopped working. I've even tried making a new account with a different US credit card, and yet Amazon now knows I'm in Japan, but doesn't know that my buddy down the street, who has only ever used his US credit card with the US site, is as well.

    I absolutely hate pirating music. I reject it on ethical grounds, and I hate tracks being mis-labeled (I have never entered track names by myself--who are these people who can't spell who are entering ID3 tags on pirated songs???) and having no control over the bitrate I get, and the album art requiring looking and futzing... It's just a shitty way to get music for all involved.

    But when I'm not even allowed to buy it online (except for on CD--which I still do for music I really, really like, so I can rip it lossless), what's a boy to do?

    The world was looking so pretty, without all those borders... Why do companies and governments need to redraw them through technological means? The promise of the internet is being quashed everywhere you look...