Slashdot Mirror


DC CTO Vivek Kundra Named To Top Federal IT Job

DCTechCzar writes "The Obama administration plans to announce it has appointed Vivek Kundra, the District of Columbia's chief technology officer, to take the top information technology post in the federal government, according to a source. Kundra, who has deployed advanced applications to improve the performance of public services during his nearly two years as CTO for the District, will replace Karen Evans as administrator for e-government and information technology in the Office of Management and Budget. The position effectively serves as the federal government's chief information officer. The administration could announce Kundra's appointment as soon as Thursday."

69 of 105 comments (clear)

  1. Anyone know more info about this guy by LingNoi · · Score: 1

    Interesting that they're trying to open up the government more via the internet, however does he have any plans to do anything else?

    1. Re:Anyone know more info about this guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yup, he's like all CTO's...

      Takes credit for what his people did.

      "He deployed" my ass he deployed. He did not do shit other than approve the research and work his people did.

      He sat on his ass and took the credit, I did not see him pulling any cable, setting up the servers and working on the application deployment.

      Posting Anon to keep from getting fired. A DC IT worker.

    2. Re:Anyone know more info about this guy by Ogive17 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, just playing the law of averages.. I'd be willing to guess this guy has some unpaid taxes!

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    3. Re:Anyone know more info about this guy by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You must be a business person. The odds are that he did NOT cheat. Several reasons;
      1. After Richardson and Geither were caught with pant's down, Obama's ppl started hard core vetting EVERYONE. The other 2 were suggested before either Richardson or Geither debacles.
      2. Statistical average.
      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    4. Re:Anyone know more info about this guy by Ark+Ku+Mon · · Score: 1

      1. After Richardson and Geither were caught with pant's down, Obama's ppl started hard core vetting EVERYONE. The other 2 were suggested before either Richardson or Geither debacles.

      You said this before but it's false. See recent and speedy withdrawal of the appointment of Tom Daschle for not paying all of his taxes. That was only last week.

    5. Re:Anyone know more info about this guy by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Daschle was not appointed last week. Obama picked him in Dec. That would be BEFORE Geither's and richardson's debacle.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    6. Re:Anyone know more info about this guy by Ark+Ku+Mon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Daschle was not appointed last week.

      Well of course not as his official nomination was only submitted to the Senate back on the 20th of January, but that was not what I was talking about when I said "last week".

      Obama picked him in Dec. That would be BEFORE Geither's and richardson's debacle.

      And his tax scandal just came out 6 days ago on the 30th of last month which would be LAST WEEK just as I said... I know you think you got some big gotcha on me, but you really didn't.

    7. Re:Anyone know more info about this guy by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      I thought it was an obvious joke.. no need to get bent out of shape. Of COURSE it's a Republican conspiracy.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    8. Re:Anyone know more info about this guy by GovTechGuy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Try this link for more information.

    9. Re:Anyone know more info about this guy by borroff · · Score: 5, Interesting

      In a previous Slashdot posting, some DC residents commented that he was the real deal. He knows his stuff, and gets things done.

      http://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1097003&cid=26519833

      There's also a Washington Post article about Kundra linked to in the comments:

      http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/04/AR2009010401235.html

    10. Re:Anyone know more info about this guy by pagedarby · · Score: 1

      Yes, the city of dc did a lot to democratize data for citizens while Kundra was CTO. It was part of their Capstat project. You can see some of DC's data as part of that project here: http://www.tableausoftware.com/blog/Vivek-kundra-dc-cto-take-obama-CTO-post

    11. Re:Anyone know more info about this guy by Hordeking · · Score: 1

      Why is it so hard to find Democrat appointees who pay their taxes? Didn't Joe Biden say that paying taxes was a form of patriotism?

      No, he said that paying your taxes is a form of patriotism if you're one of the little people who isn't on welfare.

      --
      Disclaimer: The opinions and actions of the US Gov't are in no way representative of those held by this author or its ci
    12. Re:Anyone know more info about this guy by Hordeking · · Score: 1

      If that's what happens with a "hardcore" vetting process, I'd hate to see who'd they nominate if they were going at it willy nilly.

      They'd nominate Jimmy Carter, Lyndon Johnson, Usama Bin Laden, and Michael Vick.

      --
      Disclaimer: The opinions and actions of the US Gov't are in no way representative of those held by this author or its ci
    13. Re:Anyone know more info about this guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Did you really think anyone was stupid enough to believe he went and plugged in all the cables by himself? and would you really want your CTO to spend his time doing that instead of organizing the project like he is supposed to be doing?

      But congrats on posting the silliest complaint i have heard all week.

  2. So any guesses... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    As to how many thousands of unpaid back taxes this appointment has?

    1. Re:So any guesses... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Absolutely NONE. You can bet on it that after Geither showed up with issues that ALL APPOINTMENTS after that were VETTED HARD.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    2. Re:So any guesses... by Ark+Ku+Mon · · Score: 1

      You mean like Tom Daschle?

    3. Re:So any guesses... by WindBourne · · Score: 1
      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    4. Re:So any guesses... by Ark+Ku+Mon · · Score: 1

      But his nomination was submitted to the Senate on the 20th of last month which was AFTER both of those nominees had their scandals come up. Don't you think they would have been smart enough to do some double checking after that point so as to avoid another huge embarrassment? It would seem that if two tax cheats make it through the original vetting process, that I'd be mulling back over the ones I'm about to send out no matter how well I thought they were the first time around.

    5. Re:So any guesses... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      No. He was sent to the senate on Dec 11th. More importantly, I doubt that he realized that the driver would be an issue.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    6. Re:So any guesses... by Ark+Ku+Mon · · Score: 1

      No. He was sent to the senate on Dec 11th.

      No, it wasn't. December 11th was when Obama announced that he would be nominating Daschle, that wasn't when the nomination was submitted. It was submitted on the 20th of January and the official records back me up. From: http://thomas.loc.gov/home/nomis.html

      Nomination: PN64-03-111 Date Received: January 20, 2009 (111st Congress) Nominee: Thomas Andrew Daschle, of South Dakota, to be Secretary of Health and Human Services. Referred to: Senate Finance Legislative Actions Committee Action: January 08, 2009 - Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Hearings held prior to introduction and/or referral. Floor Action: January 20, 2009 - Received in the Senate and referred to the Committee on Finance. Organization: Department of Health and Human Services Control Number: 111PN0006403

      Make sure to read the bolded sections.

    7. Re:So any guesses... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      You need to realize that the Vetting process started way before his nomination was received in the Senate.
      Also, if Tom Dashel didn't tell anyone, how would they know?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  3. Please dig up some facts about this fella by bogaboga · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know he's a very accomplished person, but would like to know whether the new appointee is friendly to Open Source Software and Linux in particular. I am optimistic though because he's been "more open" as compared to the typical government official.

    Now get us the facts about this man.

    1. Re:Please dig up some facts about this fella by shakuni · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Please dig up some facts about this fella by Danathar · · Score: 2, Informative

      He's responsible for for shifting D.C. gov to use cloud computing. (Google Apps for instance)

    3. Re:Please dig up some facts about this fella by GrigorPDX · · Score: 1

      I saw him deliver a keynote address at the Government Open Source Conference in October: http://goscon.org/node/150

      He and his counterpart across the river in Virginia, Aneesh Chopra, are both very open source friendly. Both of them spoke at the conference advocating for open source and open standards, arguing that our government should be as open and transparent as possible.

  4. Re:I wonder if that's the right message by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Informative

    The man moved here when he was 11. He IS an American by upbringing. And watching my wife (a first generation American of Indian descent) it is obvious that they try hard to assimilate here while at home being a bit more Indian.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  5. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  6. Success! by Cornwallis · · Score: 1

    Since DC is running so efficiently now I can't wait for this guy to bring his success to the rest of the nation! Cough-cough Cough-cough Cough-cough Cough-cough Cough-cough Cough-cough Cough-cough Cough-cough Cough-cough...

  7. Re:It aint open by dintech · · Score: 1

    I don't know. The majority of people are stupid. Do you really want them in charge?

  8. But what about... by Stachybotris · · Score: 1

    Almalexia and Sotha Sil? Don't they get positions too?

    1. Re:But what about... by visible.frylock · · Score: 1

      Heretic!

      The true Divines are Tiber Septim, Boethia, and Mara!

      But seriously, I thought the corprus religions in the caves were the single most badass thing about that game. Well, that and being a legally sanctioned hitman.

      --
      Billy Brown rides on. Yolanda Green bypasses Gary White.
  9. Re:It aint open by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You do realize that the United States Government wasn't set up as a pure democracy, right? It was purposefully structured with a layer of abstraction specifically to keep the ignorant masses from having a direct say. The founding fathers were well aware of what they were doing.

  10. Thats my boss! by thisisnotdave · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, I only started here (Office of the CTO) a few days ago, but around here he's very highly regarded and seen as man of vision. Either way congratulations to Vivek and I hope his replacement will be equally qualified.

    1. Re:Thats my boss! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      If by 'vision' you mean jumps on the latest gimmick.

      Piece of advice: Watch your ass and have an exit strategy.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  11. I'd think "D.C." alone is a title of doom. by tjstork · · Score: 4, Informative

    Our non-American friends need to know that as far as cities go, Washington D.C., as a city, is probably the -worst- run city in the USA. Because it is the capitol, not only are they subject to their own local authority, but they are also subject to the whims of the US Congress. The existence of the whole thing is a joke because when the country was founded, the states squabbled even over who would have the honor of the national capitol, such that, eventually a few states kicked in a tiny plot of land, formed the "District of Columbia", and thus, the capitol is its own little piece of land under direct federal jurisdiction, whose habitants actually have no constitutional rights. Since that time, there's been a lot of talk about moving the capitol, or making DC a state, or doing something with it. But right now, we have a total screwed up mess of a city that has really no industry besides government, and the result is that, outside the museums, and government offices, the place is pretty much a big stinking ghetto whose most famous mayor was busted for smoking crack.

    From this, comes our national CIO.

    I'm like, not jumping for joy.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:I'd think "D.C." alone is a title of doom. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I happen to live in DC and have done consulting with Mr. Kundra. While you are correct that we have no real rights, DC has one of the highest standards of living. The city is divided into 4 quadrants and 2 of them are incredibly rich, one is lower and middle class, and yes, one is ghetto.

      You are also incorrect that DC is made of several states. Originally, Maryland and Virginia gave land, but the current city is entirely from Maryland land. As such, becoming part of Maryland or at least being attached somehow to Maryland and its laws has been proposed before as alternatives to statehood.

      Instead of slamming a city you know nothing about, you should criticize the man himself. Having worked with him, I can tell you he creates a culture of fear in his office. None of his clients or employees I have met seem to enjoy him. He also is quite ignorant of IT and DC IT for important services is next to useless. The whole google apps thing is more or less a joke here and not useful in any meaningful way. Instead of focusing on critical services, this man has forced the adoption of gimmicks for the sake of things that "look cool."

      As for people who think this man supports open source, I am sure he does, but know that he also supports Microsoft as well. I happen to be involved with several Microsoft projects with DC and I know a great deal of their systems are MS, so the whole open source thing is just fluff PR.

      Our government here is run so poorly and Vivek is just another part of the problem. He should be working as a junior programmer or help desk at best and not as a CIO/CTO. The man has no charisma whatsoever and is no way qualified to the country. Certainly the scope of DC government far dwarfs many major cities as well and does not translate on the national level. Shame on Obama for such an ill advised appointment. I suppose I should take solace in the fact that like all Vivek's positions and experience, it is meaningless cruft and he can't do any real damage because no one likes him.

    2. Re:I'd think "D.C." alone is a title of doom. by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >or making DC a state

      Two senators for 400k people? No thanks. Its bad enough places like Wyoming get two senators. Why should I have two senators split between 12 million people and they get two senators for so few? This leads to an unequal situation in the senate.

      Just make it part of Virginia and call it a day, but its so poor and crime ridden, no one wants it.

    3. Re:I'd think "D.C." alone is a title of doom. by Duradin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There's this thing called the House of Representatives, you may want to look into it for your representation based on population needs.

    4. Re:I'd think "D.C." alone is a title of doom. by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      >or making DC a state

      Two senators for 400k people? No thanks. Its bad enough places like Wyoming get two senators. Why should I have two senators split between 12 million people and they get two senators for so few? This leads to an unequal situation in the senate.

      Just make it part of Virginia and call it a day, but its so poor and crime ridden, no one wants it.

      God bless our insightful forefathers that made sure places like Wyoming would always have as many senators as everybody else.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    5. Re:I'd think "D.C." alone is a title of doom. by JohnnyKrisma · · Score: 1

      why should "you" have 2 Senators and someone in the District gets none? DC's population is actually higher than Wyoming's and didn't our last VP come from there? Ummm, well now that you mention it, I've changed my mind...

    6. Re:I'd think "D.C." alone is a title of doom. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You obviously have no comprehension of our system of checks and balances. The senate was designed to give equal representation weight amongst all states while the house gives representation proportionate to their population.

      Taxation without representation is the issue that led to our independence. Our nation's capital deserves some sort of voting representation.

    7. Re:I'd think "D.C." alone is a title of doom. by RyoShin · · Score: 3, Informative

      whose most famous mayor was busted for smoking crack.

      And, once he got out of jail, was promptly re-elected. Smoking crack is one thing, and can be attributed to a specific person or small group, but then you have a majority vote to put this person back in office; this is much more telling of the state of D.C.

      I've not been to D.C., but I hear all the horror stories, and I hope that if I ever do have to go there it's as an elected official so I can avoid driving myself around. It mixes the country's elite with tons of urban poor, both fighting within the city for their own views. That, and it houses the majority of lobbyists in the country.

      That said, I won't apply the nastiness of D.C. to one guy I know nothing about. He may well be a proper individual for the job, and highly accomplished in his previous one.

      Even crap has peanuts in it sometimes.

    8. Re:I'd think "D.C." alone is a title of doom. by tjstork · · Score: 1

      Two senators for 400k people? No thanks. Its bad enough places like Wyoming get two senators.

      If there wasn't a bicameral Congress, or an electoral college, then, there would be no small states in the United States. The USA would basically look like New York, PA, Ohio, California, and Florida, populated but lacking farmland or natural resources and as a consequence, national wealth. In particular, until you build a lot of windmills, I wouldn't be ripping Wyoming too much, as, the vast majority of coal for American power plants comes from there.

      --
      This is my sig.
    9. Re:I'd think "D.C." alone is a title of doom. by richsc · · Score: 1

      Not entirely Maryland land: the boundaries which anyone can see are a square encompassing originally Arlington and Alexandria. You can still see the boundary markers in Alexandria near the train station.

  12. All I can say is... by MikeRT · · Score: 1

    For Obama's sake, this guy better be squeaky clean. God help Obama if Kundra has tax issues with the IRS. Obama has already had 3 appointees shot down over this, and Geithner is under attack by critics for the same issues. The last thing he needs is a fourth confirmed kill (technically a fifth confirmed kill if you consider his decision to drop his original candidate for the CIA chief over some comments vaguely in favor of torture in limited circumstances).

    1. Re:All I can say is... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      well, if Obama doesn't know about the issues, I can't see how he is at fault.
      Ass one who has an IRS issue in my past, I do give annyone the benefit of the doubt. My problem was complatly my responsibility, and completly accidental.
        I paid up and it was over. I fail to see why a mistake that was immediatly rectified matters.
      Sure, if it was hiding donations or accepting gift repeatedly. But one time?
      And it's till not the presidents fault if he wasn't told....no matter who is the president.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  13. Re:I wonder if that's the right message by zombie_monkey · · Score: 1

    I'm confused, shouldn't the GP post be the one modded troll?

  14. They're going to announce it! by LunarCrisis · · Score: 2, Funny

    The administration could announce Kundra's appointment as soon as Thursday.

    I'd better get ready to find out then!

    --
    Mr. Period: Nine is the one that's right by ten!
    Nine: One day I will kill him. Then, I will be Ten.
  15. I think it will be safe to say by Shivetya · · Score: 2, Informative

    that this nominee paid his taxes on time.

    Still, if you want, you can research through most papers using their online facilities.

    for the most part he walked into a mess at the DC school system back in 2007 and worked to upgrade them to something respectable. That and investigating people using government systems to surf porn. Apparently before him most of the record keeping was still in paper form.

    http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=vivek+kundra&hl=en&um=1&sa=N&sugg=d&as_user_ldate=2008&as_user_hdate=2009&lnav=h0&ldrange=2003,2006

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  16. Morrowind? by Aladrin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Anyone else have a Morrowind flashback or 2?

    Naming a god to the post of IT advisor is certainly a newsworthy move, at any rate. (For the unintiated, Vivek is a god in the Elder Scrolls universe, as well as a city that was named after him.)

    --
    "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    1. Re:Morrowind? by v1k · · Score: 1

      Vivek means "discerning, discriminating", especially with wisdom and intelligence, in Sanskrit.

  17. not US Government CTO by rakerman · · Score: 2, Informative

    The headline says "Top Federal IT Job", but won't that be the new CTO position? Kundra's (reportedly) being named as Office of Management and Budget administrator for e-government and information technology, not Chief Technology Officer.

    1. Re:not US Government CTO by GovTechGuy · · Score: 1

      Actually, the article points out that CTO seems to be less important than it was originally thought, which is why Kundra likely preferred to be at OMB, where he will oversee all federal IT projects.

  18. Re:It aint open by conspirator57 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    too bad this was subverted by direct election of senators and the rise to power of the opinion poll and focus group

    --
    "If still these truths be held to be
    Self evident."
    -Edna St. Vincent Millay
  19. Re:It aint open by houghi · · Score: 1

    The majority of people are stupid. Do you really want them in charge?

    They are. They vote.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  20. The real problem by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    is that Taxes are un-real. We need to move to a simplified system. I would love to see us change to a flat or even progressive tax with NO tax breaks. NADA. THe only items that should be changed would be when the tax kicks in, and what percentage.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  21. i grew up in DC by conspirator57 · · Score: 3, Informative

    hooray for me. however, it did give me the opportunity to see just how bassackwards DC is w.r.t. IT. They got federal money to improve IT in schools, so they spent much of it on a contractor to "study" the current state of IT in the schools. (Hint: 8086 PC XTs and PC Jrs if anything) It was a complete boondoggle.

    And the leader of this farcical group is now one of our nation's fearless leaders. fandamntastic.

    --
    "If still these truths be held to be
    Self evident."
    -Edna St. Vincent Millay
    1. Re:i grew up in DC by insomniac8400 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Still better than the CTO of cisco.

  22. Kiri-kin-tha's First Law of Metaphysics by pleappleappleap · · Score: 1

    Nothing unreal exists.

  23. Vivek's work is great, very useful by cnewmark · · Score: 1

    I saw this guy's work regarding customer service for local government, he's doing a great job.

    It would be cool to find a way for slashdotters to help reproduce this, everywhere.

  24. Re:It aint open by dintech · · Score: 1

    I see what you're saying there. But as a counterpoint, they don't really set legislation do they? Voters have a once-every-few-years opportunity to voice their opinion. That's not a lot of scope for molding the direction of government.

  25. Re:H1-B? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    And yet there still seems to be room for pompous, humourless prigs. Go figure.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  26. His name is Vivek by vivek7006 · · Score: 1

    He will do just fine :)

  27. Re:It aint open by Toe,+The · · Score: 1

    Treat the people like morons, and surprise: they act like morons.

    Treat the people with respect and gradually let them work into a position of responsibility, and you may be pleasantly surprised by the "wisdom of crowds."

    Or do you really think that handful of corrupt politicians in charge of each government are really better than an open, carefully thought out, modern governance structure?

  28. Re:It aint open by amiga3D · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah...they vote. They vote for tweedle dee or tweedle dum. Give me a break. The fact that 90 percent are idiots are why we suffer under the two mafia system. They can't conceive of voting for anyone who is not part of one of the two parties. Thus they get a choice between the nut cases from the left or the nut cases from the right. Less and less moderates every day in government and more and more extremists.

  29. Re:It aint open by dintech · · Score: 1

    If everyone has equal say, you get majority rule. People in large numbers are basically selfish or emotionally distanced from others anyway. Your average guy on the street finds it very hard to put himself in someone else's shows. So, you're going to be screwed if you find yourself in the minority in some debate where there is a polarisation between disparate interests. The outcome might not necessarily be the just or morally correct option.

    Think about two groups pulling in opposite directions where there is clear line of divide across groups of age, race, sex, religion, disability, class, wealth, sexual orientation, polical views age and so on. I'm sure you can think of lots of examples where the will of the masses would infringe upon the rights of the individuals in the minority.

    Think about your own life if you must. Is there any cause, interest, past-time or behaviour that is part of your life that would be squashed by this new consensus-state, just becuase it's different from what the masses see as right? You better hope the majority is as tolerant as you are in this new world order. Wisdom of the crowds indeed...

  30. Re:It aint open by Toe,+The · · Score: 1

    Majority rule is not a necessary corollary of open governance. Especially if there are too many issues for everyone to participate in every decision. Please see the source site.