Ubuntu Wipes Windows 7 In Benchmarks
twitter writes "Recent and controversial benchmarks for Windows 7 leave an important question unanswered: 'Is it faster than GNU/Linux?' Here, at last, is a benchmark that pits Ubuntu, Vista and Windows 7 against each other on the same modern hardware. From install time to GUI efficiency, Ubuntu beats Windows and is often twice as fast. Where Windows 7 is competitive, the difference is something the average user would not notice. The average GNU/Linux user is now getting better absolute performance from their computer as well as better value than the average Windows user."
Queue douchebag saying its only a beta.
Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
Because I can snap both installation DVDs in half, I submit that I am clearly more powerful than either OS. Not even close, really.
My unpatched Windows system can get rooted AT LEAST ten times faster than Ubuntu. Take that, Open Source!
See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
Clearly Microsoft has been listening to us. Vista takes up a whole 8.2GB, while Windows 7 takes up a mere 7.9GB. I can't wait to get a crack at this smaller, slimmer version of Windows!
i dont know about you but i wont use any OS that takes more than 7 clicks to install
I'm a linux user but this story is anything but serious benchmarking.
Yeah, they left out almost all distros.
I read the headline and thought installing Ubuntu would wipe a Windows 7 partition.
Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
There, fixed that for you.
Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
Hey I have carpel tunnel and mouse clicking is a very important benchmark you insensitive clout.
I always just figured the speed was gained from not having to run virus software all the time.
With virus software installed on Windows 7 ubuntu would kill it even more.
I always figured the speed was gained by not being able to actually do anything productive on Ubuntu.
A lot of stuff is included in Windows. I don't know how much of it is OS and how much of it is extra software.
That's what the anti-trust tribunal said.
If you keep carrying on like this, the next batch of mosquitoes Bill releases *will* have malaria.
I'd be interested to know what that is in non-layman's terms!
Debian and Ubuntu's alternate install take 0 clicks (but a lot of Enters)
No, that enhancement is in scope for the next Ubuntu release.
"In the absence of the ability to establish the attribute of truth they tried to establish the noble attributes."
Man, it's been a while since we've broken out the classic story of the benchmarks!
Tomorrow: Windows-centric website refutes claims of this benchmark, posts its own.
Saturday: Linux geeks refute claims of yesterday's benchmarks due to funding by Microsoft and/or lack of actual data, and post their own.
Sunday: Microsoft fans declare themselves independent, refute Saturday's benchmarks, and post their own.
Monday: Mainstream media refutes Sunday's benchmarks and posts their own claiming Ubuntu is far faster.
Tuesday: Hardcore gaming website refutes Monday's benchmarks, claims Windows 7 is so much faster, claims XP is faster still, wonders why Ubuntu was invented if it can't play Counterstrike. Benchmarks are provided to show how much faster Windows 7 is and how much Ubuntu doesn't run Counterstrike out of the box.
Wednesday: Business news site refutes Tuesday's benchmarks and claims, announces it is switching to Ubuntu. Benchmarks are provided to show how much faster Ubuntu is when dealing with MySQL and Apache.
Thursday: Another business news site refutes Wednesday's benchmarks and claims, announces it is giving up on Ubuntu, claiming MySQL is stupid and the previous news site is stupid for using it. Benchmarks are provided to show how much faster Windows 7 is when running MSSQL and IIS.
Friday: A lone Amiga geek refutes everyone's claims, brags about how much faster and better life is with Amiga, promises a new version any year now.
Saturday: (no claims or benchmarks; Linux and Windows camps simply issue condescending stares at Friday's Amiga geek)
Sunday: Linux website refutes Thursday's claims...
Demanding constant attention will only lead to attention.
Ah, a fellow gentooer. Are you done compiling yet?
The average GNU/Linux user is still running that P4 2.8 GHz machine. Luckily, it's the 800 FSB version with hyper threading, and they upped their RAM to 1 GB last year.
Ah... someone else who couldn't understand Linux. Please, sir, there's no need to bitter about it. *nix-based operating systems ARE user friendly, they're just picky about who their friends are.
Acts 17:28, "For in Him we live, and move, and have our being."
I think the Jamaican version is called "Mondriva", mon.
Free Martian Whores!