Slashdot Mirror


CBS Hosts Ad-Funded TV Series, Incl. Original Star Trek

eldavojohn writes "On Friday, CBS launched a TV Classics section to their ad based online service. Which means that Trekkies can now watch all three seasons of Star Trek: The Original Series online at the expense of a few commercials. Alongside this CBS is offering all of MacGyver, Twin Peaks and even three seasons of the original Twilight Zone. A side note, they seem to work perfectly fine in Linux. "

22 of 276 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Outside the US? by Gothic_Walrus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No thanks. I'll stick with BitTorrent, if only because I live outside the US, and it won't be available outside the US, for some reason.

    That reason is copyright law...which, unless I'm mistaken, CBS doesn't control.

    --
    Goo goo g'joob.
  2. Wow by calmofthestorm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This and Hulu make me very happy. It takes a bit longer to download than bittorrent, but I don't find the ads obtrusive (so short), the quality is good enough for me, and the option to stream live is handy.

    I imagine they don't like you downloading it but sometimes I don't have tubes, and as the commercials aren't annoying I don't bother removing them.

    Now if only they carried programming I liked more...and here we are:-)

    --
    93rd rule of Slashdot: No matter how obvious my sarcasm is, my comment will be taken seriously by someone.
    1. Re:Wow by martin-boundary · · Score: 4, Insightful

      On the contrary, it's best if they keep them as loud as possible. Makes it easier to write automatic filters :)

    2. Re:Wow by Cassius+Corodes · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You do realise that that is how they make money right? They aren't putting in ads coz they want to piss you off...

      If you want internet video to continue to provide you a service you have to actually accept having to view the ads.

      --
      Control is an illusion, order our comforting lie. From chaos, through chaos, into chaos we fly
  3. Re:Outside the US? by j0nb0y · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's quite possible they sold the foreign rights to Trek long before the Internet came along...

    --
    If you had super powers, would you use them for good, or for awesome?
  4. Re:Outside the US? by Ilgaz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Imagine you are an international TV station guy who just purchased airing rights of Star Trek and when you browse slashdot, you see this story, click and start watching the series you just purchased for $100K or even more. That is the issue.

  5. Re:indeed by wizardforce · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But I'm spoiled, I grew up on TNG instead. TOS after that was just laughable!

    well there wouldn't even be a startrek TNG without TOS and its "cheesy" effects.

    --
    Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
  6. Re:This is why I need a new computer. by joocemann · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Be your own boss. Problem solved.

  7. Re:Outside the US? by k_187 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm not sure about that, but I am sure that Viacom doesn't want to spend the money to find out.

    --
    11 was a racehorse
    12 was 12
    1111 Race
    12112
  8. Re:Outside the US? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One problem is probably regional sublicensing, so it's more contractual than copyright, but there is copyright involved. CBS might have sublicenced the distribution rights series to other companies based on country or region, and they can't just violate those licenses. These contracts predate the popularity of using the internet for video, and they can't just go back on them without consequences.

    They might have some problems selling ads for non-US viewers too, there's no sense in selling ads for viewers in the UK for products that are as yet only sold in the US.

  9. Re:Gotta love TV networks by Aerynvala · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I agree with you. It's incredibly frustrating. And it's not just the tv people, nor even just the US ones. You'd think they'd be happy to get the money/eyes on ads from any place willing to pay/watch. But I guess they'd rather maintain 'control'. And yes, I'm aware that pre-existing contracts would have to be tweaked, but I'm not seeing any effort on big content's part to do that. Idiots.

    --
    http://transformativeworks.org/
  10. Re:Gotta love TV networks by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You'd think they'd be happy to get the money/eyes on ads from any place willing to pay/watch.

    Nope. Ads are very time and location specific. They can't advertise the same things everywhere at the same time. Sandals vs snowtires, & Miami vs Minnesota.
    In traditional media (TV and print), it is easy. But retailers and advertisers are still trying to figure out how to manage that concept in the online world.

  11. Re:Outside the US? by Telvin_3d · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why do people keep bringing proxies into these discussions? Sure, there are lots of proxies available, but how many free (or cheap) high bandwidth ones are there? We are talking video here. Bouncing it through a bunch of low bandwidth connections doesn't leave you with a very good experience.

  12. Re:Gotta love TV networks by Aerynvala · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, if they can tell via IP address or whatever what country a viewer is coming from wouldn't that allow them to serve country specific content rather than just blocking them?

    Or if that's not how it works, they could have a neutral start page and then have people select the country they're from and ta da, targeted advertising.

    --
    http://transformativeworks.org/
  13. Re:Star Trek should be required in schools. by bitrex · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The new Battlestar Galactica is just Dallas in space.

  14. Re:I'm tired of TV networks like this. by gravyface · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How do you get Hulu.com in Canada?

    --
    body massage!
  15. Re:indeed by techno-vampire · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Among all the firsts that the original series created they also created true science fiction;

    I suspect that Frankie Thomas and the other people who created Tom Corbet -- Space Cadet would disagree with you, considering that they pre-dated Star Trek by almost 20 years. And, for that matter, Clark, Heinlein, Asimov, Smith and many others were writing it long before Tom Corbet was created.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  16. Re:indeed by techno-vampire · · Score: 4, Insightful
    TOS and its "cheesy" effects.

    The effects might look cheesy now, but they were much better than anything else on TV at the time. If you really want to see cheesy effects, watch the original Dr. Who sometime, or Blake's 7, for that matter.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  17. Re:Gotta love TV networks by Adrian+Lopez · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Google makes billions of dollars on advertising. The international nature of the Internet has not impeded this.

    --
    "In prison you just have to shut your eyes and take it. Here you have to shut your eyes and give it."
  18. Re:Outside the US? by drik00 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For the love of God someone mod this as funny. Silliest episode of ST:Voyager I ever saw.

    J

    --
    Beer, now there's a temporary solution -- Homer Jay S.
  19. Re:indeed by phulegart · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Don't forget Harlan Ellison and Alan Dean Foster. They also wrote some heavy science fiction. Oh wait... I understand why you forgot them. They also wrote Star Trek script material.

    But, you could have saved yourself some time and typing, if you simply reminded the parent that he forgot two words from the end of the passage you quoted. Those two words being "on television". Go ahead. Add them to the end of what you quoted. I'll wait.

    Now, when I read what he originally wrote, I never got the impression in any way that he was challenging some of the greats like A.E. Van Vogt or Zelazney, or Asimov, or Heinlein. I got the exact impression that the parent wanted to send... that Star Trek had kicked Sci-Fi out of the way, and had instead brought Science-Fiction to the little screen.

    The funny part, is the Wikipedia article you link to, has THIS to say on the subject...

    "Before Star Trek, Tom Corbett -- Space Cadet was the most scientifically accurate series on television."

    This is important, because the article YOU mention, points out the Importance of Star Trek and science fiction on television... and the article isn't even about Star Trek. If you read... actually read... with the Jungles on Venus and the Space Pirates living on asteroids, you find that the phrase "Scientifically accurate series on television" doesn't mean all that much. If no other show on TV was showing that gravity actually does work, the only show that did would be the most scientifically accurate one. Or rather, if Every show on TV is scientifically inaccurate, the title of Most Accurate doesn't mean all that much.

    You are right, in that there was Sci-Fi before Trek.

    ALL Hail You, for mentioning that there was Sci-Fi before trek.

    Now, get off your lazy ass and acknowledge that Trek did FAR MORE for bringing science and real science fiction into more American Homes than practically any other source at the time. Because if you don't, you are blind.

    --
    "I love deadlines. I love the whooshing sound they make as they fly by." -D. Adams
  20. Re:How much will sponsors pay for a dub? by S.O.B. · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You're only including countries that have large populations that speak English as a first language which is about 375M. If you also include countries that have large populations that speak English as a second (or even third language) then you're probably talking (pun intended) about another 470M to 1B depending on how literacy is defined. A pretty good sized target market for any advertiser. Add in subtitles which are easier than dubbing and you can reach most of the planet without too much difficulty.

    References:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_language#Geographical_distribution
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_English-speaking_population

    --
    Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.