Slashdot Mirror


Fly Me To Which Moon?

Hugh Pickens writes "NASA and the European Space Agency are expected later this week to settle an ongoing debate on whether to send a robotic mission to Jupiter's moon Europa or Saturn's moon Titan. Both are difficult places to get to — a mission to either would cost several billion dollars/euros to build and execute — and both have become alluring targets in the quest to learn whether Earth alone supports life. On the one hand, Europa is believed to have liquid oceans beneath its frozen crust which (on Earth at least) are a source of life-supporting chemistry. Scientists would like to scan Europa's surface for bits of material that may have seeped up from beneath the ice. 'Imagine if there were microbes entrained in material that has exuded onto the surface of Europa and they've been sitting there for maybe three million years,' says planetary scientist Dr. Brad Dalton. On the other hand, Titan has two enticing features in the search for life: liquids on the surface, and a thick atmosphere that can be used to slow down a spacecraft and help put it into orbit. Titan's surface water is locked into the crust as ice, but scientists suspect there may be a subsurface ocean where water mingles with ammonia. The mission will not get to the launch pad before 2020. 'It's unfortunate that there has to be a decision,' says NASA/JPL astrobiologist Dr. Kevin Hand. 'It's important to go to both. They are both such amazing and tantalizing worlds in terms of finding life.'"

22 of 183 comments (clear)

  1. We already know the outcome... by Etcetera · · Score: 5, Funny

    All these worlds are belong to you. Except Europa. Attempt no landings there, every 'ZIG'!!

    1. Re:We already know the outcome... by volcanopele · · Score: 4, Informative

      Except...the Europa mission doesn't have a lander. It only has two orbiters, one would go to Europa and the other would go to Ganymede.

      --
      The Gish Bar Times - Blog covering Jupiter's moon Io
    2. Re:We already know the outcome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      To Ganymede and Titan, yes sir, I've been around...

  2. access to space by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If we had worked on cheaper access to space first, we could have both.

    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
    1. Re:access to space by Jurily · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If we had worked on cheaper access to space first, we could have both.

      Agreed. we should have a space station at L1 before we do any more exploring.

    2. Re:access to space by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 4, Informative

      L1, L2, and L3 are all semi-unstable points. You'd be better off in L4 or L5.

      And solar wind at L1 is a bitch. At least the magnetosphere would protect some at L2.

      --
    3. Re:access to space by Jurily · · Score: 3, Interesting

      L1, L2, and L3 are all semi-unstable points. You'd be better off in L4 or L5.

      And solar wind at L1 is a bitch. At least the magnetosphere would protect some at L2.

      I have to agree with that. It does not lessen my point about having a space station first, then expanding further, though.

    4. Re:access to space by MadnessASAP · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Unfortunately getting to L4 or L5 is a bit of a bitch. NASA is having problems getting people back to the the moon, L4 and L5 are several times further.

      --
      I may agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to face the consequences of saying it.
    5. Re:access to space by Bearhouse · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Expecting government contractors to do anything more than provide the bare minimum to get the next contract is foolish.

      The whole point of Apollo was that nothing fundamentally *new* was required. "All" that was needed was to put the existing technology together. The same cannot be said of RLVs.

      Agree with the first pont, but the second - you're kidding, right?

      The entire point of the Apollo programs was to funnel huge amounts of cash into the public/private sector so the USA could 'catch up' with the Sovs. (If they were really 'in the lead' could be debated endlessly).

      Huge advances were required in many fields, including materials science, rocket motor design and construction, computers for simulation and guidance...

      As often, Wikipedia says it better than I could:

      "The program spurred advances in many areas of technology peripheral to rocketry and manned spaceflight. These include major contributions in the fields of avionics, telecommunications, and computers. The program sparked interest in many fields of engineering, including pioneering work using statistical methods to study the reliability of complex systems made from component parts. The physical facilities and machines which were necessary components of the manned spaceflight program remain as landmarks of civil, mechanical, and electrical engineering..."

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_program

    6. Re:access to space by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 3, Informative

      Unfortunately getting to L4 or L5 is a bit of a bitch. NASA is having problems getting people back to the the moon, L4 and L5 are several times further.

      Umm, no. L4 and L5 are in the same orbit as the moon, and therefore at the same distance.

      Not that distance is a significant factor, mind you. DeltaV requirements are the limiting factors on our ability to go places in space. DeltaV requirement to put something on the moon are about 5600 m/s, to get something to L4/5 about 4000 m/s.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  3. Bailout Chump Change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why not both? This is chump change compared to the bailout, and hey! It might actually work!!! :D

  4. Who cares how much it costs... by Loopy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just call it "stimulus" and us yanks will just print some more money for it. :/

  5. Misread.. by gzipped_tar · · Score: 5, Funny

    would cost several billion dollars/euros to build and execute

    I misread that one as "would cost several billion dollars/euros to build an executable" and thought "what the heck of a compiler they are using!!"

    --
    Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
  6. WHAT ?? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 4, Funny

    "On the other hand, Titan has two enticing features in the search for life: liquids on the surface, and a thick atmosphere that can be used to slow down a spacecraft and help put it into orbit."

    Going there just because it is easier is nothing but a crock. The ONLY criterion for a visit should be: which is judged to be a more likely candidate for life?

    The suggestion that they should go there because it is easier, is like the guy who says he lost some money "around the corner" but is looking over here instead because the light is better.

    Sheesh. That's logic for you. From the people who are supposed to try to do it! Is the fact that I am less than impressed apparent yet?

    1. Re:WHAT ?? by f()rK()_Bomb · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Obviously, life cant exist without oxygen...

      oxygen catasrophe

      Anaerobic organisms

      --
      "The space elevator will be built about 50 years after everyone stops laughing." - Arthur C. Clarke ~1980
    2. Re:WHAT ?? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Informative

      Life disturbs local entropy. An example of which is our oxygen atmosphere which is made by living things. Excess methane on Mars and Titan has been attributed to life, but is most likely the result of natural processes.

  7. Interesting Mission Concepts by volcanopele · · Score: 5, Informative
    Both the Europa and Titan mission would be very exciting missions. The Titan mission is a bit more ambitious though, with a NASA-built Titan orbiter that would map the surface at 50 meters per pixel (so not quite Google Earth resolution, but enough to define the major geologic processes that take place on Titan) and an Europe-built hot-air balloon and lander. The latter would land in the largest expanse of open liquid (methane instead of water) known outside of Earth.

    The Europa mission is a bit more tame by comparison, but has a lot more technological development to back it up (which would help it come in somewhere close to its original budget). There are two orbiters. The NASA-built orbiter would explore the inner two large moons of Jupiter: Io and Europa; while the ESA-built orbiter would explore the outer two large satellites: Ganymede and Callisto. Unlike the Titan mission, no landers are planned with this mission, but the instruments on-board both spacecraft would allow it to provide more detailed global mapping of Europa and Ganymede than the Titan mission, which as mentioned before would only provide 50-m per pixel global mapping with selected areas at higher resolution imaged by the balloon (which would be limited to a relatively narrow latitude band since Titan's winds are mostly east-west).

    The NASA-JPL website has a page with more detailed documents outlining the mission plans for each moon: http://opfm.jpl.nasa.gov/library/

    --
    The Gish Bar Times - Blog covering Jupiter's moon Io
  8. Disgusting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We can throw as much money as we like at the Halliburtons of this world and rain the national vault to fund wars which enrich our leadership's business cronies. We can use whatever's left over to bailout people so greedy and incompetent that they'll ever change their ways.

    But we have to choose between Europa or Titan.

  9. Re:Time for another Apollo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'd love to see the flag-planting ceremony for that.

    *Sploosh*

  10. It's simple, really... by nicodoggie · · Score: 5, Funny

    In the book version, we send the thing to Titan. Then when Stanley Kubrick does the movie, send it to Europa!

  11. Re:Just dreamin' a bit... by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And let's face it, the odds that we're screwing up our only livable habitat in potentially-ugly ways are increasing. Developing the capacity to move at least a few people elsewhere isn't such a terrible idea.

    And then do what with them once they're there? If we can terraform any other planet into a habitable place, it's hard to see why we couldn't do it to Earth to undo the environmental damage we've wrought. After all, Earth currently is habitable and anything we're likely to do wouldn't move it further from that mark than the other planets.

  12. Standardize by jbeaupre · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Thinking about Voyager I and II and the Mariner series, maybe it's time to create a standard probe platform (orbiter and lander halves if you insist) and build them in large quantities. Make them rugged and try to minimize expensive customization. Keep them relatively small so several can be launched at once. Then start tossing them everywhere. Use whatever orbital mechanics work (Hohmann, interplanetary transport network, whatever). But send 2, 3, or more to each destination.

    Launch a dozen at Jupiter with arrivals spaced apart and you can wait to see if the first one arrives safely. If it does, send the second to another moon or to the same one for redundancy. You now have mission flexibility on a whole new level.

    Send 2 to our moon. Then if you want to try a software upgrade, you can try it on those first.

    And so on.

    The whole point is to get the cost per craft down to the 10's of millions. If you can average 4 for $50 million and buy a rocket to launch the 4 for $50 million, you can now send 40 for the price of one. And now you have a series of missions such that if one fails, it's not a disaster. Will the data be as good as a custom probe? No way. But with so many probes you can take risks you never could before and maybe see things custom probes never could. Risks such as sending them odd places or putting some cheap funky instruments from some university.

    Almost the "Faster Better Cheaper" concept, but based on mass production instead of 1 of a kind probes.

    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.