Slashdot Mirror


Texas Judge Orders Identification of Topix Trolls

eldavojohn writes "Ars Technica has a story on a Texas judge who has ordered Topix.com to hand over the identifying details of 178 trolls that allegedly made 'perverted, sick, vile, inhumane accusations' about Mark & Rhonda Lesher. Mark Lesher was accused of sexually assaulting an unidentified former client (and subsequently found not guilty) which prompted the not so understanding discussions on Topix. Topix has until March 6 to give up the information. Let's hope the Leshers don't visit Slashdot!"

3 of 344 comments (clear)

  1. What happens if... by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...they never logged identifying details?

  2. Re:Seems like the correct procedure by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Topix is registered in Washington and hosted in California. What happens if they refuse? Is the judge going to 'ban' them from Texas? What if the posters are in Indiana or Europe?

    How do they plan on identifying people that are more than likely pseudonyms? Most forums I'm on I have a random name generator give me a name and it goes to a generic gmail account.

  3. Re:Strange Loop Troll by Hatta · · Score: 5, Interesting

    First, it wouldn't be slander, it would be libel. Slander is spoken. Libel is written.

    I've always thought that was a silly distinction for the law to make. The words are the problem, not the medium. What difference does it make whether it was spoken or written?

    And what happens if I slander someone, and someone else writes it down? Am I guilty of libel now that my statements have been committed to paper?

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!