Slashdot Mirror


The Real Risks of Obama's BlackBerry

An anonymous reader writes "When the mainstream media first announced Barack Obama's 'victory' in keeping his BlackBerry, the focus was on the security of the device, and keeping the US president's e-mail communications private from spies and hackers. The news coverage and analysis by armchair security experts thus far has failed to focus on the real threat: attacks against President Obama's location privacy, and the potential physical security risks that come with someone knowing the president's real-time physical location. In this article, a CNET blogger digs into the real risks associated with the President carrying around a tracking device at all times."

16 of 273 comments (clear)

  1. Femto-cells by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seems like using a portable femtocell and a private relay to some central government location would be enough to mitigate the problem. And besides, don't the secret service carry cell phones?/ If you can't track the prez, just track the people around him.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    1. Re:Femto-cells by Rei · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Back when I worked at Rockwell-Collins, I was developing software for a piece of SIGINT hardware. Every so often, a group of spooks from the client would come on over to play with the tools (I never learned which branch of the government they were from; management liked being vague). On one of these occasions they were scanning through the spectrum and tuning in to various signals that popped up with various demodulations. Then they encountered a signal they didn't recognize and couldn't understand, and got all excited like kids in a candy store. Someone suggested that it was probably something being worked on at Rockwell itself, and so they pulled out a directional antenna, left our office, and started running through the halls trying to track it down.

      --
      And I'd like to be the king of all Londinium and wear a shiny hat.
  2. Re:turn it off? by brian0918 · · Score: 5, Funny

    That may not be enough for most devices out there. You'll probably also have to take out the battery, and even then there could be an internal battery that keeps the tracking going. Your best bet, whenever you don't want people to track you through your cell phone, would be to smash it to bits, or coat it in honey and feed it to a bear.

  3. PrezBO's security by mrjimorg · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wouldn't worry too much about it. The #1 thing that is going to guarantee his security is this- if he dies, Biden becomes president. Just put a few adds on TV stating this and he'll be the safest man in the world.

    1. Re:PrezBO's security by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 5, Funny

      If that was his approach to security he would have asked Dick Cheney to be his running mate

      nah, that kind of thinking just blows up in your face.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  4. Re:Obama's crackberry doesn't have a power button by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Funny

    Even if it happens to be in the form of a really big sledgehammer with the word "OFF" emblazoned on it?

  5. Seriously? by i_am_socket · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They don't think he's already got a tracking device on him at all times anyway? It's calls "several dozen Secret Service agents." Pretty hard to miss, honestly.

  6. Exploding battery risks far higher by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Make sure one of the Secret Service guys always carries the BB.

    Seriously, this is just another case of illogical fear of "new" technologies. It is already easy to track him: just look for the long motorcade.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  7. Knowing where the President is... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... is much less important, from a personal security standpoint, than knowing where he's going to be.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  8. So what? by Shrike82 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So let's imagine someone did actually manage to track the President using his Blackberry. Now that person could plan an assassination based on the Presiden't location? How is that more useful than knowing he'll be in location X at time Y based on a press release, or a public event?

    The last link supposedly discusses the "risks" of a "trackable" President by supposing some would-be assassin could tell if the President was in the White House, or which car he was in out of several choices. Wouldn't this assassin be better off waiting for a public rally where the President's attendance, location (and probably the time of his attendance) are public knowledge?

    This just strikes me as wild speculation with a healty dose of paranoia. Maybe I'm wrong, and I'm sure a hundred people will now cite many examples of how this could lead to "another JFK". Fire away people...

    --
    You can advertise in this sig from as little as £99.99 a month!
  9. Give me a break by djupedal · · Score: 5, Funny

    U.S. Presidents have had subcutaneous tracking implants for some time now.

    Given a bit of technical savvy, those are no different when it comes to anyone being able to locate the Pres.

    In addition, you could strip him of tech hardware completely and the plethora of social indicators easily associated with his daily routine would still light him up like a Shenzhen cathouse.

  10. i don't think obama has a blackberry by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Informative

    i think he has a sectera edge, which is a sort of military grade blackberry. as such, you can bet he is immune from the kind of attack mentioned in the summary

    slashdot noted this already, with the rumor that he has a blackberry and a sectera. this is absurd because:

    1. the sectera has civilian and military network abilities, so it would be doubly redundant to have both a blackberry and sectera, since a sectera is pretty much already a blackberry+

    2. since we are talking about top level extremely sensitive communications, rumors about the reality of his communication device is all any of us will hear about, as a rule. and probably with purposeful misdirection about what obama is actually using thrown in to boot: let the yokels believe what they want to believe about his communication device and the "stories" aka myths about him keeping his blackberry. uh huh. anyone, anywhere, writing about what obama is using is either guessing or lying. the more the certainty and conviction they have about what his communication device is, the sillier they are. the only people who know for sure what obama is communicating with on the go are probably a few tight-lipped spooks at the nsa. and if they talk, they are about to lose their job and are going to be heavily prosecuted about disclosing obviously extremely senstive national security details of obama's mobile communication situation. all obama cares about is the convenience of qwerty keyboard email on the go in a cellphone. switch a real blackberry with a sectera edge, he is happy. he's married to the convenience, not an actual brand of device

    3. but i think most convincingly, when someone talks about obama keeping his "blackberry", i think they are using the word "blackberry" the way some people use "xerox": that is, like the word xerox has become a rough synonym for copying a piece of paper, i think blackberry is so ubiquitous now, any shiny brick with a full qwerty keyboard can be called a "blackberry" in common parlance, or soon will be. that's all the sectera edge is: a blackberry rip off with ultrahigh security. and that's most probably what obam is using

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:i don't think obama has a blackberry by GeekZilla · · Score: 5, Informative

      You are correct, it is a Sectera. I am a software engineer and am working on a web app for the dissemination of classified information on secure US networks. General Dynamics and the NSA worked together to create a mobile device that was both secure and rugged and it received final approval in late 2008. When that occurred, we began modifying our code to ensure it could run on the mobile device and even have one in the office for testing. After the election we learned that Obabma's "Blackberry" is really the GD Sectera or SME-PED.. There was one article that actually got it right soon after the election and turns out a news.google.com search for SME-PED reveals some good articles (I can't remember where I found the original article I referred to). From a Geek perspective, this is REALLY cool! Specs are freely available at the first link.

      --
      Veritas patesco per quaestio questio. Truth is revealed through questions.
  11. unless they have chinese needle snakes by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Funny

    in which case, we need gorillas to take care of the snakes. and that's the beautiful part. when wintertime rolls around, the gorillas simply freeze to death

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  12. I could imagine... by chipmeister · · Score: 5, Funny

    An antire group of people devoted to tracking and reporting on the whereabouts of the president. They could hire pundits to theorize on why he is there, film him getting in the car, getting out of the car. They could even predict where he's going to be, like "The president will be in Miami next Tuesday to talk to the guy in that place". Now that would be really freaky.

    1. Re:I could imagine... by Dragonslicer · · Score: 5, Funny

      An antire group of people devoted to tracking and reporting on the whereabouts of the president. They could hire pundits to theorize on why he is there, film him getting in the car, getting out of the car. They could even predict where he's going to be, like "The president will be in Miami next Tuesday to talk to the guy in that place". Now that would be really freaky.

      And we could give them a cute name, like "media".