Slashdot Mirror


Automation May Make Toll Roads More Common

bfwebster writes "Here in Denver, we have E-470, a toll section of the 470 beltway, that uses the usual transponder attached to your windshield. Fair enough, and I make use of it, particularly in driving to the airport. But they've just implemented new technology on E-470 that allows anyone to drive through the automated toll gates. If you don't have a transponder, it takes a photo of your license plate and sends a monthly bill to your house. As a result, the company that runs E-470 plans to close all human-staffed toll booths by mid-summer. And as an article in this morning's Rocky Mountain News notes, 'Such a system could be deployed on other roads, including some that motorists now use free. The result: a new source of money for highways and bridges badly in need of repair.' You can bet that legislators, mayors, and city councilpersons everywhere will see this as an even-better source of income than red-light cameras. You've been warned."

15 of 585 comments (clear)

  1. Yeah, it would be cool in an ideal world... by joaommp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...where everyone can be trusted and no one uses false plates to
    1) not having to pay
    2) just playing a prank to someone.

    It will happen the same as with the red light cameras. People will use false license plates or even no plates at all.

  2. Why is this a bad thing? by Reverberant · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The result: a new source of money for highways and bridges badly in need of repair.' You can bet that legislators, mayors, and city councilpersons everywhere will see this as an even-better source of income than red-light cameras. You've been warned."

    Why is this a bad thing? If the users of the road have to pay a little extra to maintain the road they're using, I don't have problem with it. If the money is being poured into some politician's slush fund, sure that's a problem, but reasonable use fees are exactly what's called for her. It sure beats the "selective billing" process of red-light cameras.

    1. Re:Why is this a bad thing? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because I'm ALREADY PAYING for those roads. I pay gasoline taxes, I pay income tax. Take a look at all the stupid earmarks on the last 2 bailout/stimulus plans. I bet that would fix plenty of roads.

    2. Re:Why is this a bad thing? by AlHunt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >>everywhere will see this as an even-better source of income than red-light cameras. You've been warned."

      >Why is this a bad thing?

      Because "out of sight, out of mind". They'll add a toll to a previuosly toll-free road, live with the brief protest until it dies down and Voila! Instant revenue stream. Next thing you know, the entire legislature will be skinny-dipping in it.

      Once they start pulling invisible tolls, you can bet your last dollar (f you have any dollars left), that the now-collected gas taxes will be diverted elsewhere. Flordia legislators pulled this scam years ago with the lottery. They sold it on the basis that the revenues collected would go to education. What they failed to mention was that they'd reduce other monies going to education. Net result, schools in Florida benefited not at all, while the Florida legislature got more dollars to piss away however they wished.

      Your government treats you like a giant urinal cake. And if they can do it "out of sight" it's only going to get worse.

      --
      1 in 4 Maine children in struggle with hunger.
    3. Re:Why is this a bad thing? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why is this a bad thing?

      Oh, I am a huge fan of road pricing, insofar it means making the people who use the road pay for it.

      There are two arguments against this:
      1) Privacy. If they implement this on all roads, the government or whomever owns the road has a nice log of where you've driven, day to day. Has your government ever given any indication that they are trustworthy enough to gain this information?

      2) As others have pointed out: this offers even better ways to milk motorists. And don't think people will protest too much if they gradually raise prices, that's what they've done over here. Motorists in the Netherlands already bring in 3 times the yearly road and public transport expenditure (for example: VAT + a special tax on new cars add as much as 66% to the sticker price); the rest is blown on other useless stuff. Once this system is in place, you can bet that prices will go up, a few points over inflation, every single year.

      Oh, and they get a free 100% accurate speed trap out of this. They've implemented such a system for just that reason around a few of our cities. At least that old system is anonymous (it turns the picture of your license plate into a "signature", which is compared against the signatures read at the end of the stretch of road being monitored. Only if a speeding violation is detected will it perform an OCR on the plate and send you the ticket. But for road pricing they need proof that you've used the road at the time you are billed for).

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  3. Re:Why is this a bad thing? -Plate Cloning by microcars · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What is to stop someone from making sets of fake plates with YOUR number on them and running through these toll roads or red lights?
    already being done by kids here

    --
    I like microcars
  4. ...Gas Tax? by RagingFuryBlack · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Isn't the purpose of the gasoline tax in the United States to account for the wear an tear that your vehicle causes to the roads? If we start implementing tolling on nearly every major highway, we should start to see a reduction or removal of the gasoline tax. No way in hell should we be paying for something twice.

    --
    Warning: Corny karma killing post above.
  5. ALL roads are toll roads by commodore64_love · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All roads in the U.S. and Canada are toll roads. You pay the toll at the gasoline pump through the ~70 cent per gallon tax. As it should be. If you're going to make use of government-paved roads, it makes sense to pay for that usage. Places with "extra" tolls are typically high-expense areas like tunnels & bridges where the gasoline toll is not enough to cover costs.

    Alternatively you could get a horse-and-buggy and pay nothing, like my Amish neighbors do. ;-)

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  6. The problem is... by gillbates · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That I already pay taxes to maintain the roads. I pay a federal tax on gasoline, which is supposed to be used to maintain the interstate highway system.

    I find it kind of unsettling that after taking my tax dollars to build and maintain their highways, certain states believe they can now charge an extra fee simply because the road passes through their state. If they can send me a bill for driving on a highway built with my tax dollars, perhaps I should be allowed to send them an invoice for reimbursement of the fuel taxes I paid while in their state.

    The idea behind having federal funding of roads is that you create a system of roads by which everyone is allowed to travel, free of charge. If individual states want to get into the toll-road business, we're going to end up like we were in the 30's and 40's, where there was no consistency in road quality and signage from one state to the next.

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
    1. Re:The problem is... by David+Greene · · Score: 4, Insightful

      hat I already pay taxes to maintain the roads. I pay a federal tax on gasoline, which is supposed to be used to maintain the interstate highway system.

      Except the federal gas tax has lost buying power over the decades as the tax has not kept pace with the cost of maintaining highways. The federal highway trust fund is bankrupt. I'd have more sympathy for your position if you were out advocating that the federal gas tax be raised to cover the full cost of driving (and it's not just road maintenance).

      --

  7. Its good for the environment by Shivetya · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Figure that will be one way to sell it. Hello carbon tax.

    Yes it is not reasonable to you or me, however there are many who would like nothing more to "punish" people who drive cars, after all only the rich or those who don't care if they are destroying the planet will drive cars. Honestly this is how it will come to pass. We have toll roads that were supposed to expire (ga400) when they paid off, guess what, ain't happened and won't ever happen.

    Once a government gets a tax in it will take a change of government to remove it. I seriously doubt it will be republican or democrats that will help us.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  8. Back to the middle age by dargaud · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In the middle age every road or bridge had a toll, and it is considered by many historians the one thing the kept their economy in the gutters. It was just too expensive to ship anything anywhere ! Think that France had extensive forests, but Louis XIV couldn't carry its wood from the center to the shore at affordable prices because of all the tolls. So the wood used in warship construction was purchased in Spain ! Well, the flip side of the coin is that France still has plenty of forest while Spain is mostly a desert since that time. The main roman advance is the construction of roads. Not the construction of tolls ! It kept the empire in one piece for half a millennium.

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
  9. Just a little word by aepervius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    4) Quite a few of the companies running such systems are run by European companies that take all the profits back home rather than reinvesting in this country.

    While I agree with the rest of your post, why is point 4) a bad things ? Shall we now boycott all US company in Europe on the ground that they bring the money back in the US, instead of Europe ? Don't you think it is a rather dumb argument , especially knowing how mostly bad can be protectionism in some case ? Because sooner or later it falls down in a tit-for-tat fight.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  10. Denver resident here. The OP fails to mention by BrianRoach · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The OP fails to mention some things about the C470/NW Parkway here in Denver

    It's pretty much the most expensive per-mile toll road in the country. And they keep raising the rates on it every 6 months.

    I could save about 5 - 8 minutes out of my 35 min commute if I used it. However, that would cost me $120 per month. $3 for 8 miles of road (each way) in my case. And that's *one* toll booth.

    And the reason those 8 miles would save me that much time is that no one uses the thing because of the ever-increasing tolls.

    I am being completely serious when I say that at 5pm (rush hour) on the northern 1/4 of the toll road, you would be hard pressed to encounter more than 6 - 7 other cars while on it. Meanwhile, the surface roads that run near it are packed with cars.

    And don't get me started about how the toll road always seems to be plowed when it snows while the surface streets aren't.

    It's not that I can't afford $120/mo ... I just refuse. It's the principle of the thing. I already pay for roads; it's called paying my taxes. Cut my taxes by $120/mo and I'll gladly pay for that road rather than the ones I'm using now.

  11. Re:Calm down, this is a decade old by DrLang21 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Of course it costs money. Where the hell is all that tax money I pay on gas going?!

    --
    I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.