Slashdot Mirror


Abraham Lincoln the Early Adopter

Hugh Pickens writes "On the 200th anniversary of his birth, President Abraham Lincoln's popular image as a log-splitting bumpkin is being re-assessed as historians have discovered that Lincoln had an avid interest in cutting-edge technology and its applications. During the war, Lincoln haunted the telegraph office (which provided the instant-messaging of its day) for the latest news from the front; he encouraged weapons development and even tested some new rifles himself on the White House lawn; and he is the only US president to hold a patent (No. 6469, granted May 22, 1849). It was for a device to lift riverboats over shoals. 'He not only created his own invention but had ideas for other inventions, such as an agricultural steam plow and a naval steam ram, [and] was fascinated by patent cases as an attorney and also by new innovations during the Civil War,' says Jason Emerson, author of Lincoln the Inventor. But Lincoln's greatest contribution to the war effort was his use of the telegraph. When Lincoln took office the White House had no telegraph connection. Lincoln 'developed the modern electronic leadership model, says Tom Wheeler, author of Mr. Lincoln's T-Mails: The Untold Story of How Abraham Lincoln Used the Telegraph To Win the Civil War. At a time when electricity was a vague scientific concept and sending signals through wires was 'mind boggling,' Lincoln was fascinated by the telegraph and developed it into a political and military tool that allowed him to project himself to the front to monitor and track what was going on. 'If he were alive today, we'd call him an early adopter,' says Wheeler."

36 of 261 comments (clear)

  1. No... by zackhugh · · Score: 5, Funny

    If he was alive today, we'd call him a zombie...

    1. Re:No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      if he was alive, i don't see how he could be undead as well.

  2. sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the telegraph office (which provided the instant-messaging of its day)

    Why always the painfully stupid condescension?

    Communicating science (or history) well to a general audience doesn't require this. See Carl Sagan. If anything, such unnecessary analogies make things *less* clear.

  3. Another tick by Dr.+Eggman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Another positive tick towards my overarching theory: If knowledge is power, then communication is both your greatest weapon and your most vital line of supplies.

    --
    Demented But Determined.
  4. Don't forget Tom by Renegade+Iconoclast · · Score: 5, Interesting

    http://inventors.about.com/library/inventors/bljefferson.htm

    Jefferson was a tinkerer who realized that every design could be improved. The same mind he dedicated to helping to create our novel system of government, he applied to physical science.

  5. Though the names change... by DerekLyons · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When Lincoln took office the White House had no telegraph connection. Lincoln 'developed the modern electronic leadership model'
     
    Is that what kids are calling it nowadays? I must be out of date - I was raised to call it micromanagement.

    1. Re:Though the names change... by GaryOlson · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Technology allows an even greater ability to micromanage; but does not necessarily imply micromanagement. Faster communications technology can make it possible for the logistics elements to shift behind the scene to better support the front line. Equally well, better technology can give the front line information to modify their plans/actions to prepare for the consequences of out-of-theater actions which will have a definitive impact.

      Micromanagement is a meme attached to people -- not technology.

      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
    2. Re:Though the names change... by Ihmhi · · Score: 5, Funny

      Micromanagement is a meme attached to StarCraft.

      Fixed.

  6. Log-splitting bumpkin, huh? by religious+freak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    President Abraham Lincoln's popular image as a log-splitting bumpkin is being re-assessed

    I doubt any serious Lincoln scholar would ever say Lincoln was a "log-splitting bumpkin". He was a brilliant, self educated man with a ferocious curiosity and probably one of the highest IQs of any president we've ever had. The guy who managed to end slavery, preserve the Union, AND assist in ushering in modern medical techniques on the battlefield a log-splitting bumpkin? Yeah, sure.

    It's been said that because he was such a deep and complex personality, our society sees Lincoln not necessarily as who he was, but he is a reflection of our current state of mind as a nation. When we began to focus on racial issues, he was an obvious focal point, when depression became more widely known, he was thought to have been depressed, gay rights bring him up as possibly being our first gay president... and slashdot calls him an early adopter.

    He was probably our greatest American president ever.

    --
    If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
    1. Re:Log-splitting bumpkin, huh? by zullnero · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The Log splitting thing was campaign fluff at the time. Back in the old days, populism got you elected. If he ran on the campaign that he was a geeky lawyer, he would have been laughed out of politics in those days.

    2. Re:Log-splitting bumpkin, huh? by commodore64_love · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >>>Back in the old days, populism got you elected.

      Nothing's changed.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    3. Re:Log-splitting bumpkin, huh? by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He was probably our greatest American president ever

      Very much so, and he was a hell of a killer too. As a percentage of population, Lincoln killed more Americans than all the rest of the US Presidents combined and by a fairly wide margin.

      If you make that assertion because you think he was responsible for the entire war, think again. The hotheads in the south who seceded before he even took the oath of office, and the even hotter heads in South Carolina who started the fighting -- those are the idiots who started the war.

      The south is especialy culpable because 50 years before during the War of 1812, when the New England states tried to open negotitations with the national government on seceding, the south was foremost in calling it treason. 50 years later they decided treason was perfectly fine.

    4. Re:Log-splitting bumpkin, huh? by johnsonav · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So did Davis. What's your point?

      Just to play devil's advocate...

      If the Union would have stopped fighting, the Confederacy probably would have too. The rebels had no desire to conquer the North, and would have been satisfied with a "two-state" solution.

      If the Confederates would have unilaterally stopped fighting, the Union wouldn't have stopped until they had forced the rebel states back into the Union.

      The Confederacy was fighting for its existence. The Union was fighting a war of conquest. I think that's a pretty big difference.

      --
      ... and that's when the C.H.U.D.'s came at me.
    5. Re:Log-splitting bumpkin, huh? by osu-neko · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ...he once was remarked that he did not care if slavery ended or continued.

      Absolutely false.

      "If freeing the slaves would preserve the Union, I would do it. If keeping slavery would preserve the Union, I would do that." (Source: CBS News Morning show, this past Thursday)

      Okay, you've quoted something that establishes he valued preserving the Union over ending slavery. Now where's this quote that would establish he did not care if slavery ended or continued?

      Lincoln was an abolitionist. He was a notorious abolitionist. So much so that southern states started seceding before he even took office. To suggest he didn't care if slavery ended or continued flies in the face of the facts. He cared very much. He just cared for the Union even more.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    6. Re:Log-splitting bumpkin, huh? by osu-neko · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Booth was willing to die for what he felt was an attack on his country.

      If Booth was willing to die to prevent an attack on his country, that would make him patriotic. OTOH, being willing to die in an act of revenge just makes you an asshat...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
  7. Lincoln was a gay, wait no he was a nerd. by King_of_Mars · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This looks like another incarnation of the "Lincoln was _______" phenomena. Apparently Lincoln was so awesome that he has to embody every singly significant idea or social event since his death.

  8. Re:he also used the word nigger a lot by jessica_alba · · Score: 3, Insightful

    he held racist views, but he also said of black persons "but in the right to eat the bread without leave of anybody else which his own hand earns, he is my equal" in other words, he didn't let his prejudice get in the way of policy.

  9. Attention! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Lincoln held opinions not very different from those of the majority of his racist countrymen. Even if slavery was wrong, "there is a physical difference between the white and black races that will for ever forbid the two races from living together on terms of social and political equality." His solution was a form of ethnic cleansing: shipping blacks off to Liberia, or Haiti, or Central America â" anywhere as long as it wasnâ(TM)t the United States.

    Lincoln's views may have started to change once he saw how bravely black troops fought for the Union cause, but even at the time of his death, he was willing to leave the fate of emancipated slaves in the hands of bigoted state legislators. "Whether Lincoln ever went beyond being an anti-slavery white supremacist," George Fredrickson writes, "is a question that is difficult to resolve."

    So should we tear down his memorial on the National Mall? The answer to this question may surprise you.

    1. Re:Attention! by phosphorylate+this · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You see no social equality because people of eropean-decendent have done a mediocre job of trying to bring it about. While on the other side of the equation people of African decent are trying to jump up 1000-years of technological development with all the historical power-imbalences that entails.

      Think about how HUGE social differences were - 200 years ago every black man in America was a slave, think on the sheer brutality that implies. In the 1960's (within living memory) seggregation was an established part of much of American society. When slavery was abolished it's not like education or skilled-jobs suddenly jumped into black communities, these things take generations to nuture from parent to child.

      Any "physical differences" between races are at most 3rd or 4th order effects. My guess is it wil take a 100 years or more before social equality has advanced to the point where being black and in power in AMERICA is not noteworthy let alone the rest of the world. You've just elected your first black president - celebrate man this is how progress is made, and how we make up for the misdeeds and ill-gotten gains of pyshcopathic forefathers (on every side).
       

    2. Re:Attention! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Maybe someone needs to go back to Math class. 2009 - 200 is 1809 which is also 200 years since Lincoln was born and not the start of the American Civil War. Also if you reread the article you linked you'd realize that the statistics say African Americans made up 14% of the overall population and 11% of those were free if you do the math.

      Now if you ignore all your errors how many opportunities were available to "freemen" in 1861? They had to fight and die on the side of the Union, (which despite not having slavery at the time) which had basically treated them like 2nd class citizens, to even gain any sort of recognition of being remotely honored.

    3. Re:Attention! by flewp · · Score: 3, Interesting
      You criticize the post above you containing errors, so it's only fair you take a closer look at the facts in your own post.

      how many opportunities were available to "freemen" in 1861? They had to fight and die on the side of the Union, (which despite not having slavery at the time)

      The Union did have slavery in 1861. Slavery had been outlawed in some Union states for some time, but Maryland, Missouri, Delaware, and Kentucky were all slave states. And despite common belief, the Emancipation Proclamation (which did became effective Jan 1st 1863) did not outright outlaw slavery. It only addressed slavery in the Confederacy. Slavery was not actually abolished nation-wide until the 13th Amendment in late 1865.

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
  10. First post: What hath god wrought! by Steve1952 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Given that the telegraph should be considered the true precursor of the internet, I recommend that Lincoln be given the honorary Slashdot number of "0".

    *** "What hath god wrought" is considered to be the first documented telegraph message.

  11. The only president with a patent? Not true, unless by LittleBigScript · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...unless you read the wikipedia on Thomas Jefferson: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Jefferson
    There are none of Thomas Jefferson's patents on the page. In fact it doesn't even mention his involvement in the patent act of 1790, http://etext.virginia.edu/journals/EH/EH40/walter40.html

    He invented a Moldboard Plow Of Least Resistance, Wheel Cipher, Portable Copying Press, and an improved polygraph for copying handwritten text.
    http://cti.itc.virginia.edu/~meg3c/classes/tcc313/200Rprojs/jefferson_invent/invent.html

  12. Re:Yeah, he set the stage for modern America by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've seen plenty of liberals defend him as saying that he wanted to "protect them", which is just as sensible as saying Hitler wanted to protect the Jews.

    In all fairness, I don't recall FDR having Japanese Americans killed.

    But yes, we tend to forget the negative or parts. It turns out that Lincon was pretty big on racism, told racist jokes about blacks, thought that interracial marriage was wrong, and that whites were the better race, all this despite believing that slavery was morally wrong. But here's the catch, if he wasn't still a racist, he wouldn't have been elected because the idea that the races really are equal would be considered far too radical.

  13. At last! by hcoal · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is 1863 the year of the Linux desktop?

    1. Re:At last! by Potor · · Score: 3, Funny

      you mean the Linux logtop.

    2. Re:At last! by mangu · · Score: 3, Funny

      you mean the Linux logtop.

      Yes, I think you're right:

      ls /var/log/*.log
      /var/log/apport.log /var/log/kdm.log /var/log/scrollkeeper.log
      /var/log/auth.log /var/log/kern.log /var/log/user.log
      /var/log/bootstrap.log /var/log/lpr.log /var/log/uucp.log
      /var/log/daemon.log /var/log/mail.log /var/log/wvdialconf.log
      /var/log/dpkg.log /var/log/pycentral.log /var/log/Xorg.0.log
      /var/log/fontconfig.log /var/log/rkhunter.log /var/log/Xorg.10.log

  14. not very different eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    "It is also unsatisfactory to some that the elective franchise is not given to the colored man. I would myself prefer that it were now conferred on the very intelligent, and on those who serve our cause as soldiers." -- 4 days before he was assassinated
    I myself, would have gone a step further and stripped the right from the very stupid (joe six-packs)

  15. If he was alive today he'd be busted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...for possession of marijuana and drug paraphernalia. He even wrote a letter to the Hohner Harmonica company stating how he loved to sit on his porch, smoking "sweet hemp" from a corncob pipe and playing his harmonica. He very likely smoked it even while in the Whitehouse, or on or about the Whitehouse grounds, since hemp smoking was rather commonplace in the mid-1800's.

  16. Re:Yeah, he set the stage for modern America by commodore64_love · · Score: 4, Interesting

    >>>In all fairness, I don't recall FDR having Japanese Americans killed.

    "Some Japanese Americans died in the camps due to inadequate medical care and the emotional stresses they encountered. Several were killed by military guards for allegedly resisting orders." "These Japanese Americans, half of whom were children, were incarcerated for up to 4 years, without due process of law or any factual basis, in bleak, remote camps surrounded by barbed wire and armed guards."

    FDR also arrested white Americans who stood in his way - the most famous one being Henry Ford (for not complying with the NRA's price minimums), but Ford could hire enough lawyers to persuade FDR to drop the case. Others were not so fortunate. FDR was a dark, dark man and now historians digging through the archives are just now discovering how dark he was.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  17. Re:The only president with a patent? Not true, unl by commodore64_love · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There was no such thing as conflict of interest back then. The real reason Jefferson did not patent is likely the same reason inventor Benjamin Franklin did not patent. They chose to share their ideas for the benefit of all - what we would call public domain. Franklin was already the wealthiest man in America, so he didn't need the cash.

    And Jefferson was very very poor, the equivalent of $100,000 in debt in today's terms, but he still preferred to give things away. Jefferson's personal library was donated as the foundation for the Second Library of Congress. (The first was burned to the ground by the British.)

     

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  18. Parent is NOT a troll by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    The parent post certainly expresses what we today consider racist opinions, but they are what Lincoln thought, they are a direct response to its parent post, and it is not a troll.

    Mods -- just because history is racist does not make reports on history racist.

  19. Re:he also used the word nigger a lot by commodore64_love · · Score: 3, Informative

    P.S. I just reviewed the video again. I did see ONE white face. Still not a "large amount" as the grandparent falsely claimed. Check it out for ye self. Listen to the hate speech (and yes that is the proper term): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwQWuQVE6sw

    "Can't we all just...get along?"

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  20. Re:he also used the word nigger a lot by gnick · · Score: 3, Insightful

    At some point it used to be acceptable to use the term "colored" as well. Not sure when all that changed.

    It occurs to me as strange every time I hear the letters "NAACP". I understand that it would have been strange to re-name the org "NAAAAP" when the P.C. terms shifted from "colored" to "African American", but I think that's the only remaining place where the term "colored" is still appropriate when referring to race...

    (As a side note, there are a few interesting scenes in Steven King's dark tower series where a "modern" white guy is conversing with a black woman from a few decades back. As would likely be the case, she's very upset when he calls her "black" and insists on the term colored, making him somewhat uncomfortable.)

    What does all this have to do with Lincoln being an early adopter of tech again?

    --
    He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  21. we'd call him an early adopter? by nurb432 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Personally I would call him 'Mr President'.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  22. Lincoln and Bush by tjstork · · Score: 3, Insightful

    he hotheads in the south who seceded before he even took the oath of office, and the even hotter heads in South Carolina who started the fighting -- those are the idiots who started the war.

    My question is this: why is it treason for a state to want to secede? I mean, it's a shitty thing, but, if the elected leaders of a state wanted to secede, then wouldn't it make the USA a sort of an empire to trample that state into remaining in the union?

    As far as Fort Sumter goes, Lincoln was given the choice of removing the troops and letting the South have the base. He told, rightly, the south to go pound sand and organized a relief mission of the fort and a federal blockade instead.

    The fact of the matter is this, the Civil War was a blatant act of imperialism by the north, upon the south, a war that was pushed into all of its horrors by Abraham Lincoln, and he was right to do it. The great lesson of the civil war is that there are times when sovereignty must be set aside for a greater good, and that some imperialism is justifiable.

    IT was right for Abraham Lincoln to destroy the South and end slavery, and, if anyone is like the Lincoln of our day, it may well be that it was right for George Bush to invade Iraq and destroy the Baath Party.

    --
    This is my sig.