Slashdot Mirror


Robotic Prostheses For Human Faces

holy_calamity writes "New Scientist reports on a patent application that suggests implanting polymer muscles beneath the skin of people suffering paralysis of the face to give them control of their features. The technique has already been used successfully to reanimate the eyelids of human cadavers. Movement could be returned to other facial features and even paralyzed limbs in the same way, the surgeons at University of California Davis say. The full patent application is also available on the WIPO site."

111 comments

  1. Way cool by flaming+error · · Score: 5, Funny

    > The technique has already been used successfully to reanimate the eyelids of human cadavers.

    That'll make such a great party trick.

    1. Re:Way cool by mc1138 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not as cool as my zombie finger in a box!

    2. Re:Way cool by shawnap · · Score: 3, Funny

      That'll make such a great party trick.

      The real trick will be getting the host to let you into the party with a corpse slung over your shoulder.

    3. Re:Way cool by Bozzio · · Score: 2, Funny

      That'll make such a great party trick.

      I was thinking more along the lines of it being the greatest coroner/mortician prank EVER!

      --
      I just pooped your party.
    4. Re:Way cool by flyingsquid · · Score: 4, Funny
      So you can even give a dead person facial expressions? This technology seems to have no limits in it applications. I mean, I'll bet you could even get Keanu Reeves to display emotions.

      OK, let me correct that statement: this technology seems to have almost no limits in its applications.

    5. Re:Way cool by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 3, Funny

      You've obviously never been to one of my parties.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    6. Re:Way cool by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      So you can even give a dead person facial expressions? This technology seems to have no limits in it applications. I mean, I'll bet you could even get Keanu Reeves to display emotions.

      (Un)fortunately, he has to be converted into a cadever before it'll work.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    7. Re:Way cool by Puff+of+Logic · · Score: 1

      More like med student prank. Holy crap. Wire up a set of bellows to inflate and deflate the lungs, and you've got a guaranteed lifetime of therapy for the victim.

      --
      P.P.S. I'm doing Science and I'm still alive.
    8. Re:Way cool by risk+one · · Score: 1

      That'll make such a great party trick.

      Forget party tricks, how about funeral tricks.

    9. Re:Way cool by vlad30 · · Score: 1

      > The technique has already been used successfully to reanimate the eyelids of human cadavers.

      That'll make such a great party trick.

      I just know somewhere, someone in the military is saying now do the rest of the body

      --
      Your'e all thinking it, I just said it for you
    10. Re:Way cool by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Damn, now we'll NEVER get rid of Dick Cheney

      -1 troll

       

    11. Re:Way cool by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1

      You think that's crazy-awesome, try the zombie head on a stick!

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    12. Re:Way cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Dead? DEAD?! I thought she was British!"

      ((There is a full joke related, but the punch line fits this best at the moment))

    13. Re:Way cool by PachmanP · · Score: 1

      "So you can even give a dead person facial expressions? This technology seems to have no limits in it applications. I mean, I'll bet you could even get Keanu Reeves to display emotions."

      (Un)fortunately, he has to be converted into a cadever before it'll work.

      Whoa!

      --
      You're thinking small. Why miniaturize the laser, when we could instead enlarge the sharks? -John Searle
    14. Re:Way cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A couple of wires hidden under the body attached to the arm muscles is supposedly quite effective. Getting slapped by a cadaver would be enough to ruin anyones morning.

    15. Re:Way cool by danlock4 · · Score: 1

      Excitement at funeral viewings, at least.

      --
      To .sig or not to .sig, that is the question.
    16. Re:Way cool by darkvizier · · Score: 1

      Yeah... I don't think 'reanimate' was the word they were looking for.

    17. Re:Way cool by Die+The+Villian · · Score: 1

      This is what i want, at my funeral, during the viewing , I'm setting this thing up to a timer so when people walk by i blink!

    18. Re:Way cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Robotic Prostitutes For Human Feces?
      Robots have the weirdest fetishes these days.

    19. Re:Way cool by Hordeking · · Score: 1

      Why don't you enlighten us with the rest of the joke.

      --
      Disclaimer: The opinions and actions of the US Gov't are in no way representative of those held by this author or its ci
  2. Blinking dead people! by TinBromide · · Score: 2, Funny

    HOLY BLINKING DEADMAN!!!

    I for one welcome our blinking undead overlords.

    --
    Is it sad that I am more likely to recognize you and your posts by your sig than your name or UID?
    1. Re:Blinking dead people! by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Partial facial paralysis hasn't done anything to Harm Sylvester Stallone's career.

      Or the rest of Hollywood, for that matter. Cosmetic paralytics like botox give the appearence of fewer wrinkles and stop microexpressions from giving away lies or other unpleasant emotions, which is funny because they often cause a zombie-like facial expression. See: FoxNews.

      Humans are striving to give facial movement to corpses while they give away their own facial expressions to look like corpses.

  3. Cadaver control? by CannonballHead · · Score: 2, Informative

    The technique has already been used successfully to reanimate the eyelids of human cadavers.

    Hmmm. I had no idea that cadavers had the capacity to control robotic eyelids :)

    From the abstract:

    Metbods: With use of four cadaver heads, an extended upper and lower blepharoplasty incision was used to secure an upper and lower expanded polytetrafluoroethylene implant in the medial orbital wall and tarsal plates. The slings were passed through a hole drilled in the lateral orbital wall or around a titanium screw. Lateral pull on the sling created eyelid closure, and the necessary distance of pull was measured. Results: The eyelid sling mechanism functioned to achieve complete eyelid closure. Less tension was required for eyelid closure when the sling was placed in both eyelids (3 mm of pull instead of 6 mm). Conclusions: The application of artificial muscle to a range of problems that affect both patient morbidity and quality of life is promising. Eyelid closure was created in a cadaver model using a novel sling, but future studies will need to address the feasibility of a prototype artificial muscle eyelid device in humans.

    1. Re:Cadaver control? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's robotic eyelid implants to you. :)

  4. Robotic Prostheses For Human Feces by Roblimo · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is the advance *I'm* waiting for...

    1. Re: Robotic Prostheses For Human Feces by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      Sad thing is that's exactly what I read when I glanced at the front page.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    2. Re: Robotic Prostheses For Human Feces by Kokuyo · · Score: 1

      For some people, the difference is marginal ;)

    3. Re: Robotic Prostheses For Human Feces by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      What is wrong with my eyes today. First it was the Pornographic Association for the RIAA ad and now I read the headline the same way you did.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    4. Re: Robotic Prostheses For Human Feces by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Only when they are shit-faced.

    5. Re: Robotic Prostheses For Human Feces by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, me too. I guess I've just got shit for brains or something.

    6. Re: Robotic Prostheses For Human Feces by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, who hasn't dreamed of seeing Mr. Hanky become a reality?

    7. Re: Robotic Prostheses For Human Feces by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, actually, if they can implant this in the anus, it could cure incontinence. As we all get older, that might be more useful than you'd like to think.

    8. Re: Robotic Prostheses For Human Feces by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if that isn't the title of a red meat strip yet, it should be.

    9. Re: Robotic Prostheses For Human Feces by troll8901 · · Score: 1

      We've got just the experimental prosthetic products for you!

      • (butt) FauxButt 3000
      • (liver) Bumbleweeny M-Class Artificial Liver
      • (stomach) BileTastic Stom-Mech9000 (factory model)
      • (guts) Frinkle and Osterman's Artificial Guts

      Remember, they're still experimental!

    10. Re: Robotic Prostheses For Human Feces by huge+colin · · Score: 1

      That sounds like a Red Meat slug line.

  5. Halloween by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    Such a long time to wait...

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  6. who else... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...read that as robotic human feces?

    1. Re:who else... by Tablizer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      ...read that as robotic human feces?

      Insert your fav lawyer and politician joke...
             

  7. Potential here! by Trillan · · Score: 5, Funny

    Before you know it, being dead won't be nearly the handicap it is now.

    What's that? I missed the point?

    1. Re:Potential here! by SysDaemon · · Score: 1

      Please, we prefer "existentially challenged" thank you.

    2. Re:Potential here! by Trillan · · Score: 1

      Differently-lifed Americans?

    3. Re:Potential here! by PachmanP · · Score: 1

      Pinning for the Fjords?

      --
      You're thinking small. Why miniaturize the laser, when we could instead enlarge the sharks? -John Searle
  8. I have given all of this much thought by erroneus · · Score: 1, Troll

    I can't say with 100% certainty how I would feel if I were unfortunate enough to live under circumstances such as these, but I can say that quality of life is an important issue for me as it would be for so many others. People frequently submit DNR orders for just this reason. If for some reason, I cannot move my face muscles and do not somehow acquire better poker playing skills as a result, then I'd say either clone me a new body or let me go. With "W" gone, the way is a little more clear to research ways of growing me a new body. So forget all of this mechanized stuff and let's get into regenerating the body.

    1. Re:I have given all of this much thought by mwilliams666 · · Score: 1

      ... So forget all of this mechanized stuff and let's get into regenerating the body.

      Hmmph. You'll be demanding dimensionally transcendent time travel capsules next :p

    2. Re:I have given all of this much thought by erroneus · · Score: 1

      I already have a time travel device!

      It involves a form of suspended animation. I lay on the device, relax and eventually I wake up somewhere between 6 and 10 hours into the future. I haven't figured out how to travel in the other direction yet but I'm working on it.

  9. Queue the They Might Be Giants by kwabbles · · Score: 2, Funny

    If I were a carpenter I'd
    Hammer on my piglet, I'd
    Collect the seven dollars and I'd
    Buy a big prosthetic forehead
    And wear it on my real head

    Everybody wants prosthetic
    Foreheads on their real heads
    Everybody wants prosthetic
    Foreheads on their real heads

    --
    Just disrupt the deflector shield with a tachyon burst.
    1. Re:Queue the They Might Be Giants by spacefiddle · · Score: 1

      I suppose you mean "Cue," but...

      how this hell is parent modded offtopic? Did you read the lyrics, or just the subject...? Sheesh.

  10. Rhymes with Prostheses by aardwolf64 · · Score: 1, Funny

    You can imagine my relief (pun intended) when I realized the title did not read:
    Robotic Prostheses For Human Feces

  11. burn victims by defiek · · Score: 1

    this will be great for people who have suffered horrific burns on their face.

  12. Prosthetic foreheads by Nerdposeur · · Score: 1, Funny
    1. Re:Prosthetic foreheads by spacefiddle · · Score: 1

      I call shenanigans. While this is redundant - someone beat you to the reference two posts ago - it's not really offtopic. Someone's modding down based on anti-TMBG bias.

      offtopic != unfunny. Mod points are supposed to be based loosely on content (yes, i hear you all laughing), not your opinion of the post. Sigh.

  13. Great by writerjosh · · Score: 2, Interesting

    BORG or Skynet? Which is coming first?

    1. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoever marked me as a "Troll" should get a life. Look at my karma: Excellent. I post here all the time.

      If you don't like my post, fine, but don't mark me as a troll before you do some basic research into who I am.

      Hey man, its no big deal. I get this all the time. You just learn to live with it.

    2. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're so very sorry, sir, please excuse the error.

      We'll correct that to off-topic as soon as possible.

    3. Re:Great by eric-x · · Score: 1

      Moderation affects karma, not the other way around.
      Read the faq: moderate posts, not users.
      Your way of thinking would mean that karma never decreases, which only leads to snobs.

    4. Re:Great by writerjosh · · Score: 1

      Either way, people marking people as Trolls for no good reason is just rude and abusive (of their power to mark "real" trolls).

    5. Re:Great by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Stop going waaaah, already... all it does is demonstrate that you're being a poor sport about somebody having a different opinion than you. Ones who tag your post as a troll are just as entitled to their opinion as the ones that tagged your post as interesting.

      Oh, and to answer your original question, borg. Although probably not in yours or my lifetime.

      Oh, and not like the borg we see on star trek who have no individuality. People will still have their own personality and ideals, but our physical and mental abilities will be enhanced artificially and those that do not do likewise will probably not be able to compete for success.

    6. Re:Great by writerjosh · · Score: 1

      Stop going waaaah, already... all it does is demonstrate that you're being a poor sport about somebody having a different opinion than you. Ones who tag your post as a troll are just as entitled to their opinion as the ones that tagged your post as interesting.

      Thanks for the reply, but "Troll" has nothing to do with difference of opinion: it's a designation that the person posting (me) is doing so for spam or to cause trouble. I welcome difference of opinion, but people who mark "Troll" are just lazy because they didn't even read the original story this post was referring to. If so, they would have seen my post as a simple nerd joke. Jeeze. So again, I say "Troll markers, get a life."

    7. Re:Great by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the reply, but "Troll" has nothing to do with difference of opinion: it's a designation that the person posting (me) is doing so for spam or to cause trouble

      YOU_ may not have intended it that way, but it's not at all inconceivable that a moderator thought you were. Complaining about it doesn't change it, and the final tags for a comment do still generally reflect the average opinions of those who had read it, so chewing out some unknown moderator for tagging you as a troll is really kind of pointless at best and immature at worst.

  14. Why is this patentable? by zooblethorpe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Since when are surgical procedures patentable? And what are the ethics of patenting this anyway, and likely thereby preventing some people from receiving such treatment, even if it is somehow legal to do so?

    Or is the patent specific to the artificial muscles?

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
    1. Re:Why is this patentable? by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      What would we do if god had patented the whole human system? The second coming of Jesus would take place in a court room where he'd be suing our asses off for infringing on his old man's patents.

    2. Re:Why is this patentable? by blueg3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Note that it's a patent application. I haven't looked to see if it's patentable, but you can file applications for things that aren't patentable.

      The concern about ethics really depends on what control is exerted with the patent. It'd all be speculation, since this isn't even a procedure ready to be used. (For drugs, for example, intellectual property controls back the majority of the drug cost -- so there are reasonable ethical questions. Even with a zero cost due to IP, neither robotic prosthesis nor the surgery and therapy needed to use them are at all cheap.)

    3. Re:Why is this patentable? by mr_matticus · · Score: 1

      RTFA. The surgical process isn't claimed; the polymer muscle and its actuation system are. Just like there are patents on surgical tools and prosthetics, there's a patent for the EAP system.

      The only people who would be prevented from receiving such a treatment are people who will have nothing to do with patents at all, in which case they'd never even be in the hospital in the first place.

    4. Re:Why is this patentable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God dosen't exist.

      It is more likely that some greedy dickhead human would patent God and everything god did.

      First they'd file in the East district of Texas where all the morons live. Then they'd argue that 1% of their DNA matches the cum stains found on the dead sea scrolls, making them a descendant of the author. Then they'd sue all of the government agencies, including the mint for printing "In God we trust" on currency, asking $17,000 in damages per violation.

      Then will come all of the churches. Only the mega-churches will be able to afford the licensing and all other churches will shut down. Disgruntled churchgoers will find better things to do than whisper to imaginary ghosts, and everybody wins.

      Religion won't be outlawed, mind you. Religion would be too expensive just because one greedy bastard ruined it all. Later people will begin to patent Judaism, Islam, and Buddhism while Scientology brags about being "the first". Ex-churchgoers will see that god loves greed above all else and they will quit believing in him because he's "too depressing".

    5. Re:Why is this patentable? by zooblethorpe · · Score: 1

      Yet the patent brief itself seems to lay claim to the process as well:

      This invention provides methods and devices for reconstructing muscular responses in patients with paralysis.

      Or am I reading too much into this use of the word "methods"? I rather hope I am.

      Cheers,

      --
      "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
      "A four-foot prune."
    6. Re:Why is this patentable? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      You are.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    7. Re:Why is this patentable? by zooblethorpe · · Score: 1

      Can you elaborate on that at all? How is the word "methods" being used in the patent brief such that it does not include the medical procedure?

      --
      "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
      "A four-foot prune."
    8. Re:Why is this patentable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the patent application.

      Ultimately, the question itself is irrelevant--any surgeon with access to the prosthetic would also have access to the procedure, even if the surgery was itself patented, which it isn't. This is no different from an artificial hip, many of which are likewise patented in their engineering, and the patent would also describe the method of attachment, as it's required to. The surgery itself is not claimed.

      It's just needless and ignorant FUD to suggest that people who would otherwise have access to this treatment would be denied on the basis of not being able to perform the surgery. The only concern in this situation is the same problem as throughout the system, and nothing more: money. Patients with the means or good insurance will go to leading hospitals with the best procedures, best surgeons, and best technology.

      "Affordable healthcare" is an oxymoron. It's expensive, and it will always be expensive. "Affordable" refers to the costs passed on to the individual, and there are only two ways to manage that: collective risk sharing (insurance) and government subsidy. Dropping the total price means managing liability and reducing administrative costs.

  15. that's just my roommate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > The technique has already been used successfully to reanimate the eyelids of human cadavers

    Err...sorry... that's just my former college roommate. He's always like that.

  16. Limited scope by El_Smack · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unless science can find another part of the human anatomy that is problematic when limp, this probably won't get off the ground.

    --


    There are 01 kinds of cars in the world. The General Lee, and everything else.
    1. Re:Limited scope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can think of at least one. I get emails about it all the time.

    2. Re:Limited scope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine being able to transfer facial expressions down there!

  17. I've seen Robocop by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

    And fixing a deformity isn't worth having to eat baby food for life.

  18. Uncanny Valley by lobiusmoop · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Feels like there's a great danger here of falling deep into the uncanny valley, especially with facial prosthetics.

    --
    "I bless every day that I continue to live, for every day is pure profit."
    1. Re:Uncanny Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you've had a stroke and your face doesn't move right (or half of it doesn't move at all), you're already *in* the uncanny valley.

      The adaptive (in an evolutionary sense) point of the uncanny valley is that the observer's brain detects that there's something wrong with the subject's movements, and that thus they are probably sick, and that thus they are best avoided. Hence, the observer feels repulsed, stays away, and avoids catching whatever illness is making the subject act all weird.

      If someone has had a stroke, your brain is correctly detecting that they look weird and that there is something wrong with them (which is that they've had a stroke). It's missing things a little bit in that strokes are not contagious, but better safe than sorry, eh? For all your instincts know, the brain damage could have been from an infectious disease.

      It's quite normal for stroke victims or others with brain damage to freak people out a bit. If we can make them look less freaky by, for example, ensuring that their paralyzed right side of the face mirrors what the normal left side does, we've helped them crawl a bit out of the uncanny valley (even though their smirks will look like smiles).

  19. Shit by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    Now they'll have to come out with another sequel to Weekend at Bernie's

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  20. I'm rewriting my will! by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is going to make my open-casket funeral so much more interesting!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:I'm rewriting my will! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      This is going to make my open-casket funeral so much more interesting!

      "Telegram!"
           

  21. old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nancy pelosi got this done years ago

  22. What next? Patented appendectomies? by zooblethorpe · · Score: 1

    Sorry to reply to myself, but here is the patent abstract, from the WIPO site linked in the posting:

    This invention provides methods and devices for reconstructing muscular responses in patients with paralysis. Electroactive polymer (EAP) actuators power implants attached to tissues in the patients. When the actuators are energized, the implants move the tissues appropriately to provide improved body functions to patients experiencing a paralysis or paresis.

    So it sure sounds like they're patenting the *procedure*, not just the artificial muscles. This strikes me as of extremely dubious ethical merit, and appears to be a prime example of why method patents are a bad idea.

    As in the subject line, just imagine if someone had patented the procedure for performing an appendectomy. Talk about extortion -- "License my patent, or die!"

    Admittedly, facial reconstruction surgery, the bailiwick of this particular patent, is not so vital an application of medical technologies, but the simple fact that such procedures *can* apparently be patented is itself deeply troubling.

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
    1. Re:What next? Patented appendectomies? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      It's more like "License my patent, or get sued after the operation and end up paying me somewhat more money than you would have if you'd bought a license."

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  23. Cooler idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A prehensile robotic penis, anyone? Kind of like the dolphins have...
     
    Just imagine!

    1. Re:Cooler idea! by trouser · · Score: 1

      A dolphin has a robotic penis?! No wonder they never stop smiling.

      --
      Now wash your hands.
  24. Great by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    Now we have the technology to re-create the Baywatch "Running down the beach in slow motion" scenes in real time! I just can't wait until breast augmentation candidates can opt for active control of their fun bags instead of the passive systems we now have... "Look at me! I can make them dance!"

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  25. Time I got new glasses by TarnVeda · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I originally read this as " Robotic Prostheses For Human Feces". Cool - Bionic Poop!!! (and a fitting analogy for the patent ).

    1. Re:Time I got new glasses by maldelarke · · Score: 1

      I thought the same thing! Robot Feces, I was looking forward to seeing that actually.

  26. This will be useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for killing opponents and reanimating their features for a bit to agree wholeheartedly with your policies and then announce their retirement, without all that expense and detection risk of good computer rendering.

  27. It could be worse by mangu · · Score: 1

    A few stories below, I read "The International Federation of Pornographic Industry (IFPI)", which, by the way, seems a quite appropriate description of said federation...

  28. Hollywood is excited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With the development of further robotic enhancements, movie makers would now be able to make movies WITH REAL LIVE..er..DEAD ZOMBIES!!!! Plus, Priscilla Presely and other celebrities with botched facial plastic surgeries and botox treatments can now form more than one facial expression.

  29. Out of patent by now by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    Actually, since patents last for only 20 years, likely all that stuff would be in the public domain by now. And we'd have an exact description of how to do it ourselves too, instead of still having to guess at it. As it is, the old fart is keeping it all a trade secret, which is just what patents were supposed to prevent.

    On the other hand, I guess 7 of his days in Genesis seem to have been almost 2 billion years each (counting "let there be light" as coinciding with the big bang.) So 20 of his years for the patent to expire... ooer, maybe we don't want to wait that long after all :P

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  30. MOD PARENT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Up, I say! Up!!

  31. botox by neonsignal · · Score: 1

    So now famous actors can botox and still do their job... oh wait

    1. Re:botox by peater · · Score: 1

      A little botox in my buttocks
      A little botox in my face
      Add some robotics to them both
      And in the Oscars I'd have a place

  32. This will be great for meetings... by d474 · · Score: 1

    ...I'll show up to a meeting, switch to Facial Auto-Pilot mode, fall asleep, and my face will appear to be raising eyebrows in interest when my voice analyzer detects the end of a sentence, smiling when it hears others lauging...

    Heck, you could even hook your eyes up to this, automatic blinking, eyes looking around. I will just have to perfect the *wake up* sensor so I know when I can leave the meeting...

    --
    Authority questions you. Return the favor.
  33. I can think of another major use by NotSoHeavyD3 · · Score: 1

    That'd be helping a husband keep a straight face when his wife asks "Does this make me look fat?"

    --
    Did you know 80 to 90% of the moderators on slashdot wouldn't recognize a troll even if one dragged them under a bridge.
  34. Actualy I read that: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Robotic Prostitutes For Human Feces" - hey, not a bad trade I thought.. Then I put my glases on... :P

  35. Oh no! Now they can make by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Zombies!

  36. I will post as anonymous coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    cuz I'm at work and can't create a profile

    years ago my mother suffered from Bells Palsy. In most of the cases of bells palsy the patient will regain full return of facial nerve control, however for my mother full control of her right eyelid and lip will never happen.

    I think that there will be some great uses for this and certainly not trying to bring anyone down, but it'd be nice to see my mom smile or wink again...now back to the robotic feces and flirty cadavers

  37. I've never done this before... by Dripdry · · Score: 0, Redundant

    and I have the Karma to spare, so...

      I welcome our new robot zombie overlords!

    --
    -
  38. Need my eyes checked... by Veggiesama · · Score: 1

    I thought it read "Robotic Prostitutes for Human Feces." Stop thinking, brain of mine...

    1. Re:Need my eyes checked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      me too. Going to take a dump now.

    2. Re:Need my eyes checked... by danlock4 · · Score: 1

      That was exactly my initial thought, and when I told myself, "START thinking, brain of mine..."

      --
      To .sig or not to .sig, that is the question.
    3. Re:Need my eyes checked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      err... exactly my initial thought except that the only word I had read incorrectly was faces (replacing the "a" in "faces" with an "e")

  39. Botox by onionlee · · Score: 1

    So, you get botox and freeze your face. ... then you fix it with this?

  40. Unfairly modded down by troll8901 · · Score: 1

    There are several complaints in this story about posts marked unfairly as "Troll". Yours is one such unfortunate victim.

    When's the meta-moderation feature coming back?

  41. A Crap Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anyone else read this as "Robotic Prostheses For Human Faeces"?

    I, for one, welcome our new cyberpoo overlords.

  42. I cant wait by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    I hope they come out with the one that 7 of 9 on voyager wears,
    cant wait to get one of those for my girlfriend, and also the body suit, that was hot!

  43. Weekend at Bernies - made easy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In this day and age, we all enjoy a weekend-long elaborate farce, but do we have the time and energy to arrange one? And what guarantees can we have to ensure that the weekend goes without a hitch?

    Worry no longer, dear customers, we have just the technology for you!

  44. I hope I'm the only one that read: by josquint · · Score: 1

    Robotic Prostheses for Human Feces...

    yuk

  45. Fun at wakes by angryrobot · · Score: 1

    I'm not going to have a wake when I die, but if I did, I would certainly leave instructions to have these implanted to scare the crap out of the people that came.