Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Court Reinstates Proof-of-Age Requirement For Nude Ads

Posted by timothy on from the barely-legal dept.

arbitraryaardvark writes "An Ohio swinger's magazine objects to keeping proof on file that its advertisers are over 18. I reported here in 2007 that the 6th circuit struck down U.S.C. Title 18, Section 2257 as a First Amendment violation. The full 6th circuit has now overturned that ruling. The case might continue to the Supreme Court. The Cleveland Plain Dealer reports."

3 of 267 comments (clear)

  1. Kids will Lie. by jellomizer · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I am sorry no matter howmany safe guards you put up. A kid will find a way to see such material.

    You Under 18
    You are 18 and over

    A kid say 13-17 who wants to see such material will go yea I am over 18, and click the link. The more difficult you get won't stop any kid who wants to get in. For the most part if a kid wants to see internet porn they can no matter what blocks you put in.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  2. Re:First nudes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Suck my hairy dick bitch!

    $250.

  3. Re:First nudes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Suck my hairy dick bitch!

    Why date a shemale if you aren't willing to suck it yourself? Stupid troll.