Slashdot Mirror
NASA's Orbiting Carbon Observatory Mission Fails
jw3 writes "The NASA Orbiting Carbon Observatory scheduled for launch today has failed its mission: the payload fairing failed to separate and the launch managers declared a contingency. George Diller, NASA launch commentator, said, 'It either did not separate or did not separate in the way that it should, but at any rate we're still trying to evaluate exactly what the status of the spacecraft is at this point.'" Update: 02/24 14:17 GMT by T : Reader fadethepolice points out a Reuters report which says that the craft crashed into the ocean just short of Antarctica.
is a hoax, and the rocket knows it was just wasting time and money. It threw the launch.
Without a full investigation, I'd hypothesize tha the status is "laying in many pieces on the ice somewhere in Antarctica."
SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
Aliens sabotaged the launch so they can continue to warm the planet to make it more palatable to their bodies when they invade 20 years from now.
The satellite will now be re-purposed to study carbon and methane emissions that need to be observed to determine the current threat level regarding activity in R'lyeh.
"Initial indications are the vehicle did not have enough [force] to reach orbit and landed just short of Antarctica in the ocean."
I'm sure the ancient ones are happy to have some new tech to plunder.
All hail the new tentacle observer!
There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order- Ed Howdershelt Via Tass
The telemetry from the satellite is reading zero across the board. That must mean there's no carbon dioxide in the atmosphere anymore. Now we don't have to worry about global warming - fantastic!
Good work, NASA. I knew we could get this climate change thing cleared up once we had better data.
The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain
That was _last_ season. This season we'll be monitoring CO2 levels from space. Also planned are mapping cow farts via Google maps mashups and planned for season three: a Google maps/Zillow mashup showing the exact number of humans on the African sub-continent who could have survived for more than a month on the energy wasted through the carbon footprint of every house in America. That's right. Search for your house in Zillow and be instantly notified of how many people died so you could watch the superbowlcrapgame in comfort and style. Additional efforts by season 2 sponsor AT&T will allow you to track high CO2 outputters via GPS in their phones. Season 3 sponsors AT&T and General Dynamics plan to bring you HCO European edition via UAV. That's right, each week we'll allow one Republican Evangelical to get "up close and personal" with one of Europe's most prolific CO2 outputters via UAV. The fun never ends.
Thanks to the FTC, EPA, and several other federal agencies, there will be no tax credits, carbon credits, alternative energies, or in fact any plan to reduce CO2 outputs. We just want you to see what you could have done to help the world. It's a feel better move, change you can relax with.
---
This message brought to you by ExxonNonMobile, "fuel for a greener tomorrow"
---
What actually happened is that the aliens hiding behind the moon realized we'd notice their trail of hothouse gases from terraforming equipment on the moon, and have disabled the rocket to ensure the satellite does not do its job.
Support NYCountryLawyer RIAA vs People
Dear Lincoln,
Ha ha old man, I had to spend much in sabotaging your CO2 monitoring satellite. But now all your base are belong to us.
Signed,
Chairman Mao
Chinese Empire
My poetry site welcomes the unusual.
So we lost a machine that would have given us concrete evidence on the *possible* increase in carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere. And now NASA lost it even though they haven't lost an earth orbit bound spacecraft in a while. Let me get my tinfoil hat.
"wahts woring iwth my tyoping?"
Seems more like they used a Taurus. If one of those gets where it's going, it's a miracle.
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
So this means that in the battle against climate change, the biggest shot NASA has taken thus far is a rocket attack on Antarctica.
Oh honey look... How cute... an angry slashdotter!
This sucks! No C02 means: 1) All plants will soon die 2) All animals die soon after (including us) 3) ? 4) !profit
The world is made by those who show up for the job.
So you are saying it will take another 7 years? Why did they launch all the plans and engineers up with it?
I bet they can build a new one in months if they did not kill all the engineers and burn all the documentation.
but then I dont know what NASA's new operation rules are. That might be a requirement. Place all that in the pit below the rocket just before launch...
"Sorry dave and john, you knew this would happen when you signed your employment papers."
"OOps! halt the countdown! we frgot to throw in all the computer backups as well! WHEW! almost screwed that one up!"
Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
That's a pretty accurate (if twitterpated) version of what it's like to be live at a launch that fails... excitement, Excitement, exCITEment, EXCITEMENT... letdown.
I can see the fnords!
No...to measure ice melt properties in Antarctica, NASA scattered a non-homogeneous collection of light reflection and absorption particle on the shelf. Approval to scatter material all across Antarctica would have been delayed in committee for months using normal methods. This way, everyone feels sorry for NASA that they lost a scientific rocket when in fact they have succeeded.
Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
An ICBM is what happens when you take a shit outside in Antarctica.
If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
Of course the Taurus XL launch vehicle hasn't been an overwhelming success...
Unless we restate things as, "NASA successfully lands Carbon Observatory in Pacific ocean".
But perhaps I'm just nitpicking. :)
Not at all. In fact, to further refine it, I'd say "That's like saying your car broke down because the truck hauling it from the manufacturer to the dealership was actually a rocket propelling it into orbit which failed to separate properly from your car which is actually a satellite and then they crashed into the ocean near Antarctica."
That's what the guy on Venus said.